Nitrogen budget in integrated aquaculture systems with Nile tilapia and Amazon River prawn

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: David, Fernanda S. [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Proença, Danilo C. [UNESP], Valenti, Wagner C. [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10499-017-0145-y
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/174519
Resumo: The present work aims to describe the nitrogen (N) budget in integrated aquaculture systems with Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) and Amazon River prawn (Macrobrachium amazonicum) in earthen ponds, with and without the addition of different substrates. The experimental design was completely randomized, with three treatments (without a substrate, with a geotextile fabric substrate, and with a bamboo substrate) and four replications. Diet was the major input of N in the systems, ranging from ~65 to 71% and followed by inlet water (~26–31%). The portion retained in reared animals and periphyton ranged from ~21 to 25% (being ~21–24% in fish and prawns). The outputs that contributed most to the accumulation and release of N were, respectively, sediment (~24–38%) and N2 (~30–36%) emitted to the atmosphere. The addition of substrates did not improve the accumulation of nitrogen in the biomass of the target species. This suggests that the periphyton had a minor role on feed availability. In general, the systems were not efficient in using nitrogen since only ~22% of all available nitrogen was retained into prawn and tilapia biomass. On the other hand, the emission of N2 (an inert gas) to the atmosphere almost compensated the nitrogen supplied in the diet that was not assimilated by the reared animals and periphyton. In addition, data suggest that the integrated aquaculture in stagnant ponds may sequester substantial amounts of nitrogen from nutrient-rich aquatic environments and could be used as a mitigation tool.
id UNSP_2d352590993d286827bfe0273de7a73d
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/174519
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Nitrogen budget in integrated aquaculture systems with Nile tilapia and Amazon River prawnIntegrated aquaculture systemsMass balanceNitrogen budgetNitrogen sequesterPeriphytonSubstrateThe present work aims to describe the nitrogen (N) budget in integrated aquaculture systems with Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) and Amazon River prawn (Macrobrachium amazonicum) in earthen ponds, with and without the addition of different substrates. The experimental design was completely randomized, with three treatments (without a substrate, with a geotextile fabric substrate, and with a bamboo substrate) and four replications. Diet was the major input of N in the systems, ranging from ~65 to 71% and followed by inlet water (~26–31%). The portion retained in reared animals and periphyton ranged from ~21 to 25% (being ~21–24% in fish and prawns). The outputs that contributed most to the accumulation and release of N were, respectively, sediment (~24–38%) and N2 (~30–36%) emitted to the atmosphere. The addition of substrates did not improve the accumulation of nitrogen in the biomass of the target species. This suggests that the periphyton had a minor role on feed availability. In general, the systems were not efficient in using nitrogen since only ~22% of all available nitrogen was retained into prawn and tilapia biomass. On the other hand, the emission of N2 (an inert gas) to the atmosphere almost compensated the nitrogen supplied in the diet that was not assimilated by the reared animals and periphyton. In addition, data suggest that the integrated aquaculture in stagnant ponds may sequester substantial amounts of nitrogen from nutrient-rich aquatic environments and could be used as a mitigation tool.Aquaculture Center CAUNESP–São Paulo State UniversityBiosciences Institute UNESP–São Paulo State University, Coastal CampusAquaculture Center CAUNESP–São Paulo State UniversityBiosciences Institute UNESP–São Paulo State University, Coastal CampusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)David, Fernanda S. [UNESP]Proença, Danilo C. [UNESP]Valenti, Wagner C. [UNESP]2018-12-11T17:11:31Z2018-12-11T17:11:31Z2017-10-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article1733-1746application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10499-017-0145-yAquaculture International, v. 25, n. 5, p. 1733-1746, 2017.1573-143X0967-6120http://hdl.handle.net/11449/17451910.1007/s10499-017-0145-y2-s2.0-850185105792-s2.0-85018510579.pdfScopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengAquaculture International0,591info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-04-09T15:43:44Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/174519Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-04-09T15:43:44Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Nitrogen budget in integrated aquaculture systems with Nile tilapia and Amazon River prawn
title Nitrogen budget in integrated aquaculture systems with Nile tilapia and Amazon River prawn
spellingShingle Nitrogen budget in integrated aquaculture systems with Nile tilapia and Amazon River prawn
David, Fernanda S. [UNESP]
Integrated aquaculture systems
Mass balance
Nitrogen budget
Nitrogen sequester
Periphyton
Substrate
title_short Nitrogen budget in integrated aquaculture systems with Nile tilapia and Amazon River prawn
title_full Nitrogen budget in integrated aquaculture systems with Nile tilapia and Amazon River prawn
title_fullStr Nitrogen budget in integrated aquaculture systems with Nile tilapia and Amazon River prawn
title_full_unstemmed Nitrogen budget in integrated aquaculture systems with Nile tilapia and Amazon River prawn
title_sort Nitrogen budget in integrated aquaculture systems with Nile tilapia and Amazon River prawn
author David, Fernanda S. [UNESP]
author_facet David, Fernanda S. [UNESP]
Proença, Danilo C. [UNESP]
Valenti, Wagner C. [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Proença, Danilo C. [UNESP]
Valenti, Wagner C. [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv David, Fernanda S. [UNESP]
Proença, Danilo C. [UNESP]
Valenti, Wagner C. [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Integrated aquaculture systems
Mass balance
Nitrogen budget
Nitrogen sequester
Periphyton
Substrate
topic Integrated aquaculture systems
Mass balance
Nitrogen budget
Nitrogen sequester
Periphyton
Substrate
description The present work aims to describe the nitrogen (N) budget in integrated aquaculture systems with Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) and Amazon River prawn (Macrobrachium amazonicum) in earthen ponds, with and without the addition of different substrates. The experimental design was completely randomized, with three treatments (without a substrate, with a geotextile fabric substrate, and with a bamboo substrate) and four replications. Diet was the major input of N in the systems, ranging from ~65 to 71% and followed by inlet water (~26–31%). The portion retained in reared animals and periphyton ranged from ~21 to 25% (being ~21–24% in fish and prawns). The outputs that contributed most to the accumulation and release of N were, respectively, sediment (~24–38%) and N2 (~30–36%) emitted to the atmosphere. The addition of substrates did not improve the accumulation of nitrogen in the biomass of the target species. This suggests that the periphyton had a minor role on feed availability. In general, the systems were not efficient in using nitrogen since only ~22% of all available nitrogen was retained into prawn and tilapia biomass. On the other hand, the emission of N2 (an inert gas) to the atmosphere almost compensated the nitrogen supplied in the diet that was not assimilated by the reared animals and periphyton. In addition, data suggest that the integrated aquaculture in stagnant ponds may sequester substantial amounts of nitrogen from nutrient-rich aquatic environments and could be used as a mitigation tool.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-10-01
2018-12-11T17:11:31Z
2018-12-11T17:11:31Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10499-017-0145-y
Aquaculture International, v. 25, n. 5, p. 1733-1746, 2017.
1573-143X
0967-6120
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/174519
10.1007/s10499-017-0145-y
2-s2.0-85018510579
2-s2.0-85018510579.pdf
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10499-017-0145-y
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/174519
identifier_str_mv Aquaculture International, v. 25, n. 5, p. 1733-1746, 2017.
1573-143X
0967-6120
10.1007/s10499-017-0145-y
2-s2.0-85018510579
2-s2.0-85018510579.pdf
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Aquaculture International
0,591
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 1733-1746
application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1803650380149555200