A Critique of Poverty: Exploring the Underground of Social Philosophy

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Silva, Hélio Alexandre [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2021
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.14746/PRT2021.4.6
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/223617
Resumo: Poverty is the primary focus of this paper; more particularly, the critique of poverty and not its mere description. It would not be an overstatement to say that one of the common grounds for poverty theories is that they describe the poor as those who systematically experience their lives in privation, namely around having the minimum when it comes to needs such as housing, food, health, education, free time, etc. There is, therefore, a theoretical and socially accepted orientation that promotes the sedimentation of a deep affinity between poverty and the minimum. Based on this reasoning, what is set on the horizon is a kind of non-explicit acceptance that the overcoming of poverty can be achieved by granting the poor something beyond the minimum, however elementary that “something extra” may be. Thus, if the experience of poverty involves some sort of lack or privation, and if this condition can be fully filled by something that has already been socially produced, then what would justify the fact that some people are able to fully fill it while others (the poor) can only secure the bare minimum? In light of this, perhaps it would be better not to question the acceptable “minimum” but, rather, to ask: Why would the notion of poverty be guided by this normative criterion? Therefore, a way of describing my broader hypothesis on poverty would be to understand that it should be measured based on the level of denial of access to what has been socially produced. The further one is from accessing social wealth, the poorer one is. Finally, this tendency toward assimilation between poverty and the minimum engenders a depressive effect on demands for social change.
id UNSP_269d650d729eb4267ee7ed5fe5c3aaae
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/223617
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling A Critique of Poverty: Exploring the Underground of Social PhilosophyMinimumPovertySocial philosophyPoverty is the primary focus of this paper; more particularly, the critique of poverty and not its mere description. It would not be an overstatement to say that one of the common grounds for poverty theories is that they describe the poor as those who systematically experience their lives in privation, namely around having the minimum when it comes to needs such as housing, food, health, education, free time, etc. There is, therefore, a theoretical and socially accepted orientation that promotes the sedimentation of a deep affinity between poverty and the minimum. Based on this reasoning, what is set on the horizon is a kind of non-explicit acceptance that the overcoming of poverty can be achieved by granting the poor something beyond the minimum, however elementary that “something extra” may be. Thus, if the experience of poverty involves some sort of lack or privation, and if this condition can be fully filled by something that has already been socially produced, then what would justify the fact that some people are able to fully fill it while others (the poor) can only secure the bare minimum? In light of this, perhaps it would be better not to question the acceptable “minimum” but, rather, to ask: Why would the notion of poverty be guided by this normative criterion? Therefore, a way of describing my broader hypothesis on poverty would be to understand that it should be measured based on the level of denial of access to what has been socially produced. The further one is from accessing social wealth, the poorer one is. Finally, this tendency toward assimilation between poverty and the minimum engenders a depressive effect on demands for social change.São Paulo State University School of Human and Social Sciences, 900 Eufrásia Monteiro Petraglia Avenue, SPSão Paulo State University School of Human and Social Sciences, 900 Eufrásia Monteiro Petraglia Avenue, SPUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Silva, Hélio Alexandre [UNESP]2022-04-28T19:51:49Z2022-04-28T19:51:49Z2021-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article139-165http://dx.doi.org/10.14746/PRT2021.4.6Praktyka Teoretyczna, v. 42, n. 4, p. 139-165, 2021.2081-8130http://hdl.handle.net/11449/22361710.14746/PRT2021.4.62-s2.0-85126129467Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengPraktyka Teoretycznainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-04-28T19:51:49Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/223617Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462022-04-28T19:51:49Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv A Critique of Poverty: Exploring the Underground of Social Philosophy
title A Critique of Poverty: Exploring the Underground of Social Philosophy
spellingShingle A Critique of Poverty: Exploring the Underground of Social Philosophy
Silva, Hélio Alexandre [UNESP]
Minimum
Poverty
Social philosophy
title_short A Critique of Poverty: Exploring the Underground of Social Philosophy
title_full A Critique of Poverty: Exploring the Underground of Social Philosophy
title_fullStr A Critique of Poverty: Exploring the Underground of Social Philosophy
title_full_unstemmed A Critique of Poverty: Exploring the Underground of Social Philosophy
title_sort A Critique of Poverty: Exploring the Underground of Social Philosophy
author Silva, Hélio Alexandre [UNESP]
author_facet Silva, Hélio Alexandre [UNESP]
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Silva, Hélio Alexandre [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Minimum
Poverty
Social philosophy
topic Minimum
Poverty
Social philosophy
description Poverty is the primary focus of this paper; more particularly, the critique of poverty and not its mere description. It would not be an overstatement to say that one of the common grounds for poverty theories is that they describe the poor as those who systematically experience their lives in privation, namely around having the minimum when it comes to needs such as housing, food, health, education, free time, etc. There is, therefore, a theoretical and socially accepted orientation that promotes the sedimentation of a deep affinity between poverty and the minimum. Based on this reasoning, what is set on the horizon is a kind of non-explicit acceptance that the overcoming of poverty can be achieved by granting the poor something beyond the minimum, however elementary that “something extra” may be. Thus, if the experience of poverty involves some sort of lack or privation, and if this condition can be fully filled by something that has already been socially produced, then what would justify the fact that some people are able to fully fill it while others (the poor) can only secure the bare minimum? In light of this, perhaps it would be better not to question the acceptable “minimum” but, rather, to ask: Why would the notion of poverty be guided by this normative criterion? Therefore, a way of describing my broader hypothesis on poverty would be to understand that it should be measured based on the level of denial of access to what has been socially produced. The further one is from accessing social wealth, the poorer one is. Finally, this tendency toward assimilation between poverty and the minimum engenders a depressive effect on demands for social change.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-01-01
2022-04-28T19:51:49Z
2022-04-28T19:51:49Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.14746/PRT2021.4.6
Praktyka Teoretyczna, v. 42, n. 4, p. 139-165, 2021.
2081-8130
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/223617
10.14746/PRT2021.4.6
2-s2.0-85126129467
url http://dx.doi.org/10.14746/PRT2021.4.6
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/223617
identifier_str_mv Praktyka Teoretyczna, v. 42, n. 4, p. 139-165, 2021.
2081-8130
10.14746/PRT2021.4.6
2-s2.0-85126129467
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Praktyka Teoretyczna
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 139-165
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1803046820130062336