Bonding Performance for Repairs Using Bulk Fill and Conventional Methacrylate Composites
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
DOI: | 10.1155/2021/2935507 |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/2935507 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/233976 |
Resumo: | This study compared the bond strength of a composite repair made with a bulk fill composite and a conventional one using different surface treatments. Specimens were prepared as truncated cones (bases: 4 mm × 2 mm, height: 4 mm) using a bulk fill (OBFa: Filtek One) or a conventional resin (FTKa: Filtek Z250) (n = 66). They were artificially aged (10,000 cycles, 5°C-55°C, 30 sec) and subdivided according to surface treatments: NT - no treatment (control), Abr - abrasion with a diamond tip, and sand - sandblasting with aluminum oxide (50 μm). Treatments were performed over the smaller diameter surface, followed by adhesive (Scothbond Universal) application. A new specimen with similar dimensions was constructed over it using either the OBF or the FTK, totaling 12 groups (n = 11). Bond strength was assessed by tensile test. The data were submitted to two-way ANOVA separately for OBFa and FTKa, followed by Tukey's test (p<0.05). For the aged OBFa groups, there was significant differences for composite type and surface treatment, with higher values of bond strength when repaired with the same material (OBFa/OBF > OBFa/FTK), and sandblasting and bur abrasion presented higher values compared to the control group (NT). For the aged FTKa groups, there were no differences for the composite or surface treatment. Therefore, the bulk fill resin composite tested present better repair performance when the same composite was used, while the conventional resin composite was less influenced by the material and the surface treatment performed. |
id |
UNSP_25c7551f2638d163ab40c144c6610521 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/233976 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Bonding Performance for Repairs Using Bulk Fill and Conventional Methacrylate CompositesThis study compared the bond strength of a composite repair made with a bulk fill composite and a conventional one using different surface treatments. Specimens were prepared as truncated cones (bases: 4 mm × 2 mm, height: 4 mm) using a bulk fill (OBFa: Filtek One) or a conventional resin (FTKa: Filtek Z250) (n = 66). They were artificially aged (10,000 cycles, 5°C-55°C, 30 sec) and subdivided according to surface treatments: NT - no treatment (control), Abr - abrasion with a diamond tip, and sand - sandblasting with aluminum oxide (50 μm). Treatments were performed over the smaller diameter surface, followed by adhesive (Scothbond Universal) application. A new specimen with similar dimensions was constructed over it using either the OBF or the FTK, totaling 12 groups (n = 11). Bond strength was assessed by tensile test. The data were submitted to two-way ANOVA separately for OBFa and FTKa, followed by Tukey's test (p<0.05). For the aged OBFa groups, there was significant differences for composite type and surface treatment, with higher values of bond strength when repaired with the same material (OBFa/OBF > OBFa/FTK), and sandblasting and bur abrasion presented higher values compared to the control group (NT). For the aged FTKa groups, there were no differences for the composite or surface treatment. Therefore, the bulk fill resin composite tested present better repair performance when the same composite was used, while the conventional resin composite was less influenced by the material and the surface treatment performed.Department of Restorative Dentistry School of Dentistry Taubaté University UNITAU Department of Dentistry, TaubatéSão Paulo State University-UNESP Institute of Science and Technology Department of Restorative Dentistry, São PauloDepartment of Dentistry School of Health Sciences University of BrasíliaSão Paulo State University-UNESP Institute of Science and Technology Department of Restorative Dentistry, São PauloUNITAUUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)University of BrasíliaBenzi, Janaina GalvãoPucci, César Rogério [UNESP]Freitas, Maiara RodriguesSuzy Liporoni, Priscila ChristianeZanatta, Rayssa Ferreira2022-05-01T11:54:28Z2022-05-01T11:54:28Z2021-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/2935507International Journal of Dentistry, v. 2021.1687-87361687-8728http://hdl.handle.net/11449/23397610.1155/2021/29355072-s2.0-85122355443Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengInternational Journal of Dentistryinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-05-01T11:54:28Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/233976Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T23:49:51.236353Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Bonding Performance for Repairs Using Bulk Fill and Conventional Methacrylate Composites |
