Characteristics and management of congenital anophthalmos and microphthalmos at a tertiary eye hospital

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Galindo-Ferreiro, Alicia
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Elkhamary, Sahar M, Alhammad, Fatimah, AlGhafri, Laila, AlWehaib, Manar, Alessa, Dalal, Aldossari, Saif, Akaishi, Patricia, Khadekar, Rajiv, AlShaikh, Osama, Schellini, Silvana Artioli [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
DOI: 10.1080/01676830.2018.1521843
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01676830.2018.1521843
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/189790
Resumo: Purpose: The purpose of the study is to evaluate demographic data and outcomes of the management of congenital anophthalmia/microphthalmia. Methods: This retrospective, descriptive, cross-sectional study evaluated patients with congenital anophthalmia/microphthalmia managed from 2004 to 2014 at a tertiary hospital in Saudi Arabia. Data were collected on patient age, gender, cause, orbital status, laterality, systemic comorbidities, ocular evaluation, and management (type of surgery, type of orbital implant, and complications). The main outcome measure was the ability to hold the prosthesis. Results: The study sample was composed of 513 eyes/sockets of 365 patients. Two-hundred and seventeen (59.4%) patients were unilateral cases. Forty-one (8%) sockets were due to congenital anophthalmia and 471 (92%) were due to microphthalmia. There were 73.2% isolated cases and 28.5% with systemic involvement. Systemic involvement was more common in bilateral cases. The most commonly associated conditions were central nervous disorders. One-hundred and nineteen (46.7%) cases had parental consanguinity. Two hundred and eighteen eyes/sockets (163 patients) underwent surgery including conjunctival flap (38; 17.4%), evisceration (38; 17.4%), enucleation (16; 7.3%), or procedures to improve the anophthalmic socket volume (45; 20.6%). Volume enhancing procedures included polymethylmethacrylate orbital implants (26; 57.8%), expanders (11; 24.4%), integrated hydroxyapatite or polyethylene implants (2; 4.4%), and dermis-fat graft (6; 13.3%). In most cases, clinical or surgical management resulted in a successful outcome. Conclusion: Anophthalmia/Microphthalmia was detected in 36.5 patients/year. The majority had isolated microphthalmia. Good outcomes were achieved with clinical or surgical management in the majority of cases.
id UNSP_3b84857b550f570b575de3b7435218ad
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/189790
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Characteristics and management of congenital anophthalmos and microphthalmos at a tertiary eye hospitalAnophthalmiacongenitaldisordersmicrophthalmiaoutcomePurpose: The purpose of the study is to evaluate demographic data and outcomes of the management of congenital anophthalmia/microphthalmia. Methods: This retrospective, descriptive, cross-sectional study evaluated patients with congenital anophthalmia/microphthalmia managed from 2004 to 2014 at a tertiary hospital in Saudi Arabia. Data were collected on patient age, gender, cause, orbital status, laterality, systemic comorbidities, ocular evaluation, and management (type of surgery, type of orbital implant, and complications). The main outcome measure was the ability to hold the prosthesis. Results: The study sample was composed of 513 eyes/sockets of 365 patients. Two-hundred and seventeen (59.4%) patients were unilateral cases. Forty-one (8%) sockets were due to congenital anophthalmia and 471 (92%) were due to microphthalmia. There were 73.2% isolated cases and 28.5% with systemic involvement. Systemic involvement was more common in bilateral cases. The most commonly associated conditions were central nervous disorders. One-hundred and nineteen (46.7%) cases had parental consanguinity. Two hundred and eighteen eyes/sockets (163 patients) underwent surgery including conjunctival flap (38; 17.4%), evisceration (38; 17.4%), enucleation (16; 7.3%), or procedures to improve the anophthalmic socket volume (45; 20.6%). Volume enhancing procedures included polymethylmethacrylate orbital implants (26; 57.8%), expanders (11; 24.4%), integrated hydroxyapatite or polyethylene implants (2; 4.4%), and dermis-fat graft (6; 13.3%). In most cases, clinical or surgical management resulted in a successful outcome. Conclusion: Anophthalmia/Microphthalmia was detected in 36.5 patients/year. The majority had isolated microphthalmia. Good outcomes were achieved with clinical or surgical management in the majority of cases.Department of Ophthalmology Rio Hortega University HospitalOculoplastics and Orbit Division King Khaled Eye Specialist HospitalDiagnostic Imaging Department King Khaled Eye Specialist HospitalDiagnostic Imaging Department Mansoura Faculty Of MedicineDepartment of Ophthalmology Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo–USP- Ribeirao PretoDepartment of Ophthalmology Faculdade de Medicina - Universidade Estadual Paulista - UNESPDepartment of Ophthalmology Faculdade de Medicina - Universidade Estadual Paulista - UNESPRio Hortega University HospitalKing Khaled Eye Specialist HospitalMansoura Faculty Of MedicineUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Galindo-Ferreiro, AliciaElkhamary, Sahar MAlhammad, FatimahAlGhafri, LailaAlWehaib, ManarAlessa, DalalAldossari, SaifAkaishi, PatriciaKhadekar, RajivAlShaikh, OsamaSchellini, Silvana Artioli [UNESP]2019-10-06T16:52:16Z2019-10-06T16:52:16Z2019-05-04info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article192-198http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01676830.2018.1521843Orbit (London), v. 38, n. 3, p. 192-198, 2019.1744-51080167-6830http://hdl.handle.net/11449/18979010.1080/01676830.2018.15218432-s2.0-85054553701Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengOrbit (London)info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-08-16T18:44:17Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/189790Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-16T18:44:17Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Characteristics and management of congenital anophthalmos and microphthalmos at a tertiary eye hospital
