Bond strength between acrylic resin and maxillofacial silicone
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2012 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572012000600010 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/227109 |
Resumo: | The development of implant dentistry improved the possibilities of rehabilitation with maxillofacial prosthesis. However, clinically it is difficult to bond the silicone to the attachment system. Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of an adhesive system on the bond strength between acrylic resin and facial silicone. Material and Methods: A total of 120 samples were fabricated with auto-polymerized acrylic resin and MDX 4-4210 facial silicone. Both materials were bonded through mechanical retentions and/or application of primers (DC 1205 primer and Sofreliner primer S) and adhesive (Silastic Medical Adhesive Type A) or not (control group). Samples were divided into 12 groups according to the method used to attach the silicone to the acrylic resin. All samples were subjected to a T-peel test in a universal testing machine. Failures were classified as adhesive, cohesive or mixed. The data were evaluated by the analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the Tukey's HSD test (α=.05). Results: The highest bond strength values (5.95 N/mm; 3.07 N/mm; 4.75 N/mm) were recorded for the samples that received a Sofreliner primer application. These values were significantly higher when the samples had no scratches and did not receive the application of Silastic Medical Adhesive Type A. Conclusions: The most common type of failure was adhesive. The use of Sofreliner primer increased the bond strength between the auto-polymerized acrylic resin and the Silastic MDX 4-4210 facial silicone. |
id |
UNSP_3f7b384e3c0b9dea970cdd9db5711219 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/227109 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Bond strength between acrylic resin and maxillofacial siliconeAcrylic resinsDental implantationPolymethyl methacrylateSilicone elastomersThe development of implant dentistry improved the possibilities of rehabilitation with maxillofacial prosthesis. However, clinically it is difficult to bond the silicone to the attachment system. Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of an adhesive system on the bond strength between acrylic resin and facial silicone. Material and Methods: A total of 120 samples were fabricated with auto-polymerized acrylic resin and MDX 4-4210 facial silicone. Both materials were bonded through mechanical retentions and/or application of primers (DC 1205 primer and Sofreliner primer S) and adhesive (Silastic Medical Adhesive Type A) or not (control group). Samples were divided into 12 groups according to the method used to attach the silicone to the acrylic resin. All samples were subjected to a T-peel test in a universal testing machine. Failures were classified as adhesive, cohesive or mixed. The data were evaluated by the analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the Tukey's HSD test (α=.05). Results: The highest bond strength values (5.95 N/mm; 3.07 N/mm; 4.75 N/mm) were recorded for the samples that received a Sofreliner primer application. These values were significantly higher when the samples had no scratches and did not receive the application of Silastic Medical Adhesive Type A. Conclusions: The most common type of failure was adhesive. The use of Sofreliner primer increased the bond strength between the auto-polymerized acrylic resin and the Silastic MDX 4-4210 facial silicone.Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics Araçatuba Dental School Univ Estadual Paulista-UNESP, Rua José Bonifácio, n.1193, Vila Mendonça-16.015-050-Araçatuba-SPDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics Araçatuba Dental School Univ Estadual Paulista-UNESP, Rua José Bonifácio, n.1193, Vila Mendonça-16.015-050-Araçatuba-SPUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Haddad, Marcela Filié [UNESP]Goiato, Marcelo Coelho [UNESP]dos Santos, Daniela Micheline [UNESP]Crepaldi, Nádia de Marchi [UNESP]Pesqueira, Aldiéris Alves [UNESP]Bannwart, Lisiane Cristina [UNESP]2022-04-29T06:48:18Z2022-04-29T06:48:18Z2012-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article649-654http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572012000600010Journal of Applied Oral Science, v. 20, n. 6, p. 649-654, 2012.1678-77651678-7757http://hdl.handle.net/11449/22710910.1590/S1678-775720120006000102-s2.0-84872776982Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengJournal of Applied Oral Scienceinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-09-19T14:50:49Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/227109Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestrepositoriounesp@unesp.bropendoar:29462024-09-19T14:50:49Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Bond strength between acrylic resin and maxillofacial silicone |
