Instrumento de rastreio para disfagia orofaríngea no Acidente Vascular Encefálico - Parte I: evidências de validade baseadas no conteúdo e nos processos de resposta
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng por |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/20172017009 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/170282 |
Resumo: | Purpose: The aim of the present study was to identify the evidence of validity based on the content and response process of the Rastreamento de Disfagia Orofaríngea no Acidente Vascular Encefálico (RADAVE; Screening Tool for Oropharyngeal Dysphagia in Stroke). Methods: The criteria used to elaborate the questions were based on a literature review. A group of judges consisting of 19 different health professionals evaluated the relevance and representativeness of the questions, and the results were analyzed using the Content Validity Index. In order to evidence validity based on the response processes, 23 health professionals administered the screening tool and analyzed the questions using a structured scale and cognitive interview. Results: The RADAVE structured to be applied in two stages. The first version consisted of 18 questions in stage I and 11 questions in stage II. Eight questions in stage I and four in stage II did not reach the minimum Content Validity Index, requiring reformulation by the authors. The cognitive interview demonstrated some misconceptions. New adjustments were made and the final version was produced with 12 questions in stage I and six questions in stage II. Conclusion: It was possible to develop a screening tool for dysphagia in stroke with adequate evidence of validity based on content and response processes. Both validity evidences obtained so far allowed to adjust the screening tool in relation to its construct. The next studies will analyze the other evidences of validity and the measures of accuracy. |
id |
UNSP_3207ee9d82e3a953685a4a51fffb2d3b |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/170282 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Instrumento de rastreio para disfagia orofaríngea no Acidente Vascular Encefálico - Parte I: evidências de validade baseadas no conteúdo e nos processos de respostaScreening tool for oropharyngeal dysphagia in stroke - Part I: evidence of validity based on the content and response processesPurpose: The aim of the present study was to identify the evidence of validity based on the content and response process of the Rastreamento de Disfagia Orofaríngea no Acidente Vascular Encefálico (RADAVE; Screening Tool for Oropharyngeal Dysphagia in Stroke). Methods: The criteria used to elaborate the questions were based on a literature review. A group of judges consisting of 19 different health professionals evaluated the relevance and representativeness of the questions, and the results were analyzed using the Content Validity Index. In order to evidence validity based on the response processes, 23 health professionals administered the screening tool and analyzed the questions using a structured scale and cognitive interview. Results: The RADAVE structured to be applied in two stages. The first version consisted of 18 questions in stage I and 11 questions in stage II. Eight questions in stage I and four in stage II did not reach the minimum Content Validity Index, requiring reformulation by the authors. The cognitive interview demonstrated some misconceptions. New adjustments were made and the final version was produced with 12 questions in stage I and six questions in stage II. Conclusion: It was possible to develop a screening tool for dysphagia in stroke with adequate evidence of validity based on content and response processes. Both validity evidences obtained so far allowed to adjust the screening tool in relation to its construct. The next studies will analyze the other evidences of validity and the measures of accuracy.Instituto Dante Pazzanese de Cardiologia - IDPC - São Paulo (SP), BrasilUniversidade de Marília - UNIMAR - Marília (SP), BrasilUniversidade Federal da Paraíba - UFPB - João Pessoa (PB), BrasilUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte - UFRN - Natal (RN), BrasilUniversidade Estadual Paulista - UNESP - Marília (SP), BrasilUniversidade Federal da Paraíba (UFPB)Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Almeida, Tatiana Magalhães deCola, Paula CristinaPernambuco, Leandro de AraújoMagalhães, Hipólito VirgílioMagnoni, Carlos DanielSilva, Roberta Gonçalves da2018-12-11T16:50:06Z2018-12-11T16:50:06Z2017-08-17info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlee20170009application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/20172017009CoDAS, v. 29, n. 4, p. e20170009-, 2017.2317-1782http://hdl.handle.net/11449/17028210.1590/2317-1782/20172017009S2317-178220170004003102-s2.0-85031690648S2317-17822017000400310.pdf52220235112860580000-0002-2016-3566Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengporCoDAS0,267info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-11-09T06:07:55Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/170282Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T17:12:19.846749Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Instrumento de rastreio para disfagia orofaríngea no Acidente Vascular Encefálico - Parte I: evidências de validade baseadas no conteúdo e nos processos de resposta Screening tool for oropharyngeal dysphagia in stroke - Part I: evidence of validity based on the content and response processes |
