How Much Time Should Be Waited and What Are the Main Findings to Evaluate the Hepatocellular Carcinoma Response to Regorafenib? A Real-Life Experience
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/6219896 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/207911 |
Resumo: | Background. Hepatocellular carcinoma is a relevant cause of mortality worldwide, mainly among patients who have a prior liver disease. In spite of clear recommendations regarding surveillance and screening methods, most patients are still diagnosed only when they are no longer candidates to curative treatment modalities, while others do not achieve the goals of such treatments, thus increasing the need of anticancer drugs. Moreover, when cirrhotic patients begin to receive these drugs, many types of adverse events are seen as a reason to withdrawal, even when there are findings suggesting a good response to the treatment. Case Summary. This case report is about a cirrhotic patient who received many types of treatment, from surgery and chemoembolization during early stages to first- and second-line systemic therapy when the disease turned to be advanced. Since he had no signs of liver dysfunction and suffered tumor progression during sorafenib treatment, regorafenib was initiated. The main findings that make this case important are the adverse events after taking this second-line agent, which would certainly be considered unacceptable and would lead to the drug withdrawal. The reasons why regorafenib was maintained are explained based on clinical and imaging findings, showing how this decision led to an excellent response. Conclusions. The knowledge of the main adverse events described in the pilot clinical trials can avoid unnecessary withdrawal of regorafenib. In addition, some clinical and imaging findings can be deemed as predictors of good response to tyrosine kinase inhibitors. |
id |
UNSP_2b3b683221cd740826aeaa13384ae0ae |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/207911 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
How Much Time Should Be Waited and What Are the Main Findings to Evaluate the Hepatocellular Carcinoma Response to Regorafenib? A Real-Life ExperienceBackground. Hepatocellular carcinoma is a relevant cause of mortality worldwide, mainly among patients who have a prior liver disease. In spite of clear recommendations regarding surveillance and screening methods, most patients are still diagnosed only when they are no longer candidates to curative treatment modalities, while others do not achieve the goals of such treatments, thus increasing the need of anticancer drugs. Moreover, when cirrhotic patients begin to receive these drugs, many types of adverse events are seen as a reason to withdrawal, even when there are findings suggesting a good response to the treatment. Case Summary. This case report is about a cirrhotic patient who received many types of treatment, from surgery and chemoembolization during early stages to first- and second-line systemic therapy when the disease turned to be advanced. Since he had no signs of liver dysfunction and suffered tumor progression during sorafenib treatment, regorafenib was initiated. The main findings that make this case important are the adverse events after taking this second-line agent, which would certainly be considered unacceptable and would lead to the drug withdrawal. The reasons why regorafenib was maintained are explained based on clinical and imaging findings, showing how this decision led to an excellent response. Conclusions. The knowledge of the main adverse events described in the pilot clinical trials can avoid unnecessary withdrawal of regorafenib. In addition, some clinical and imaging findings can be deemed as predictors of good response to tyrosine kinase inhibitors.Fundação Para O Desenvolvimento Médico e Hospitalar Hospital Estadual de BauruImagem Diagnósticos Médicos BauruGastroenterology Division Department of Internal Medicine Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Surgery Department Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Department of Gastroenterology General Hospital of Northern Theater Command (Formerly General Hospital of Shenyang Military Area)Gastroenterology Division Department of Internal Medicine Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Surgery Department Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Fundação Para O Desenvolvimento Médico e Hospitalar Hospital Estadual de BauruBauruUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)General Hospital of Northern Theater Command (Formerly General Hospital of Shenyang Military Area)Kawanami, Gustavo HidekiKatsuda, LeopoldoRocha, Thiara Barcelos [UNESP]Da Silva Yamashiro, FabioPelafsky, Leonardo [UNESP]Qi, XingshunRomeiro, Fernando Gomes [UNESP]2021-06-25T11:03:07Z2021-06-25T11:03:07Z2021-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/6219896Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, v. 2021.2291-27972291-2789http://hdl.handle.net/11449/20791110.1155/2021/62198962-s2.0-85100960020Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengCanadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatologyinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-09-30T17:35:29Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/207911Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestrepositoriounesp@unesp.bropendoar:29462024-09-30T17:35:29Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
