Can non-collagenous proteins be employed for the differential diagnosis among fibrous dysplasia, cemento-osseous dysplasia and cemento-ossifying fibroma?

• Autor(a) principal: Veltrini, Vanessa Cristina
• Data de Publicação: 2019
• Outros Autores: Figueira, Jéssica Araújo [UNESP], Santin, Gabriela Cristina, de Sousa, Suzana Cantanhede Orsini Machado, de Araújo, Ney Soares
• Tipo de documento: Artigo
• Idioma: eng
• Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
• Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prp.2019.152450; http://hdl.handle.net/11449/189118
• topic: Benign mesenchymal odontogenic tumours; Bone sialoprotein; Fibro-osseous lesions; Osteocalcin; Osteonectin; Osteopontin

Differential diagnosis among fibrous dysplasias, cemento-ossifying fibromas and cemento-osseous dysplasias is difficult, since there is considerable overlap of histologic features, but also extremely important, since they differ greatly in etiology, clinical behaviour, prognosis and terapeuthic approach. There is no data about the use of immunohistochemistry, a viable and accessible technique, for this purpose. The objective of this study was to investigate, comparatively, the immunohistochemical expression of major non-collagenous proteins (osteonectin [ON], osteopontin [OP], bone sialoprotein [BSP] and osteocalcin [OC]) of mineralized tissue extracellular matrix in 22 cases of fibrous dysplasias, 16 of cemento-ossifying fibromas and 16 of cemento-osseous dysplasias. ON maintained the same expression profile in all cases; the staining for OP was negative in fusiform cells producing cementoid globules and weak, as well as heterogeneous, in high mineralized matrixes; there was negativity for BSP in cementoid globules and in the fusiform cells that produce them, differently from the strong positive expression found in the majority of bone trabeculae and their peripheral cuboidal osteoblasts; and finally, the immuno-reactivity for OC was weak, except in cuboidal osteoblasts and osteocytes. We can conclude that the nature of mineralized structure and the cellular phenotype are much more responsible for variability in immunohistochemical profile than the type of lesion (fibrous dysplasias, cemento-ossifying fibromas and cemento-osseous dysplasias) which makes difficult, at least for a while, the use of these proteins with diagnosis purpose.