Avaliação audiológica em trabalhadores expostos a ruído e praguicida
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2010 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1808-86942010000400003 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/117921 |
Resumo: | Noise-induced hearing loss has been studied for many years and today many experts also investigate the synergic action of chemical products, since they can be potentially ototoxic. AIM: to investigate the audiological findings in workers exposed to occupational noise and pesticide and to compare it to data from noise-exposed workers. STUDY DESIGN: Clinical retrospective. MATERIAL AND METHOD: individuals that had been exposed to pesticide and noise (group I), and individuals that had been exposed to noise only (group II). RESULTS: The classification of the audiometric findings showed in that group I: 35% had normal hearing thresholds, 53.75% had degree 1 hearing loss and 11.25% had degree 2 hearing loss; and group II had 57.5% of normal hearing, 40% had degree 1 hearing loss and only 2.5% had degree 2 hearing loss. The analysis of the audiometric findings also showed a significant worsening after comparing groups I and II thresholds, in the frequency of 3 kHz on the left ear and 4 kHz on both ears. CONCLUSION: The analysis showed that group I had worse audiometric thresholds compared to group II. |
id |
UNSP_1eb4a067eb80367c780a5a786c1fb7e2 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/117921 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Avaliação audiológica em trabalhadores expostos a ruído e praguicidaAudiological evaluation in workers exposed to noise and pesticideperda auditivapraguicidasruídohearing losspesticidesnoiseNoise-induced hearing loss has been studied for many years and today many experts also investigate the synergic action of chemical products, since they can be potentially ototoxic. AIM: to investigate the audiological findings in workers exposed to occupational noise and pesticide and to compare it to data from noise-exposed workers. STUDY DESIGN: Clinical retrospective. MATERIAL AND METHOD: individuals that had been exposed to pesticide and noise (group I), and individuals that had been exposed to noise only (group II). RESULTS: The classification of the audiometric findings showed in that group I: 35% had normal hearing thresholds, 53.75% had degree 1 hearing loss and 11.25% had degree 2 hearing loss; and group II had 57.5% of normal hearing, 40% had degree 1 hearing loss and only 2.5% had degree 2 hearing loss. The analysis of the audiometric findings also showed a significant worsening after comparing groups I and II thresholds, in the frequency of 3 kHz on the left ear and 4 kHz on both ears. CONCLUSION: The analysis showed that group I had worse audiometric thresholds compared to group II.A perda auditiva induzida por ruído é estudada há muitos anos, e atualmente a literatura especializada estuda também a ação sinérgica dos produtos químicos, uma vez que eles podem ser potencialmente ototóxicos. OBJETIVO: Pesquisar os achados audiológicos em trabalhadores expostos ao ruído ocupacional e a praguicidas e comparar com os dados obtidos em trabalhadores expostos ao ruído. FORMA DE ESTUDO: Clínico retrospectivo. MATERIAL E MÉTODO: Foram analisados os prontuários de indivíduos que foram expostos ao praguicida e ao ruído (grupo I), e indivíduos que foram somente expostos ao ruído (grupo II). RESULTADOS: A classificação dos achados audiométricos revelou para o grupo I: 35% orelhas normais, 53,75% com perda auditiva de grau 1 e 11,25% com perda de grau 2. Enquanto que o grupo II apresentou 57,5% de orelhas normais, 40% com perda auditiva de grau 1 e apenas 2,5% com perda de grau 2. A análise dos achados audiométricos demonstrou também uma piora significativa após a comparação entre os limiares do grupo I e grupo II, na frequência de 3 kHz orelha esquerda e na frequência de 4kHz em ambas as orelhas. CONCLUSÃO: A análise mostrou que o grupo I tem limiares audiométricos piores comparado ao grupo II.Associação Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia CervicofacialUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Guida, Heraldo Lorena [UNESP]Morini, Renata Graziele [UNESP]Cardoso, Ana Cláudia Vieira [UNESP]2015-03-19T16:20:28Z2015-03-19T16:20:28Z2010-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article423-427application/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1808-86942010000400003Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology. Associação Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia Cervicofacial, v. 76, n. 4, p. 423-427, 