Giberelina, citocinina e auxina na qualidade química de bagas de uva superior seedless
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2013 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://www.seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/21839 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/112591 |
Resumo: | Trials were carried out in Juazeiro, Bahia State, Brazil, aiming to test plant regulators composed by gibberellin, cytokine and auxin effects on chemical quality of Superior Seedless grape berries. The first trial studied the effects of Stimulate (R) (bio regulator) and X-Cyte (R) (cytokine) associated to a new gibberellin formulation (N-Large (R)) and associated to Pro-Gibb (R), which is a product used as source of gibberellin. Products were sprayed at berries development phase (18, 21, 51 and 56 days after spur-pruning). Treatments were: T1: Pro-Gibb (R); T2: Stimulate (R) (Dose 1); T3: Stimulate (R) (Dose 2); T4: Stimulate (R) (Dose 3); T5: Pro-Gibb (R) + X-Cyte (R) (Low Dose - DB); T6: Pro-Gibb (R) + X-Cyte (R) (Intermediate Dose - DM); T7: Pro-Gibb (R) + X-Cyte (R) (High Dose - DA); T8: N-Large (R); T9: N-Large (R) + X-Cyte (R) (DB); T10: N-Large (R) + X-Cyte (R) (DM); T11: N-Large (R) + X-Cyte (R) (DA). The second trial aimed to assess the effect of the new gibberellin formulation (N-Large (R)) associated or not with cytokine (X-Cyte (R)) also sprayed straight over the bunches at berries development phase (17, 55 e 66 days after spur-pruning). Treatments were: T1: Pro-Gibb (R) - blank; T2: N-Large (R) (DB); T3: N-Large (R) (DM); T4: N-Large (R) (DA); T5: N-Large (R) (DB) + X-Cyte (R) (DB); T6: N-Large (R) (DB) + X-Cyte (R) (DM); T7: N-Large (R) (DB) + X-Cyte (R) (DA); T8: N-Large (R) (DM) + X-Cyte (R) (DB); T9: N-Large (R) (DM) + X-Cyte (R) (DM); T10: N-Large (R) (DM) + X-Cyte (R) (DA); T11: N-Large (R) (DA) + X-Cyte (R) (DB); T12: N-Large (R) (DA) + X-Cyte (R) (DM); T13: N-Large (R) (DA) + X-Cyte (R) (DA). Experimental design was random blocks with four repetitions with each repetition/parcel having three useful plants in the same row. At harvest, when bunches average had soluble solids over 15 degrees Brix, berries were collected for soluble solids, pH, titratable acidity analysis as well as (SS/AT) ratio calculation. In both trials, plant regulators evaluated did not provide significant changes on chemical quality of 'Superior Seedless' grape berries. Therefore, the lack of differences on response between the commercially used product (Pro-Gibb (R)) and the other products tested (Stimulate (R), X-Cyte (R) e N-Large (R)) prove the last as promising for the ` Superior Seedless' grape cultivation, leaving a larger range of alternative for grape farmers in the Sao Francisco Valley, Bahia. |
id |
UNSP_34954f6fb2d4e5d81f4b13ae3df0a4c3 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/112591 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Giberelina, citocinina e auxina na qualidade química de bagas de uva superior seedlessGibberellin, citocinin and auxin on chemical quality of 'superior seedless' grape berriesVitis vinifera L.Post-harvestPlant regulatorsTrials were carried out in Juazeiro, Bahia State, Brazil, aiming to test plant regulators composed by gibberellin, cytokine and auxin effects on chemical quality of Superior Seedless grape berries. The first trial studied the effects of Stimulate (R) (bio regulator) and X-Cyte (R) (cytokine) associated to a new gibberellin formulation (N-Large (R)) and associated to Pro-Gibb (R), which is a product used as source of gibberellin. Products were sprayed at berries development phase (18, 21, 51 and 56 days after spur-pruning). Treatments were: T1: