Influence of uncorrected refractive error and unmet refractive error on visual impairment in a Brazilian population
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2014 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2415-14-84 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/112287 |
Resumo: | Background: The World Health Organization (WHO) definitions of blindness and visual impairment are widely based on best-corrected visual acuity excluding uncorrected refractive errors (URE) as a visual impairment cause. Recently, URE was included as a cause of visual impairment, thus emphasizing the burden of visual impairment due to refractive error (RE) worldwide is substantially higher. The purpose of the present study is to determine the reversal of visual impairment and blindness in the population correcting RE and possible associations between RE and individual characteristics.Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in nine counties of the western region of state of Sao Paulo, using systematic and random sampling of households between March 2004 and July 2005. Individuals aged more than 1 year old were included and were evaluated for demographic data, eye complaints, history, and eye exam, including no corrected visual acuity (NCVA), best corrected vision acuity (BCVA), automatic and manual refractive examination. The definition adopted for URE was applied to individuals with NCVA > 0.15 logMAR and BCVA <= 0.15 logMAR after refractive correction and unmet refractive error (UREN), individuals who had visual impairment or blindness (NCVA > 0.5 logMAR) and BCVA <= 0.5 logMAR after optical correction.Results: A total of 70.2% of subjects had normal NCVA. URE was detected in 13.8%. Prevalence of 4.6% of optically reversible low vision and 1.8% of blindness reversible by optical correction were found. UREN was detected in 6.5% of individuals, more frequently observed in women over the age of 50 and in higher RE carriers. Visual impairment related to eye diseases is not reversible with spectacles. Using multivariate analysis, associations between URE and UREN with regard to sex, age and RE was observed.Conclusion: RE is an important cause of reversible blindness and low vision in the Brazilian population. |
id |
UNSP_3814673420bd7eaa71b1f0e1199dfd59 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/112287 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Influence of uncorrected refractive error and unmet refractive error on visual impairment in a Brazilian populationBlindnessVisual impairmentSpectaclesRefractive errorsUREURENBackground: The World Health Organization (WHO) definitions of blindness and visual impairment are widely based on best-corrected visual acuity excluding uncorrected refractive errors (URE) as a visual impairment cause. Recently, URE was included as a cause of visual impairment, thus emphasizing the burden of visual impairment due to refractive error (RE) worldwide is substantially higher. The purpose of the present study is to determine the reversal of visual impairment and blindness in the population correcting RE and possible associations between RE and individual characteristics.Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in nine counties of the western region of state of Sao Paulo, using systematic and random sampling of households between March 2004 and July 2005. Individuals aged more than 1 year old were included and were evaluated for demographic data, eye complaints, history, and eye exam, including no corrected visual acuity (NCVA), best corrected vision acuity (BCVA), automatic and manual refractive examination. The definition adopted for URE was applied to individuals with NCVA > 0.15 logMAR and BCVA <= 0.15 logMAR after refractive correction and unmet refractive error (UREN), individuals who had visual impairment or blindness (NCVA > 0.5 logMAR) and BCVA <= 0.5 logMAR after optical correction.Results: A total of 70.2% of subjects had normal NCVA. URE was detected in 13.8%. Prevalence of 4.6% of optically reversible low vision and 1.8% of blindness reversible by optical correction were found. UREN was detected in 6.5% of individuals, more frequently observed in women over the age of 50 and in higher RE carriers. Visual impairment related to eye diseases is not reversible with spectacles. Using multivariate analysis, associations between URE and UREN with regard to sex, age and RE was observed.Conclusion: RE is an important cause of reversible blindness and low vision in the Brazilian population.Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)Universidade Estadual PaulistaUniv Estadual Paulista, UNESP, Fac Med Botucatu, Dept Ophthalmol, BR-18618970 Botucatu, SP, BrazilUniv Estadual Paulista, UNESP, Dept Biostat, Inst Biociencias Botucatu, BR-18618970 Botucatu, SP, BrazilUniv Estadual Paulista, UNESP, Fac Med Botucatu, Dept Ophthalmol, BR-18618970 Botucatu, SP, BrazilUniv Estadual Paulista, UNESP, Dept Biostat, Inst Biociencias Botucatu, BR-18618970 Botucatu, SP, BrazilBiomed Central Ltd.Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Ferraz, Fabio H. [UNESP]Corrente, José Eduardo [UNESP]Opromolla, Paula [UNESP]Schellini, Silvana Artioli [UNESP]2014-12-03T13:10:35Z2014-12-03T13:10:35Z2014-06-25info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article10application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2415-14-84Bmc Ophthalmology. London: Biomed Central Ltd, v. 14, 10 p., 2014.1471-2415http://hdl.handle.net/11449/11228710.1186/1471-2415-14-84WOS:000338376300003WOS000338376300003.pdf94202491008354920000-0001-5478-4996Web of Sciencereponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengBmc Ophthalmology1.7700,921info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-08-16T18:44:18Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/112287Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-16T18:44:18Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Influence of uncorrected refractive error and unmet refractive error on visual impairment in a Brazilian population |
