Estimation of soil penetration resistance with standardized moisture using modeling by artificial neural networks
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2020.104505 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/201518 |
Resumo: | One of the most used evaluations to monitor soil compaction is based on soil penetration resistance (SPR). However, since SPR is influenced by soil moisture, this evaluation performed in the field may often lead to incorrect interpretations. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of models in the estimation of soil penetration resistance with standardized moisture (SPRlab) based on soil penetration resistance measured in the field (SPRfield) and on soil moisture (U) and indicate the best soil layer and best model for that. Samplings were carried out in the years 2016 (72 points – 24 in each layer) and 2017 (270 points – 90 in each layer) in three soil layers (0.00–0.10 m, 0.10–0.20 m and 0.20–0.30 m). Samples collected in 2017 were used to calibrate the models and samples collected in 2016 were used to validate them. The models used were obtained by multiple linear and nonlinear regressions and artificial neural networks (ANNs). Models were calibrated with all sampled layers and stratified per layer. In the latter case, the samples were separated into two parts, one with the surface layer (0.00–0.10 m) and another with subsurface layers (0.10–0.20 m and 0.20–0.30 m). SPRlab can be estimated with high accuracy from SPRfield and U measured in the field. We recommend the use of ANN models (MLP or RBF) and soil samples collected from the 0.10–0.30 m layer for the monitoring of soil penetration resistance. |
id |
UNSP_3c405eba3f707b0d3a97e7881ac22ec2 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/201518 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Estimation of soil penetration resistance with standardized moisture using modeling by artificial neural networksLinear modelsModels accuracyNonlinear modelsSoil moistureOne of the most used evaluations to monitor soil compaction is based on soil penetration resistance (SPR). However, since SPR is influenced by soil moisture, this evaluation performed in the field may often lead to incorrect interpretations. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of models in the estimation of soil penetration resistance with standardized moisture (SPRlab) based on soil penetration resistance measured in the field (SPRfield) and on soil moisture (U) and indicate the best soil layer and best model for that. Samplings were carried out in the years 2016 (72 points – 24 in each layer) and 2017 (270 points – 90 in each layer) in three soil layers (0.00–0.10 m, 0.10–0.20 m and 0.20–0.30 m). Samples collected in 2017 were used to calibrate the models and samples collected in 2016 were used to validate them. The models used were obtained by multiple linear and nonlinear regressions and artificial neural networks (ANNs). Models were calibrated with all sampled layers and stratified per layer. In the latter case, the samples were separated into two parts, one with the surface layer (0.00–0.10 m) and another with subsurface layers (0.10–0.20 m and 0.20–0.30 m). SPRlab can be estimated with high accuracy from SPRfield and U measured in the field. We recommend the use of ANN models (MLP or RBF) and soil samples collected from the 0.10–0.30 m layer for the monitoring of soil penetration resistance.Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)São Paulo State University (Unesp) School of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences, Via de Acesso Prof. Paulo Donato Castellane s/n, 14884-900 JaboticabalSão Paulo State University (Unesp) School of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences, Via de Acesso Prof. Paulo Donato Castellane s/n, 14884-900 JaboticabalUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Fernandes, Mariele Monique Honorato [UNESP]Coelho, Anderson Prates [UNESP]Silva, Matheus Flavio da [UNESP]Bertonha, Rafael Scabello [UNESP]de Queiroz, Renata Fernandes [UNESP]Furlani, Carlos Eduardo Angeli [UNESP]Fernandes, Carolina [UNESP]2020-12-12T02:34:36Z2020-12-12T02:34:36Z2020-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2020.104505Catena, v. 189.0341-8162http://hdl.handle.net/11449/20151810.1016/j.catena.2020.1045052-s2.0-85078889419Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengCatenainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-06-07T14:24:19Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/201518Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T22:41:30.409463Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Estimation of soil penetration resistance with standardized moisture using modeling by artificial neural networks |
title |
Estimation of soil penetration resistance with standardized moisture using modeling by artificial neural networks |
spellingShingle |
Estimation of soil penetration resistance with standardized moisture using modeling by artificial neural networks Fernandes, Mariele Monique Honorato [UNESP] Linear models Models accuracy Nonlinear models Soil moisture |
title_short |
Estimation of soil penetration resistance with standardized moisture using modeling by artificial neural networks |
title_full |
Estimation of soil penetration resistance with standardized moisture using modeling by artificial neural networks |
title_fullStr |
Estimation of soil penetration resistance with standardized moisture using modeling by artificial neural networks |
title_full_unstemmed |
Estimation of soil penetration resistance with standardized moisture using modeling by artificial neural networks |
title_sort |
Estimation of soil penetration resistance with standardized moisture using modeling by artificial neural networks |
author |
Fernandes, Mariele Monique Honorato [UNESP] |
author_facet |
Fernandes, Mariele Monique Honorato [UNESP] Coelho, Anderson Prates [UNESP] Silva, Matheus Flavio da [UNESP] Bertonha, Rafael Scabello [UNESP] de Queiroz, Renata Fernandes [UNESP] Furlani, Carlos Eduardo Angeli [UNESP] Fernandes, Carolina [UNESP] |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Coelho, Anderson Prates [UNESP] Silva, Matheus Flavio da [UNESP] Bertonha, Rafael Scabello [UNESP] de Queiroz, Renata Fernandes [UNESP] Furlani, Carlos Eduardo Angeli [UNESP] Fernandes, Carolina [UNESP] |
author2_role |
author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Fernandes, Mariele Monique Honorato [UNESP] Coelho, Anderson Prates [UNESP] Silva, Matheus Flavio da [UNESP] Bertonha, Rafael Scabello [UNESP] de Queiroz, Renata Fernandes [UNESP] Furlani, Carlos Eduardo Angeli [UNESP] Fernandes, Carolina [UNESP] |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Linear models Models accuracy Nonlinear models Soil moisture |
topic |
Linear models Models accuracy Nonlinear models Soil moisture |
description |
One of the most used evaluations to monitor soil compaction is based on soil penetration resistance (SPR). However, since SPR is influenced by soil moisture, this evaluation performed in the field may often lead to incorrect interpretations. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of models in the estimation of soil penetration resistance with standardized moisture (SPRlab) based on soil penetration resistance measured in the field (SPRfield) and on soil moisture (U) and indicate the best soil layer and best model for that. Samplings were carried out in the years 2016 (72 points – 24 in each layer) and 2017 (270 points – 90 in each layer) in three soil layers (0.00–0.10 m, 0.10–0.20 m and 0.20–0.30 m). Samples collected in 2017 were used to calibrate the models and samples collected in 2016 were used to validate them. The models used were obtained by multiple linear and nonlinear regressions and artificial neural networks (ANNs). Models were calibrated with all sampled layers and stratified per layer. In the latter case, the samples were separated into two parts, one with the surface layer (0.00–0.10 m) and another with subsurface layers (0.10–0.20 m and 0.20–0.30 m). SPRlab can be estimated with high accuracy from SPRfield and U measured in the field. We recommend the use of ANN models (MLP or RBF) and soil samples collected from the 0.10–0.30 m layer for the monitoring of soil penetration resistance. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-12-12T02:34:36Z 2020-12-12T02:34:36Z 2020-06-01 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2020.104505 Catena, v. 189. 0341-8162 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/201518 10.1016/j.catena.2020.104505 2-s2.0-85078889419 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2020.104505 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/201518 |
identifier_str_mv |
Catena, v. 189. 0341-8162 10.1016/j.catena.2020.104505 2-s2.0-85078889419 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Catena |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808129450996400128 |