The 2019 Brazilian Survey On Nutritional Practices Provided By Feedlot Cattle Consulting Nutritionists
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.37496/RBZ5020200189 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/233347 |
Resumo: | This survey aimed to provide a current outlook of nutritional recommendations and management practices adopted by feedlot nutritionists in Brazil. The survey questionnaire consisted of 96 questions that included general information on nutritionists, animals, ingredients utilized in finishing diets, management and formulation practices, feeding management, and challenges associated with applying nutritional recommendations in practice. Thirty-six nutritionists, responsible for 4,671,062 animals in Brazil, responded our questionnaire. An increase in the percentage of nutritionists (38.9%) recommending 66% or more grain inclusion in the diets was observed. Fine grinding remained the preferred grain processing method by nutritionists (44.4%); however, more than 50% of nutritionists recommended highmoisture harvest and storage as the secondary grain processing method of choice. The average level of concentrate in the diets was 83.3%, which is higher compared with past surveys. The preferred fiber analysis method by 80.6% respondents was physically effective neutral detergent fiber (peNDF), and corn silage remained the main roughage source in finishing diets (69.4%). Improvements in diet mixing and distribution were also noted. While 79.0% of nutritionists’ clients use a truck-mounted mixer and 69.5% of them also use programmed delivery per pen, 44.4% of the nutritionists reported that their clients use clean-bunk management. Respiratory diseases and acidosis (reported by 71.4 and 27.6% of the respondents, respectively) are among the main health problems. The present survey provides an overview of nutritional practices currently adopted by feedlot nutritionists, who played an important role on the improvement of feeding management in Brazil over the last 10 years. |
id |
UNSP_2705877d6daa41057251089af6e72e16 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/233347 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
The 2019 Brazilian Survey On Nutritional Practices Provided By Feedlot Cattle Consulting Nutritionistsbeef cattleBrazilenergyrecommendationThis survey aimed to provide a current outlook of nutritional recommendations and management practices adopted by feedlot nutritionists in Brazil. The survey questionnaire consisted of 96 questions that included general information on nutritionists, animals, ingredients utilized in finishing diets, management and formulation practices, feeding management, and challenges associated with applying nutritional recommendations in practice. Thirty-six nutritionists, responsible for 4,671,062 animals in Brazil, responded our questionnaire. An increase in the percentage of nutritionists (38.9%) recommending 66% or more grain inclusion in the diets was observed. Fine grinding remained the preferred grain processing method by nutritionists (44.4%); however, more than 50% of nutritionists recommended highmoisture harvest and storage as the secondary grain processing method of choice. The average level of concentrate in the diets was 83.3%, which is higher compared with past surveys. The preferred fiber analysis method by 80.6% respondents was physically effective neutral detergent fiber (peNDF), and corn silage remained the main roughage source in finishing diets (69.4%). Improvements in diet mixing and distribution were also noted. While 79.0% of nutritionists’ clients use a truck-mounted mixer and 69.5% of them also use programmed delivery per pen, 44.4% of the nutritionists reported that their clients use clean-bunk management. Respiratory diseases and acidosis (reported by 71.4 and 27.6% of the respondents, respectively) are among the main health problems. The present survey provides an overview of nutritional practices currently adopted by feedlot nutritionists, who played an important role on the improvement of feeding management in Brazil over the last 10 years.Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)Universidade Estadual Paulista Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e ZootecniaUniversidade Estadual Paulista Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e TecnológicasUniversidade Estadual Paulista Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e ZootecniaUniversidade Estadual Paulista Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e TecnológicasUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Silvestre, Antonio Marcos [UNESP]Millen, Danilo Domingues [UNESP]2022-05-01T07:58:49Z2022-05-01T07:58:49Z2021-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article1-25http://dx.doi.org/10.37496/RBZ5020200189Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, v. 50, p. 1-25.1806-92901516-3598http://hdl.handle.net/11449/23334710.37496/RBZ50202001892-s2.0-85111746756Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengRevista Brasileira de Zootecniainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-05-07T13:47:22Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/233347Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T17:17:07.998558Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The 2019 Brazilian Survey On Nutritional Practices Provided By Feedlot Cattle Consulting Nutritionists |
title |
The 2019 Brazilian Survey On Nutritional Practices Provided By Feedlot Cattle Consulting Nutritionists |
spellingShingle |
The 2019 Brazilian Survey On Nutritional Practices Provided By Feedlot Cattle Consulting Nutritionists Silvestre, Antonio Marcos [UNESP] beef cattle Brazil energy recommendation |
title_short |
The 2019 Brazilian Survey On Nutritional Practices Provided By Feedlot Cattle Consulting Nutritionists |
title_full |
The 2019 Brazilian Survey On Nutritional Practices Provided By Feedlot Cattle Consulting Nutritionists |
title_fullStr |
The 2019 Brazilian Survey On Nutritional Practices Provided By Feedlot Cattle Consulting Nutritionists |
title_full_unstemmed |
The 2019 Brazilian Survey On Nutritional Practices Provided By Feedlot Cattle Consulting Nutritionists |
title_sort |
The 2019 Brazilian Survey On Nutritional Practices Provided By Feedlot Cattle Consulting Nutritionists |
author |
Silvestre, Antonio Marcos [UNESP] |
author_facet |
Silvestre, Antonio Marcos [UNESP] Millen, Danilo Domingues [UNESP] |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Millen, Danilo Domingues [UNESP] |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Silvestre, Antonio Marcos [UNESP] Millen, Danilo Domingues [UNESP] |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
beef cattle Brazil energy recommendation |
topic |
beef cattle Brazil energy recommendation |
description |
This survey aimed to provide a current outlook of nutritional recommendations and management practices adopted by feedlot nutritionists in Brazil. The survey questionnaire consisted of 96 questions that included general information on nutritionists, animals, ingredients utilized in finishing diets, management and formulation practices, feeding management, and challenges associated with applying nutritional recommendations in practice. Thirty-six nutritionists, responsible for 4,671,062 animals in Brazil, responded our questionnaire. An increase in the percentage of nutritionists (38.9%) recommending 66% or more grain inclusion in the diets was observed. Fine grinding remained the preferred grain processing method by nutritionists (44.4%); however, more than 50% of nutritionists recommended highmoisture harvest and storage as the secondary grain processing method of choice. The average level of concentrate in the diets was 83.3%, which is higher compared with past surveys. The preferred fiber analysis method by 80.6% respondents was physically effective neutral detergent fiber (peNDF), and corn silage remained the main roughage source in finishing diets (69.4%). Improvements in diet mixing and distribution were also noted. While 79.0% of nutritionists’ clients use a truck-mounted mixer and 69.5% of them also use programmed delivery per pen, 44.4% of the nutritionists reported that their clients use clean-bunk management. Respiratory diseases and acidosis (reported by 71.4 and 27.6% of the respondents, respectively) are among the main health problems. The present survey provides an overview of nutritional practices currently adopted by feedlot nutritionists, who played an important role on the improvement of feeding management in Brazil over the last 10 years. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-01-01 2022-05-01T07:58:49Z 2022-05-01T07:58:49Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.37496/RBZ5020200189 Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, v. 50, p. 1-25. 1806-9290 1516-3598 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/233347 10.37496/RBZ5020200189 2-s2.0-85111746756 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.37496/RBZ5020200189 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/233347 |
identifier_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, v. 50, p. 1-25. 1806-9290 1516-3598 10.37496/RBZ5020200189 2-s2.0-85111746756 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
1-25 |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808128784066412544 |