Leaf morphophysiology of a Neotropical mistletoe is shaped by seasonal patterns of host leaf phenology

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Scalon, Marina Corrêa
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Rossatto, Davi Rodrigo [UNESP], Domingos, Fabricius Maia Chaves Bicalho, Franco, Augusto Cesar
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00442-015-3519-8
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/172326
Resumo: Several mistletoe species are able to grow and reproduce on both deciduous and evergreen hosts, suggesting a degree of plasticity in their ability to cope with differences in intrinsic host functions. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of host phenology on mistletoe water relations and leaf gas exchange. Mistletoe Passovia ovata parasitizing evergreen (Miconia albicans) hosts and P. ovata parasitizing deciduous (Byrsonima verbascifolia) hosts were sampled in a Neotropical savanna. Photosynthetic parameters, diurnal cycles of stomatal conductance, pre-dawn and midday leaf water potential, and stomatal anatomical traits were measured during the peak of the dry and wet seasons, respectively. P. ovata showed distinct water-use strategies that were dependent on host phenology. For P. ovata parasitizing the deciduous host, water use efficiency (WUE; ratio of photosynthetic rate to transpirational water loss) was 2-fold lower in the dry season than in the wet season; in contrast, WUE was maintained at the same level during the wet and dry seasons in P. ovata parasitizing the evergreen host. Generally, mistletoe and host diurnal cycles of stomatal conductance were linked, although there were clear differences in leaf water potential, with mistletoe showing anisohydric behaviour and the host showing isohydric behaviour. Compared to mistletoes attached to evergreen hosts, those parasitizing deciduous hosts had a 1.4-fold lower stomatal density and 1.2-fold wider stomata on both leaf surfaces, suggesting that the latter suffered less intense drought stress. This is the first study to show morphophysiological differences in the same mistletoe species parasitizing hosts of different phenological groups. Our results provide evidence that phenotypical plasticity (anatomical and physiological) might be essential to favour the use of a greater range of hosts.
id UNSP_37fdb99f483ac11e646fc90b6d94c244
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/172326
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Leaf morphophysiology of a Neotropical mistletoe is shaped by seasonal patterns of host leaf phenologyCerradoHemiparasiteLoranthaceaeStomatal traitsWater useSeveral mistletoe species are able to grow and reproduce on both deciduous and evergreen hosts, suggesting a degree of plasticity in their ability to cope with differences in intrinsic host functions. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of host phenology on mistletoe water relations and leaf gas exchange. Mistletoe Passovia ovata parasitizing evergreen (Miconia albicans) hosts and P. ovata parasitizing deciduous (Byrsonima verbascifolia) hosts were sampled in a Neotropical savanna. Photosynthetic parameters, diurnal cycles of stomatal conductance, pre-dawn and midday leaf water potential, and stomatal anatomical traits were measured during the peak of the dry and wet seasons, respectively. P. ovata showed distinct water-use strategies that were dependent on host phenology. For P. ovata parasitizing the deciduous host, water use efficiency (WUE; ratio of photosynthetic rate to transpirational water loss) was 2-fold lower in the dry season than in the wet season; in contrast, WUE was maintained at the same level during the wet and dry seasons in P. ovata parasitizing the evergreen host. Generally, mistletoe and host diurnal cycles of stomatal conductance were linked, although there were clear differences in leaf water potential, with mistletoe showing anisohydric behaviour and the host showing isohydric behaviour. Compared to mistletoes attached to evergreen hosts, those parasitizing deciduous hosts had a 1.4-fold lower stomatal density and 1.2-fold wider stomata on both leaf surfaces, suggesting that the latter suffered less intense drought stress. This is the first study to show morphophysiological differences in the same mistletoe species parasitizing hosts of different phenological groups. Our results provide evidence that phenotypical plasticity (anatomical and physiological) might be essential to favour the use of a greater range of hosts.Laboratório de Ecofisiologia Vegetal Departamento de Botânica Instituto de Ciências Biológicas Universidade de Brasília, Caixa Postal 04457Laboratório de Ecologia Vegetal Departamento de Biologia (FCAV) Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), UNESP Campus de JaboticabalDepartamento de Zoologia Instituto de Ciências Biológicas Universidade de BrasíliaLaboratório de Ecologia Vegetal Departamento de Biologia (FCAV) Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), UNESP Campus de JaboticabalUniversidade de Brasília (UnB)Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Scalon, Marina CorrêaRossatto, Davi