Posttreatment of 3D-printed surfaces for electrochemical applications: A critical review on proposed protocols
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/elsa.202100136 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/246830 |
Resumo: | This mini-review presents an overview of recent trends for 3D printed sensors and biosensors (with a focus on Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) based technology), along with their posttreatment surfaces to improve electrochemical applications. The protocols described in the literature and advances in this field were covered, bringing a critical discussion about the achievements and limitations to improve the electrical properties of conducting filaments, as well as their electroanalytical performance. In addition, the pros and cons of the processes used in surface posttreatment to improve the performance of electrodes constructed by FDM are presented, comparing the time consumed during chemical and electrochemical treatments or combining the two to improve the characteristics of the sensors. Finally, the discussion about the real necessity of surface treatments of electrodes constructed by FDM technology, the techniques used for this, and some ecological protocols are discussed (surface posttreatments with and without reagents) or whether the simple optimization of printing parameters could also significantly improve the electrochemical performance of sensors built with such technologies. |
id |
UNSP_34240d9be5f033c87baa05e6c2c03284 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/246830 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Posttreatment of 3D-printed surfaces for electrochemical applications: A critical review on proposed protocols3D printed sensorsConducting polymersElectroanalytical applicationsFused deposition modelingSurface posttreatmentThis mini-review presents an overview of recent trends for 3D printed sensors and biosensors (with a focus on Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) based technology), along with their posttreatment surfaces to improve electrochemical applications. The protocols described in the literature and advances in this field were covered, bringing a critical discussion about the achievements and limitations to improve the electrical properties of conducting filaments, as well as their electroanalytical performance. In addition, the pros and cons of the processes used in surface posttreatment to improve the performance of electrodes constructed by FDM are presented, comparing the time consumed during chemical and electrochemical treatments or combining the two to improve the characteristics of the sensors. Finally, the discussion about the real necessity of surface treatments of electrodes constructed by FDM technology, the techniques used for this, and some ecological protocols are discussed (surface posttreatments with and without reagents) or whether the simple optimization of printing parameters could also significantly improve the electrochemical performance of sensors built with such technologies.Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)Instituto de Química Universidade de São PauloInstituto de Química Universidade Federal de UberlândiaFaculdade de Ciências Exatas e Tecnologia Universidade Federal da Grande DouradosUNESP Toxicological Evaluation and Removal of Micropollutants and Radioactives (INCT-DATREM) National Institute for Alternative Technologies of Detection Institute of ChemistryUNESP Toxicological Evaluation and Removal of Micropollutants and Radioactives (INCT-DATREM) National Institute for Alternative Technologies of Detection Institute of ChemistryFAPESP: 2014/50867-3FAPESP: 2017/13137-5FAPESP: 2020/00325-0CAPES: 25/2014FAPESP: 307271/2017-0CNPq: 311847-2018-8FAPESP: 427731/2018-6CAPES: Pró-ForensesUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)Universidade Federal da Grande DouradosUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Rocha, Diego P.Rocha, Raquel G.Castro, Sílvia V. F.Trindade, Magno A. G. [UNESP]Munoz, Rodrigo A. A.Richter, Eduardo M.Angnes, Lucio2023-07-29T12:51:41Z2023-07-29T12:51:41Z2022-10-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1002/elsa.202100136Electrochemical Science Advances, v. 2, n. 5, 2022.2698-5977http://hdl.handle.net/11449/24683010.1002/elsa.2021001362-s2.0-85148040948Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengElectrochemical Science Advancesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-07-29T12:51:41Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/246830Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462023-07-29T12:51:41Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Posttreatment of 3D-printed surfaces for electrochemical applications: A critical review on proposed protocols |
title |
Posttreatment of 3D-printed surfaces for electrochemical applications: A critical review on proposed protocols |
spellingShingle |
Posttreatment of 3D-printed surfaces for electrochemical applications: A critical review on proposed protocols Rocha, Diego P. 3D printed sensors Conducting polymers Electroanalytical applications Fused deposition modeling Surface posttreatment |
title_short |
Posttreatment of 3D-printed surfaces for electrochemical applications: A critical review on proposed protocols |
title_full |
Posttreatment of 3D-printed surfaces for electrochemical applications: A critical review on proposed protocols |
title_fullStr |
Posttreatment of 3D-printed surfaces for electrochemical applications: A critical review on proposed protocols |
title_full_unstemmed |
Posttreatment of 3D-printed surfaces for electrochemical applications: A critical review on proposed protocols |
title_sort |
Posttreatment of 3D-printed surfaces for electrochemical applications: A critical review on proposed protocols |
author |
Rocha, Diego P. |
author_facet |
Rocha, Diego P. Rocha, Raquel G. Castro, Sílvia V. F. Trindade, Magno A. G. [UNESP] Munoz, Rodrigo A. A. Richter, Eduardo M. Angnes, Lucio |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Rocha, Raquel G. Castro, Sílvia V. F. Trindade, Magno A. G. [UNESP] Munoz, Rodrigo A. A. Richter, Eduardo M. Angnes, Lucio |
author2_role |
author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de São Paulo (USP) Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU) Universidade Federal da Grande Dourados Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Rocha, Diego P. Rocha, Raquel G. Castro, Sílvia V. F. Trindade, Magno A. G. [UNESP] Munoz, Rodrigo A. A. Richter, Eduardo M. Angnes, Lucio |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
3D printed sensors Conducting polymers Electroanalytical applications Fused deposition modeling Surface posttreatment |
topic |
3D printed sensors Conducting polymers Electroanalytical applications Fused deposition modeling Surface posttreatment |
description |
This mini-review presents an overview of recent trends for 3D printed sensors and biosensors (with a focus on Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) based technology), along with their posttreatment surfaces to improve electrochemical applications. The protocols described in the literature and advances in this field were covered, bringing a critical discussion about the achievements and limitations to improve the electrical properties of conducting filaments, as well as their electroanalytical performance. In addition, the pros and cons of the processes used in surface posttreatment to improve the performance of electrodes constructed by FDM are presented, comparing the time consumed during chemical and electrochemical treatments or combining the two to improve the characteristics of the sensors. Finally, the discussion about the real necessity of surface treatments of electrodes constructed by FDM technology, the techniques used for this, and some ecological protocols are discussed (surface posttreatments with and without reagents) or whether the simple optimization of printing parameters could also significantly improve the electrochemical performance of sensors built with such technologies. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-10-01 2023-07-29T12:51:41Z 2023-07-29T12:51:41Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/elsa.202100136 Electrochemical Science Advances, v. 2, n. 5, 2022. 2698-5977 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/246830 10.1002/elsa.202100136 2-s2.0-85148040948 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/elsa.202100136 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/246830 |
identifier_str_mv |
Electrochemical Science Advances, v. 2, n. 5, 2022. 2698-5977 10.1002/elsa.202100136 2-s2.0-85148040948 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Electrochemical Science Advances |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1803046829659521024 |