The 2019 Brazilian Survey On Nutritional Practices Provided By Feedlot Cattle Consulting Nutritionists

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Silvestre, Antonio Marcos [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Millen, Danilo Domingues [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.37496/RBZ5020200189
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/233347
Resumo: This survey aimed to provide a current outlook of nutritional recommendations and management practices adopted by feedlot nutritionists in Brazil. The survey questionnaire consisted of 96 questions that included general information on nutritionists, animals, ingredients utilized in finishing diets, management and formulation practices, feeding management, and challenges associated with applying nutritional recommendations in practice. Thirty-six nutritionists, responsible for 4,671,062 animals in Brazil, responded our questionnaire. An increase in the percentage of nutritionists (38.9%) recommending 66% or more grain inclusion in the diets was observed. Fine grinding remained the preferred grain processing method by nutritionists (44.4%); however, more than 50% of nutritionists recommended highmoisture harvest and storage as the secondary grain processing method of choice. The average level of concentrate in the diets was 83.3%, which is higher compared with past surveys. The preferred fiber analysis method by 80.6% respondents was physically effective neutral detergent fiber (peNDF), and corn silage remained the main roughage source in finishing diets (69.4%). Improvements in diet mixing and distribution were also noted. While 79.0% of nutritionists’ clients use a truck-mounted mixer and 69.5% of them also use programmed delivery per pen, 44.4% of the nutritionists reported that their clients use clean-bunk management. Respiratory diseases and acidosis (reported by 71.4 and 27.6% of the respondents, respectively) are among the main health problems. The present survey provides an overview of nutritional practices currently adopted by feedlot nutritionists, who played an important role on the improvement of feeding management in Brazil over the last 10 years.
id UNSP_2705877d6daa41057251089af6e72e16
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/233347
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling The 2019 Brazilian Survey On Nutritional Practices Provided By Feedlot Cattle Consulting Nutritionistsbeef cattleBrazilenergyrecommendationThis survey aimed to provide a current outlook of nutritional recommendations and management practices adopted by feedlot nutritionists in Brazil. The survey questionnaire consisted of 96 questions that included general information on nutritionists, animals, ingredients utilized in finishing diets, management and formulation practices, feeding management, and challenges associated with applying nutritional recommendations in practice. Thirty-six nutritionists, responsible for 4,671,062 animals in Brazil, responded our questionnaire. An increase in the percentage of nutritionists (38.9%) recommending 66% or more grain inclusion in the diets was observed. Fine grinding remained the preferred grain processing method by nutritionists (44.4%); however, more than 50% of nutritionists recommended highmoisture harvest and storage as the secondary grain processing method of choice. The average level of concentrate in the diets was 83.3%, which is higher compared with past surveys. The preferred fiber analysis method by 80.6% respondents was physically effective neutral detergent fiber (peNDF), and corn silage remained the main roughage source in finishing diets (69.4%). Improvements in diet mixing and distribution were also noted. While 79.0% of nutritionists’ clients use a truck-mounted mixer and 69.5% of them also use programmed delivery per pen, 44.4% of the nutritionists reported that their clients use clean-bunk management. Respiratory diseases and acidosis (reported by 71.4 and 27.6% of the respondents, respectively) are among the main health problems. The present survey provides an overview of nutritional practices currently adopted by feedlot nutritionists, who played an important role on the improvement of feeding management in Brazil over the last 10 years.Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)Universidade Estadual Paulista Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e ZootecniaUniversidade Estadual Paulista Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e TecnológicasUniversidade Estadual Paulista Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e ZootecniaUniversidade Estadual Paulista Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e TecnológicasUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Silvestre, Antonio Marcos [UNESP]Millen, Danilo Domingues [UNESP]2022-05-01T07:58:49Z2022-05-01T07:58:49Z2021-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article1-25http://dx.doi.org/10.37496/RBZ5020200189Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, v. 50, p. 1-25.1806-92901516-3598http://hdl.handle.net/11449/23334710.37496/RBZ50202001892-s2.0-85111746756Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengRevista Brasileira de Zootecniainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-05-07T13:47:22Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/233347Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T17:17:07.998558Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The 2019 Brazilian Survey On Nutritional Practices Provided By Feedlot Cattle Consulting Nutritionists
title The 2019 Brazilian Survey On Nutritional Practices Provided By Feedlot Cattle Consulting Nutritionists
spellingShingle The 2019 Brazilian Survey On Nutritional Practices Provided By Feedlot Cattle Consulting Nutritionists
Silvestre, Antonio Marcos [UNESP]
beef cattle
Brazil
energy
recommendation
title_short The 2019 Brazilian Survey On Nutritional Practices Provided By Feedlot Cattle Consulting Nutritionists
title_full The 2019 Brazilian Survey On Nutritional Practices Provided By Feedlot Cattle Consulting Nutritionists
title_fullStr The 2019 Brazilian Survey On Nutritional Practices Provided By Feedlot Cattle Consulting Nutritionists
title_full_unstemmed The 2019 Brazilian Survey On Nutritional Practices Provided By Feedlot Cattle Consulting Nutritionists
title_sort The 2019 Brazilian Survey On Nutritional Practices Provided By Feedlot Cattle Consulting Nutritionists
author Silvestre, Antonio Marcos [UNESP]
author_facet Silvestre, Antonio Marcos [UNESP]
Millen, Danilo Domingues [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Millen, Danilo Domingues [UNESP]
author2_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Silvestre, Antonio Marcos [UNESP]
Millen, Danilo Domingues [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv beef cattle
Brazil
energy
recommendation
topic beef cattle
Brazil
energy
recommendation
description This survey aimed to provide a current outlook of nutritional recommendations and management practices adopted by feedlot nutritionists in Brazil. The survey questionnaire consisted of 96 questions that included general information on nutritionists, animals, ingredients utilized in finishing diets, management and formulation practices, feeding management, and challenges associated with applying nutritional recommendations in practice. Thirty-six nutritionists, responsible for 4,671,062 animals in Brazil, responded our questionnaire. An increase in the percentage of nutritionists (38.9%) recommending 66% or more grain inclusion in the diets was observed. Fine grinding remained the preferred grain processing method by nutritionists (44.4%); however, more than 50% of nutritionists recommended highmoisture harvest and storage as the secondary grain processing method of choice. The average level of concentrate in the diets was 83.3%, which is higher compared with past surveys. The preferred fiber analysis method by 80.6% respondents was physically effective neutral detergent fiber (peNDF), and corn silage remained the main roughage source in finishing diets (69.4%). Improvements in diet mixing and distribution were also noted. While 79.0% of nutritionists’ clients use a truck-mounted mixer and 69.5% of them also use programmed delivery per pen, 44.4% of the nutritionists reported that their clients use clean-bunk management. Respiratory diseases and acidosis (reported by 71.4 and 27.6% of the respondents, respectively) are among the main health problems. The present survey provides an overview of nutritional practices currently adopted by feedlot nutritionists, who played an important role on the improvement of feeding management in Brazil over the last 10 years.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-01-01
2022-05-01T07:58:49Z
2022-05-01T07:58:49Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.37496/RBZ5020200189
Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, v. 50, p. 1-25.
1806-9290
1516-3598
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/233347
10.37496/RBZ5020200189
2-s2.0-85111746756
url http://dx.doi.org/10.37496/RBZ5020200189
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/233347
identifier_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, v. 50, p. 1-25.
1806-9290
1516-3598
10.37496/RBZ5020200189
2-s2.0-85111746756
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 1-25
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808128784066412544