Sampling technique affects the population structure assessments of fiddler crab Minuca vocator (Herbst, 1804) (Ocypodidae: Gelasiminae)
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2358-2936e2016015 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/185338 |
Resumo: | We examined how the sampling technique can affect the evaluation of Minuca vocator (Herbst, 1804) population structure. We used two sampling procedures: catch-per-unit-effort (CPUE) and quadrat technique (QT). Body size, size-frequency distribution, population density, juvenile recruitment rates, proportion of ovigerous females and sex ratio were compared between the sampling procedures. QT allowed us to estimate and compare crab and burrow densities. CPUE sampled both adult crabs and the largest crabs more frequently, whereas QT recorded a greater proportion of smaller crabs. CPUE underestimated the size of M. vocator populations, while density estimates obtained with QT were accurate. The proportion of juveniles was higher with QT than with CPUE, suggesting that recruitment rates estimated by QT were more suitable. The sampling effort provided by CPUE was more efficient for obtaining ovigerous-dependent information than QT. Both sampling techniques showed a predominance of males in all three M. vocator populations. The population density estimation based on burrows overestimated the natural density of M. vocator in all mangroves. Our results suggest that neither CPUE nor QT individually were accurate sampling techniques, but together provided reliable assessments of fiddler crab populations. |
id |
UNSP_1b8e7ad10663928cddf29fff8461ddb8 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/185338 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Sampling technique affects the population structure assessments of fiddler crab Minuca vocator (Herbst, 1804) (Ocypodidae: Gelasiminae)Body sizecatch-per-unit-effortquadratrecruitmentsex-ratioWe examined how the sampling technique can affect the evaluation of Minuca vocator (Herbst, 1804) population structure. We used two sampling procedures: catch-per-unit-effort (CPUE) and quadrat technique (QT). Body size, size-frequency distribution, population density, juvenile recruitment rates, proportion of ovigerous females and sex ratio were compared between the sampling procedures. QT allowed us to estimate and compare crab and burrow densities. CPUE sampled both adult crabs and the largest crabs more frequently, whereas QT recorded a greater proportion of smaller crabs. CPUE underestimated the size of M. vocator populations, while density estimates obtained with QT were accurate. The proportion of juveniles was higher with QT than with CPUE, suggesting that recruitment rates estimated by QT were more suitable. The sampling effort provided by CPUE was more efficient for obtaining ovigerous-dependent information than QT. Both sampling techniques showed a predominance of males in all three M. vocator populations. The population density estimation based on burrows overestimated the natural density of M. vocator in all mangroves. Our results suggest that neither CPUE nor QT individually were accurate sampling techniques, but together provided reliable assessments of fiddler crab populations.Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)UNLP CONICET, Inst Limnol Dr Raul A Ringuelet, Blvd 120 & 62,Casilla Correo 712, RA-1900 La Plata, Buenos Aires, ArgentinaConsejo Nacl Invest Cient & Tecn, Buenos Aires, DF, ArgentinaUniv Estadual Paulista, Inst Biociencias, Dept Zool, BR-18618970 Botucatu, SP, BrazilUniv Estadual Paulista, Inst Biociencias, Dept Zool, BR-18618970 Botucatu, SP, BrazilFAPESP: 98/03134-6Soc Brasileira CarcinologiaUNLP CONICETConsejo Nacl Invest Cient & TecnUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Delevati Colpo, KarineLucia Negreiros-Fransozo, Maria [UNESP]2019-10-04T12:34:42Z2019-10-04T12:34:42Z2016-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article11application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2358-2936e2016015Nauplius. Rio Grande Rs: Soc Brasileira Carcinologia, v. 24, 11 p., 2016.0104-6497http://hdl.handle.net/11449/18533810.1590/2358-2936e2016015S0104-64972016000100212WOS:000456319000015S0104-64972016000100212.pdfWeb of Sciencereponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengNaupliusinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-01-23T07:09:12Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/185338Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T23:46:30.702018Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Sampling technique affects the population structure assessments of fiddler crab Minuca vocator (Herbst, 1804) (Ocypodidae: Gelasiminae) |
