Influence of different dialysis modalities in the measurement of resting energy expenditure in patients with acute kidney injury in ICU

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Góes, Cassiana R. de [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Vogt, Barbara Perez [UNESP], Sanches, Ana Claudia S. [UNESP], Balbi, André L. [UNESP], Ponce, Daniela [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2016.08.008
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/173819
Resumo: Background Currently, the execution of indirect calorimetry, which is considered the gold standard for measuring energy expenditure, is not indicate during dialysis, and it may interfere on nutritional therapy of these patients. This study aimed to evaluate the resting energy expenditure (REE) in patients with severe acute kidney injury treated by different modalities of dialysis and to identify whether dialysis influences on REE. Methods This was a prospective cohort study that evaluated patients admitted in intensive care units with diagnosis of acute kidney injury AKIN-3, mechanically ventilated, and submitted to conventional hemodialysis (CHD), extended hemodialysis (EHD) or high volume peritoneal dialysis (HVPD). Indirect calorimetry was performed at pre dialysis time and during the dialysis procedure. Parameters that could change REE were also evaluated. Results One-hundred patients undergoing 290 dialysis sessions were evaluated, with mean age 60.3 ± 17 years, 69% were male and 74% have died. There was no significant difference between REE of predialysis time and during dialysis time (2156 ± 659 kcal vs. 2100 ± 634 kcal, respectively, p = 0.15). No difference was observed in the REE before and during dialysis of different modalities. There were no differences between parameters pre and during dialysis of each modality. There was only a difference in norepinephrine dose, which was higher in pre dialysis time in HVPD and EHD modalities, compared with CHD modality. Moreover, during dialysis time, EHD modality had significantly higher VAD compared to other dialysis modalities. Conclusion The three evaluated modalities did not change REE. Indirect calorimetry can be performed during dialysis procedures and there was no difference between ventilation parameters, sedatives use, body temperature and VAD in both moments.
id UNSP_2d7256f969b19b43e3c2e12fd6dc034a
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/173819
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Influence of different dialysis modalities in the measurement of resting energy expenditure in patients with acute kidney injury in ICUAcute kidney injuryDialisysEnergy expenditureIndirect calorimetryIntensive careBackground Currently, the execution of indirect calorimetry, which is considered the gold standard for measuring energy expenditure, is not indicate during dialysis, and it may interfere on nutritional therapy of these patients. This study aimed to evaluate the resting energy expenditure (REE) in patients with severe acute kidney injury treated by different modalities of dialysis and to identify whether dialysis influences on REE. Methods This was a prospective cohort study that evaluated patients admitted in intensive care units with diagnosis of acute kidney injury AKIN-3, mechanically ventilated, and submitted to conventional hemodialysis (CHD), extended hemodialysis (EHD) or high volume peritoneal dialysis (HVPD). Indirect calorimetry was performed at pre dialysis time and during the dialysis procedure. Parameters that could change REE were also evaluated. Results One-hundred patients undergoing 290 dialysis sessions were evaluated, with mean age 60.3 ± 17 years, 69% were male and 74% have died. There was no significant difference between REE of predialysis time and during dialysis time (2156 ± 659 kcal vs. 2100 ± 634 kcal, respectively, p = 0.15). No difference was observed in the REE before and during dialysis of different modalities. There were no differences between parameters pre and during dialysis of each modality. There was only a difference in norepinephrine dose, which was higher in pre dialysis time in HVPD and EHD modalities, compared with CHD modality. Moreover, during dialysis time, EHD modality had significantly higher VAD compared to other dialysis modalities. Conclusion The three evaluated modalities did not change REE. Indirect calorimetry can be performed during dialysis procedures and there was no difference between ventilation parameters, sedatives use, body temperature and VAD in both moments.Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu UNESP Univ Estadual Paulista Department of Internal MedicineFaculdade de Medicina de Botucatu UNESP Univ Estadual Paulista Department of Internal MedicineFAPESP: 2013/00315-1Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Góes, Cassiana R. de [UNESP]Vogt, Barbara Perez [UNESP]Sanches, Ana Claudia S. [UNESP]Balbi, André L. [UNESP]Ponce, Daniela [UNESP]2018-12-11T17:07:55Z2018-12-11T17:07:55Z2017-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article1170-1174application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2016.08.008Clinical Nutrition, v. 36, n. 4, p. 1170-1174, 2017.1532-19830261-5614http://hdl.handle.net/11449/17381910.1016/j.clnu.2016.08.0082-s2.0-849965621712-s2.0-84996562171.pdfScopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengClinical Nutrition1,905info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-01-09T06:27:15Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/173819Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-01-09T06:27:15Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Influence of different dialysis modalities in the measurement of resting energy expenditure in patients with acute kidney injury in ICU
