Analysis of bond strength between a nylon reinforcement structure and dental resins

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Nakano, Leonardo-Jiro-Nomura [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Lopes, Guilherme-Da Rocha-Scalzer [UNESP], Firmino, Aline-Silva, de Matos, Jefferson-David-Melo [UNESP], Tango, Rubens-Nisie [UNESP], Paes-Junior, Tarcisio-José-De Arruda [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.57654
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/206340
Resumo: Background: Nylon is a polymer that its use to reinforce dental resins has shown positive results such as increased flexural strength. The aim of this study was to evaluate the bond strength between dental resins and a nylon reinforcement. Material and Methods: Forty cylindrical nylon blocks with 13 x 23 mm with 0.5% by volume of silica and 40 without were made. Half of the samples of each nylon composition were sandblasted with aluminum oxide (50µm) for 3 s (2.8 bar pressure, distance: 20 mm, incidence angle: 90o). On the nylon blocks, cylinders of chemically activated acrylic resin and indirect composite resin were made, with a bonding area of 6,28 mm2. Eight different groups were obtained according to the material used and the surface treatment (n = 10): Acrylic Resin + Nylon; GAS: Acrylic Resin + Nylon with Silica; GAT: Acrylic Resin + Nylon (Al2O3); GAST: Acrylic Resin + Nylon with Silica (Al2O3); GC: Composite Resin + Nylon; GCS: Composite Resin + Nylon with Silica; GCT: Composite Resin + Nylon (Al2O3); GCST: Composite Resin + Nylon with Silica (Al2O3). The shear test was carried out. The Student's and the Kruskal-Wallis test was adopted. Results: There was no statistically difference in the bond strength for nylon with silica for the acrylic resin group. For the composite groups, nylon with silica did not present a statistically difference without surface treatment (p = 0.10) and with surface treatment the bond strength decreased (p = 0.000). The GCT showed a higher bond strength (0.89 MPa). The surface treatment improved the bond strength for the both groups. Conclusions: The presence of silica in the nylon composition did not influence the bond strength between materials evaluated. However, the surface treatment with aluminum oxide proved to be favorable for this adhesion.
id UNSP_2fd6011d37085fae8f61437ec7219c30
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/206340
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Analysis of bond strength between a nylon reinforcement structure and dental resinsNylons - ResinsSynthetic - Structures Strengthening - Dental ResearchBackground: Nylon is a polymer that its use to reinforce dental resins has shown positive results such as increased flexural strength. The aim of this study was to evaluate the bond strength between dental resins and a nylon reinforcement. Material and Methods: Forty cylindrical nylon blocks with 13 x 23 mm with 0.5% by volume of silica and 40 without were made. Half of the samples of each nylon composition were sandblasted with aluminum oxide (50µm) for 3 s (2.8 bar pressure, distance: 20 mm, incidence angle: 90o). On the nylon blocks, cylinders of chemically activated acrylic resin and indirect composite resin were made, with a bonding area of 6,28 mm2. Eight different groups were obtained according to the material used and the surface treatment (n = 10): Acrylic Resin + Nylon; GAS: Acrylic Resin + Nylon with Silica; GAT: Acrylic Resin + Nylon (Al2O3); GAST: Acrylic Resin + Nylon with Silica (Al2O3); GC: Composite Resin + Nylon; GCS: Composite Resin + Nylon with Silica; GCT: Composite Resin + Nylon (Al2O3); GCST: Composite Resin + Nylon with Silica (Al2O3). The shear test was carried out. The Student's and the Kruskal-Wallis test was adopted. Results: There was no statistically difference in the bond strength for nylon with silica for the acrylic resin group. For the composite groups, nylon with silica did not present a statistically difference without surface treatment (p = 0.10) and with surface treatment the bond strength decreased (p = 0.000). The GCT showed a higher bond strength (0.89 MPa). The surface treatment improved the bond strength for the both groups. Conclusions: The presence of silica in the nylon composition did not influence the bond strength between materials evaluated. However, the surface treatment with aluminum oxide proved to be favorable for this adhesion.Department of Prosthodontics and Dental Materials São Paulo State University (Unesp) Institute of Science and TechnologyDepartment of Dentistry Universidade São Francisco UFSDepartment of Prosthodontics and Dental Materials São Paulo State University (Unesp) Institute of Science and TechnologyUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Universidade Federal de Sergipe (UFS)Nakano, Leonardo-Jiro-Nomura [UNESP]Lopes, Guilherme-Da Rocha-Scalzer [UNESP]Firmino, Aline-Silvade Matos, Jefferson-David-Melo [UNESP]Tango, Rubens-Nisie [UNESP]Paes-Junior, Tarcisio-José-De Arruda [UNESP]2021-06-25T10:30:27Z2021-06-25T10:30:27Z2021-05-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article505-510http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.57654Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry, v. 13, n. 5, p. 505-510, 2021.1989-5488http://hdl.handle.net/11449/20634010.4317/jced.576542-s2.0-85105818044Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengJournal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistryinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-10-23T03:21:58Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/206340Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T16:03:29.615825Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Analysis of bond strength between a nylon reinforcement structure and dental resins
