Comparative in vitro study of the shear bond strength of brackets bonded with restorative and orthodontic resins
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2011 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1806-83242011000100009 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/226240 |
Resumo: | The aim of this study was to evaluate the shear bond strength of brackets bonded with different restorative systems and compare it with that afforded by an established orthodontic bonding system. Seventy human bicuspids were used, divided into five different groups with 14 teeth each. Whereas a specific orthodontic bonding resin (TransbondTM XT) was used in the control group, the restorative systems Charisma, Tetric Ceram, TPH Spectrum and Z100 were used in the other four groups. Seven days after bonding the brackets to the samples, shear forces were applied under pressure in a universal testing machine. The data collected was evaluated using the ANOVA test and, when a difference was identified, the Tukey test was applied. A 5% level of significance was adopted. The mean results of the shear bond strength tests were as follows: Group 1 (Charisma), 14.98 MPa; Group 2 (Tetric Ceram), 15.16 MPa; Group 3 (TPH), 17.70 MPa; Group 4 (Z100), 13.91 MPa; and Group 5 or control group (TransbondTM XT), 17.15 MPa. No statistically significant difference was found among the groups. It was concluded that all tested resins have sufficient bond strength to be recommended for bonding orthodontic brackets. |
id |
UNSP_2ebea4bcf24d979bd48eb7bf52516a5e |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/226240 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Comparative in vitro study of the shear bond strength of brackets bonded with restorative and orthodontic resinsDental bondingDental cementsOrthodontic bracketsOrthodonticsShear strengthThe aim of this study was to evaluate the shear bond strength of brackets bonded with different restorative systems and compare it with that afforded by an established orthodontic bonding system. Seventy human bicuspids were used, divided into five different groups with 14 teeth each. Whereas a specific orthodontic bonding resin (TransbondTM XT) was used in the control group, the restorative systems Charisma, Tetric Ceram, TPH Spectrum and Z100 were used in the other four groups. Seven days after bonding the brackets to the samples, shear forces were applied under pressure in a universal testing machine. The data collected was evaluated using the ANOVA test and, when a difference was identified, the Tukey test was applied. A 5% level of significance was adopted. The mean results of the shear bond strength tests were as follows: Group 1 (Charisma), 14.98 MPa; Group 2 (Tetric Ceram), 15.16 MPa; Group 3 (TPH), 17.70 MPa; Group 4 (Z100), 13.91 MPa; and Group 5 or control group (TransbondTM XT), 17.15 MPa. No statistically significant difference was found among the groups. It was concluded that all tested resins have sufficient bond strength to be recommended for bonding orthodontic brackets.Department of Orthodontics SOEPAR -Sindicato dos Odontologistas do Paraná, Curitiba, PRDepartment of Orthodontics Araraquara School of Dentistry UNESP - Univ Estadual Paulista, Araraquara, SPDepartment of Orthodontics UNICID -University of São Paulo City, São Paulo, SPDepartment of Orthodontics Araraquara School of Dentistry UNESP - Univ Estadual Paulista, Araraquara, SPSOEPAR -Sindicato dos Odontologistas do ParanáUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Universidade de São Paulo (USP)Isber, HassanAmbrosio, Aldrieli Regina [UNESP]Carvalho, Paulo Eduardo Guedesdo Valle-Corotti, Karyna MartinsSiqueira, Danilo Furquim2022-04-28T22:02:31Z2022-04-28T22:02:31Z2011-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article49-55http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1806-83242011000100009Brazilian Oral Research, v. 25, n. 1, p. 49-55, 2011.1807-31071806-8324http://hdl.handle.net/11449/22624010.1590/S1806-832420110001000092-s2.0-79952158458Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengBrazilian Oral Researchinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-09-26T14:21:11Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/226240Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestrepositoriounesp@unesp.bropendoar:29462024-09-26T14:21:11Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Comparative in vitro study of the shear bond strength of brackets bonded with restorative and orthodontic resins |
title |
Comparative in vitro study of the shear bond strength of brackets bonded with restorative and orthodontic resins |
spellingShingle |
Comparative in vitro study of the shear bond strength of brackets bonded with restorative and orthodontic resins Isber, Hassan Dental bonding Dental cements Orthodontic brackets Orthodontics Shear strength |
title_short |
Comparative in vitro study of the shear bond strength of brackets bonded with restorative and orthodontic resins |
title_full |
Comparative in vitro study of the shear bond strength of brackets bonded with restorative and orthodontic resins |
title_fullStr |
Comparative in vitro study of the shear bond strength of brackets bonded with restorative and orthodontic resins |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparative in vitro study of the shear bond strength of brackets bonded with restorative and orthodontic resins |
title_sort |
Comparative in vitro study of the shear bond strength of brackets bonded with restorative and orthodontic resins |
author |
Isber, Hassan |
author_facet |
Isber, Hassan Ambrosio, Aldrieli Regina [UNESP] Carvalho, Paulo Eduardo Guedes do Valle-Corotti, Karyna Martins Siqueira, Danilo Furquim |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Ambrosio, Aldrieli Regina [UNESP] Carvalho, Paulo Eduardo Guedes do Valle-Corotti, Karyna Martins Siqueira, Danilo Furquim |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
SOEPAR -Sindicato dos Odontologistas do Paraná Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Isber, Hassan Ambrosio, Aldrieli Regina [UNESP] Carvalho, Paulo Eduardo Guedes do Valle-Corotti, Karyna Martins Siqueira, Danilo Furquim |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Dental bonding Dental cements Orthodontic brackets Orthodontics Shear strength |
topic |
Dental bonding Dental cements Orthodontic brackets Orthodontics Shear strength |
description |
The aim of this study was to evaluate the shear bond strength of brackets bonded with different restorative systems and compare it with that afforded by an established orthodontic bonding system. Seventy human bicuspids were used, divided into five different groups with 14 teeth each. Whereas a specific orthodontic bonding resin (TransbondTM XT) was used in the control group, the restorative systems Charisma, Tetric Ceram, TPH Spectrum and Z100 were used in the other four groups. Seven days after bonding the brackets to the samples, shear forces were applied under pressure in a universal testing machine. The data collected was evaluated using the ANOVA test and, when a difference was identified, the Tukey test was applied. A 5% level of significance was adopted. The mean results of the shear bond strength tests were as follows: Group 1 (Charisma), 14.98 MPa; Group 2 (Tetric Ceram), 15.16 MPa; Group 3 (TPH), 17.70 MPa; Group 4 (Z100), 13.91 MPa; and Group 5 or control group (TransbondTM XT), 17.15 MPa. No statistically significant difference was found among the groups. It was concluded that all tested resins have sufficient bond strength to be recommended for bonding orthodontic brackets. |
publishDate |
2011 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2011-01-01 2022-04-28T22:02:31Z 2022-04-28T22:02:31Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1806-83242011000100009 Brazilian Oral Research, v. 25, n. 1, p. 49-55, 2011. 1807-3107 1806-8324 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/226240 10.1590/S1806-83242011000100009 2-s2.0-79952158458 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1806-83242011000100009 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/226240 |
identifier_str_mv |
Brazilian Oral Research, v. 25, n. 1, p. 49-55, 2011. 1807-3107 1806-8324 10.1590/S1806-83242011000100009 2-s2.0-79952158458 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Oral Research |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
49-55 |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
repositoriounesp@unesp.br |
_version_ |
1813546393709576192 |