How Much Time Should Be Waited and What Are the Main Findings to Evaluate the Hepatocellular Carcinoma Response to Regorafenib? A Real-Life Experience |
title |
How Much Time Should Be Waited and What Are the Main Findings to Evaluate the Hepatocellular Carcinoma Response to Regorafenib? A Real-Life Experience |
spellingShingle |
How Much Time Should Be Waited and What Are the Main Findings to Evaluate the Hepatocellular Carcinoma Response to Regorafenib? A Real-Life Experience Kawanami, Gustavo Hideki |
title_short |
How Much Time Should Be Waited and What Are the Main Findings to Evaluate the Hepatocellular Carcinoma Response to Regorafenib? A Real-Life Experience |
title_full |
How Much Time Should Be Waited and What Are the Main Findings to Evaluate the Hepatocellular Carcinoma Response to Regorafenib? A Real-Life Experience |
title_fullStr |
How Much Time Should Be Waited and What Are the Main Findings to Evaluate the Hepatocellular Carcinoma Response to Regorafenib? A Real-Life Experience |
title_full_unstemmed |
How Much Time Should Be Waited and What Are the Main Findings to Evaluate the Hepatocellular Carcinoma Response to Regorafenib? A Real-Life Experience |
title_sort |
How Much Time Should Be Waited and What Are the Main Findings to Evaluate the Hepatocellular Carcinoma Response to Regorafenib? A Real-Life Experience |
author |
Kawanami, Gustavo Hideki |
author_facet |
Kawanami, Gustavo Hideki Katsuda, Leopoldo Rocha, Thiara Barcelos [UNESP] Da Silva Yamashiro, Fabio Pelafsky, Leonardo [UNESP] Qi, Xingshun Romeiro, Fernando Gomes [UNESP] |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Katsuda, Leopoldo Rocha, Thiara Barcelos [UNESP] Da Silva Yamashiro, Fabio Pelafsky, Leonardo [UNESP] Qi, Xingshun Romeiro, Fernando Gomes [UNESP] |
author2_role |
author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Fundação Para O Desenvolvimento Médico e Hospitalar Hospital Estadual de Bauru Bauru Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) General Hospital of Northern Theater Command (Formerly General Hospital of Shenyang Military Area) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Kawanami, Gustavo Hideki Katsuda, Leopoldo Rocha, Thiara Barcelos [UNESP] Da Silva Yamashiro, Fabio Pelafsky, Leonardo [UNESP] Qi, Xingshun Romeiro, Fernando Gomes [UNESP] |
description |
Background. Hepatocellular carcinoma is a relevant cause of mortality worldwide, mainly among patients who have a prior liver disease. In spite of clear recommendations regarding surveillance and screening methods, most patients are still diagnosed only when they are no longer candidates to curative treatment modalities, while others do not achieve the goals of such treatments, thus increasing the need of anticancer drugs. Moreover, when cirrhotic patients begin to receive these drugs, many types of adverse events are seen as a reason to withdrawal, even when there are findings suggesting a good response to the treatment. Case Summary. This case report is about a cirrhotic patient who received many types of treatment, from surgery and chemoembolization during early stages to first- and second-line systemic therapy when the disease turned to be advanced. Since he had no signs of liver dysfunction and suffered tumor progression during sorafenib treatment, regorafenib was initiated. The main findings that make this case important are the adverse events after taking this second-line agent, which would certainly be considered unacceptable and would lead to the drug withdrawal. The reasons why regorafenib was maintained are explained based on clinical and imaging findings, showing how this decision led to an excellent response. Conclusions. The knowledge of the main adverse events described in the pilot clinical trials can avoid unnecessary withdrawal of regorafenib. In addition, some clinical and imaging findings can be deemed as predictors of good response to tyrosine kinase inhibitors. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-06-25T11:03:07Z 2021-06-25T11:03:07Z 2021-01-01 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/6219896 Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, v. 2021. 2291-2797 2291-2789 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/207911 10.1155/2021/6219896 2-s2.0-85100960020 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/6219896 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/207911 |
identifier_str_mv |
Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, v. 2021. 2291-2797 2291-2789 10.1155/2021/6219896 2-s2.0-85100960020 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
repositoriounesp@unesp.br |
_version_ |
1813546474046226432 |