How Much Time Should Be Waited and What Are the Main Findings to Evaluate the Hepatocellular Carcinoma Response to Regorafenib? A Real-Life Experience

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Kawanami, Gustavo Hideki
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Katsuda, Leopoldo, Rocha, Thiara Barcelos [UNESP], Da Silva Yamashiro, Fabio, Pelafsky, Leonardo [UNESP], Qi, Xingshun, Romeiro, Fernando Gomes [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/6219896
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/207911
Resumo: Background. Hepatocellular carcinoma is a relevant cause of mortality worldwide, mainly among patients who have a prior liver disease. In spite of clear recommendations regarding surveillance and screening methods, most patients are still diagnosed only when they are no longer candidates to curative treatment modalities, while others do not achieve the goals of such treatments, thus increasing the need of anticancer drugs. Moreover, when cirrhotic patients begin to receive these drugs, many types of adverse events are seen as a reason to withdrawal, even when there are findings suggesting a good response to the treatment. Case Summary. This case report is about a cirrhotic patient who received many types of treatment, from surgery and chemoembolization during early stages to first- and second-line systemic therapy when the disease turned to be advanced. Since he had no signs of liver dysfunction and suffered tumor progression during sorafenib treatment, regorafenib was initiated. The main findings that make this case important are the adverse events after taking this second-line agent, which would certainly be considered unacceptable and would lead to the drug withdrawal. The reasons why regorafenib was maintained are explained based on clinical and imaging findings, showing how this decision led to an excellent response. Conclusions. The knowledge of the main adverse events described in the pilot clinical trials can avoid unnecessary withdrawal of regorafenib. In addition, some clinical and imaging findings can be deemed as predictors of good response to tyrosine kinase inhibitors.
id UNSP_2b3b683221cd740826aeaa13384ae0ae
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/207911
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling How Much Time Should Be Waited and What Are the Main Findings to Evaluate the Hepatocellular Carcinoma Response to Regorafenib? A Real-Life ExperienceBackground. Hepatocellular carcinoma is a relevant cause of mortality worldwide, mainly among patients who have a prior liver disease. In spite of clear recommendations regarding surveillance and screening methods, most patients are still diagnosed only when they are no longer candidates to curative treatment modalities, while others do not achieve the goals of such treatments, thus increasing the need of anticancer drugs. Moreover, when cirrhotic patients begin to receive these drugs, many types of adverse events are seen as a reason to withdrawal, even when there are findings suggesting a good response to the treatment. Case Summary. This case report is about a cirrhotic patient who received many types of treatment, from surgery and chemoembolization during early stages to first- and second-line systemic therapy when the disease turned to be advanced. Since he had no signs of liver dysfunction and suffered tumor progression during sorafenib treatment, regorafenib was initiated. The main findings that make this case important are the adverse events after taking this second-line agent, which would certainly be considered unacceptable and would lead to the drug withdrawal. The reasons why regorafenib was maintained are explained based on clinical and imaging findings, showing how this decision led to an excellent response. Conclusions. The knowledge of the main adverse events described in the pilot clinical trials can avoid unnecessary withdrawal of regorafenib. In addition, some clinical and imaging findings can be deemed as predictors of good response to tyrosine kinase inhibitors.Fundação Para O Desenvolvimento Médico e Hospitalar Hospital Estadual de BauruImagem Diagnósticos Médicos BauruGastroenterology Division Department of Internal Medicine Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Surgery Department Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Department of Gastroenterology General Hospital of Northern Theater Command (Formerly General Hospital of Shenyang Military Area)Gastroenterology Division Department of Internal Medicine Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Surgery Department Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Fundação Para O Desenvolvimento Médico e Hospitalar Hospital Estadual de BauruBauruUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)General Hospital of Northern Theater Command (Formerly General Hospital of Shenyang Military Area)Kawanami, Gustavo HidekiKatsuda, LeopoldoRocha, Thiara Barcelos [UNESP]Da Silva Yamashiro, FabioPelafsky, Leonardo [UNESP]Qi, XingshunRomeiro, Fernando Gomes [UNESP]2021-06-25T11:03:07Z2021-06-25T11:03:07Z2021-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/6219896Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, v. 2021.2291-27972291-2789http://hdl.handle.net/11449/20791110.1155/2021/62198962-s2.0-85100960020Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengCanadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatologyinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-09-30T17:35:29Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/207911Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestrepositoriounesp@unesp.bropendoar:29462024-09-30T17:35:29Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv How Much Time Should Be Waited and What Are the Main Findings to Evaluate the Hepatocellular Carcinoma Response to Regorafenib? A Real-Life Experience