Pro-Gibb (R); T2: Stimulate (R) (Dose 1); T3: Stimulate (R) (Dose 2); T4: Stimulate (R) (Dose 3); T5: Pro-Gibb (R) + X-Cyte (R) (Low Dose - DB); T6: Pro-Gibb (R) + X-Cyte (R) (Intermediate Dose - DM); T7: Pro-Gibb (R) + X-Cyte (R) (High Dose - DA); T8: N-Large (R); T9: N-Large (R) + X-Cyte (R) (DB); T10: N-Large (R) + X-Cyte (R) (DM); T11: N-Large (R) + X-Cyte (R) (DA). The second trial aimed to assess the effect of the new gibberellin formulation (N-Large (R)) associated or not with cytokine (X-Cyte (R)) also sprayed straight over the bunches at berries development phase (17, 55 e 66 days after spur-pruning). Treatments were: T1: Pro-Gibb (R) - blank; T2: N-Large (R) (DB); T3: N-Large (R) (DM); T4: N-Large (R) (DA); T5: N-Large (R) (DB) + X-Cyte (R) (DB); T6: N-Large (R) (DB) + X-Cyte (R) (DM); T7: N-Large (R) (DB) + X-Cyte (R) (DA); T8: N-Large (R) (DM) + X-Cyte (R) (DB); T9: N-Large (R) (DM) + X-Cyte (R) (DM); T10: N-Large (R) (DM) + X-Cyte (R) (DA); T11: N-Large (R) (DA) + X-Cyte (R) (DB); T12: N-Large (R) (DA) + X-Cyte (R) (DM); T13: N-Large (R) (DA) + X-Cyte (R) (DA). Experimental design was random blocks with four repetitions with each repetition/parcel having three useful plants in the same row. At harvest, when bunches average had soluble solids over 15 degrees Brix, berries were collected for soluble solids, pH, titratable acidity analysis as well as (SS/AT) ratio calculation. In both trials, plant regulators evaluated did not provide significant changes on chemical quality of 'Superior Seedless' grape berries. Therefore, the lack of differences on response between the commercially used product (Pro-Gibb (R)) and the other products tested (Stimulate (R), X-Cyte (R) e N-Large (R)) prove the last as promising for the ` Superior Seedless' grape cultivation, leaving a larger range of alternative for grape farmers in the Sao Francisco Valley, Bahia.Os experimentos foram conduzidos no município de Juazeiro/BA com a finalidade de avaliar o efeito de reguladores vegetais compostos por giberelina, citocinina e auxina na qualidade química de bagas de uva do cultivar Superior Seedless. No primeiro ensaio estudaram-se os efeitos de Stimulate (biorregulador) e X-Cyte (citocinina) associado a uma nova formulação comercial de giberelina (N-Large) e ao Pro-Gibb, produto usualmente utilizado como fonte de giberelina, aplicados via pulverização na fase de desenvolvimento das bagas (18, 21, 51 e 56 dias após a poda de produção). Para tanto se empregou os seguintes tratamentos: T1: Pro-Gibb; T2: Stimulate (Dose 1); T3: Stimulate (Dose 2); T4: Stimulate (Dose 3); T5: Pro-Gibb + X-Cyte (Dose Baixa - DB); T6: Pro-Gibb + X-Cyte (Dose Média - DM); T7: Pro-Gibb + X-Cyte (Dose Alta - DA); T8: N-Large; T9: N-Large + X-Cyte (DB); T10: N-Large + X-Cyte (DM); T11: N-Large + X-Cyte (DA). O segundo ensaio teve por objetivo verificar o efeito da nova formulação de giberelina (N-Large) associada ou não a citocinina (X-Cyte) também aplicados via pulverização direcionada aos cachos na fase de desenvolvimento das bagas (17, 55 e 66 dias após a poda de produção). Assim, os seguintes tratamentos foram empregados: T1: Pro-Gibb; T2: N-Large (DB); T3: N-Large (DM); T4: N-Large (DA); T5: N-Large (DB) + X-Cyte (DB); T6: N-Large (DB) + X-Cyte (DM); T7: N-Large (DB) + X-Cyte (DA); T8: N-Large (DM) + X-Cyte (DB); T9: N-Large (DM) + X-Cyte (DM); T10: N-Large (DM) + X-Cyte (DA); T11: N-Large (DA) + X-Cyte (DB); T12: N-Large (DA) + X-Cyte (DM); T13: N-Large (DA) + X-Cyte (DA). O delineamento experimental foi em blocos ao acaso com quatro repetições, onde se considerou cada parcela uma repetição com três plantas úteis na mesma linha de plantas. Por ocasião da colheita, momento