The use of an alternative feed additive, containing benzoic acid, thymol, eugenol, and piperine, improved growth performance, nutrient and energy digestibility, and gut health in weaned piglets

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Silva Junior, Claudio D. [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Martins, Claudia C. S., Dias, Francine T. F., Sitanaka, Natalia Y., Ferracioli, Leticia B., Moraes, Jose E., Pizzolante, Carla C., Budino, Fabio E. L., Pereira, Rafaela, Tizioto, Polyana, Paula, Vinicius R. C., Coutinho, Luiz L., Ruiz, Urbano S.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jas/skaa119
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/195420
Resumo: This research evaluated a feed additive (benzoic acid, eugenol, thymol, and piperine), associated or not with colistin, in weaned piglets feeding. The parameters evaluated were growth performance, apparent total tract digestibility (ATTD) of nutrients, diarrhea incidence, intestinal morphology, relative weights of digestive organs, microbial diversity, and the percentages of operational taxonomic units of microorganisms in the cecum content of pigs. One-hundred and eight crossbred piglets (5.3 +/- 0.5 kg) were used in a three-phase feeding program (21 to 35, 36 to 50, 51 to 65 d of age) and fed a control diet with no inclusion of growth promoter feed additive, a diet with 40 ppm of colistin, a diet with 0.3% of alternative additive, and a diet with 0.3% of alternative additive and 40 ppm of colistin. The diets were based on corn, soybean meal, dairy products, and spray-dried blood plasma and formulated to provide 3.40, 3.38, and 3.20 Mcal of ME/kg and 14.5, 13.3, and 10.9 g/kg of digestible lysine, in phases 1, 2, and 3, respectively. The piglets were housed three per pen, with nine replicates per diet, in a complete randomized block design based on initial BW. The data were submitted to ANOVA and means were separated by Tukey test (5%), using SAS. Pigs fed diets with the alternative feed additive had greater (P < 0.05) ADG (114.3 vs. 91.8 g) and ADFI (190.1 vs. 163.3 g) in phase 1 than pigs fed diets without the product. The alternative additive improved (P < 0.05) ATTD of crude protein (CP) in phase 1 (71.0% vs. 68.6%), gross energy in phases 1 (77.4% vs. 75.2%) and 3 (79.0% vs. 77.1%), and dry matter in phase 3 (79.1% vs. 77.1%). The antibiotic inclusion in the diets increased (P < 0.05) ATTD of CP in phase 1 (71.5% vs. 68.2%). The alternative feed additive tended (P = 0.06) to increase (46%) normal feces frequency, decreased (P < 0.05) goblet cells count (104.3 vs. 118.1) in the jejunum, and decreased (P < 0.05) small intestine (4.60% vs. 4.93%) and colon (1.41% vs. 1.65%) relative weights, compared with pigs not fed with the alternative additive. There was a tendency (P = 0.09) for a lower concentration of Escherichia-Shigella (1.46% vs. 3.5%) and lower (P < 0.05) percentage of Campylobacter (0.52% vs. 10.21%) in the cecum content of piglets fed diets containing essential oils and benzoic acid compared with pigs fed diets without the alternative feed additive. The alternative feed additive was effective in improving growth performance, diets digestibility, and gut health in piglets soon after weaning.
id UNSP_29ada658a00d4c64a62e18cb05536d91
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/195420
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling The use of an alternative feed additive, containing benzoic acid, thymol, eugenol, and piperine, improved growth performance, nutrient and energy digestibility, and gut health in weaned pigletsdiarrheagut healthmicrobiotaphytogenic additiveThis research evaluated a feed additive (benzoic acid, eugenol, thymol, and piperine), associated or not with colistin, in weaned piglets feeding. The parameters evaluated were growth performance, apparent total tract digestibility (ATTD) of nutrients, diarrhea incidence, intestinal morphology, relative weights of digestive organs, microbial diversity, and the percentages of operational taxonomic units of microorganisms in the cecum content of pigs. One-hundred and eight crossbred piglets (5.3 +/- 0.5 kg) were used in a three-phase feeding program (21 to 35, 36 to 50, 51 to 65 d of age) and fed a control diet with no inclusion of growth promoter feed additive, a diet with 40 ppm of colistin, a diet with 0.3% of alternative additive, and a diet with 0.3% of alternative additive and 40 ppm of colistin. The diets were based on corn, soybean meal, dairy products, and spray-dried blood plasma and formulated to provide 3.40, 3.38, and 3.20 Mcal of ME/kg and 14.5, 13.3, and 10.9 g/kg of digestible lysine, in phases 1, 2, and 3, respectively. The piglets were housed three per pen, with nine replicates per diet, in a complete randomized block