Effectiveness and toxicity of second-line actinomycin D in patients with methotrexate-resistant postmolar low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Maestá, Izildinha [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Nitecki, Roni, Desmarais, Cecilia Canedo Freitas [UNESP], Horowitz, Neil S., Goldstein, Donald P., Elias, Kevin M., Berkowitz, Ross S.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.02.001
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/200030
Resumo: Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate both the outcomes and toxicity of second-line actinomycin D (ActD) chemotherapy in methotrexate (MTX) - resistant low-risk postmolar gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN) with 5-day ActD versus pulsed ActD. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included patients with MTX-resistant low-risk postmolar GTN from 1974 to 2016. Second-line chemotherapy consisted of 5-day ActD (10–12 μg/kg per day for 5 days every 14 days) or biweekly ActD (1.25 mg/m2 every 2 weeks). Data on patient characteristics, disease presentation, treatment outcome, and toxicity were collected. Results: Sixty-eight MTX-resistant patients receiving ActD as second-line chemotherapy were identified (5-day ActD, 53 patients; pulsed ActD, 15 patients). No significant differences were observed in patient/disease characteristics and sustained remission (overall rate 72%) between second-line ActD regimens. Time to hCG remission was significantly faster (median 21 vs 47 days, p = .04) and required fewer treatment cycles (median 1 vs 2, p < .001) with 5-day ActD. Thrombocytopenia was only observed with 5-day ActD (64.6 vs 0%, p < .001). The frequency (60.4 vs 16.7%, p = .009) and severity (grade 3: 37.9 vs 0%, p = .045) of oral mucositis was significantly higher with 5-day ActD. Grade 2 alopecia was significantly more frequent (70.6 vs 16.7%, p = .02) with 5-day ActD. Conclusions: While 5-day ActD and pulsed ActD achieve comparable remission rates, due to its reduced toxicity, ease of administration, and patient convenience, pulsed ActD should be the treatment of choice for MTX-resistant postmolar low-risk GTN.
id UNSP_2569cb69f5892aa32ef7776c1bc40153
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/200030
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Effectiveness and toxicity of second-line actinomycin D in patients with methotrexate-resistant postmolar low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasiaActinomycin DEffectivenessLow-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasiaSecond-line chemotherapyToxicityObjectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate both the outcomes and toxicity of second-line actinomycin D (ActD) chemotherapy in methotrexate (MTX) - resistant low-risk postmolar gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN) with 5-day ActD versus pulsed ActD. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included patients with MTX-resistant low-risk postmolar GTN from 1974 to 2016. Second-line chemotherapy consisted of 5-day ActD (10–12 μg/kg per day for 5 days every 14 days) or biweekly ActD (1.25 mg/m2 every 2 weeks). Data on patient characteristics, disease presentation, treatment outcome, and toxicity were collected. Results: Sixty-eight MTX-resistant patients receiving ActD as second-line chemotherapy were identified (5-day ActD, 53 patients; pulsed ActD, 15 patients). No significant differences were observed in patient/disease characteristics and sustained remission (overall rate 72%) between second-line ActD regimens. Time to hCG remission was significantly faster (median 21 vs 47 days, p = .04) and required fewer treatment cycles (median 1 vs 2, p < .001) with 5-day ActD. Thrombocytopenia was only observed with 5-day ActD (64.6 vs 0%, p < .001). The frequency (60.4 vs 16.7%, p = .009) and severity (grade 3: 37.9 vs 0%, p = .045) of oral mucositis was significantly higher with 5-day ActD. Grade 2 alopecia was significantly more frequent (70.6 vs 16.7%, p = .02) with 5-day ActD. Conclusions: While 5-day ActD and pulsed ActD achieve comparable remission rates, due to its reduced toxicity, ease of administration, and patient convenience, pulsed ActD should be the treatment of choice for MTX-resistant postmolar low-risk GTN.Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)Botucatu Trophoblastic Disease Center Botucatu Medical School Hospital Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics UNESP—Sao Paulo State UniversityPostgraduate Program in Tocogynecology of Botucatu Medical School UNESP—São Paulo State UniversityDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology Brigham and Women's HospitalNew England Trophoblastic Disease Center Division of Gynecologic Oncology Department of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Biology Brigham and Women's HospitalHarvard Medical SchoolBotucatu Trophoblastic Disease Center Botucatu Medical School Hospital Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics UNESP—Sao Paulo State UniversityPostgraduate Program in Tocogynecology of Botucatu Medical School UNESP—São Paulo State UniversityUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Brigham and Women's HospitalHarvard Medical SchoolMaestá, Izildinha [UNESP]Nitecki, RoniDesmarais, Cecilia Canedo Freitas [UNESP]Horowitz, Neil S.Goldstein, Donald P.Elias, Kevin M.Berkowitz, Ross S.2020-12-12T01:55:45Z2020-12-12T01:55:45Z2020-05-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article372-378http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.02.001Gynecologic Oncology, v. 157, n. 2, p. 372-378, 2020.1095-68590090-8258http://hdl.handle.net/11449/20003010.1016/j.ygyno.2020.02.0012-s2.0-85078960105Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengGynecologic Oncologyinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-10-23T11:11:09Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/200030Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462021-10-23T11:11:09Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Effectiveness and toxicity of second-line actinomycin D in patients with methotrexate-resistant postmolar low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia
title Effectiveness and toxicity of second-line actinomycin D in patients with methotrexate-resistant postmolar low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia
spellingShingle Effectiveness and toxicity of second-line actinomycin D in patients with methotrexate-resistant postmolar low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia
Maestá, Izildinha [UNESP]
Actinomycin D
Effectiveness
Low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia
Second-line chemotherapy
Toxicity
title_short Effectiveness and toxicity of second-line actinomycin D in patients with methotrexate-resistant postmolar low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia
title_full Effectiveness and toxicity of second-line actinomycin D in patients with methotrexate-resistant postmolar low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia
title_fullStr Effectiveness and toxicity of second-line actinomycin D in patients with methotrexate-resistant postmolar low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness and toxicity of second-line actinomycin D in patients with methotrexate-resistant postmolar low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia
title_sort Effectiveness and toxicity of second-line actinomycin D in patients with methotrexate-resistant postmolar low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia
author Maestá, Izildinha [UNESP]
author_facet Maestá, Izildinha [UNESP]
Nitecki, Roni
Desmarais, Cecilia Canedo Freitas [UNESP]
Horowitz, Neil S.
Goldstein, Donald P.
Elias, Kevin M.
Berkowitz, Ross S.
author_role author
author2 Nitecki, Roni
Desmarais, Cecilia Canedo Freitas [UNESP]
Horowitz, Neil S.
Goldstein, Donald P.
Elias, Kevin M.
Berkowitz, Ross S.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Harvard Medical School
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Maestá, Izildinha [UNESP]
Nitecki, Roni
Desmarais, Cecilia Canedo Freitas [UNESP]
Horowitz, Neil S.
Goldstein, Donald P.
Elias, Kevin M.
Berkowitz, Ross S.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Actinomycin D
Effectiveness
Low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia
Second-line chemotherapy
Toxicity
topic Actinomycin D
Effectiveness
Low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia
Second-line chemotherapy
Toxicity
description Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate both the outcomes and toxicity of second-line actinomycin D (ActD) chemotherapy in methotrexate (MTX) - resistant low-risk postmolar gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN) with 5-day ActD versus pulsed ActD. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included patients with MTX-resistant low-risk postmolar GTN from 1974 to 2016. Second-line chemotherapy consisted of 5-day ActD (10–12 μg/kg per day for 5 days every 14 days) or biweekly ActD (1.25 mg/m2 every 2 weeks). Data on patient characteristics, disease presentation, treatment outcome, and toxicity were collected. Results: Sixty-eight MTX-resistant patients receiving ActD as second-line chemotherapy were identified (5-day ActD, 53 patients; pulsed ActD, 15 patients). No significant differences were observed in patient/disease characteristics and sustained remission (overall rate 72%) between second-line ActD regimens. Time to hCG remission was significantly faster (median 21 vs 47 days, p = .04) and required fewer treatment cycles (median 1 vs 2, p < .001) with 5-day ActD. Thrombocytopenia was only observed with 5-day ActD (64.6 vs 0%, p < .001). The frequency (60.4 vs 16.7%, p = .009) and severity (grade 3: 37.9 vs 0%, p = .045) of oral mucositis was significantly higher with 5-day ActD. Grade 2 alopecia was significantly more frequent (70.6 vs 16.7%, p = .02) with 5-day ActD. Conclusions: While 5-day ActD and pulsed ActD achieve comparable remission rates, due to its reduced toxicity, ease of administration, and patient convenience, pulsed ActD should be the treatment of choice for MTX-resistant postmolar low-risk GTN.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-12-12T01:55:45Z
2020-12-12T01:55:45Z
2020-05-01
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.02.001
Gynecologic Oncology, v. 157, n. 2, p. 372-378, 2020.
1095-6859
0090-8258
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/200030
10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.02.001
2-s2.0-85078960105
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.02.001
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/200030
identifier_str_mv Gynecologic Oncology, v. 157, n. 2, p. 372-378, 2020.
1095-6859
0090-8258
10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.02.001
2-s2.0-85078960105
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Gynecologic Oncology
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 372-378
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799965557951299584