em que a média dos cachos apresentava teor de sólidos solúveis superior a 15 ºBrix, foram retiradas bagas para as análises de sólidos solúveis, pH, acidez titulável e, cálculo do ratio (SS/AT). Em ambos os ensaios os reguladores vegetais avaliados não proporcionaram alterações significativas nas características químicas das bagas de uva ‘Superior Seedless’. Assim, a ausência de diferença de resposta entre o produto comercialmente empregado (Pro-Gibb) e os demais testados (Stimulate, X-Cyte e N-Large) os torna promissores no cultivo da uva ‘Superior Seedless’, fornecendo maior número de alternativas aos produtores da região do Vale do São Francisco.Univ Fed Mato Grosso, Fac Agron Med Vet & Zootecnia FAMEVZ, Dept Fitotecnia & Fitossanidade, Cuiaba, MT, BrazilUniv Estadual Paulista, UNESP, Inst Biociencias, Dept Bot, Botucatu, SP, BrazilUNESP, Inst Biociencias, Dept Bot, Botucatu, SP, BrazilUniv Estadual Paulista, UNESP, Inst Biociencias, Dept Bot, Botucatu, SP, BrazilUNESP, Inst Biociencias, Dept Bot, Botucatu, SP, BrazilUniv Federal UberlandiaUniv Fed Mato GrossoUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Camili, Elisangela ClareteRodrigues, Joao Domingos [UNESP]Ono, Elizabeth Orika [UNESP]2014-12-03T13:10:51Z2014-12-03T13:10:51Z2013-11-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article1761-1770application/pdfhttp://www.seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/21839Bioscience Journal. Uberlandia: Univ Federal Uberlandia, v. 29, n. 6, p. 1761-1770, 2013.1981-3163http://hdl.handle.net/11449/112591WOS:000327940900002WOS000327940900002.pdf42114321288164097904769201845860Web of Sciencereponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPporBioscience Journal0.404info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-10-09T13:28:30Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/112591Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestrepositoriounesp@unesp.bropendoar:29462024-10-09T13:28:30Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Giberelina, citocinina e auxina na qualidade química de bagas de uva superior seedless Gibberellin, citocinin and auxin on chemical quality of 'superior seedless' grape berries |
title |
Giberelina, citocinina e auxina na qualidade química de bagas de uva superior seedless |
spellingShingle |
Giberelina, citocinina e auxina na qualidade química de bagas de uva superior seedless Camili, Elisangela Clarete Vitis vinifera L. Post-harvest Plant regulators |
title_short |
Giberelina, citocinina e auxina na qualidade química de bagas de uva superior seedless |
title_full |
Giberelina, citocinina e auxina na qualidade química de bagas de uva superior seedless |
title_fullStr |
Giberelina, citocinina e auxina na qualidade química de bagas de uva superior seedless |
title_full_unstemmed |
Giberelina, citocinina e auxina na qualidade química de bagas de uva superior seedless |
title_sort |
Giberelina, citocinina e auxina na qualidade química de bagas de uva superior seedless |
author |
Camili, Elisangela Clarete |
author_facet |
Camili, Elisangela Clarete Rodrigues, Joao Domingos [UNESP] Ono, Elizabeth Orika [UNESP] |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Rodrigues, Joao Domingos [UNESP] Ono, Elizabeth Orika [UNESP] |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Univ Fed Mato Grosso Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Camili, Elisangela Clarete Rodrigues, Joao Domingos [UNESP] Ono, Elizabeth Orika [UNESP] |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Vitis vinifera L. Post-harvest Plant regulators |
topic |
Vitis vinifera L. Post-harvest Plant regulators |
description |
