Predominant theoretical perspectives on China's approach to IR as a discipline: between autonomy and integration
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | spa |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.5752/P.2317-773X.2021V9N4P63-89 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/240056 |
Resumo: | The rise of the People's Republic of China (PRC) in the international system has effects and consequences in all areas of study, including International Relations (IR) as a discipline. After an initial period of isolation, after the Revolution led by Mao Zedong, in 1949, the process of Reform and Opening, led by Deng Xiaoping, from 1978, made the Chinese academy reconnect with a field of studies with predominance of theoretical frameworks from the Anglo-Saxon world. This supposed that the Chinese researchers had a stage of uncritical absorption of this knowledge, classified as learning and copying, in which the same debates that have taken place in the West were incorporated, without further questioning. However, in the second half of the 1980s, voices emerged that raised question's for a Chinese perspective in addressing these issues. Thus, its own literature developped toward this topic, and in the 2000s two integrative views appear and are consolidated: those of Yan Xuetong and Qin Yaqing, who propose, with different emphases and intentions, to link the Western Theory of IR with classical Chinese thinking. Another author, Zhao Tingyang, claims the Tianxia (All-under-Heaven), worldview of the pre-Qin era (2100 to 221 BC), as a possible alternative to the Westphalian paradigm. The following work analyzes this phenomenon, as well as the new epistemological approaches that assuming this challenge implies. |
id |
UNSP_345bbbdb32fd92eb29756273fddd19b4 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/240056 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Predominant theoretical perspectives on China's approach to IR as a discipline: between autonomy and integrationPerspectivas teóricas predominantes na abordagem da China em relacao as RI como disciplina: entre autonomia e integracaoChinese School of International RelationsEpistemological approachesRI with Chinese characteristicsTheory of International RelationsTianxiaThe rise of the People's Republic of China (PRC) in the international system has effects and consequences in all areas of study, including International Relations (IR) as a discipline. After an initial period of isolation, after the Revolution led by Mao Zedong, in 1949, the process of Reform and Opening, led by Deng Xiaoping, from 1978, made the Chinese academy reconnect with a field of studies with predominance of theoretical frameworks from the Anglo-Saxon world. This supposed that the Chinese researchers had a stage of uncritical absorption of this knowledge, classified as learning and copying, in which the same debates that have taken place in the West were incorporated, without further questioning. However, in the second half of the 1980s, voices emerged that raised question's for a Chinese perspective in addressing these issues. Thus, its own literature developped toward this topic, and in the 2000s two integrative views appear and are consolidated: those of Yan Xuetong and Qin Yaqing, who propose, with different emphases and intentions, to link the Western Theory of IR with classical Chinese thinking. Another author, Zhao Tingyang, claims the Tianxia (All-under-Heaven), worldview of the pre-Qin era (2100 to 221 BC), as a possible alternative to the Westphalian paradigm. The following work analyzes this phenomenon, as well as the new epistemological approaches that assuming this challenge implies.Programa de Pos-Graduacao San Tiago Dantas (UNESP UNICAMP PUC-SP)Programa de Pos-Graduacao San Tiago Dantas (UNESP UNICAMP PUC-SP)Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Aristegui, Carlos Monge [UNESP]2023-03-01T19:59:24Z2023-03-01T19:59:24Z2021-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article63-89http://dx.doi.org/10.5752/P.2317-773X.2021V9N4P63-89Estudos Internacionais, v. 9, n. 4, p. 63-89, 2021.2317-773Xhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/24005610.5752/P.2317-773X.2021V9N4P63-892-s2.0-85129991772Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPspaEstudos Internacionaisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-03-01T19:59:24Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/240056Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T23:04:15.413676Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Predominant theoretical perspectives on China's approach to IR as a discipline: between autonomy and integration Perspectivas teóricas predominantes na abordagem da China em relacao as RI como disciplina: entre autonomia e integracao |
title |
Predominant theoretical perspectives on China's approach to IR as a discipline: between autonomy and integration |
spellingShingle |
Predominant theoretical perspectives on China's approach to IR as a discipline: between autonomy and integration Aristegui, Carlos Monge [UNESP] Chinese School of International Relations Epistemological approaches RI with Chinese characteristics Theory of International Relations Tianxia |
title_short |
Predominant theoretical perspectives on China's approach to IR as a discipline: between autonomy and integration |
title_full |
Predominant theoretical perspectives on China's approach to IR as a discipline: between autonomy and integration |
title_fullStr |
Predominant theoretical perspectives on China's approach to IR as a discipline: between autonomy and integration |
title_full_unstemmed |
Predominant theoretical perspectives on China's approach to IR as a discipline: between autonomy and integration |
title_sort |
Predominant theoretical perspectives on China's approach to IR as a discipline: between autonomy and integration |
author |
Aristegui, Carlos Monge [UNESP] |
author_facet |
Aristegui, Carlos Monge [UNESP] |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Aristegui, Carlos Monge [UNESP] |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Chinese School of International Relations Epistemological approaches RI with Chinese characteristics Theory of International Relations Tianxia |
topic |
Chinese School of International Relations Epistemological approaches RI with Chinese characteristics Theory of International Relations Tianxia |
description |
The rise of the People's Republic of China (PRC) in the international system has effects and consequences in all areas of study, including International Relations (IR) as a discipline. After an initial period of isolation, after the Revolution led by Mao Zedong, in 1949, the process of Reform and Opening, led by Deng Xiaoping, from 1978, made the Chinese academy reconnect with a field of studies with predominance of theoretical frameworks from the Anglo-Saxon world. This supposed that the Chinese researchers had a stage of uncritical absorption of this knowledge, classified as learning and copying, in which the same debates that have taken place in the West were incorporated, without further questioning. However, in the second half of the 1980s, voices emerged that raised question's for a Chinese perspective in addressing these issues. Thus, its own literature developped toward this topic, and in the 2000s two integrative views appear and are consolidated: those of Yan Xuetong and Qin Yaqing, who propose, with different emphases and intentions, to link the Western Theory of IR with classical Chinese thinking. Another author, Zhao Tingyang, claims the Tianxia (All-under-Heaven), worldview of the pre-Qin era (2100 to 221 BC), as a possible alternative to the Westphalian paradigm. The following work analyzes this phenomenon, as well as the new epistemological approaches that assuming this challenge implies. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-12-01 2023-03-01T19:59:24Z 2023-03-01T19:59:24Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.5752/P.2317-773X.2021V9N4P63-89 Estudos Internacionais, v. 9, n. 4, p. 63-89, 2021. 2317-773X http://hdl.handle.net/11449/240056 10.5752/P.2317-773X.2021V9N4P63-89 2-s2.0-85129991772 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.5752/P.2317-773X.2021V9N4P63-89 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/240056 |
identifier_str_mv |
Estudos Internacionais, v. 9, n. 4, p. 63-89, 2021. 2317-773X 10.5752/P.2317-773X.2021V9N4P63-89 2-s2.0-85129991772 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
spa |
language |
spa |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Estudos Internacionais |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
63-89 |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808129487378841600 |