Comparison of gingival display in smile attractiveness among restorative dentists, orthodontists, prosthodontists, periodontists, and laypeople

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Pinzan-Vercelino, Célia Regina Maio
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Costa, Ana Carla Souza, Ferreira, Meire Coelho, Bramante, Fausto Silva, Fialho, Melissa Proença Nogueira, Gurgel, Júlio de Araújo [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.03.023
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/190359
Resumo: Statement of problem: Multidisciplinary treatment needs a common goal, and dentists should understand the esthetic perception of laypeople and the other specialists involved. Such information is sparse. Purpose: The purpose of this cross-sectional study was to compare the influence of gingival display on perceived smile esthetics among restorative dentists, orthodontists, prosthodontists, periodontists, and laypeople. Material and methods: Photographs of the smiles of 2 volunteers (1 female and 1 male)were manipulated on a computer to produce gingival exposure of 1, 3, and 5 mm and central incisor coverage of 3 and 5 mm. The images were evaluated by using a 100-mm visual analog scale by 155 raters divided into 5 groups (restorative dentists, orthodontists, prosthodontists, periodontists, and laypeople). Results: The dental specialists, mainly orthodontists and periodontists, were more sensitive about alterations in gingival display than the laypeople. For the female smile, higher mean scores were attributed to 1 mm of gingival exposure by all groups of raters. For the male smile, 3 mm of central incisor coverage received higher mean scores, except for the laypeople, who considered gingival display of 1 mm to be more attractive. For both smiles, 5 mm of gingival display was judged to be the least attractive. Conclusions: Considering the differences in opinion between dental specialists and laypeople and the acceptable variations in gingival display, the preferences of patients should be considered in the diagnosis and treatment decision-making process.
id UNSP_3dfe32a0b2fbd276bcdeb94dda9a2da4
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/190359
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Comparison of gingival display in smile attractiveness among restorative dentists, orthodontists, prosthodontists, periodontists, and laypeopleStatement of problem: Multidisciplinary treatment needs a common goal, and dentists should understand the esthetic perception of laypeople and the other specialists involved. Such information is sparse. Purpose: The purpose of this cross-sectional study was to compare the influence of gingival display on perceived smile esthetics among restorative dentists, orthodontists, prosthodontists, periodontists, and laypeople. Material and methods: Photographs of the smiles of 2 volunteers (1 female and 1 male)were manipulated on a computer to produce gingival exposure of 1, 3, and 5 mm and central incisor coverage of 3 and 5 mm. The images were evaluated by using a 100-mm visual analog scale by 155 raters divided into 5 groups (restorative dentists, orthodontists, prosthodontists, periodontists, and laypeople). Results: The dental specialists, mainly orthodontists and periodontists, were more sensitive about alterations in gingival display than the laypeople. For the female smile, higher mean scores were attributed to 1 mm of gingival exposure by all groups of raters. For the male smile, 3 mm of central incisor coverage received higher mean scores, except for the laypeople, who considered gingival display of 1 mm to be more attractive. For both smiles, 5 mm of gingival display was judged to be the least attractive. Conclusions: Considering the differences in opinion between dental specialists and laypeople and the acceptable variations in gingival display, the preferences of patients should be considered in the diagnosis and treatment decision-making process.Department of Orthodontics University Ceuma (UniCeuma)Doctoral student University Ceuma (UniCeuma)Department of Epidemiology University Ceuma (UniCeuma)Department of Orthodontics Pontificia Universidad Católica Madre y Maestra (PUCMM)Department of Denstistry University Ceuma (UniCeuma)Department of Orthodontics State University of São Paulo (UNESP)Department of Orthodontics State University of São Paulo (UNESP)University Ceuma (UniCeuma)Pontificia Universidad Católica Madre y Maestra (PUCMM)Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Pinzan-Vercelino, Célia Regina MaioCosta, Ana Carla SouzaFerreira, Meire CoelhoBramante, Fausto SilvaFialho, Melissa Proença NogueiraGurgel, Júlio de Araújo [UNESP]2019-10-06T17:10:38Z2019-10-06T17:10:38Z2019-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.03.023Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry.0022-3913http://hdl.handle.net/11449/19035910.1016/j.prosdent.2019.03.0232-s2.0-85066232665Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengJournal of Prosthetic Dentistryinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-08-09T17:40:01Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/190359Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-09T17:40:01Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparison of gingival display in smile attractiveness among restorative dentists, orthodontists, prosthodontists, periodontists, and laypeople
