Enamel roughness changes after removal of orthodontic adhesive

• Autor(a) principal: Degrazia, Felipe Weidenbach
• Data de Publicação: 2018
• Outros Autores: Genari, Bruna, Ferrazzo, Vilmar Antonio, Dos Santos-Pinto, Ary [UNESP], Grehs, Renésio Armindo
• Tipo de documento: Artigo
• Idioma: eng
• Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
• Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/dj6030039; http://hdl.handle.net/11449/221261
• topic: Dental bonding; Dental debonding; Dental enamel; Orthodontic brackets

The aim of this study was to evaluate enamel roughness, quality of the enamel surfaces and time duration comparing different orthodontic adhesive removal protocols. Premolars were used to test three adhesive removal methods (n = 20): five-blade carbide bur, 30-blade carbide bur, and ultrasonic diamond bur. Bracket was bonded using Transbond TM XT adhesive. Roughness with different parameters was measured before bracket bonding and after adhesive remnants removal. Micromorphological analysis of enamel surface (n = 5) was performed by SEM images and categorized in enamel damage index-“perfect”; “satisfying”; “imperfect”; and “unacceptable”. Time was measured in seconds. All removal methods caused increased roughness in relation to R a , R q , and R z parameters (X axis) comparing to healthy enamel surface. Enamel surface resulted from removal using five-blade burs was scored as satisfactory. Carbide bur groups decreased the roughness values of R a , R q , and R z parameters on the Y axis and enamel surface was considered unacceptable. The 30-blade group increased symmetry (R sk ) and flattening (R ku ) parameters of roughness and surface was scored as unsatisfactory. Diamond bur removed adhesive in 54.8 s, faster than five-blade carbide bur. The five-blade bur group resulted in less enamel roughness than the 30-blade and diamond groups.