Analysis of bond strength between a nylon reinforcement structure and dental resins
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.57654 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/206340 |
Resumo: | Background: Nylon is a polymer that its use to reinforce dental resins has shown positive results such as increased flexural strength. The aim of this study was to evaluate the bond strength between dental resins and a nylon reinforcement. Material and Methods: Forty cylindrical nylon blocks with 13 x 23 mm with 0.5% by volume of silica and 40 without were made. Half of the samples of each nylon composition were sandblasted with aluminum oxide (50µm) for 3 s (2.8 bar pressure, distance: 20 mm, incidence angle: 90o). On the nylon blocks, cylinders of chemically activated acrylic resin and indirect composite resin were made, with a bonding area of 6,28 mm2. Eight different groups were obtained according to the material used and the surface treatment (n = 10): Acrylic Resin + Nylon; GAS: Acrylic Resin + Nylon with Silica; GAT: Acrylic Resin + Nylon (Al2O3); GAST: Acrylic Resin + Nylon with Silica (Al2O3); GC: Composite Resin + Nylon; GCS: Composite Resin + Nylon with Silica; GCT: Composite Resin + Nylon (Al2O3); GCST: Composite Resin + Nylon with Silica (Al2O3). The shear test was carried out. The Student's and the Kruskal-Wallis test was adopted. Results: There was no statistically difference in the bond strength for nylon with silica for the acrylic resin group. For the composite groups, nylon with silica did not present a statistically difference without surface treatment (p = 0.10) and with surface treatment the bond strength decreased (p = 0.000). The GCT showed a higher bond strength (0.89 MPa). The surface treatment improved the bond strength for the both groups. Conclusions: The presence of silica in the nylon composition did not influence the bond strength between materials evaluated. However, the surface treatment with aluminum oxide proved to be favorable for this adhesion. |
id |
UNSP_2fd6011d37085fae8f61437ec7219c30 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/206340 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Analysis of bond strength between a nylon reinforcement structure and dental resinsNylons - ResinsSynthetic - Structures Strengthening - Dental ResearchBackground: Nylon is a polymer that its use to reinforce dental resins has shown positive results such as increased flexural strength. The aim of this study was to evaluate the bond strength between dental resins and a nylon reinforcement. Material and Methods: Forty cylindrical nylon blocks with 13 x 23 mm with 0.5% by volume of silica and 40 without were made. Half of the samples of each nylon composition were sandblasted with aluminum oxide (50µm) for 3 s (2.8 bar pressure, distance: 20 mm, incidence angle: 90o). On the nylon blocks, cylinders of chemically activated acrylic resin and indirect composite resin were made, with a bonding area of 6,28 mm2. Eight different groups were obtained according to the material used and the surface treatment (n = 10): Acrylic Resin + Nylon; GAS: Acrylic Resin + Nylon with Silica; GAT: Acrylic Resin + Nylon (Al2O3); GAST: Acrylic Resin + Nylon with Silica (Al2O3); GC: Composite Resin + Nylon; GCS: Composite Resin + Nylon with Silica; GCT: Composite Resin + Nylon (Al2O3); GCST: Composite Resin + Nylon with Silica (Al2O3). The shear test was carried out. The Student's and the Kruskal-Wallis test was adopted. Results: There was no statistically difference in the bond strength for nylon with silica for the acrylic resin group. For the composite groups, nylon with silica did not present a statistically difference without surface treatment (p = 0.10) and with surface treatment the bond strength decreased (p = 0.000). The GCT showed a higher bond strength (0.89 MPa). The surface treatment improved the bond strength for the both groups. Conclusions: The presence of silica in the nylon composition did not influence the bond strength between materials evaluated. However, the surface treatment with aluminum oxide proved to be favorable for this adhesion.Department of Prosthodontics and Dental Materials São Paulo State University (Unesp) Institute of Science and TechnologyDepartment of Dentistry Universidade São Francisco UFSDepartment of Prosthodontics and Dental Materials São Paulo State University (Unesp) Institute of Science and TechnologyUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Universidade Federal de Sergipe (UFS)Nakano, Leonardo-Jiro-Nomura [UNESP]Lopes, Guilherme-Da Rocha-Scalzer [UNESP]Firmino, Aline-Silvade Matos, Jefferson-David-Melo [UNESP]Tango, Rubens-Nisie [UNESP]Paes-Junior, Tarcisio-José-De Arruda [UNESP]2021-06-25T10:30:27Z2021-06-25T10:30:27Z2021-05-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article505-510http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.57654Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry, v. 13, n. 5, p. 505-510, 2021.1989-5488http://hdl.handle.net/11449/20634010.4317/jced.576542-s2.0-85105818044Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengJournal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistryinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-10-23T03:21:58Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/206340Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T16:03:29.615825Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Analysis of bond strength between a nylon reinforcement structure and dental resins |