design based on initial BW. The data were submitted to ANOVA and means were separated by Tukey test (5%), using SAS. Pigs fed diets with the alternative feed additive had greater (P < 0.05) ADG (114.3 vs. 91.8 g) and ADFI (190.1 vs. 163.3 g) in phase 1 than pigs fed diets without the product. The alternative additive improved (P < 0.05) ATTD of crude protein (CP) in phase 1 (71.0% vs. 68.6%), gross energy in phases 1 (77.4% vs. 75.2%) and 3 (79.0% vs. 77.1%), and dry matter in phase 3 (79.1% vs. 77.1%). The antibiotic inclusion in the diets increased (P < 0.05) ATTD of CP in phase 1 (71.5% vs. 68.2%). The alternative feed additive tended (P = 0.06) to increase (46%) normal feces frequency, decreased (P < 0.05) goblet cells count (104.3 vs. 118.1) in the jejunum, and decreased (P < 0.05) small intestine (4.60% vs. 4.93%) and colon (1.41% vs. 1.65%) relative weights, compared with pigs not fed with the alternative additive. There was a tendency (P = 0.09) for a lower concentration of Escherichia-Shigella (1.46% vs. 3.5%) and lower (P < 0.05) percentage of Campylobacter (0.52% vs. 10.21%) in the cecum content of piglets fed diets containing essential oils and benzoic acid compared with pigs fed diets without the alternative feed additive. The alternative feed additive was effective in improving growth performance, diets digestibility, and gut health in piglets soon after weaning.Sao Paulo State Univ, Fac Agr & Technol Sci, BR-17900000 Dracena, SP, BrazilDSM Nutr Prod Brazil SA, BR-01451905 Sao Paulo, SP, BrazilInst Anim Sci & Pastures, BR-13460000 Nova Odessa, SP, BrazilUniv Sao Paulo, Luiz de Queiroz Coll Agr, Dept Anim Sci, BR-13418900 Piracicaba, SP, BrazilNGS Solucoes Genom, BR-13416030 Piracicaba, SP, BrazilSao Paulo State Univ, Fac Agr & Technol Sci, BR-17900000 Dracena, SP, BrazilOxford Univ Press IncUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)DSM Nutr Prod Brazil SAInst Anim Sci & PasturesUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)NGS Solucoes GenomSilva Junior, Claudio D. [UNESP]Martins, Claudia C. S.Dias, Francine T. F.Sitanaka, Natalia Y.Ferracioli, Leticia B.Moraes, Jose E.Pizzolante, Carla C.Budino, Fabio E. L.Pereira, RafaelaTizioto, PolyanaPaula, Vinicius R. C.Coutinho, Luiz L.Ruiz, Urbano S.2020-12-10T17:34:06Z2020-12-10T17:34:06Z2020-05-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article10http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jas/skaa119Journal Of Animal Science. Cary: Oxford Univ Press Inc, v. 98, n. 5, 10 p., 2020.0021-8812http://hdl.handle.net/11449/19542010.1093/jas/skaa119WOS:000537847300016Web of Sciencereponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengJournal Of Animal Scienceinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-10-23T07:21:30Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/195420Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T15:38:27.347386Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The use of an alternative feed additive, containing benzoic acid, thymol, eugenol, and piperine, improved growth performance, nutrient and energy digestibility, and gut health in weaned piglets
title The use of an alternative feed additive, containing benzoic acid, thymol, eugenol, and piperine, improved growth performance, nutrient and energy digestibility, and gut health in weaned piglets
spellingShingle The use of an alternative feed additive, containing benzoic acid, thymol, eugenol, and piperine, improved growth performance, nutrient and energy digestibility, and gut health in weaned piglets
Silva Junior, Claudio D. [UNESP]
diarrhea
gut health
microbiota
phytogenic additive
title_short The use of an alternative feed additive, containing benzoic acid, thymol, eugenol, and piperine, improved growth performance, nutrient and energy digestibility, and gut health in weaned piglets
title_full The use of an alternative feed additive, containing benzoic acid, thymol, eugenol, and piperine, improved growth performance, nutrient and energy digestibility, and gut health in weaned piglets
title_fullStr The use of an alternative feed additive, containing benzoic acid, thymol, eugenol, and piperine, improved growth performance, nutrient and energy digestibility, and gut health in weaned piglets
title_full_unstemmed The use of an alternative feed additive, containing benzoic acid, thymol, eugenol, and piperine, improved growth performance, nutrient and energy digestibility, and gut health in weaned piglets
title_sort The use of an alternative feed additive, containing benzoic acid, thymol, eugenol, and piperine, improved growth performance, nutrient and energy digestibility, and gut health in weaned piglets
author Silva Junior, Claudio D. [UNESP]
author_facet Silva Junior, Claudio D. [UNESP]
Martins, Claudia C. S.
Dias, Francine T. F.
