Climate change and opposing spatial conservation priorities for anuran protection in the Brazilian hotspots
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2019.04.003 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/185669 |
Resumo: | In conservation biogeography, the process of spatial conservation prioritization (SCP) aims to select areas that meet biodiversity targets at a minimum set coverage. Here, we propose a SCP scheme for the highly endemic and diverse anuran fauna of the Atlantic Forest (AF) and Cerrado (CER) South American hotspots under different climate change scenarios. Specifically, we make use of predicted anuran occurrences, built for baseline and future (2050 and 2070) time slices, and address biological and conservation metrics to identify potential priority regions for anuran conservation over time using the software MARXAN. Considering each time slice separately, the percentage area needed for total anuran representation varies at magnitudes of 9.8-10.66% for the AF and 6.4-8.8% for the CER. Pooling all time slices together in the selected conservation network, the identified spatial priorities account for 15.56% and 13.25% of the total AF and CER areas respectively. However, we identified opposing strategies for the anuran spatial conservation prioritization in the AF and CER over the different time periods; the increasing of priority cells across time considering the potential species redistribution under climate change in the AF, and the selection of fewer priority cells in the future than the identified for the baseline climate in the CER. The southeastern AF coast was identified as a priority area for amphibian conservation in this hotspot, as well as some other smaller areas in the northern and southern regions. Priority areas identified in the CER, although patchy distributed across the hotspot, are found in specific central-northern, western, and southeastern regions. The different conservation strategies identified in the present SCP emphasize the need for establishing different conservation efforts according to a sequential scheduling of priority areas that optimizes the long-term conservation goals. |
id |
UNSP_3c12af00f6ce3623852c7a3953774ba1 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/185669 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Climate change and opposing spatial conservation priorities for anuran protection in the Brazilian hotspotsAtlantic ForestCerradoEcological niche modellingMARXAN softwareSpatial conservation prioritizationIn conservation biogeography, the process of spatial conservation prioritization (SCP) aims to select areas that meet biodiversity targets at a minimum set coverage. Here, we propose a SCP scheme for the highly endemic and diverse anuran fauna of the Atlantic Forest (AF) and Cerrado (CER) South American hotspots under different climate change scenarios. Specifically, we make use of predicted anuran occurrences, built for baseline and future (2050 and 2070) time slices, and address biological and conservation metrics to identify potential priority regions for anuran conservation over time using the software MARXAN. Considering each time slice separately, the percentage area needed for total anuran representation varies at magnitudes of 9.8-10.66% for the AF and 6.4-8.8% for the CER. Pooling all time slices together in the selected conservation network, the identified spatial priorities account for 15.56% and 13.25% of the total AF and CER areas respectively. However, we identified opposing strategies for the anuran spatial conservation prioritization in the AF and CER over the different time periods; the increasing of priority cells across time considering the potential species redistribution under climate change in the AF, and the selection of fewer priority cells in the future than the identified for the baseline climate in the CER. The southeastern AF coast was identified as a priority area for amphibian conservation in this hotspot, as well as some other smaller areas in the northern and southern regions. Priority areas identified in the CER, although patchy distributed across the hotspot, are found in specific central-northern, western, and southeastern regions. The different conservation strategies identified in the present SCP emphasize the need for establishing different conservation efforts according to a sequential scheduling of priority areas that optimizes the long-term conservation goals.Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)University Research and Scientific Production Support Program (PROBIP/UEG)Univ Estadual Paulista, Dept Ciencias Biol, BR-17033360 Bauru, SP, BrazilUniv Estadual Goias, Campus Anapolis Ciencias Exatas & Tecnol Henrique, BR-75132903 Anapolis, Go, BrazilUniv Estadual Paulista, Dept Ciencias Biol, BR-17033360 Bauru, SP, BrazilFAPESP: 2011/18510-0FAPESP: 2012/07765-0CNPq: 114613/2018-4CNPq: 431012/2016-4Elsevier B.V.Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Univ Estadual GoiasVasconcelos, Tiago S. [UNESP]Prado, Vitor H. M.2019-10-04T12:37:26Z2019-10-04T12:37:26Z2019-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article118-124http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2019.04.003Journal For Nature Conservation. Munich: Elsevier Gmbh, v. 49, p. 118-124, 2019.1617-1381http://hdl.handle.net/11449/18566910.1016/j.jnc.2019.04.003WOS:000466571500014Web of Sciencereponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengJournal For Nature Conservationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-04-23T15:23:30Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/185669Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T18:54:41.756686Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Climate change and opposing spatial conservation priorities for anuran protection in the Brazilian hotspots |