title |
Bond strength between acrylic resin and maxillofacial silicone |
spellingShingle |
Bond strength between acrylic resin and maxillofacial silicone Haddad, Marcela Filié [UNESP] Acrylic resins Dental implantation Polymethyl methacrylate Silicone elastomers |
title_short |
Bond strength between acrylic resin and maxillofacial silicone |
title_full |
Bond strength between acrylic resin and maxillofacial silicone |
title_fullStr |
Bond strength between acrylic resin and maxillofacial silicone |
title_full_unstemmed |
Bond strength between acrylic resin and maxillofacial silicone |
title_sort |
Bond strength between acrylic resin and maxillofacial silicone |
author |
Haddad, Marcela Filié [UNESP] |
author_facet |
Haddad, Marcela Filié [UNESP] Goiato, Marcelo Coelho [UNESP] dos Santos, Daniela Micheline [UNESP] Crepaldi, Nádia de Marchi [UNESP] Pesqueira, Aldiéris Alves [UNESP] Bannwart, Lisiane Cristina [UNESP] |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Goiato, Marcelo Coelho [UNESP] dos Santos, Daniela Micheline [UNESP] Crepaldi, Nádia de Marchi [UNESP] Pesqueira, Aldiéris Alves [UNESP] Bannwart, Lisiane Cristina [UNESP] |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Haddad, Marcela Filié [UNESP] Goiato, Marcelo Coelho [UNESP] dos Santos, Daniela Micheline [UNESP] Crepaldi, Nádia de Marchi [UNESP] Pesqueira, Aldiéris Alves [UNESP] Bannwart, Lisiane Cristina [UNESP] |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Acrylic resins Dental implantation Polymethyl methacrylate Silicone elastomers |
topic |
Acrylic resins Dental implantation Polymethyl methacrylate Silicone elastomers |
description |
The development of implant dentistry improved the possibilities of rehabilitation with maxillofacial prosthesis. However, clinically it is difficult to bond the silicone to the attachment system. Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of an adhesive system on the bond strength between acrylic resin and facial silicone. Material and Methods: A total of 120 samples were fabricated with auto-polymerized acrylic resin and MDX 4-4210 facial silicone. Both materials were bonded through mechanical retentions and/or application of primers (DC 1205 primer and Sofreliner primer S) and adhesive (Silastic Medical Adhesive Type A) or not (control group). Samples were divided into 12 groups according to the method used to attach the silicone to the acrylic resin. All samples were subjected to a T-peel test in a universal testing machine. Failures were classified as adhesive, cohesive or mixed. The data were evaluated by the analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the Tukey's HSD test (α=.05). Results: The highest bond strength values (5.95 N/mm; 3.07 N/mm; 4.75 N/mm) were recorded for the samples that received a Sofreliner primer application. These values were significantly higher when the samples had no scratches and did not receive the application of Silastic Medical Adhesive Type A. Conclusions: The most common type of failure was adhesive. The use of Sofreliner primer increased the bond strength between the auto-polymerized acrylic resin and the Silastic MDX 4-4210 facial silicone. |
publishDate |
2012 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2012-01-01 2022-04-29T06:48:18Z 2022-04-29T06:48:18Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572012000600010 Journal of Applied Oral Science, v. 20, n. 6, p. 649-654, 2012. 1678-7765 1678-7757 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/227109 10.1590/S1678-77572012000600010 2-s2.0-84872776982 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572012000600010 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/227109 |
identifier_str_mv |
Journal of Applied Oral Science, v. 20, n. 6, p. 649-654, 2012. 1678-7765 1678-7757 10.1590/S1678-77572012000600010 2-s2.0-84872776982 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Journal of Applied Oral Science |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
649-654 |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
repositoriounesp@unesp.br |
_version_ |
1813546411213455360 |