title Characteristics and management of congenital anophthalmos and microphthalmos at a tertiary eye hospital
spellingShingle Characteristics and management of congenital anophthalmos and microphthalmos at a tertiary eye hospital
Characteristics and management of congenital anophthalmos and microphthalmos at a tertiary eye hospital
Galindo-Ferreiro, Alicia
Anophthalmia
congenital
disorders
microphthalmia
outcome
Galindo-Ferreiro, Alicia
Anophthalmia
congenital
disorders
microphthalmia
outcome
title_short Characteristics and management of congenital anophthalmos and microphthalmos at a tertiary eye hospital
title_full Characteristics and management of congenital anophthalmos and microphthalmos at a tertiary eye hospital
title_fullStr Characteristics and management of congenital anophthalmos and microphthalmos at a tertiary eye hospital
Characteristics and management of congenital anophthalmos and microphthalmos at a tertiary eye hospital
title_full_unstemmed Characteristics and management of congenital anophthalmos and microphthalmos at a tertiary eye hospital
Characteristics and management of congenital anophthalmos and microphthalmos at a tertiary eye hospital
title_sort Characteristics and management of congenital anophthalmos and microphthalmos at a tertiary eye hospital
author Galindo-Ferreiro, Alicia
author_facet Galindo-Ferreiro, Alicia
Galindo-Ferreiro, Alicia
Elkhamary, Sahar M
Alhammad, Fatimah
AlGhafri, Laila
AlWehaib, Manar
Alessa, Dalal
Aldossari, Saif
Akaishi, Patricia
Khadekar, Rajiv
AlShaikh, Osama
Schellini, Silvana Artioli [UNESP]
Elkhamary, Sahar M
Alhammad, Fatimah
AlGhafri, Laila
AlWehaib, Manar
Alessa, Dalal
Aldossari, Saif
Akaishi, Patricia
Khadekar, Rajiv
AlShaikh, Osama
Schellini, Silvana Artioli [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Elkhamary, Sahar M
Alhammad, Fatimah
AlGhafri, Laila
AlWehaib, Manar
Alessa, Dalal
Aldossari, Saif
Akaishi, Patricia
Khadekar, Rajiv
AlShaikh, Osama
Schellini, Silvana Artioli [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Rio Hortega University Hospital
King Khaled Eye Specialist Hospital
Mansoura Faculty Of Medicine
Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Galindo-Ferreiro, Alicia
Elkhamary, Sahar M
Alhammad, Fatimah
AlGhafri, Laila
AlWehaib, Manar
Alessa, Dalal
Aldossari, Saif
Akaishi, Patricia
Khadekar, Rajiv
AlShaikh, Osama
Schellini, Silvana Artioli [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Anophthalmia
congenital
disorders
microphthalmia
outcome
topic Anophthalmia
congenital
disorders
microphthalmia
outcome
description Purpose: The purpose of the study is to evaluate demographic data and outcomes of the management of congenital anophthalmia/microphthalmia. Methods: This retrospective, descriptive, cross-sectional study evaluated patients with congenital anophthalmia/microphthalmia managed from 2004 to 2014 at a tertiary hospital in Saudi Arabia. Data were collected on patient age, gender, cause, orbital status, laterality, systemic comorbidities, ocular evaluation, and management (type of surgery, type of orbital implant, and complications). The main outcome measure was the ability to hold the prosthesis. Results: The study sample was composed of 513 eyes/sockets of 365 patients. Two-hundred and seventeen (59.4%) patients were unilateral cases. Forty-one (8%) sockets were due to congenital anophthalmia and 471 (92%) were due to microphthalmia. There were 73.2% isolated cases and 28.5% with systemic involvement. Systemic involvement was more common in bilateral cases. The most commonly associated conditions were central nervous disorders. One-hundred and nineteen (46.7%) cases had parental consanguinity. Two hundred and eighteen eyes/sockets (163 patients) underwent surgery including conjunctival flap (38; 17.4%), evisceration (38; 17.4%), enucleation (16; 7.3%), or procedures to improve the anophthalmic socket volume (45; 20.6%). Volume enhancing procedures included polymethylmethacrylate orbital implants (26; 57.8%), expanders (11; 24.4%), integrated hydroxyapatite or polyethylene implants (2; 4.4%), and dermis-fat graft (6; 13.3%). In most cases, clinical or surgical management resulted in a successful outcome. Conclusion: Anophthalmia/Microphthalmia was detected in 36.5 patients/year. The majority had isolated microphthalmia. Good outcomes were achieved with clinical or surgical management in the majority of cases.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-10-06T16:52:16Z
2019-10-06T16:52:16Z
2019-05-04
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01676830.2018.1521843
Orbit (London), v. 38, n. 3, p. 192-198, 2019.
1744-5108
0167-6830
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/189790
10.1080/01676830.2018.1521843
2-s2.0-85054553701
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01676830.2018.1521843
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/189790
identifier_str_mv Orbit (London), v. 38, n. 3, p. 192-198, 2019.
1744-5108
0167-6830
10.1080/01676830.2018.1521843
2-s2.0-85054553701
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Orbit (London)
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 192-198
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1822231999199313920
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv 10.1080/01676830.2018.1521843