Soil compaction management and soybean yields with cover crops under no-till and occasional chiseling

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Calonego, Juliano C. [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Raphael, Juan P. A. [UNESP], Rigon, Joao P. G. [UNESP], Oliveira Neto, Leontino de [UNESP], Rosolem, Ciro A. [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2017.02.001
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/162679
Resumo: The introduction of cover crops in agricultural systems under no-till is important in soil structuring and remediation. However, there is a lack of studies exploring the effects of cover crops compared with other soil compaction control tools, such as chiseling, in the long term, mainly under tropical climates. This study aimed to evaluate soil physical properties by cover crops and chiseling in a compacted soil, as well as its effects on soybean yields. The experiment was conducted in Botucatu, Brazil, under no-till. Three crops were grown per year. Soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merrill] was cropped as summer crop in rotation with triticale (X Triticosecale Wittmack) or sunflower [Helianthus annuus (L.)] as fall/winter crop. In spring, three different cover crops were grown, pearl millet [Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Brown], forage sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] and sunn hemp [Crotalaria juncea (L.)], compared to a fallow treatment, which was chiseled in 2003, 2009 and 2013 only, always in October and down to 0.60 m depth. The first chiseling increased soil macroporosity and soybean yields in the immediate cropping season (2003/2004). However, these benefits were short-lived and in two years the use of cover crops resulted in higher yields. In the long-term, cover crops improve soil structure, with equal or better results than those obtained by occasional chiseling, as an increase in soil macroporosity by sunn hemp up to 0.20 m depth and a decrease in soil bulk density by sunn hemp and pearl millet in the 0.40-0.60 m layer. Among the cover crops, sunn hemp is particularly interesting, because it increases macroporosity in clay soils otherwise with limited aeration and increases the soybean yield. (C) 2017 Published by Elsevier B.V.
id UNSP_2cda20cfd0a0512bf17bf9c6195e3c99
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/162679
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Soil compaction management and soybean yields with cover crops under no-till and occasional chiselingAgricultural managementCrop rotationLand use effectsSoil physical proprietiesNo-tillSoil use and managementThe introduction of cover crops in agricultural systems under no-till is important in soil structuring and remediation. However, there is a lack of studies exploring the effects of cover crops compared with other soil compaction control tools, such as chiseling, in the long term, mainly under tropical climates. This study aimed to evaluate soil physical properties by cover crops and chiseling in a compacted soil, as well as its effects on soybean yields. The experiment was conducted in Botucatu, Brazil, under no-till. Three crops were grown per year. Soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merrill] was cropped as summer crop in rotation with triticale (X Triticosecale Wittmack) or sunflower [Helianthus annuus (L.)] as fall/winter crop. In spring, three different cover crops were grown, pearl millet [Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Brown], forage sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] and sunn hemp [Crotalaria juncea (L.)], compared to a fallow treatment, which was chiseled in 2003, 2009 and 2013 only, always in October and down to 0.60 m depth. The first chiseling increased soil macroporosity and soybean yields in the immediate cropping season (2003/2004). However, these benefits were short-lived and in two years the use of cover crops resulted in higher yields. In the long-term, cover crops improve soil structure, with equal or better results than those obtained by occasional chiseling, as an increase in soil macroporosity by sunn hemp up to 0.20 m depth and a decrease in soil bulk density by sunn hemp and pearl millet in the 0.40-0.60 m layer. Among the cover crops, sunn hemp is particularly interesting, because it increases macroporosity in clay soils otherwise with limited aeration and increases the soybean yield. (C) 2017 Published by Elsevier B.V.Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)Sao Paulo State Univ, Coll Agr Sci, Dept Crop Sci, Jose Barbosa Barros St 1780, BR-18610307 Botucatu, SP, BrazilSao Paulo State Univ, Coll Agr Sci, Dept Crop Sci, Jose Barbosa Barros St 1780, BR-18610307 Botucatu, SP, BrazilElsevier B.V.Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Calonego, Juliano C. [UNESP]Raphael, Juan P. A. [UNESP]Rigon, Joao P. G. [UNESP]Oliveira Neto, Leontino de [UNESP]Rosolem, Ciro A. [UNESP]2018-11-26T17:24:25Z2018-11-26T17:24:25Z2017-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article31-37application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2017.02.001European Journal Of Agronomy. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Bv, v. 85, p. 31-37, 2017.1161-0301http://hdl.handle.net/11449/16267910.1016/j.eja.2017.02.001WOS:000398877100004WOS000398877100004.pdf57207758732595280000-0003-2001-0874Web of Sciencereponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengEuropean Journal Of Agronomy1,335info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-04-30T15:59:53Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/162679Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-04-30T15:59:53Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Soil compaction management and soybean yields with cover crops under no-till and occasional chiseling