title |
Influence of uncorrected refractive error and unmet refractive error on visual impairment in a Brazilian population |
spellingShingle |
Influence of uncorrected refractive error and unmet refractive error on visual impairment in a Brazilian population Ferraz, Fabio H. [UNESP] Blindness Visual impairment Spectacles Refractive errors URE UREN |
title_short |
Influence of uncorrected refractive error and unmet refractive error on visual impairment in a Brazilian population |
title_full |
Influence of uncorrected refractive error and unmet refractive error on visual impairment in a Brazilian population |
title_fullStr |
Influence of uncorrected refractive error and unmet refractive error on visual impairment in a Brazilian population |
title_full_unstemmed |
Influence of uncorrected refractive error and unmet refractive error on visual impairment in a Brazilian population |
title_sort |
Influence of uncorrected refractive error and unmet refractive error on visual impairment in a Brazilian population |
author |
Ferraz, Fabio H. [UNESP] |
author_facet |
Ferraz, Fabio H. [UNESP] Corrente, José Eduardo [UNESP] Opromolla, Paula [UNESP] Schellini, Silvana Artioli [UNESP] |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Corrente, José Eduardo [UNESP] Opromolla, Paula [UNESP] Schellini, Silvana Artioli [UNESP] |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Ferraz, Fabio H. [UNESP] Corrente, José Eduardo [UNESP] Opromolla, Paula [UNESP] Schellini, Silvana Artioli [UNESP] |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Blindness Visual impairment Spectacles Refractive errors URE UREN |
topic |
Blindness Visual impairment Spectacles Refractive errors URE UREN |
description |
Background: The World Health Organization (WHO) definitions of blindness and visual impairment are widely based on best-corrected visual acuity excluding uncorrected refractive errors (URE) as a visual impairment cause. Recently, URE was included as a cause of visual impairment, thus emphasizing the burden of visual impairment due to refractive error (RE) worldwide is substantially higher. The purpose of the present study is to determine the reversal of visual impairment and blindness in the population correcting RE and possible associations between RE and individual characteristics.Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in nine counties of the western region of state of Sao Paulo, using systematic and random sampling of households between March 2004 and July 2005. Individuals aged more than 1 year old were included and were evaluated for demographic data, eye complaints, history, and eye exam, including no corrected visual acuity (NCVA), best corrected vision acuity (BCVA), automatic and manual refractive examination. The definition adopted for URE was applied to individuals with NCVA > 0.15 logMAR and BCVA <= 0.15 logMAR after refractive correction and unmet refractive error (UREN), individuals who had visual impairment or blindness (NCVA > 0.5 logMAR) and BCVA <= 0.5 logMAR after optical correction.Results: A total of 70.2% of subjects had normal NCVA. URE was detected in 13.8%. Prevalence of 4.6% of optically reversible low vision and 1.8% of blindness reversible by optical correction were found. UREN was detected in 6.5% of individuals, more frequently observed in women over the age of 50 and in higher RE carriers. Visual impairment related to eye diseases is not reversible with spectacles. Using multivariate analysis, associations between URE and UREN with regard to sex, age and RE was observed.Conclusion: RE is an important cause of reversible blindness and low vision in the Brazilian population. |
publishDate |
2014 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2014-12-03T13:10:35Z 2014-12-03T13:10:35Z 2014-06-25 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2415-14-84 Bmc Ophthalmology. London: Biomed Central Ltd, v. 14, 10 p., 2014. 1471-2415 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/112287 10.1186/1471-2415-14-84 WOS:000338376300003 WOS000338376300003.pdf 9420249100835492 0000-0001-5478-4996 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2415-14-84 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/112287 |
identifier_str_mv |
Bmc Ophthalmology. London: Biomed Central Ltd, v. 14, 10 p., 2014. 1471-2415 10.1186/1471-2415-14-84 WOS:000338376300003 WOS000338376300003.pdf 9420249100835492 0000-0001-5478-4996 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Bmc Ophthalmology 1.770 0,921 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
10 application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Biomed Central Ltd. |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Biomed Central Ltd. |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Web of Science reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808128180853145600 |