title How Much Time Should Be Waited and What Are the Main Findings to Evaluate the Hepatocellular Carcinoma Response to Regorafenib? A Real-Life Experience
spellingShingle How Much Time Should Be Waited and What Are the Main Findings to Evaluate the Hepatocellular Carcinoma Response to Regorafenib? A Real-Life Experience
Kawanami, Gustavo Hideki
title_short How Much Time Should Be Waited and What Are the Main Findings to Evaluate the Hepatocellular Carcinoma Response to Regorafenib? A Real-Life Experience
title_full How Much Time Should Be Waited and What Are the Main Findings to Evaluate the Hepatocellular Carcinoma Response to Regorafenib? A Real-Life Experience
title_fullStr How Much Time Should Be Waited and What Are the Main Findings to Evaluate the Hepatocellular Carcinoma Response to Regorafenib? A Real-Life Experience
title_full_unstemmed How Much Time Should Be Waited and What Are the Main Findings to Evaluate the Hepatocellular Carcinoma Response to Regorafenib? A Real-Life Experience
title_sort How Much Time Should Be Waited and What Are the Main Findings to Evaluate the Hepatocellular Carcinoma Response to Regorafenib? A Real-Life Experience
author Kawanami, Gustavo Hideki
author_facet Kawanami, Gustavo Hideki
Katsuda, Leopoldo
Rocha, Thiara Barcelos [UNESP]
Da Silva Yamashiro, Fabio
Pelafsky, Leonardo [UNESP]
Qi, Xingshun
Romeiro, Fernando Gomes [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Katsuda, Leopoldo
Rocha, Thiara Barcelos [UNESP]
Da Silva Yamashiro, Fabio
Pelafsky, Leonardo [UNESP]
Qi, Xingshun
Romeiro, Fernando Gomes [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Fundação Para O Desenvolvimento Médico e Hospitalar Hospital Estadual de Bauru
Bauru
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
General Hospital of Northern Theater Command (Formerly General Hospital of Shenyang Military Area)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Kawanami, Gustavo Hideki
Katsuda, Leopoldo
Rocha, Thiara Barcelos [UNESP]
Da Silva Yamashiro, Fabio
Pelafsky, Leonardo [UNESP]
Qi, Xingshun
Romeiro, Fernando Gomes [UNESP]
description Background. Hepatocellular carcinoma is a relevant cause of mortality worldwide, mainly among patients who have a prior liver disease. In spite of clear recommendations regarding surveillance and screening methods, most patients are still diagnosed only when they are no longer candidates to curative treatment modalities, while others do not achieve the goals of such treatments, thus increasing the need of anticancer drugs. Moreover, when cirrhotic patients begin to receive these drugs, many types of adverse events are seen as a reason to withdrawal, even when there are findings suggesting a good response to the treatment. Case Summary. This case report is about a cirrhotic patient who received many types of treatment, from surgery and chemoembolization during early stages to first- and second-line systemic therapy when the disease turned to be advanced. Since he had no signs of liver dysfunction and suffered tumor progression during sorafenib treatment, regorafenib was initiated. The main findings that make this case important are the adverse events after taking this second-line agent, which would certainly be considered unacceptable and would lead to the drug withdrawal. The reasons why regorafenib was maintained are explained based on clinical and imaging findings, showing how this decision led to an excellent response. Conclusions. The knowledge of the main adverse events described in the pilot clinical trials can avoid unnecessary withdrawal of regorafenib. In addition, some clinical and imaging findings can be deemed as predictors of good response to tyrosine kinase inhibitors.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-06-25T11:03:07Z
2021-06-25T11:03:07Z
2021-01-01
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/6219896
Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, v. 2021.
2291-2797
2291-2789
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/207911
10.1155/2021/6219896
2-s2.0-85100960020
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/6219896
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/207911
identifier_str_mv Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, v. 2021.
2291-2797
2291-2789
10.1155/2021/6219896
2-s2.0-85100960020
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repositoriounesp@unesp.br
_version_ 1813546474046226432