Total and harvest-date yield of processing tomato cultivars

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Santos, G. M. [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2004
Outros Autores: Cintra, A. A D [UNESP], Braz, L. T. [UNESP], Grilli, G. V G [UNESP], Braz, B. A.
Tipo de documento: Artigo de conferência
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://www.actahort.org/books/637/637_20.htm
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/67739
Resumo: The productivity of 28 tomato cultivars was evaluated over three stages of harvest. The study was carried out during from June to December of 1999 in an open field at the experimental area of the Section of Olericulture and Aromatic Medicinal Plants, Department of Crop Production at FCAV-UNESP, Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil. The cultivars studied were H 7155, Hypeel, Andino, U 573, H 9036, IPA 6, H 9494, AG 33, Yuba, RPT 1294, AG 72, Pelmeech, Curico, Hypeel 45, RPT 1478, H 9492, H 9498, H 2710, Hitech 45, Halley, Botu 13, H 9553, U 646, NK 1570, AG 45, RPT 1095, RPT 1570, and PSX 37511. The experimental design was a randomized block design with four repetitions, with five plants per plot. Productivity was evaluated at three stages of harvest at 119, 149 and 179 days after seeding. There were no significant differences among the cultivars at the first harvest (119 days). The majority of the cultivars produced their highest yield at the second harvest; the most productive cultivars were Curicó and AG 72, which yielded 4.69 and 4.67 kg/plant, respectively, although they did not differ statistically from the cultivars Hypeel 45 (4.35 kg/plant) and H 9498 (4.16 kg/plant). Yields of the cultivars Andino and H 9494 were evenly distributed between the second and third harvests. At the third harvest, cultivar IPA 6 had the highest yield (2.9 kg/plant) and was statistically different from all other cultivars except H 9036 (2.34 kg). These two cultivars had the most delayed and concentrated maturity, making them suitable for mechanical harvesting, although at a later time. Cultivar AG 72 had the greatest total yield (5.76 kg/plant), but it was not statistically different from cultivars Hypeel 45 (5.43 kg), Curico (4.17 kg), H 9498 (4.83 kg), H 7155 (4.58 kg) and Halley (4.55 kg). All of the cultivars, with the exception of cultivars H 9036, IPA 6, Andino and H 9494 showed in the second harvest concentrated maturity, making it suitable for mechanical harvesting.
id UNSP_21095b48a6e2f002d53589613e6fffd6
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/67739
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Total and harvest-date yield of processing tomato cultivarsFruit qualityLycopersicon esculentum Mill.YieldThe productivity of 28 tomato cultivars was evaluated over three stages of harvest. The study was carried out during from June to December of 1999 in an open field at the experimental area of the Section of Olericulture and Aromatic Medicinal Plants, Department of Crop Production at FCAV-UNESP, Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil. The cultivars studied were H 7155, Hypeel, Andino, U 573, H 9036, IPA 6, H 9494, AG 33, Yuba, RPT 1294, AG 72, Pelmeech, Curico, Hypeel 45, RPT 1478, H 9492, H 9498, H 2710, Hitech 45, Halley, Botu 13, H 9553, U 646, NK 1570, AG 45, RPT 1095, RPT 1570, and PSX 37511. The experimental design was a randomized block design with four repetitions, with five plants per plot. Productivity was evaluated at three stages of harvest at 119, 149 and 179 days after seeding. There were no significant differences among the cultivars at the first harvest (119 days). The majority of the cultivars produced their highest yield at the second harvest; the most productive cultivars were Curicó and AG 72, which yielded 4.69 and 4.67 kg/plant, respectively, although they did not differ statistically from the cultivars Hypeel 45 (4.35 kg/plant) and H 9498 (4.16 kg/plant). Yields of the cultivars Andino and H 9494 were evenly distributed between the second and third harvests. At the third harvest, cultivar IPA 6 had the highest yield (2.9 kg/plant) and was statistically different from all other cultivars except H 9036 (2.34 kg). These two cultivars had the most delayed and concentrated maturity, making them suitable for mechanical harvesting, although at a later time. Cultivar AG 72 had the greatest total yield (5.76 kg/plant), but it was not statistically different from cultivars Hypeel 45 (5.43 kg), Curico (4.17 kg), H 9498 (4.83 kg), H 7155 (4.58 kg) and Halley (4.55 kg). All of the cultivars, with the exception of cultivars H 9036, IPA 6, Andino and H 9494 showed in the second harvest concentrated maturity, making it suitable for mechanical harvesting.Departamento de Produção Vegetal Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias UNESP, JaboticabalSyngenta, JaboticabalDepartamento de Produção Vegetal Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias UNESP, JaboticabalUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)SyngentaSantos, G. M. [UNESP]Cintra, A. A D [UNESP]Braz, L. T. [UNESP]Grilli, G. V G [UNESP]Braz, B. A.2014-05-27T11:21:05Z2014-05-27T11:21:05Z2004-05-31info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject175-181http://www.actahort.org/books/637/637_20.htmActa Horticulturae, v. 637, p. 175-181.0567-7572http://hdl.handle.net/11449/67739WOS:0002236962000202-s2.0-84879647454Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengActa Horticulturae0,198info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-06-07T13:58:07Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/67739Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T13:36:08.288853Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Total and harvest-date yield of processing tomato cultivars
title Total and harvest-date yield of processing tomato cultivars
spellingShingle Total and harvest-date yield of processing tomato cultivars
Santos, G. M. [UNESP]
Fruit quality
Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.