title |
Instrumento de rastreio para disfagia orofaríngea no Acidente Vascular Encefálico - Parte I: evidências de validade baseadas no conteúdo e nos processos de resposta |
spellingShingle |
Instrumento de rastreio para disfagia orofaríngea no Acidente Vascular Encefálico - Parte I: evidências de validade baseadas no conteúdo e nos processos de resposta Almeida, Tatiana Magalhães de |
title_short |
Instrumento de rastreio para disfagia orofaríngea no Acidente Vascular Encefálico - Parte I: evidências de validade baseadas no conteúdo e nos processos de resposta |
title_full |
Instrumento de rastreio para disfagia orofaríngea no Acidente Vascular Encefálico - Parte I: evidências de validade baseadas no conteúdo e nos processos de resposta |
title_fullStr |
Instrumento de rastreio para disfagia orofaríngea no Acidente Vascular Encefálico - Parte I: evidências de validade baseadas no conteúdo e nos processos de resposta |
title_full_unstemmed |
Instrumento de rastreio para disfagia orofaríngea no Acidente Vascular Encefálico - Parte I: evidências de validade baseadas no conteúdo e nos processos de resposta |
title_sort |
Instrumento de rastreio para disfagia orofaríngea no Acidente Vascular Encefálico - Parte I: evidências de validade baseadas no conteúdo e nos processos de resposta |
author |
Almeida, Tatiana Magalhães de |
author_facet |
Almeida, Tatiana Magalhães de Cola, Paula Cristina Pernambuco, Leandro de Araújo Magalhães, Hipólito Virgílio Magnoni, Carlos Daniel Silva, Roberta Gonçalves da |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Cola, Paula Cristina Pernambuco, Leandro de Araújo Magalhães, Hipólito Virgílio Magnoni, Carlos Daniel Silva, Roberta Gonçalves da |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal da Paraíba (UFPB) Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Almeida, Tatiana Magalhães de Cola, Paula Cristina Pernambuco, Leandro de Araújo Magalhães, Hipólito Virgílio Magnoni, Carlos Daniel Silva, Roberta Gonçalves da |
description |
Purpose: The aim of the present study was to identify the evidence of validity based on the content and response process of the Rastreamento de Disfagia Orofaríngea no Acidente Vascular Encefálico (RADAVE; Screening Tool for Oropharyngeal Dysphagia in Stroke). Methods: The criteria used to elaborate the questions were based on a literature review. A group of judges consisting of 19 different health professionals evaluated the relevance and representativeness of the questions, and the results were analyzed using the Content Validity Index. In order to evidence validity based on the response processes, 23 health professionals administered the screening tool and analyzed the questions using a structured scale and cognitive interview. Results: The RADAVE structured to be applied in two stages. The first version consisted of 18 questions in stage I and 11 questions in stage II. Eight questions in stage I and four in stage II did not reach the minimum Content Validity Index, requiring reformulation by the authors. The cognitive interview demonstrated some misconceptions. New adjustments were made and the final version was produced with 12 questions in stage I and six questions in stage II. Conclusion: It was possible to develop a screening tool for dysphagia in stroke with adequate evidence of validity based on content and response processes. Both validity evidences obtained so far allowed to adjust the screening tool in relation to its construct. The next studies will analyze the other evidences of validity and the measures of accuracy. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-08-17 2018-12-11T16:50:06Z 2018-12-11T16:50:06Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/20172017009 CoDAS, v. 29, n. 4, p. e20170009-, 2017. 2317-1782 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/170282 10.1590/2317-1782/20172017009 S2317-17822017000400310 2-s2.0-85031690648 S2317-17822017000400310.pdf 5222023511286058 0000-0002-2016-3566 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/20172017009 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/170282 |
identifier_str_mv |
CoDAS, v. 29, n. 4, p. e20170009-, 2017. 2317-1782 10.1590/2317-1782/20172017009 S2317-17822017000400310 2-s2.0-85031690648 S2317-17822017000400310.pdf 5222023511286058 0000-0002-2016-3566 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng por |
language |
eng por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
CoDAS 0,267 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
e20170009 application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808128772200726528 |