title |
Climate change and opposing spatial conservation priorities for anuran protection in the Brazilian hotspots |
spellingShingle |
Climate change and opposing spatial conservation priorities for anuran protection in the Brazilian hotspots Vasconcelos, Tiago S. [UNESP] Atlantic Forest Cerrado Ecological niche modelling MARXAN software Spatial conservation prioritization |
title_short |
Climate change and opposing spatial conservation priorities for anuran protection in the Brazilian hotspots |
title_full |
Climate change and opposing spatial conservation priorities for anuran protection in the Brazilian hotspots |
title_fullStr |
Climate change and opposing spatial conservation priorities for anuran protection in the Brazilian hotspots |
title_full_unstemmed |
Climate change and opposing spatial conservation priorities for anuran protection in the Brazilian hotspots |
title_sort |
Climate change and opposing spatial conservation priorities for anuran protection in the Brazilian hotspots |
author |
Vasconcelos, Tiago S. [UNESP] |
author_facet |
Vasconcelos, Tiago S. [UNESP] Prado, Vitor H. M. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Prado, Vitor H. M. |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) Univ Estadual Goias |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Vasconcelos, Tiago S. [UNESP] Prado, Vitor H. M. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Atlantic Forest Cerrado Ecological niche modelling MARXAN software Spatial conservation prioritization |
topic |
Atlantic Forest Cerrado Ecological niche modelling MARXAN software Spatial conservation prioritization |
description |
In conservation biogeography, the process of spatial conservation prioritization (SCP) aims to select areas that meet biodiversity targets at a minimum set coverage. Here, we propose a SCP scheme for the highly endemic and diverse anuran fauna of the Atlantic Forest (AF) and Cerrado (CER) South American hotspots under different climate change scenarios. Specifically, we make use of predicted anuran occurrences, built for baseline and future (2050 and 2070) time slices, and address biological and conservation metrics to identify potential priority regions for anuran conservation over time using the software MARXAN. Considering each time slice separately, the percentage area needed for total anuran representation varies at magnitudes of 9.8-10.66% for the AF and 6.4-8.8% for the CER. Pooling all time slices together in the selected conservation network, the identified spatial priorities account for 15.56% and 13.25% of the total AF and CER areas respectively. However, we identified opposing strategies for the anuran spatial conservation prioritization in the AF and CER over the different time periods; the increasing of priority cells across time considering the potential species redistribution under climate change in the AF, and the selection of fewer priority cells in the future than the identified for the baseline climate in the CER. The southeastern AF coast was identified as a priority area for amphibian conservation in this hotspot, as well as some other smaller areas in the northern and southern regions. Priority areas identified in the CER, although patchy distributed across the hotspot, are found in specific central-northern, western, and southeastern regions. The different conservation strategies identified in the present SCP emphasize the need for establishing different conservation efforts according to a sequential scheduling of priority areas that optimizes the long-term conservation goals. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-10-04T12:37:26Z 2019-10-04T12:37:26Z 2019-06-01 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2019.04.003 Journal For Nature Conservation. Munich: Elsevier Gmbh, v. 49, p. 118-124, 2019. 1617-1381 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/185669 10.1016/j.jnc.2019.04.003 WOS:000466571500014 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2019.04.003 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/185669 |
identifier_str_mv |
Journal For Nature Conservation. Munich: Elsevier Gmbh, v. 49, p. 118-124, 2019. 1617-1381 10.1016/j.jnc.2019.04.003 WOS:000466571500014 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Journal For Nature Conservation |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
118-124 |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Elsevier B.V. |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Elsevier B.V. |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Web of Science reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808128997762007040 |