Yield
title_short Total and harvest-date yield of processing tomato cultivars
title_full Total and harvest-date yield of processing tomato cultivars
title_fullStr Total and harvest-date yield of processing tomato cultivars
title_full_unstemmed Total and harvest-date yield of processing tomato cultivars
title_sort Total and harvest-date yield of processing tomato cultivars
author Santos, G. M. [UNESP]
author_facet Santos, G. M. [UNESP]
Cintra, A. A D [UNESP]
Braz, L. T. [UNESP]
Grilli, G. V G [UNESP]
Braz, B. A.
author_role author
author2 Cintra, A. A D [UNESP]
Braz, L. T. [UNESP]
Grilli, G. V G [UNESP]
Braz, B. A.
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
Syngenta
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Santos, G. M. [UNESP]
Cintra, A. A D [UNESP]
Braz, L. T. [UNESP]
Grilli, G. V G [UNESP]
Braz, B. A.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Fruit quality
Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.
Yield
topic Fruit quality
Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.
Yield
description The productivity of 28 tomato cultivars was evaluated over three stages of harvest. The study was carried out during from June to December of 1999 in an open field at the experimental area of the Section of Olericulture and Aromatic Medicinal Plants, Department of Crop Production at FCAV-UNESP, Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil. The cultivars studied were H 7155, Hypeel, Andino, U 573, H 9036, IPA 6, H 9494, AG 33, Yuba, RPT 1294, AG 72, Pelmeech, Curico, Hypeel 45, RPT 1478, H 9492, H 9498, H 2710, Hitech 45, Halley, Botu 13, H 9553, U 646, NK 1570, AG 45, RPT 1095, RPT 1570, and PSX 37511. The experimental design was a randomized block design with four repetitions, with five plants per plot. Productivity was evaluated at three stages of harvest at 119, 149 and 179 days after seeding. There were no significant differences among the cultivars at the first harvest (119 days). The majority of the cultivars produced their highest yield at the second harvest; the most productive cultivars were Curicó and AG 72, which yielded 4.69 and 4.67 kg/plant, respectively, although they did not differ statistically from the cultivars Hypeel 45 (4.35 kg/plant) and H 9498 (4.16 kg/plant). Yields of the cultivars Andino and H 9494 were evenly distributed between the second and third harvests. At the third harvest, cultivar IPA 6 had the highest yield (2.9 kg/plant) and was statistically different from all other cultivars except H 9036 (2.34 kg). These two cultivars had the most delayed and concentrated maturity, making them suitable for mechanical harvesting, although at a later time. Cultivar AG 72 had the greatest total yield (5.76 kg/plant), but it was not statistically different from cultivars Hypeel 45 (5.43 kg), Curico (4.17 kg), H 9498 (4.83 kg), H 7155 (4.58 kg) and Halley (4.55 kg). All of the cultivars, with the exception of cultivars H 9036, IPA 6, Andino and H 9494 showed in the second harvest concentrated maturity, making it suitable for mechanical harvesting.
publishDate 2004
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2004-05-31
2014-05-27T11:21:05Z
2014-05-27T11:21:05Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject
format conferenceObject
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://www.actahort.org/books/637/637_20.htm
Acta Horticulturae, v. 637, p. 175-181.
0567-7572
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/67739
WOS:000223696200020
2-s2.0-84879647454
url http://www.actahort.org/books/637/637_20.htm
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/67739
identifier_str_mv Acta Horticulturae, v. 637, p. 175-181.
0567-7572
WOS:000223696200020
2-s2.0-84879647454
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Acta Horticulturae
0,198
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 175-181
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808128253341204480