Can phytogenic additives improve the performance of broilers and replace growth-promoting antibiotics? A meta-analytic approach

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Polycarpo, Gustavo Do Valle [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: de Lima, Gabrieli Andressa [UNESP], Ávida, Thaís de Souza [UNESP], Rosas, Fábio Sampaio [UNESP], Cruz-Polycarpo, Valquíria Cação [UNESP], Biller, Jaqueline Dalbello [UNESP], Barbosa, Bárbara Fernanda da Silva [UNESP], Burbarelli, Maria Fernanda de Castro
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/cjas-2021-0058
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/241891
Resumo: Phytogenic additives have been studied intensively in broiler chicken production to substitute growth-promoting antibiotics. However, the comprehensive literature on this topic makes it difficult to understand overall results because there are a noticeable number of studies with conflicting conclusions. While several research studies have shown that phytogenic additives may increment broiler chicken’s performance, others make the opposite evident. This study aimed to organize and understand information through meta-analysis considering a great number of publications and the factors that may interfere in the results of phytogenic additives, evaluating whether phytogenic additives can be used as a performance-enhancing additive for broilers, when compared with the effectiveness of growth-promoting antibiotics. The main factor that interferes in the evaluation of phytogenic additives is the microbiological challenge. Phytogenic additives improved average daily gain (ADG) (P < 0.001) and feed conversion (P < 0.001) regardless of microbiological challenge; however, they were worse compared with antibiotics under higher challenge (P < 0.020). A meta-regression of ADG in function of average daily feed intake confirmed that phytogenic additives increased the feed efficiency of broilers, but with less effectiveness than antibiotics. The blends of phytogenic additives increased the ADG in relation to the isolated use of only one phytogenic additive.
id UNSP_2bf13dd78341aec6ad5a9797d7ac8648
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/241891
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Can phytogenic additives improve the performance of broilers and replace growth-promoting antibiotics? A meta-analytic approachaqueous plant extractchickenessential oilgrowth promoterplant extractPhytogenic additives have been studied intensively in broiler chicken production to substitute growth-promoting antibiotics. However, the comprehensive literature on this topic makes it difficult to understand overall results because there are a noticeable number of studies with conflicting conclusions. While several research studies have shown that phytogenic additives may increment broiler chicken’s performance, others make the opposite evident. This study aimed to organize and understand information through meta-analysis considering a great number of publications and the factors that may interfere in the results of phytogenic additives, evaluating whether phytogenic additives can be used as a performance-enhancing additive for broilers, when compared with the effectiveness of growth-promoting antibiotics. The main factor that interferes in the evaluation of phytogenic additives is the microbiological challenge. Phytogenic additives improved average daily gain (ADG) (P < 0.001) and feed conversion (P < 0.001) regardless of microbiological challenge; however, they were worse compared with antibiotics under higher challenge (P < 0.020). A meta-regression of ADG in function of average daily feed intake confirmed that phytogenic additives increased the feed efficiency of broilers, but with less effectiveness than antibiotics. The blends of phytogenic additives increased the ADG in relation to the isolated use of only one phytogenic additive.São Paulo State University (UNESP) College of Technology and Agricultural Sciences, SPUniversity of Grande Dourados – UFGD College of Agricultural Sciences Unit II, MSSão Paulo State University (UNESP) College of Technology and Agricultural Sciences, SPUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Unit IIPolycarpo, Gustavo Do Valle [UNESP]de Lima, Gabrieli Andressa [UNESP]Ávida, Thaís de Souza [UNESP]Rosas, Fábio Sampaio [UNESP]Cruz-Polycarpo, Valquíria Cação [UNESP]Biller, Jaqueline Dalbello [UNESP]Barbosa, Bárbara Fernanda da Silva [UNESP]Burbarelli, Maria Fernanda de Castro2023-03-02T02:50:14Z2023-03-02T02:50:14Z2022-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article289-300http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/cjas-2021-0058Canadian Journal of Animal Science, v. 102, n. 2, p. 289-300, 2022.1918-18250008-3984http://hdl.handle.net/11449/24189110.1139/cjas-2021-00582-s2.0-85130931487Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengCanadian Journal of Animal Scienceinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-03-02T02:50:14Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/241891Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462023-03-02T02:50:14Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Can phytogenic additives improve the performance of broilers and replace growth-promoting antibiotics? A meta-analytic approach