title Comparison of gingival display in smile attractiveness among restorative dentists, orthodontists, prosthodontists, periodontists, and laypeople
spellingShingle Comparison of gingival display in smile attractiveness among restorative dentists, orthodontists, prosthodontists, periodontists, and laypeople
Pinzan-Vercelino, Célia Regina Maio
title_short Comparison of gingival display in smile attractiveness among restorative dentists, orthodontists, prosthodontists, periodontists, and laypeople
title_full Comparison of gingival display in smile attractiveness among restorative dentists, orthodontists, prosthodontists, periodontists, and laypeople
title_fullStr Comparison of gingival display in smile attractiveness among restorative dentists, orthodontists, prosthodontists, periodontists, and laypeople
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of gingival display in smile attractiveness among restorative dentists, orthodontists, prosthodontists, periodontists, and laypeople
title_sort Comparison of gingival display in smile attractiveness among restorative dentists, orthodontists, prosthodontists, periodontists, and laypeople
author Pinzan-Vercelino, Célia Regina Maio
author_facet Pinzan-Vercelino, Célia Regina Maio
Costa, Ana Carla Souza
Ferreira, Meire Coelho
Bramante, Fausto Silva
Fialho, Melissa Proença Nogueira
Gurgel, Júlio de Araújo [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Costa, Ana Carla Souza
Ferreira, Meire Coelho
Bramante, Fausto Silva
Fialho, Melissa Proença Nogueira
Gurgel, Júlio de Araújo [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv University Ceuma (UniCeuma)
Pontificia Universidad Católica Madre y Maestra (PUCMM)
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Pinzan-Vercelino, Célia Regina Maio
Costa, Ana Carla Souza
Ferreira, Meire Coelho
Bramante, Fausto Silva
Fialho, Melissa Proença Nogueira
Gurgel, Júlio de Araújo [UNESP]
description Statement of problem: Multidisciplinary treatment needs a common goal, and dentists should understand the esthetic perception of laypeople and the other specialists involved. Such information is sparse. Purpose: The purpose of this cross-sectional study was to compare the influence of gingival display on perceived smile esthetics among restorative dentists, orthodontists, prosthodontists, periodontists, and laypeople. Material and methods: Photographs of the smiles of 2 volunteers (1 female and 1 male)were manipulated on a computer to produce gingival exposure of 1, 3, and 5 mm and central incisor coverage of 3 and 5 mm. The images were evaluated by using a 100-mm visual analog scale by 155 raters divided into 5 groups (restorative dentists, orthodontists, prosthodontists, periodontists, and laypeople). Results: The dental specialists, mainly orthodontists and periodontists, were more sensitive about alterations in gingival display than the laypeople. For the female smile, higher mean scores were attributed to 1 mm of gingival exposure by all groups of raters. For the male smile, 3 mm of central incisor coverage received higher mean scores, except for the laypeople, who considered gingival display of 1 mm to be more attractive. For both smiles, 5 mm of gingival display was judged to be the least attractive. Conclusions: Considering the differences in opinion between dental specialists and laypeople and the acceptable variations in gingival display, the preferences of patients should be considered in the diagnosis and treatment decision-making process.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-10-06T17:10:38Z
2019-10-06T17:10:38Z
2019-01-01
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.03.023
Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry.
0022-3913
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/190359
10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.03.023
2-s2.0-85066232665
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.03.023
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/190359
identifier_str_mv Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry.
0022-3913
10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.03.023
2-s2.0-85066232665
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808128198040354816