Sitanaka, Natalia Y.
Ferracioli, Leticia B.
Moraes, Jose E.
Pizzolante, Carla C.
Budino, Fabio E. L.
Pereira, Rafaela
Tizioto, Polyana
Paula, Vinicius R. C.
Coutinho, Luiz L.
Ruiz, Urbano S.
author_role author
author2 Martins, Claudia C. S.
Dias, Francine T. F.
Sitanaka, Natalia Y.
Ferracioli, Leticia B.
Moraes, Jose E.
Pizzolante, Carla C.
Budino, Fabio E. L.
Pereira, Rafaela
Tizioto, Polyana
Paula, Vinicius R. C.
Coutinho, Luiz L.
Ruiz, Urbano S.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
DSM Nutr Prod Brazil SA
Inst Anim Sci & Pastures
Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
NGS Solucoes Genom
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Silva Junior, Claudio D. [UNESP]
Martins, Claudia C. S.
Dias, Francine T. F.
Sitanaka, Natalia Y.
Ferracioli, Leticia B.
Moraes, Jose E.
Pizzolante, Carla C.
Budino, Fabio E. L.
Pereira, Rafaela
Tizioto, Polyana
Paula, Vinicius R. C.
Coutinho, Luiz L.
Ruiz, Urbano S.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv diarrhea
gut health
microbiota
phytogenic additive
topic diarrhea
gut health
microbiota
phytogenic additive
description This research evaluated a feed additive (benzoic acid, eugenol, thymol, and piperine), associated or not with colistin, in weaned piglets feeding. The parameters evaluated were growth performance, apparent total tract digestibility (ATTD) of nutrients, diarrhea incidence, intestinal morphology, relative weights of digestive organs, microbial diversity, and the percentages of operational taxonomic units of microorganisms in the cecum content of pigs. One-hundred and eight crossbred piglets (5.3 +/- 0.5 kg) were used in a three-phase feeding program (21 to 35, 36 to 50, 51 to 65 d of age) and fed a control diet with no inclusion of growth promoter feed additive, a diet with 40 ppm of colistin, a diet with 0.3% of alternative additive, and a diet with 0.3% of alternative additive and 40 ppm of colistin. The diets were based on corn, soybean meal, dairy products, and spray-dried blood plasma and formulated to provide 3.40, 3.38, and 3.20 Mcal of ME/kg and 14.5, 13.3, and 10.9 g/kg of digestible lysine, in phases 1, 2, and 3, respectively. The piglets were housed three per pen, with nine replicates per diet, in a complete randomized block design based on initial BW. The data were submitted to ANOVA and means were separated by Tukey test (5%), using SAS. Pigs fed diets with the alternative feed additive had greater (P < 0.05) ADG (114.3 vs. 91.8 g) and ADFI (190.1 vs. 163.3 g) in phase 1 than pigs fed diets without the product. The alternative additive improved (P < 0.05) ATTD of crude protein (CP) in phase 1 (71.0% vs. 68.6%), gross energy in phases 1 (77.4% vs. 75.2%) and 3 (79.0% vs. 77.1%), and dry matter in phase 3 (79.1% vs. 77.1%). The antibiotic inclusion in the diets increased (P < 0.05) ATTD of CP in phase 1 (71.5% vs. 68.2%). The alternative feed additive tended (P = 0.06) to increase (46%) normal feces frequency, decreased (P < 0.05) goblet cells count (104.3 vs. 118.1) in the jejunum, and decreased (P < 0.05) small intestine (4.60% vs. 4.93%) and colon (1.41% vs. 1.65%) relative weights, compared with pigs not fed with the alternative additive. There was a tendency (P = 0.09) for a lower concentration of Escherichia-Shigella (1.46% vs. 3.5%) and lower (P < 0.05) percentage of Campylobacter (0.52% vs. 10.21%) in the cecum content of piglets fed diets containing essential oils and benzoic acid compared with pigs fed diets without the alternative feed additive. The alternative feed additive was effective in improving growth performance, diets digestibility, and gut health in piglets soon after weaning.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-12-10T17:34:06Z
2020-12-10T17:34:06Z
2020-05-01
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jas/skaa119
Journal Of Animal Science. Cary: Oxford Univ Press Inc, v. 98, n. 5, 10 p., 2020.
0021-8812
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/195420
10.1093/jas/skaa119
WOS:000537847300016
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jas/skaa119
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/195420
identifier_str_mv Journal Of Animal Science. Cary: Oxford Univ Press Inc, v. 98, n. 5, 10 p., 2020.
0021-8812
10.1093/jas/skaa119
WOS:000537847300016
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Journal Of Animal Science
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 10
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Oxford Univ Press Inc
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Oxford Univ Press Inc
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Web of Science
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808128543066947584