title Can phytogenic additives improve the performance of broilers and replace growth-promoting antibiotics? A meta-analytic approach
spellingShingle Can phytogenic additives improve the performance of broilers and replace growth-promoting antibiotics? A meta-analytic approach
Polycarpo, Gustavo Do Valle [UNESP]
aqueous plant extract
chicken
essential oil
growth promoter
plant extract
title_short Can phytogenic additives improve the performance of broilers and replace growth-promoting antibiotics? A meta-analytic approach
title_full Can phytogenic additives improve the performance of broilers and replace growth-promoting antibiotics? A meta-analytic approach
title_fullStr Can phytogenic additives improve the performance of broilers and replace growth-promoting antibiotics? A meta-analytic approach
title_full_unstemmed Can phytogenic additives improve the performance of broilers and replace growth-promoting antibiotics? A meta-analytic approach
title_sort Can phytogenic additives improve the performance of broilers and replace growth-promoting antibiotics? A meta-analytic approach
author Polycarpo, Gustavo Do Valle [UNESP]
author_facet Polycarpo, Gustavo Do Valle [UNESP]
de Lima, Gabrieli Andressa [UNESP]
Ávida, Thaís de Souza [UNESP]
Rosas, Fábio Sampaio [UNESP]
Cruz-Polycarpo, Valquíria Cação [UNESP]
Biller, Jaqueline Dalbello [UNESP]
Barbosa, Bárbara Fernanda da Silva [UNESP]
Burbarelli, Maria Fernanda de Castro
author_role author
author2 de Lima, Gabrieli Andressa [UNESP]
Ávida, Thaís de Souza [UNESP]
Rosas, Fábio Sampaio [UNESP]
Cruz-Polycarpo, Valquíria Cação [UNESP]
Biller, Jaqueline Dalbello [UNESP]
Barbosa, Bárbara Fernanda da Silva [UNESP]
Burbarelli, Maria Fernanda de Castro
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
Unit II
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Polycarpo, Gustavo Do Valle [UNESP]
de Lima, Gabrieli Andressa [UNESP]
Ávida, Thaís de Souza [UNESP]
Rosas, Fábio Sampaio [UNESP]
Cruz-Polycarpo, Valquíria Cação [UNESP]
Biller, Jaqueline Dalbello [UNESP]
Barbosa, Bárbara Fernanda da Silva [UNESP]
Burbarelli, Maria Fernanda de Castro
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv aqueous plant extract
chicken
essential oil
growth promoter
plant extract
topic aqueous plant extract
chicken
essential oil
growth promoter
plant extract
description Phytogenic additives have been studied intensively in broiler chicken production to substitute growth-promoting antibiotics. However, the comprehensive literature on this topic makes it difficult to understand overall results because there are a noticeable number of studies with conflicting conclusions. While several research studies have shown that phytogenic additives may increment broiler chicken’s performance, others make the opposite evident. This study aimed to organize and understand information through meta-analysis considering a great number of publications and the factors that may interfere in the results of phytogenic additives, evaluating whether phytogenic additives can be used as a performance-enhancing additive for broilers, when compared with the effectiveness of growth-promoting antibiotics. The main factor that interferes in the evaluation of phytogenic additives is the microbiological challenge. Phytogenic additives improved average daily gain (ADG) (P < 0.001) and feed conversion (P < 0.001) regardless of microbiological challenge; however, they were worse compared with antibiotics under higher challenge (P < 0.020). A meta-regression of ADG in function of average daily feed intake confirmed that phytogenic additives increased the feed efficiency of broilers, but with less effectiveness than antibiotics. The blends of phytogenic additives increased the ADG in relation to the isolated use of only one phytogenic additive.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-01-01
2023-03-02T02:50:14Z
2023-03-02T02:50:14Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/cjas-2021-0058
Canadian Journal of Animal Science, v. 102, n. 2, p. 289-300, 2022.
1918-1825
0008-3984
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/241891
10.1139/cjas-2021-0058
2-s2.0-85130931487
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/cjas-2021-0058
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/241891
identifier_str_mv Canadian Journal of Animal Science, v. 102, n. 2, p. 289-300, 2022.
1918-1825
0008-3984
10.1139/cjas-2021-0058
2-s2.0-85130931487
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Canadian Journal of Animal Science
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 289-300
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1797790223630860288