Sampling technique affects the population structure assessments of fiddler crab Minuca vocator (Herbst, 1804) (Ocypodidae: Gelasiminae)

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Delevati Colpo, Karine
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Lucia Negreiros-Fransozo, Maria [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2358-2936e2016015
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/185338
Resumo: We examined how the sampling technique can affect the evaluation of Minuca vocator (Herbst, 1804) population structure. We used two sampling procedures: catch-per-unit-effort (CPUE) and quadrat technique (QT). Body size, size-frequency distribution, population density, juvenile recruitment rates, proportion of ovigerous females and sex ratio were compared between the sampling procedures. QT allowed us to estimate and compare crab and burrow densities. CPUE sampled both adult crabs and the largest crabs more frequently, whereas QT recorded a greater proportion of smaller crabs. CPUE underestimated the size of M. vocator populations, while density estimates obtained with QT were accurate. The proportion of juveniles was higher with QT than with CPUE, suggesting that recruitment rates estimated by QT were more suitable. The sampling effort provided by CPUE was more efficient for obtaining ovigerous-dependent information than QT. Both sampling techniques showed a predominance of males in all three M. vocator populations. The population density estimation based on burrows overestimated the natural density of M. vocator in all mangroves. Our results suggest that neither CPUE nor QT individually were accurate sampling techniques, but together provided reliable assessments of fiddler crab populations.
id UNSP_1b8e7ad10663928cddf29fff8461ddb8
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/185338
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Sampling technique affects the population structure assessments of fiddler crab Minuca vocator (Herbst, 1804) (Ocypodidae: Gelasiminae)Body sizecatch-per-unit-effortquadratrecruitmentsex-ratioWe examined how the sampling technique can affect the evaluation of Minuca vocator (Herbst, 1804) population structure. We used two sampling procedures: catch-per-unit-effort (CPUE) and quadrat technique (QT). Body size, size-frequency distribution, population density, juvenile recruitment rates, proportion of ovigerous females and sex ratio were compared between the sampling procedures. QT allowed us to estimate and compare crab and burrow densities. CPUE sampled both adult crabs and the largest crabs more frequently, whereas QT recorded a greater proportion of smaller crabs. CPUE underestimated the size of M. vocator populations, while density estimates obtained with QT were accurate. The proportion of juveniles was higher with QT than with CPUE, suggesting that recruitment rates estimated by QT were more suitable. The sampling effort provided by CPUE was more efficient for obtaining ovigerous-dependent information than QT. Both sampling techniques showed a predominance of males in all three M. vocator populations. The population density estimation based on burrows overestimated the natural density of M. vocator in all mangroves. Our results suggest that neither CPUE nor QT individually were accurate sampling techniques, but together provided reliable assessments of fiddler crab populations.Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)UNLP CONICET, Inst Limnol Dr Raul A Ringuelet, Blvd 120 & 62,Casilla Correo 712, RA-1900 La Plata, Buenos Aires, ArgentinaConsejo Nacl Invest Cient & Tecn, Buenos Aires, DF, ArgentinaUniv Estadual Paulista, Inst Biociencias, Dept Zool, BR-18618970 Botucatu, SP, BrazilUniv Estadual Paulista, Inst Biociencias, Dept Zool, BR-18618970 Botucatu, SP, BrazilFAPESP: 98/03134-6Soc Brasileira CarcinologiaUNLP CONICETConsejo Nacl Invest Cient & TecnUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Delevati Colpo, KarineLucia Negreiros-Fransozo, Maria [UNESP]2019-10-04T12:34:42Z2019-10-04T12:34:42Z2016-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article11application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2358-2936e2016015Nauplius. Rio Grande Rs: Soc Brasileira Carcinologia, v. 24, 11 p., 2016.0104-6497http://hdl.handle.net/11449/18533810.1590/2358-2936e2016015S0104-64972016000100212WOS:000456319000015S0104-64972016000100212.pdfWeb of Sciencereponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengNaupliusinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-01-23T07:09:12Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/185338Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T23:46:30.702018Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Sampling technique affects the population structure assessments of fiddler crab Minuca vocator (Herbst, 1804) (Ocypodidae: Gelasiminae)