title Soil compaction management and soybean yields with cover crops under no-till and occasional chiseling
spellingShingle Soil compaction management and soybean yields with cover crops under no-till and occasional chiseling
Calonego, Juliano C. [UNESP]
Agricultural management
Crop rotation
Land use effects
Soil physical proprieties
No-till
Soil use and management
title_short Soil compaction management and soybean yields with cover crops under no-till and occasional chiseling
title_full Soil compaction management and soybean yields with cover crops under no-till and occasional chiseling
title_fullStr Soil compaction management and soybean yields with cover crops under no-till and occasional chiseling
title_full_unstemmed Soil compaction management and soybean yields with cover crops under no-till and occasional chiseling
title_sort Soil compaction management and soybean yields with cover crops under no-till and occasional chiseling
author Calonego, Juliano C. [UNESP]
author_facet Calonego, Juliano C. [UNESP]
Raphael, Juan P. A. [UNESP]
Rigon, Joao P. G. [UNESP]
Oliveira Neto, Leontino de [UNESP]
Rosolem, Ciro A. [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Raphael, Juan P. A. [UNESP]
Rigon, Joao P. G. [UNESP]
Oliveira Neto, Leontino de [UNESP]
Rosolem, Ciro A. [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Calonego, Juliano C. [UNESP]
Raphael, Juan P. A. [UNESP]
Rigon, Joao P. G. [UNESP]
Oliveira Neto, Leontino de [UNESP]
Rosolem, Ciro A. [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Agricultural management
Crop rotation
Land use effects
Soil physical proprieties
No-till
Soil use and management
topic Agricultural management
Crop rotation
Land use effects
Soil physical proprieties
No-till
Soil use and management
description The introduction of cover crops in agricultural systems under no-till is important in soil structuring and remediation. However, there is a lack of studies exploring the effects of cover crops compared with other soil compaction control tools, such as chiseling, in the long term, mainly under tropical climates. This study aimed to evaluate soil physical properties by cover crops and chiseling in a compacted soil, as well as its effects on soybean yields. The experiment was conducted in Botucatu, Brazil, under no-till. Three crops were grown per year. Soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merrill] was cropped as summer crop in rotation with triticale (X Triticosecale Wittmack) or sunflower [Helianthus annuus (L.)] as fall/winter crop. In spring, three different cover crops were grown, pearl millet [Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Brown], forage sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] and sunn hemp [Crotalaria juncea (L.)], compared to a fallow treatment, which was chiseled in 2003, 2009 and 2013 only, always in October and down to 0.60 m depth. The first chiseling increased soil macroporosity and soybean yields in the immediate cropping season (2003/2004). However, these benefits were short-lived and in two years the use of cover crops resulted in higher yields. In the long-term, cover crops improve soil structure, with equal or better results than those obtained by occasional chiseling, as an increase in soil macroporosity by sunn hemp up to 0.20 m depth and a decrease in soil bulk density by sunn hemp and pearl millet in the 0.40-0.60 m layer. Among the cover crops, sunn hemp is particularly interesting, because it increases macroporosity in clay soils otherwise with limited aeration and increases the soybean yield. (C) 2017 Published by Elsevier B.V.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-04-01
2018-11-26T17:24:25Z
2018-11-26T17:24:25Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2017.02.001
European Journal Of Agronomy. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Bv, v. 85, p. 31-37, 2017.
1161-0301
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/162679
10.1016/j.eja.2017.02.001
WOS:000398877100004
WOS000398877100004.pdf
5720775873259528
0000-0003-2001-0874
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2017.02.001
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/162679
identifier_str_mv European Journal Of Agronomy. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Bv, v. 85, p. 31-37, 2017.
1161-0301
10.1016/j.eja.2017.02.001
WOS:000398877100004
WOS000398877100004.pdf
5720775873259528
0000-0003-2001-0874
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv European Journal Of Agronomy
1,335
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 31-37
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier B.V.
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier B.V.
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Web of Science
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799965659306655744