Bonding Performance for Repairs Using Bulk Fill and Conventional Methacrylate Composites

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Benzi, Janaina Galvão
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Pucci, César Rogério [UNESP], Freitas, Maiara Rodrigues, Suzy Liporoni, Priscila Christiane, Zanatta, Rayssa Ferreira
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
DOI: 10.1155/2021/2935507
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/2935507
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/233976
Resumo: This study compared the bond strength of a composite repair made with a bulk fill composite and a conventional one using different surface treatments. Specimens were prepared as truncated cones (bases: 4 mm × 2 mm, height: 4 mm) using a bulk fill (OBFa: Filtek One) or a conventional resin (FTKa: Filtek Z250) (n = 66). They were artificially aged (10,000 cycles, 5°C-55°C, 30 sec) and subdivided according to surface treatments: NT - no treatment (control), Abr - abrasion with a diamond tip, and sand - sandblasting with aluminum oxide (50 μm). Treatments were performed over the smaller diameter surface, followed by adhesive (Scothbond Universal) application. A new specimen with similar dimensions was constructed over it using either the OBF or the FTK, totaling 12 groups (n = 11). Bond strength was assessed by tensile test. The data were submitted to two-way ANOVA separately for OBFa and FTKa, followed by Tukey's test (p<0.05). For the aged OBFa groups, there was significant differences for composite type and surface treatment, with higher values of bond strength when repaired with the same material (OBFa/OBF > OBFa/FTK), and sandblasting and bur abrasion presented higher values compared to the control group (NT). For the aged FTKa groups, there were no differences for the composite or surface treatment. Therefore, the bulk fill resin composite tested present better repair performance when the same composite was used, while the conventional resin composite was less influenced by the material and the surface treatment performed.
id UNSP_25c7551f2638d163ab40c144c6610521
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/233976
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Bonding Performance for Repairs Using Bulk Fill and Conventional Methacrylate CompositesThis study compared the bond strength of a composite repair made with a bulk fill composite and a conventional one using different surface treatments. Specimens were prepared as truncated cones (bases: 4 mm × 2 mm, height: 4 mm) using a bulk fill (OBFa: Filtek One) or a conventional resin (FTKa: Filtek Z250) (n = 66). They were artificially aged (10,000 cycles, 5°C-55°C, 30 sec) and subdivided according to surface treatments: NT - no treatment (control), Abr - abrasion with a diamond tip, and sand - sandblasting with aluminum oxide (50 μm). Treatments were performed over the smaller diameter surface, followed by adhesive (Scothbond Universal) application. A new specimen with similar dimensions was constructed over it using either the OBF or the FTK, totaling 12 groups (n = 11). Bond strength was assessed by tensile test. The data were submitted to two-way ANOVA separately for OBFa and FTKa, followed by Tukey's test (p<0.05). For the aged OBFa groups, there was significant differences for composite type and surface treatment, with higher values of bond strength when repaired with the same material (OBFa/OBF > OBFa/FTK), and sandblasting and bur abrasion presented higher values compared to the control group (NT). For the aged FTKa groups, there were no differences for the composite or surface treatment. Therefore, the bulk fill resin composite tested present better repair performance when the same composite was used, while the conventional resin composite was less influenced by the material and the surface treatment performed.Department of Restorative Dentistry School of Dentistry Taubaté University UNITAU Department of Dentistry, TaubatéSão Paulo State University-UNESP Institute of Science and Technology Department of Restorative Dentistry, São PauloDepartment of Dentistry School of Health Sciences University of BrasíliaSão Paulo State University-UNESP Institute of Science and Technology Department of Restorative Dentistry, São PauloUNITAUUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)University of BrasíliaBenzi, Janaina GalvãoPucci, César Rogério [UNESP]Freitas, Maiara RodriguesSuzy Liporoni, Priscila ChristianeZanatta, Rayssa Ferreira2022-05-01T11:54:28Z2022-05-01T11:54:28Z2021-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/2935507International Journal of Dentistry, v. 2021.1687-87361687-8728http://hdl.handle.net/11449/23397610.1155/2021/29355072-s2.0-85122355443Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengInternational Journal of Dentistryinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-05-01T11:54:28Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/233976Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T23:49:51.236353Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Bonding Performance for Repairs Using Bulk Fill and Conventional Methacrylate Composites