title |
Bonding Performance for Repairs Using Bulk Fill and Conventional Methacrylate Composites |
spellingShingle |
Bonding Performance for Repairs Using Bulk Fill and Conventional Methacrylate Composites Bonding Performance for Repairs Using Bulk Fill and Conventional Methacrylate Composites Benzi, Janaina Galvão Benzi, Janaina Galvão |
title_short |
Bonding Performance for Repairs Using Bulk Fill and Conventional Methacrylate Composites |
title_full |
Bonding Performance for Repairs Using Bulk Fill and Conventional Methacrylate Composites |
title_fullStr |
Bonding Performance for Repairs Using Bulk Fill and Conventional Methacrylate Composites Bonding Performance for Repairs Using Bulk Fill and Conventional Methacrylate Composites |
title_full_unstemmed |
Bonding Performance for Repairs Using Bulk Fill and Conventional Methacrylate Composites Bonding Performance for Repairs Using Bulk Fill and Conventional Methacrylate Composites |
title_sort |
Bonding Performance for Repairs Using Bulk Fill and Conventional Methacrylate Composites |
author |
Benzi, Janaina Galvão |
author_facet |
Benzi, Janaina Galvão Benzi, Janaina Galvão Pucci, César Rogério [UNESP] Freitas, Maiara Rodrigues Suzy Liporoni, Priscila Christiane Zanatta, Rayssa Ferreira Pucci, César Rogério [UNESP] Freitas, Maiara Rodrigues Suzy Liporoni, Priscila Christiane Zanatta, Rayssa Ferreira |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Pucci, César Rogério [UNESP] Freitas, Maiara Rodrigues Suzy Liporoni, Priscila Christiane Zanatta, Rayssa Ferreira |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
UNITAU Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) University of Brasília |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Benzi, Janaina Galvão Pucci, César Rogério [UNESP] Freitas, Maiara Rodrigues Suzy Liporoni, Priscila Christiane Zanatta, Rayssa Ferreira |
description |
This study compared the bond strength of a composite repair made with a bulk fill composite and a conventional one using different surface treatments. Specimens were prepared as truncated cones (bases: 4 mm × 2 mm, height: 4 mm) using a bulk fill (OBFa: Filtek One) or a conventional resin (FTKa: Filtek Z250) (n = 66). They were artificially aged (10,000 cycles, 5°C-55°C, 30 sec) and subdivided according to surface treatments: NT - no treatment (control), Abr - abrasion with a diamond tip, and sand - sandblasting with aluminum oxide (50 μm). Treatments were performed over the smaller diameter surface, followed by adhesive (Scothbond Universal) application. A new specimen with similar dimensions was constructed over it using either the OBF or the FTK, totaling 12 groups (n = 11). Bond strength was assessed by tensile test. The data were submitted to two-way ANOVA separately for OBFa and FTKa, followed by Tukey's test (p<0.05). For the aged OBFa groups, there was significant differences for composite type and surface treatment, with higher values of bond strength when repaired with the same material (OBFa/OBF > OBFa/FTK), and sandblasting and bur abrasion presented higher values compared to the control group (NT). For the aged FTKa groups, there were no differences for the composite or surface treatment. Therefore, the bulk fill resin composite tested present better repair performance when the same composite was used, while the conventional resin composite was less influenced by the material and the surface treatment performed. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-01-01 2022-05-01T11:54:28Z 2022-05-01T11:54:28Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/2935507 International Journal of Dentistry, v. 2021. 1687-8736 1687-8728 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/233976 10.1155/2021/2935507 2-s2.0-85122355443 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/2935507 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/233976 |
identifier_str_mv |
International Journal of Dentistry, v. 2021. 1687-8736 1687-8728 10.1155/2021/2935507 2-s2.0-85122355443 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
International Journal of Dentistry |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1822218374992625664 |
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1155/2021/2935507 |