title Analysis of bond strength between a nylon reinforcement structure and dental resins
spellingShingle Analysis of bond strength between a nylon reinforcement structure and dental resins
Nakano, Leonardo-Jiro-Nomura [UNESP]
Nylons - Resins
Synthetic - Structures Strengthening - Dental Research
title_short Analysis of bond strength between a nylon reinforcement structure and dental resins
title_full Analysis of bond strength between a nylon reinforcement structure and dental resins
title_fullStr Analysis of bond strength between a nylon reinforcement structure and dental resins
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of bond strength between a nylon reinforcement structure and dental resins
title_sort Analysis of bond strength between a nylon reinforcement structure and dental resins
author Nakano, Leonardo-Jiro-Nomura [UNESP]
author_facet Nakano, Leonardo-Jiro-Nomura [UNESP]
Lopes, Guilherme-Da Rocha-Scalzer [UNESP]
Firmino, Aline-Silva
de Matos, Jefferson-David-Melo [UNESP]
Tango, Rubens-Nisie [UNESP]
Paes-Junior, Tarcisio-José-De Arruda [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Lopes, Guilherme-Da Rocha-Scalzer [UNESP]
Firmino, Aline-Silva
de Matos, Jefferson-David-Melo [UNESP]
Tango, Rubens-Nisie [UNESP]
Paes-Junior, Tarcisio-José-De Arruda [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
Universidade Federal de Sergipe (UFS)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Nakano, Leonardo-Jiro-Nomura [UNESP]
Lopes, Guilherme-Da Rocha-Scalzer [UNESP]
Firmino, Aline-Silva
de Matos, Jefferson-David-Melo [UNESP]
Tango, Rubens-Nisie [UNESP]
Paes-Junior, Tarcisio-José-De Arruda [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Nylons - Resins
Synthetic - Structures Strengthening - Dental Research
topic Nylons - Resins
Synthetic - Structures Strengthening - Dental Research
description Background: Nylon is a polymer that its use to reinforce dental resins has shown positive results such as increased flexural strength. The aim of this study was to evaluate the bond strength between dental resins and a nylon reinforcement. Material and Methods: Forty cylindrical nylon blocks with 13 x 23 mm with 0.5% by volume of silica and 40 without were made. Half of the samples of each nylon composition were sandblasted with aluminum oxide (50µm) for 3 s (2.8 bar pressure, distance: 20 mm, incidence angle: 90o). On the nylon blocks, cylinders of chemically activated acrylic resin and indirect composite resin were made, with a bonding area of 6,28 mm2. Eight different groups were obtained according to the material used and the surface treatment (n = 10): Acrylic Resin + Nylon; GAS: Acrylic Resin + Nylon with Silica; GAT: Acrylic Resin + Nylon (Al2O3); GAST: Acrylic Resin + Nylon with Silica (Al2O3); GC: Composite Resin + Nylon; GCS: Composite Resin + Nylon with Silica; GCT: Composite Resin + Nylon (Al2O3); GCST: Composite Resin + Nylon with Silica (Al2O3). The shear test was carried out. The Student's and the Kruskal-Wallis test was adopted. Results: There was no statistically difference in the bond strength for nylon with silica for the acrylic resin group. For the composite groups, nylon with silica did not present a statistically difference without surface treatment (p = 0.10) and with surface treatment the bond strength decreased (p = 0.000). The GCT showed a higher bond strength (0.89 MPa). The surface treatment improved the bond strength for the both groups. Conclusions: The presence of silica in the nylon composition did not influence the bond strength between materials evaluated. However, the surface treatment with aluminum oxide proved to be favorable for this adhesion.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-06-25T10:30:27Z
2021-06-25T10:30:27Z
2021-05-01
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.57654
Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry, v. 13, n. 5, p. 505-510, 2021.
1989-5488
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/206340
10.4317/jced.57654
2-s2.0-85105818044
url http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.57654
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/206340
identifier_str_mv Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry, v. 13, n. 5, p. 505-510, 2021.
1989-5488
10.4317/jced.57654
2-s2.0-85105818044
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 505-510
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808128601574342656