Comparison of gingival display in smile attractiveness among restorative dentists, orthodontists, prosthodontists, periodontists, and laypeople
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.03.023 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/190359 |
Resumo: | Statement of problem: Multidisciplinary treatment needs a common goal, and dentists should understand the esthetic perception of laypeople and the other specialists involved. Such information is sparse. Purpose: The purpose of this cross-sectional study was to compare the influence of gingival display on perceived smile esthetics among restorative dentists, orthodontists, prosthodontists, periodontists, and laypeople. Material and methods: Photographs of the smiles of 2 volunteers (1 female and 1 male)were manipulated on a computer to produce gingival exposure of 1, 3, and 5 mm and central incisor coverage of 3 and 5 mm. The images were evaluated by using a 100-mm visual analog scale by 155 raters divided into 5 groups (restorative dentists, orthodontists, prosthodontists, periodontists, and laypeople). Results: The dental specialists, mainly orthodontists and periodontists, were more sensitive about alterations in gingival display than the laypeople. For the female smile, higher mean scores were attributed to 1 mm of gingival exposure by all groups of raters. For the male smile, 3 mm of central incisor coverage received higher mean scores, except for the laypeople, who considered gingival display of 1 mm to be more attractive. For both smiles, 5 mm of gingival display was judged to be the least attractive. Conclusions: Considering the differences in opinion between dental specialists and laypeople and the acceptable variations in gingival display, the preferences of patients should be considered in the diagnosis and treatment decision-making process. |
id |
UNSP_3dfe32a0b2fbd276bcdeb94dda9a2da4 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/190359 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Comparison of gingival display in smile attractiveness among restorative dentists, orthodontists, prosthodontists, periodontists, and laypeopleStatement of problem: Multidisciplinary treatment needs a common goal, and dentists should understand the esthetic perception of laypeople and the other specialists involved. Such information is sparse. Purpose: The purpose of this cross-sectional study was to compare the influence of gingival display on perceived smile esthetics among restorative dentists, orthodontists, prosthodontists, periodontists, and laypeople. Material and methods: Photographs of the smiles of 2 volunteers (1 female and 1 male)were manipulated on a computer to produce gingival exposure of 1, 3, and 5 mm and central incisor coverage of 3 and 5 mm. The images were evaluated by using a 100-mm visual analog scale by 155 raters divided into 5 groups (restorative dentists, orthodontists, prosthodontists, periodontists, and laypeople). Results: The dental specialists, mainly orthodontists and periodontists, were more sensitive about alterations in gingival display than the laypeople. For the female smile, higher mean scores were attributed to 1 mm of gingival exposure by all groups of raters. For the male smile, 3 mm of central incisor coverage received higher mean scores, except for the laypeople, who considered gingival display of 1 mm to be more attractive. For both smiles, 5 mm of gingival display was judged to be the least attractive. Conclusions: Considering the differences in opinion between dental specialists and laypeople and the acceptable variations in gingival display, the preferences of patients should be considered in the diagnosis and treatment decision-making process.Department of Orthodontics University Ceuma (UniCeuma)Doctoral student University Ceuma (UniCeuma)Department of Epidemiology University Ceuma (UniCeuma)Department of Orthodontics Pontificia Universidad Católica Madre y Maestra (PUCMM)Department of Denstistry University Ceuma (UniCeuma)Department of Orthodontics State University of São Paulo (UNESP)Department of Orthodontics State University of São Paulo (UNESP)University Ceuma (UniCeuma)Pontificia Universidad Católica Madre y Maestra (PUCMM)Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Pinzan-Vercelino, Célia Regina MaioCosta, Ana Carla SouzaFerreira, Meire CoelhoBramante, Fausto SilvaFialho, Melissa Proença NogueiraGurgel, Júlio de Araújo [UNESP]2019-10-06T17:10:38Z2019-10-06T17:10:38Z2019-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.03.023Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry.0022-3913http://hdl.handle.net/11449/19035910.1016/j.prosdent.2019.03.0232-s2.0-85066232665Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengJournal of Prosthetic Dentistryinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-08-09T17:40:01Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/190359Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-09T17:40:01Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Comparison of gingival display in smile attractiveness among restorative dentists, orthodontists, prosthodontists, periodontists, and laypeople |