Rodrigo [UNESP]Domingos, Fabricius Maia Chaves BicalhoFranco, Augusto Cesar2018-12-11T16:59:44Z2018-12-11T16:59:44Z2016-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article1103-1112application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00442-015-3519-8Oecologia, v. 180, n. 4, p. 1103-1112, 2016.0029-8549http://hdl.handle.net/11449/17232610.1007/s00442-015-3519-82-s2.0-849502619152-s2.0-84950261915.pdfScopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengOecologia1,695info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-12-27T06:23:28Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/172326Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462023-12-27T06:23:28Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Leaf morphophysiology of a Neotropical mistletoe is shaped by seasonal patterns of host leaf phenology
title Leaf morphophysiology of a Neotropical mistletoe is shaped by seasonal patterns of host leaf phenology
spellingShingle Leaf morphophysiology of a Neotropical mistletoe is shaped by seasonal patterns of host leaf phenology
Scalon, Marina Corrêa
Cerrado
Hemiparasite
Loranthaceae
Stomatal traits
Water use
title_short Leaf morphophysiology of a Neotropical mistletoe is shaped by seasonal patterns of host leaf phenology
title_full Leaf morphophysiology of a Neotropical mistletoe is shaped by seasonal patterns of host leaf phenology
title_fullStr Leaf morphophysiology of a Neotropical mistletoe is shaped by seasonal patterns of host leaf phenology
title_full_unstemmed Leaf morphophysiology of a Neotropical mistletoe is shaped by seasonal patterns of host leaf phenology
title_sort Leaf morphophysiology of a Neotropical mistletoe is shaped by seasonal patterns of host leaf phenology
author Scalon, Marina Corrêa
author_facet Scalon, Marina Corrêa
Rossatto, Davi Rodrigo [UNESP]
Domingos, Fabricius Maia Chaves Bicalho
Franco, Augusto Cesar
author_role author
author2 Rossatto, Davi Rodrigo [UNESP]
Domingos, Fabricius Maia Chaves Bicalho
Franco, Augusto Cesar
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de Brasília (UnB)
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Scalon, Marina Corrêa
Rossatto, Davi Rodrigo [UNESP]
Domingos, Fabricius Maia Chaves Bicalho
Franco, Augusto Cesar
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Cerrado
Hemiparasite
Loranthaceae
Stomatal traits
Water use
topic Cerrado
Hemiparasite
Loranthaceae
Stomatal traits
Water use
description Several mistletoe species are able to grow and reproduce on both deciduous and evergreen hosts, suggesting a degree of plasticity in their ability to cope with differences in intrinsic host functions. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of host phenology on mistletoe water relations and leaf gas exchange. Mistletoe Passovia ovata parasitizing evergreen (Miconia albicans) hosts and P. ovata parasitizing deciduous (Byrsonima verbascifolia) hosts were sampled in a Neotropical savanna. Photosynthetic parameters, diurnal cycles of stomatal conductance, pre-dawn and midday leaf water potential, and stomatal anatomical traits were measured during the peak of the dry and wet seasons, respectively. P. ovata showed distinct water-use strategies that were dependent on host phenology. For P. ovata parasitizing the deciduous host, water use efficiency (WUE; ratio of photosynthetic rate to transpirational water loss) was 2-fold lower in the dry season than in the wet season; in contrast, WUE was maintained at the same level during the wet and dry seasons in P. ovata parasitizing the evergreen host. Generally, mistletoe and host diurnal cycles of stomatal conductance were linked, although there were clear differences in leaf water potential, with mistletoe showing anisohydric behaviour and the host showing isohydric behaviour. Compared to mistletoes attached to evergreen hosts, those parasitizing deciduous hosts had a 1.4-fold lower stomatal density and 1.2-fold wider stomata on both leaf surfaces, suggesting that the latter suffered less intense drought stress. This is the first study to show morphophysiological differences in the same mistletoe species parasitizing hosts of different phenological groups. Our results provide evidence that phenotypical plasticity (anatomical and physiological) might be essential to favour the use of a greater range of hosts.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-04-01
2018-12-11T16:59:44Z
2018-12-11T16:59:44Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00442-015-3519-8
Oecologia, v. 180, n. 4, p. 1103-1112, 2016.
0029-8549
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/172326
10.1007/s00442-015-3519-8
2-s2.0-84950261915
2-s2.0-84950261915.pdf
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00442-015-3519-8
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/172326
identifier_str_mv Oecologia, v. 180, n. 4, p. 1103-1112, 2016.
0029-8549
10.1007/s00442-015-3519-8
2-s2.0-84950261915
2-s2.0-84950261915.pdf
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Oecologia
1,695
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 1103-1112
application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799965426841550848