title Bonding Performance for Repairs Using Bulk Fill and Conventional Methacrylate Composites
spellingShingle Bonding Performance for Repairs Using Bulk Fill and Conventional Methacrylate Composites
Bonding Performance for Repairs Using Bulk Fill and Conventional Methacrylate Composites
Benzi, Janaina Galvão
Benzi, Janaina Galvão
title_short Bonding Performance for Repairs Using Bulk Fill and Conventional Methacrylate Composites
title_full Bonding Performance for Repairs Using Bulk Fill and Conventional Methacrylate Composites
title_fullStr Bonding Performance for Repairs Using Bulk Fill and Conventional Methacrylate Composites
Bonding Performance for Repairs Using Bulk Fill and Conventional Methacrylate Composites
title_full_unstemmed Bonding Performance for Repairs Using Bulk Fill and Conventional Methacrylate Composites
Bonding Performance for Repairs Using Bulk Fill and Conventional Methacrylate Composites
title_sort Bonding Performance for Repairs Using Bulk Fill and Conventional Methacrylate Composites
author Benzi, Janaina Galvão
author_facet Benzi, Janaina Galvão
Benzi, Janaina Galvão
Pucci, César Rogério [UNESP]
Freitas, Maiara Rodrigues
Suzy Liporoni, Priscila Christiane
Zanatta, Rayssa Ferreira
Pucci, César Rogério [UNESP]
Freitas, Maiara Rodrigues
Suzy Liporoni, Priscila Christiane
Zanatta, Rayssa Ferreira
author_role author
author2 Pucci, César Rogério [UNESP]
Freitas, Maiara Rodrigues
Suzy Liporoni, Priscila Christiane
Zanatta, Rayssa Ferreira
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv UNITAU
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
University of Brasília
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Benzi, Janaina Galvão
Pucci, César Rogério [UNESP]
Freitas, Maiara Rodrigues
Suzy Liporoni, Priscila Christiane
Zanatta, Rayssa Ferreira
description This study compared the bond strength of a composite repair made with a bulk fill composite and a conventional one using different surface treatments. Specimens were prepared as truncated cones (bases: 4 mm × 2 mm, height: 4 mm) using a bulk fill (OBFa: Filtek One) or a conventional resin (FTKa: Filtek Z250) (n = 66). They were artificially aged (10,000 cycles, 5°C-55°C, 30 sec) and subdivided according to surface treatments: NT - no treatment (control), Abr - abrasion with a diamond tip, and sand - sandblasting with aluminum oxide (50 μm). Treatments were performed over the smaller diameter surface, followed by adhesive (Scothbond Universal) application. A new specimen with similar dimensions was constructed over it using either the OBF or the FTK, totaling 12 groups (n = 11). Bond strength was assessed by tensile test. The data were submitted to two-way ANOVA separately for OBFa and FTKa, followed by Tukey's test (p<0.05). For the aged OBFa groups, there was significant differences for composite type and surface treatment, with higher values of bond strength when repaired with the same material (OBFa/OBF > OBFa/FTK), and sandblasting and bur abrasion presented higher values compared to the control group (NT). For the aged FTKa groups, there were no differences for the composite or surface treatment. Therefore, the bulk fill resin composite tested present better repair performance when the same composite was used, while the conventional resin composite was less influenced by the material and the surface treatment performed.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-01-01
2022-05-01T11:54:28Z
2022-05-01T11:54:28Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/2935507
International Journal of Dentistry, v. 2021.
1687-8736
1687-8728
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/233976
10.1155/2021/2935507
2-s2.0-85122355443
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/2935507
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/233976
identifier_str_mv International Journal of Dentistry, v. 2021.
1687-8736
1687-8728
10.1155/2021/2935507
2-s2.0-85122355443
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv International Journal of Dentistry
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1822218374992625664
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv 10.1155/2021/2935507