title |
Sampling technique affects the population structure assessments of fiddler crab Minuca vocator (Herbst, 1804) (Ocypodidae: Gelasiminae) |
spellingShingle |
Sampling technique affects the population structure assessments of fiddler crab Minuca vocator (Herbst, 1804) (Ocypodidae: Gelasiminae) Delevati Colpo, Karine Body size catch-per-unit-effort quadrat recruitment sex-ratio |
title_short |
Sampling technique affects the population structure assessments of fiddler crab Minuca vocator (Herbst, 1804) (Ocypodidae: Gelasiminae) |
title_full |
Sampling technique affects the population structure assessments of fiddler crab Minuca vocator (Herbst, 1804) (Ocypodidae: Gelasiminae) |
title_fullStr |
Sampling technique affects the population structure assessments of fiddler crab Minuca vocator (Herbst, 1804) (Ocypodidae: Gelasiminae) |
title_full_unstemmed |
Sampling technique affects the population structure assessments of fiddler crab Minuca vocator (Herbst, 1804) (Ocypodidae: Gelasiminae) |
title_sort |
Sampling technique affects the population structure assessments of fiddler crab Minuca vocator (Herbst, 1804) (Ocypodidae: Gelasiminae) |
author |
Delevati Colpo, Karine |
author_facet |
Delevati Colpo, Karine Lucia Negreiros-Fransozo, Maria [UNESP] |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Lucia Negreiros-Fransozo, Maria [UNESP] |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
UNLP CONICET Consejo Nacl Invest Cient & Tecn Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Delevati Colpo, Karine Lucia Negreiros-Fransozo, Maria [UNESP] |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Body size catch-per-unit-effort quadrat recruitment sex-ratio |
topic |
Body size catch-per-unit-effort quadrat recruitment sex-ratio |
description |
We examined how the sampling technique can affect the evaluation of Minuca vocator (Herbst, 1804) population structure. We used two sampling procedures: catch-per-unit-effort (CPUE) and quadrat technique (QT). Body size, size-frequency distribution, population density, juvenile recruitment rates, proportion of ovigerous females and sex ratio were compared between the sampling procedures. QT allowed us to estimate and compare crab and burrow densities. CPUE sampled both adult crabs and the largest crabs more frequently, whereas QT recorded a greater proportion of smaller crabs. CPUE underestimated the size of M. vocator populations, while density estimates obtained with QT were accurate. The proportion of juveniles was higher with QT than with CPUE, suggesting that recruitment rates estimated by QT were more suitable. The sampling effort provided by CPUE was more efficient for obtaining ovigerous-dependent information than QT. Both sampling techniques showed a predominance of males in all three M. vocator populations. The population density estimation based on burrows overestimated the natural density of M. vocator in all mangroves. Our results suggest that neither CPUE nor QT individually were accurate sampling techniques, but together provided reliable assessments of fiddler crab populations. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-01-01 2019-10-04T12:34:42Z 2019-10-04T12:34:42Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2358-2936e2016015 Nauplius. Rio Grande Rs: Soc Brasileira Carcinologia, v. 24, 11 p., 2016. 0104-6497 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/185338 10.1590/2358-2936e2016015 S0104-64972016000100212 WOS:000456319000015 S0104-64972016000100212.pdf |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2358-2936e2016015 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/185338 |
identifier_str_mv |
Nauplius. Rio Grande Rs: Soc Brasileira Carcinologia, v. 24, 11 p., 2016. 0104-6497 10.1590/2358-2936e2016015 S0104-64972016000100212 WOS:000456319000015 S0104-64972016000100212.pdf |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Nauplius |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
11 application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Soc Brasileira Carcinologia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Soc Brasileira Carcinologia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Web of Science reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808129550665646080 |