Avaliação audiológica em trabalhadores expostos a ruído e praguicida

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Guida, Heraldo Lorena [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2010
Outros Autores: Morini, Renata Graziele [UNESP], Cardoso, Ana Cláudia Vieira [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1808-86942010000400003
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/117921
Resumo: Noise-induced hearing loss has been studied for many years and today many experts also investigate the synergic action of chemical products, since they can be potentially ototoxic. AIM: to investigate the audiological findings in workers exposed to occupational noise and pesticide and to compare it to data from noise-exposed workers. STUDY DESIGN: Clinical retrospective. MATERIAL AND METHOD: individuals that had been exposed to pesticide and noise (group I), and individuals that had been exposed to noise only (group II). RESULTS: The classification of the audiometric findings showed in that group I: 35% had normal hearing thresholds, 53.75% had degree 1 hearing loss and 11.25% had degree 2 hearing loss; and group II had 57.5% of normal hearing, 40% had degree 1 hearing loss and only 2.5% had degree 2 hearing loss. The analysis of the audiometric findings also showed a significant worsening after comparing groups I and II thresholds, in the frequency of 3 kHz on the left ear and 4 kHz on both ears. CONCLUSION: The analysis showed that group I had worse audiometric thresholds compared to group II.
id UNSP_1eb4a067eb80367c780a5a786c1fb7e2
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/117921
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Avaliação audiológica em trabalhadores expostos a ruído e praguicidaAudiological evaluation in workers exposed to noise and pesticideperda auditivapraguicidasruídohearing losspesticidesnoiseNoise-induced hearing loss has been studied for many years and today many experts also investigate the synergic action of chemical products, since they can be potentially ototoxic. AIM: to investigate the audiological findings in workers exposed to occupational noise and pesticide and to compare it to data from noise-exposed workers. STUDY DESIGN: Clinical retrospective. MATERIAL AND METHOD: individuals that had been exposed to pesticide and noise (group I), and individuals that had been exposed to noise only (group II). RESULTS: The classification of the audiometric findings showed in that group I: 35% had normal hearing thresholds, 53.75% had degree 1 hearing loss and 11.25% had degree 2 hearing loss; and group II had 57.5% of normal hearing, 40% had degree 1 hearing loss and only 2.5% had degree 2 hearing loss. The analysis of the audiometric findings also showed a significant worsening after comparing groups I and II thresholds, in the frequency of 3 kHz on the left ear and 4 kHz on both ears. CONCLUSION: The analysis showed that group I had worse audiometric thresholds compared to group II.A perda auditiva induzida por ruído é estudada há muitos anos, e atualmente a literatura especializada estuda também a ação sinérgica dos produtos químicos, uma vez que eles podem ser potencialmente ototóxicos. OBJETIVO: Pesquisar os achados audiológicos em trabalhadores expostos ao ruído ocupacional e a praguicidas e comparar com os dados obtidos em trabalhadores expostos ao ruído. FORMA DE ESTUDO: Clínico retrospectivo. MATERIAL E MÉTODO: Foram analisados os prontuários de indivíduos que foram expostos ao praguicida e ao ruído (grupo I), e indivíduos que foram somente expostos ao ruído (grupo II). RESULTADOS: A classificação dos achados audiométricos revelou para o grupo I: 35% orelhas normais, 53,75% com perda auditiva de grau 1 e 11,25% com perda de grau 2. Enquanto que o grupo II apresentou 57,5% de orelhas normais, 40% com perda auditiva de grau 1 e apenas 2,5% com perda de grau 2. A análise dos achados audiométricos demonstrou também uma piora significativa após a comparação entre os limiares do grupo I e grupo II, na frequência de 3 kHz orelha esquerda e na frequência de 4kHz em ambas as orelhas. CONCLUSÃO: A análise mostrou que o grupo I tem limiares audiométricos piores comparado ao grupo II.Associação Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia CervicofacialUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Guida, Heraldo Lorena [UNESP]Morini, Renata Graziele [UNESP]Cardoso, Ana Cláudia Vieira [UNESP]2015-03-19T16:20:28Z2015-03-19T16:20:28Z2010-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article423-427application/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1808-86942010000400003Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology. Associação Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia Cervicofacial, v. 76, n. 4, p. 423-427, 2010.1808-8694http://hdl.handle.net/11449/11792110.1590/S1808-86942010000400003S1808-86942010000400003S1808-86942010000400003-en.pdfS1808-86942010000400003-pt.pdf25453368477091203025898045643500SciELOreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPporBrazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology1.4120,443info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-11-17T06:14:15Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/117921Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462023-11-17T06:14:15Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Avaliação audiológica em trabalhadores expostos a ruído e praguicida
Audiological evaluation in workers exposed to noise and pesticide
title Avaliação audiológica em trabalhadores expostos a ruído e praguicida
spellingShingle Avaliação audiológica em trabalhadores expostos a ruído e praguicida
Guida, Heraldo Lorena [UNESP]
perda auditiva
praguicidas
ruído
hearing loss
pesticides
noise
title_short Avaliação audiológica em trabalhadores expostos a ruído e praguicida
title_full Avaliação audiológica em trabalhadores expostos a ruído e praguicida
title_fullStr Avaliação audiológica em trabalhadores expostos a ruído e praguicida
title_full_unstemmed Avaliação audiológica em trabalhadores expostos a ruído e praguicida
title_sort Avaliação audiológica em trabalhadores expostos a ruído e praguicida
author Guida, Heraldo Lorena [UNESP]
author_facet Guida, Heraldo Lorena [UNESP]
Morini, Renata Graziele [UNESP]
Cardoso, Ana Cláudia Vieira [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Morini, Renata Graziele [UNESP]
Cardoso, Ana Cláudia Vieira [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Guida, Heraldo Lorena [UNESP]
Morini, Renata Graziele [UNESP]
Cardoso, Ana Cláudia Vieira [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv perda auditiva
praguicidas
ruído
hearing loss
pesticides
noise
topic perda auditiva
praguicidas
ruído
hearing loss
pesticides
noise
description Noise-induced hearing loss has been studied for many years and today many experts also investigate the synergic action of chemical products, since they can be potentially ototoxic. AIM: to investigate the audiological findings in workers exposed to occupational noise and pesticide and to compare it to data from noise-exposed workers. STUDY DESIGN: Clinical retrospective. MATERIAL AND METHOD: individuals that had been exposed to pesticide and noise (group I), and individuals that had been exposed to noise only (group II). RESULTS: The classification of the audiometric findings showed in that group I: 35% had normal hearing thresholds, 53.75% had degree 1 hearing loss and 11.25% had degree 2 hearing loss; and group II had 57.5% of normal hearing, 40% had degree 1 hearing loss and only 2.5% had degree 2 hearing loss. The analysis of the audiometric findings also showed a significant worsening after comparing groups I and II thresholds, in the frequency of 3 kHz on the left ear and 4 kHz on both ears. CONCLUSION: The analysis showed that group I had worse audiometric thresholds compared to group II.
publishDate 2010
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2010-08-01
2015-03-19T16:20:28Z
2015-03-19T16:20:28Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1808-86942010000400003
Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology. Associação Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia Cervicofacial, v. 76, n. 4, p. 423-427, 2010.
1808-8694
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/117921
10.1590/S1808-86942010000400003
S1808-86942010000400003
S1808-86942010000400003-en.pdf
S1808-86942010000400003-pt.pdf
2545336847709120
3025898045643500
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1808-86942010000400003
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/117921
identifier_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology. Associação Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia Cervicofacial, v. 76, n. 4, p. 423-427, 2010.
1808-8694
10.1590/S1808-86942010000400003
S1808-86942010000400003
S1808-86942010000400003-en.pdf
S1808-86942010000400003-pt.pdf
2545336847709120
3025898045643500
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology
1.412
0,443
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 423-427
application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia Cervicofacial
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia Cervicofacial
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv SciELO
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799964971647369216