2010.1808-8694http://hdl.handle.net/11449/11792110.1590/S1808-86942010000400003S1808-86942010000400003S1808-86942010000400003-en.pdfS1808-86942010000400003-pt.pdf25453368477091203025898045643500SciELOreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPporBrazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology1.4120,443info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-11-17T06:14:15Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/117921Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462023-11-17T06:14:15Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Avaliação audiológica em trabalhadores expostos a ruído e praguicida Audiological evaluation in workers exposed to noise and pesticide |
title |
Avaliação audiológica em trabalhadores expostos a ruído e praguicida |
spellingShingle |
Avaliação audiológica em trabalhadores expostos a ruído e praguicida Guida, Heraldo Lorena [UNESP] perda auditiva praguicidas ruído hearing loss pesticides noise |
title_short |
Avaliação audiológica em trabalhadores expostos a ruído e praguicida |
title_full |
Avaliação audiológica em trabalhadores expostos a ruído e praguicida |
title_fullStr |
Avaliação audiológica em trabalhadores expostos a ruído e praguicida |
title_full_unstemmed |
Avaliação audiológica em trabalhadores expostos a ruído e praguicida |
title_sort |
Avaliação audiológica em trabalhadores expostos a ruído e praguicida |
author |
Guida, Heraldo Lorena [UNESP] |
author_facet |
Guida, Heraldo Lorena [UNESP] Morini, Renata Graziele [UNESP] Cardoso, Ana Cláudia Vieira [UNESP] |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Morini, Renata Graziele [UNESP] Cardoso, Ana Cláudia Vieira [UNESP] |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Guida, Heraldo Lorena [UNESP] Morini, Renata Graziele [UNESP] Cardoso, Ana Cláudia Vieira [UNESP] |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
perda auditiva praguicidas ruído hearing loss pesticides noise |
topic |
perda auditiva praguicidas ruído hearing loss pesticides noise |
description |
Noise-induced hearing loss has been studied for many years and today many experts also investigate the synergic action of chemical products, since they can be potentially ototoxic. AIM: to investigate the audiological findings in workers exposed to occupational noise and pesticide and to compare it to data from noise-exposed workers. STUDY DESIGN: Clinical retrospective. MATERIAL AND METHOD: individuals that had been exposed to pesticide and noise (group I), and individuals that had been exposed to noise only (group II). RESULTS: The classification of the audiometric findings showed in that group I: 35% had normal hearing thresholds, 53.75% had degree 1 hearing loss and 11.25% had degree 2 hearing loss; and group II had 57.5% of normal hearing, 40% had degree 1 hearing loss and only 2.5% had degree 2 hearing loss. The analysis of the audiometric findings also showed a significant worsening after comparing groups I and II thresholds, in the frequency of 3 kHz on the left ear and 4 kHz on both ears. CONCLUSION: The analysis showed that group I had worse audiometric thresholds compared to group II. |
publishDate |
2010 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2010-08-01 2015-03-19T16:20:28Z 2015-03-19T16:20:28Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1808-86942010000400003 Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology. Associação Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia Cervicofacial, v. 76, n. 4, p. 423-427, 2010. 1808-8694 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/117921 10.1590/S1808-86942010000400003 S1808-86942010000400003 S1808-86942010000400003-en.pdf S1808-86942010000400003-pt.pdf 2545336847709120 3025898045643500 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1808-86942010000400003 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/117921 |
identifier_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology. Associação Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia Cervicofacial, v. 76, n. 4, p. 423-427, 2010. 1808-8694 10.1590/S1808-86942010000400003 S1808-86942010000400003 S1808-86942010000400003-en.pdf S1808-86942010000400003-pt.pdf 2545336847709120 3025898045643500 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology 1.412 0,443 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
423-427 application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia Cervicofacial |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia Cervicofacial |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
SciELO reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799964971647369216 |