title |
Comparison of gingival display in smile attractiveness among restorative dentists, orthodontists, prosthodontists, periodontists, and laypeople |
spellingShingle |
Comparison of gingival display in smile attractiveness among restorative dentists, orthodontists, prosthodontists, periodontists, and laypeople Pinzan-Vercelino, Célia Regina Maio |
title_short |
Comparison of gingival display in smile attractiveness among restorative dentists, orthodontists, prosthodontists, periodontists, and laypeople |
title_full |
Comparison of gingival display in smile attractiveness among restorative dentists, orthodontists, prosthodontists, periodontists, and laypeople |
title_fullStr |
Comparison of gingival display in smile attractiveness among restorative dentists, orthodontists, prosthodontists, periodontists, and laypeople |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison of gingival display in smile attractiveness among restorative dentists, orthodontists, prosthodontists, periodontists, and laypeople |
title_sort |
Comparison of gingival display in smile attractiveness among restorative dentists, orthodontists, prosthodontists, periodontists, and laypeople |
author |
Pinzan-Vercelino, Célia Regina Maio |
author_facet |
Pinzan-Vercelino, Célia Regina Maio Costa, Ana Carla Souza Ferreira, Meire Coelho Bramante, Fausto Silva Fialho, Melissa Proença Nogueira Gurgel, Júlio de Araújo [UNESP] |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Costa, Ana Carla Souza Ferreira, Meire Coelho Bramante, Fausto Silva Fialho, Melissa Proença Nogueira Gurgel, Júlio de Araújo [UNESP] |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
University Ceuma (UniCeuma) Pontificia Universidad Católica Madre y Maestra (PUCMM) Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Pinzan-Vercelino, Célia Regina Maio Costa, Ana Carla Souza Ferreira, Meire Coelho Bramante, Fausto Silva Fialho, Melissa Proença Nogueira Gurgel, Júlio de Araújo [UNESP] |
description |
Statement of problem: Multidisciplinary treatment needs a common goal, and dentists should understand the esthetic perception of laypeople and the other specialists involved. Such information is sparse. Purpose: The purpose of this cross-sectional study was to compare the influence of gingival display on perceived smile esthetics among restorative dentists, orthodontists, prosthodontists, periodontists, and laypeople. Material and methods: Photographs of the smiles of 2 volunteers (1 female and 1 male)were manipulated on a computer to produce gingival exposure of 1, 3, and 5 mm and central incisor coverage of 3 and 5 mm. The images were evaluated by using a 100-mm visual analog scale by 155 raters divided into 5 groups (restorative dentists, orthodontists, prosthodontists, periodontists, and laypeople). Results: The dental specialists, mainly orthodontists and periodontists, were more sensitive about alterations in gingival display than the laypeople. For the female smile, higher mean scores were attributed to 1 mm of gingival exposure by all groups of raters. For the male smile, 3 mm of central incisor coverage received higher mean scores, except for the laypeople, who considered gingival display of 1 mm to be more attractive. For both smiles, 5 mm of gingival display was judged to be the least attractive. Conclusions: Considering the differences in opinion between dental specialists and laypeople and the acceptable variations in gingival display, the preferences of patients should be considered in the diagnosis and treatment decision-making process. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-10-06T17:10:38Z 2019-10-06T17:10:38Z 2019-01-01 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.03.023 Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 0022-3913 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/190359 10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.03.023 2-s2.0-85066232665 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.03.023 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/190359 |
identifier_str_mv |
Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 0022-3913 10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.03.023 2-s2.0-85066232665 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808128198040354816 |