title Sampling technique affects the population structure assessments of fiddler crab Minuca vocator (Herbst, 1804) (Ocypodidae: Gelasiminae)
spellingShingle Sampling technique affects the population structure assessments of fiddler crab Minuca vocator (Herbst, 1804) (Ocypodidae: Gelasiminae)
Delevati Colpo, Karine
Body size
catch-per-unit-effort
quadrat
recruitment
sex-ratio
title_short Sampling technique affects the population structure assessments of fiddler crab Minuca vocator (Herbst, 1804) (Ocypodidae: Gelasiminae)
title_full Sampling technique affects the population structure assessments of fiddler crab Minuca vocator (Herbst, 1804) (Ocypodidae: Gelasiminae)
title_fullStr Sampling technique affects the population structure assessments of fiddler crab Minuca vocator (Herbst, 1804) (Ocypodidae: Gelasiminae)
title_full_unstemmed Sampling technique affects the population structure assessments of fiddler crab Minuca vocator (Herbst, 1804) (Ocypodidae: Gelasiminae)
title_sort Sampling technique affects the population structure assessments of fiddler crab Minuca vocator (Herbst, 1804) (Ocypodidae: Gelasiminae)
author Delevati Colpo, Karine
author_facet Delevati Colpo, Karine
Lucia Negreiros-Fransozo, Maria [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Lucia Negreiros-Fransozo, Maria [UNESP]
author2_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv UNLP CONICET
Consejo Nacl Invest Cient & Tecn
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Delevati Colpo, Karine
Lucia Negreiros-Fransozo, Maria [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Body size
catch-per-unit-effort
quadrat
recruitment
sex-ratio
topic Body size
catch-per-unit-effort
quadrat
recruitment
sex-ratio
description We examined how the sampling technique can affect the evaluation of Minuca vocator (Herbst, 1804) population structure. We used two sampling procedures: catch-per-unit-effort (CPUE) and quadrat technique (QT). Body size, size-frequency distribution, population density, juvenile recruitment rates, proportion of ovigerous females and sex ratio were compared between the sampling procedures. QT allowed us to estimate and compare crab and burrow densities. CPUE sampled both adult crabs and the largest crabs more frequently, whereas QT recorded a greater proportion of smaller crabs. CPUE underestimated the size of M. vocator populations, while density estimates obtained with QT were accurate. The proportion of juveniles was higher with QT than with CPUE, suggesting that recruitment rates estimated by QT were more suitable. The sampling effort provided by CPUE was more efficient for obtaining ovigerous-dependent information than QT. Both sampling techniques showed a predominance of males in all three M. vocator populations. The population density estimation based on burrows overestimated the natural density of M. vocator in all mangroves. Our results suggest that neither CPUE nor QT individually were accurate sampling techniques, but together provided reliable assessments of fiddler crab populations.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-01-01
2019-10-04T12:34:42Z
2019-10-04T12:34:42Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2358-2936e2016015
Nauplius. Rio Grande Rs: Soc Brasileira Carcinologia, v. 24, 11 p., 2016.
0104-6497
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/185338
10.1590/2358-2936e2016015
S0104-64972016000100212
WOS:000456319000015
S0104-64972016000100212.pdf
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2358-2936e2016015
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/185338
identifier_str_mv Nauplius. Rio Grande Rs: Soc Brasileira Carcinologia, v. 24, 11 p., 2016.
0104-6497
10.1590/2358-2936e2016015
S0104-64972016000100212
WOS:000456319000015
S0104-64972016000100212.pdf
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Nauplius
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 11
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Soc Brasileira Carcinologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Soc Brasileira Carcinologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Web of Science
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808129550665646080