title |
Analysis of bond strength between a nylon reinforcement structure and dental resins |
spellingShingle |
Analysis of bond strength between a nylon reinforcement structure and dental resins Nakano, Leonardo-Jiro-Nomura [UNESP] Nylons - Resins Synthetic - Structures Strengthening - Dental Research |
title_short |
Analysis of bond strength between a nylon reinforcement structure and dental resins |
title_full |
Analysis of bond strength between a nylon reinforcement structure and dental resins |
title_fullStr |
Analysis of bond strength between a nylon reinforcement structure and dental resins |
title_full_unstemmed |
Analysis of bond strength between a nylon reinforcement structure and dental resins |
title_sort |
Analysis of bond strength between a nylon reinforcement structure and dental resins |
author |
Nakano, Leonardo-Jiro-Nomura [UNESP] |
author_facet |
Nakano, Leonardo-Jiro-Nomura [UNESP] Lopes, Guilherme-Da Rocha-Scalzer [UNESP] Firmino, Aline-Silva de Matos, Jefferson-David-Melo [UNESP] Tango, Rubens-Nisie [UNESP] Paes-Junior, Tarcisio-José-De Arruda [UNESP] |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Lopes, Guilherme-Da Rocha-Scalzer [UNESP] Firmino, Aline-Silva de Matos, Jefferson-David-Melo [UNESP] Tango, Rubens-Nisie [UNESP] Paes-Junior, Tarcisio-José-De Arruda [UNESP] |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) Universidade Federal de Sergipe (UFS) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Nakano, Leonardo-Jiro-Nomura [UNESP] Lopes, Guilherme-Da Rocha-Scalzer [UNESP] Firmino, Aline-Silva de Matos, Jefferson-David-Melo [UNESP] Tango, Rubens-Nisie [UNESP] Paes-Junior, Tarcisio-José-De Arruda [UNESP] |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Nylons - Resins Synthetic - Structures Strengthening - Dental Research |
topic |
Nylons - Resins Synthetic - Structures Strengthening - Dental Research |
description |
Background: Nylon is a polymer that its use to reinforce dental resins has shown positive results such as increased flexural strength. The aim of this study was to evaluate the bond strength between dental resins and a nylon reinforcement. Material and Methods: Forty cylindrical nylon blocks with 13 x 23 mm with 0.5% by volume of silica and 40 without were made. Half of the samples of each nylon composition were sandblasted with aluminum oxide (50µm) for 3 s (2.8 bar pressure, distance: 20 mm, incidence angle: 90o). On the nylon blocks, cylinders of chemically activated acrylic resin and indirect composite resin were made, with a bonding area of 6,28 mm2. Eight different groups were obtained according to the material used and the surface treatment (n = 10): Acrylic Resin + Nylon; GAS: Acrylic Resin + Nylon with Silica; GAT: Acrylic Resin + Nylon (Al2O3); GAST: Acrylic Resin + Nylon with Silica (Al2O3); GC: Composite Resin + Nylon; GCS: Composite Resin + Nylon with Silica; GCT: Composite Resin + Nylon (Al2O3); GCST: Composite Resin + Nylon with Silica (Al2O3). The shear test was carried out. The Student's and the Kruskal-Wallis test was adopted. Results: There was no statistically difference in the bond strength for nylon with silica for the acrylic resin group. For the composite groups, nylon with silica did not present a statistically difference without surface treatment (p = 0.10) and with surface treatment the bond strength decreased (p = 0.000). The GCT showed a higher bond strength (0.89 MPa). The surface treatment improved the bond strength for the both groups. Conclusions: The presence of silica in the nylon composition did not influence the bond strength between materials evaluated. However, the surface treatment with aluminum oxide proved to be favorable for this adhesion. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-06-25T10:30:27Z 2021-06-25T10:30:27Z 2021-05-01 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.57654 Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry, v. 13, n. 5, p. 505-510, 2021. 1989-5488 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/206340 10.4317/jced.57654 2-s2.0-85105818044 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.57654 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/206340 |
identifier_str_mv |
Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry, v. 13, n. 5, p. 505-510, 2021. 1989-5488 10.4317/jced.57654 2-s2.0-85105818044 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
505-510 |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808128601574342656 |