title Influence of different dialysis modalities in the measurement of resting energy expenditure in patients with acute kidney injury in ICU
spellingShingle Influence of different dialysis modalities in the measurement of resting energy expenditure in patients with acute kidney injury in ICU
Góes, Cassiana R. de [UNESP]
Acute kidney injury
Dialisys
Energy expenditure
Indirect calorimetry
Intensive care
title_short Influence of different dialysis modalities in the measurement of resting energy expenditure in patients with acute kidney injury in ICU
title_full Influence of different dialysis modalities in the measurement of resting energy expenditure in patients with acute kidney injury in ICU
title_fullStr Influence of different dialysis modalities in the measurement of resting energy expenditure in patients with acute kidney injury in ICU
title_full_unstemmed Influence of different dialysis modalities in the measurement of resting energy expenditure in patients with acute kidney injury in ICU
title_sort Influence of different dialysis modalities in the measurement of resting energy expenditure in patients with acute kidney injury in ICU
author Góes, Cassiana R. de [UNESP]
author_facet Góes, Cassiana R. de [UNESP]
Vogt, Barbara Perez [UNESP]
Sanches, Ana Claudia S. [UNESP]
Balbi, André L. [UNESP]
Ponce, Daniela [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Vogt, Barbara Perez [UNESP]
Sanches, Ana Claudia S. [UNESP]
Balbi, André L. [UNESP]
Ponce, Daniela [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Góes, Cassiana R. de [UNESP]
Vogt, Barbara Perez [UNESP]
Sanches, Ana Claudia S. [UNESP]
Balbi, André L. [UNESP]
Ponce, Daniela [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Acute kidney injury
Dialisys
Energy expenditure
Indirect calorimetry
Intensive care
topic Acute kidney injury
Dialisys
Energy expenditure
Indirect calorimetry
Intensive care
description Background Currently, the execution of indirect calorimetry, which is considered the gold standard for measuring energy expenditure, is not indicate during dialysis, and it may interfere on nutritional therapy of these patients. This study aimed to evaluate the resting energy expenditure (REE) in patients with severe acute kidney injury treated by different modalities of dialysis and to identify whether dialysis influences on REE. Methods This was a prospective cohort study that evaluated patients admitted in intensive care units with diagnosis of acute kidney injury AKIN-3, mechanically ventilated, and submitted to conventional hemodialysis (CHD), extended hemodialysis (EHD) or high volume peritoneal dialysis (HVPD). Indirect calorimetry was performed at pre dialysis time and during the dialysis procedure. Parameters that could change REE were also evaluated. Results One-hundred patients undergoing 290 dialysis sessions were evaluated, with mean age 60.3 ± 17 years, 69% were male and 74% have died. There was no significant difference between REE of predialysis time and during dialysis time (2156 ± 659 kcal vs. 2100 ± 634 kcal, respectively, p = 0.15). No difference was observed in the REE before and during dialysis of different modalities. There were no differences between parameters pre and during dialysis of each modality. There was only a difference in norepinephrine dose, which was higher in pre dialysis time in HVPD and EHD modalities, compared with CHD modality. Moreover, during dialysis time, EHD modality had significantly higher VAD compared to other dialysis modalities. Conclusion The three evaluated modalities did not change REE. Indirect calorimetry can be performed during dialysis procedures and there was no difference between ventilation parameters, sedatives use, body temperature and VAD in both moments.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-08-01
2018-12-11T17:07:55Z
2018-12-11T17:07:55Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2016.08.008
Clinical Nutrition, v. 36, n. 4, p. 1170-1174, 2017.
1532-1983
0261-5614
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/173819
10.1016/j.clnu.2016.08.008
2-s2.0-84996562171
2-s2.0-84996562171.pdf
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2016.08.008
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/173819
identifier_str_mv Clinical Nutrition, v. 36, n. 4, p. 1170-1174, 2017.
1532-1983
0261-5614
10.1016/j.clnu.2016.08.008
2-s2.0-84996562171
2-s2.0-84996562171.pdf
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Clinical Nutrition
1,905
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 1170-1174
application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1803650210330574848