Trials were carried out in Juazeiro, Bahia State, Brazil, aiming to test plant regulators composed by gibberellin, cytokine and auxin effects on chemical quality of Superior Seedless grape berries. The first trial studied the effects of Stimulate (R) (bio regulator) and X-Cyte (R) (cytokine) associated to a new gibberellin formulation (N-Large (R)) and associated to Pro-Gibb (R), which is a product used as source of gibberellin. Products were sprayed at berries development phase (18, 21, 51 and 56 days after spur-pruning). Treatments were: T1: Pro-Gibb (R); T2: Stimulate (R) (Dose 1); T3: Stimulate (R) (Dose 2); T4: Stimulate (R) (Dose 3); T5: Pro-Gibb (R) + X-Cyte (R) (Low Dose - DB); T6: Pro-Gibb (R) + X-Cyte (R) (Intermediate Dose - DM); T7: Pro-Gibb (R) + X-Cyte (R) (High Dose - DA); T8: N-Large (R); T9: N-Large (R) + X-Cyte (R) (DB); T10: N-Large (R) + X-Cyte (R) (DM); T11: N-Large (R) + X-Cyte (R) (DA). The second trial aimed to assess the effect of the new gibberellin formulation (N-Large (R)) associated or not with cytokine (X-Cyte (R)) also sprayed straight over the bunches at berries development phase (17, 55 e 66 days after spur-pruning). Treatments were: T1: Pro-Gibb (R) - blank; T2: N-Large (R) (DB); T3: N-Large (R) (DM); T4: N-Large (R) (DA); T5: N-Large (R) (DB) + X-Cyte (R) (DB); T6: N-Large (R) (DB) + X-Cyte (R) (DM); T7: N-Large (R) (DB) + X-Cyte (R) (DA); T8: N-Large (R) (DM) + X-Cyte (R) (DB); T9: N-Large (R) (DM) + X-Cyte (R) (DM); T10: N-Large (R) (DM) + X-Cyte (R) (DA); T11: N-Large (R) (DA) + X-Cyte (R) (DB); T12: N-Large (R) (DA) + X-Cyte (R) (DM); T13: N-Large (R) (DA) + X-Cyte (R) (DA). Experimental design was random blocks with four repetitions with each repetition/parcel having three useful plants in the same row. At harvest, when bunches average had soluble solids over 15 degrees Brix, berries were collected for soluble solids, pH, titratable acidity analysis as well as (SS/AT) ratio calculation. In both trials, plant regulators evaluated did not provide significant changes on chemical quality of 'Superior Seedless' grape berries. Therefore, the lack of differences on response between the commercially used product (Pro-Gibb (R)) and the other products tested (Stimulate (R), X-Cyte (R) e N-Large (R)) prove the last as promising for the ` Superior Seedless' grape cultivation, leaving a larger range of alternative for grape farmers in the Sao Francisco Valley, Bahia. |
publishDate |
2013 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2013-11-01 2014-12-03T13:10:51Z 2014-12-03T13:10:51Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://www.seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/21839 Bioscience Journal. Uberlandia: Univ Federal Uberlandia, v. 29, n. 6, p. 1761-1770, 2013. 1981-3163 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/112591 WOS:000327940900002 WOS000327940900002.pdf 4211432128816409 7904769201845860 |
url |
http://www.seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/21839 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/112591 |
identifier_str_mv |
Bioscience Journal. Uberlandia: Univ Federal Uberlandia, v. 29, n. 6, p. 1761-1770, 2013. 1981-3163 WOS:000327940900002 WOS000327940900002.pdf 4211432128816409 7904769201845860 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Bioscience Journal 0.404 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
1761-1770 application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Univ Federal Uberlandia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Univ Federal Uberlandia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Web of Science reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
repositoriounesp@unesp.br |
_version_ |
1826304519806386176 |