Bond strength between acrylic resin and maxillofacial silicone

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Haddad, Marcela Filié [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2012
Outros Autores: Goiato, Marcelo Coelho [UNESP], dos Santos, Daniela Micheline [UNESP], Crepaldi, Nádia de Marchi [UNESP], Pesqueira, Aldiéris Alves [UNESP], Bannwart, Lisiane Cristina [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572012000600010
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/227109
Resumo: The development of implant dentistry improved the possibilities of rehabilitation with maxillofacial prosthesis. However, clinically it is difficult to bond the silicone to the attachment system. Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of an adhesive system on the bond strength between acrylic resin and facial silicone. Material and Methods: A total of 120 samples were fabricated with auto-polymerized acrylic resin and MDX 4-4210 facial silicone. Both materials were bonded through mechanical retentions and/or application of primers (DC 1205 primer and Sofreliner primer S) and adhesive (Silastic Medical Adhesive Type A) or not (control group). Samples were divided into 12 groups according to the method used to attach the silicone to the acrylic resin. All samples were subjected to a T-peel test in a universal testing machine. Failures were classified as adhesive, cohesive or mixed. The data were evaluated by the analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the Tukey's HSD test (α=.05). Results: The highest bond strength values (5.95 N/mm; 3.07 N/mm; 4.75 N/mm) were recorded for the samples that received a Sofreliner primer application. These values were significantly higher when the samples had no scratches and did not receive the application of Silastic Medical Adhesive Type A. Conclusions: The most common type of failure was adhesive. The use of Sofreliner primer increased the bond strength between the auto-polymerized acrylic resin and the Silastic MDX 4-4210 facial silicone.
id UNSP_3f7b384e3c0b9dea970cdd9db5711219
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/227109
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Bond strength between acrylic resin and maxillofacial siliconeAcrylic resinsDental implantationPolymethyl methacrylateSilicone elastomersThe development of implant dentistry improved the possibilities of rehabilitation with maxillofacial prosthesis. However, clinically it is difficult to bond the silicone to the attachment system. Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of an adhesive system on the bond strength between acrylic resin and facial silicone. Material and Methods: A total of 120 samples were fabricated with auto-polymerized acrylic resin and MDX 4-4210 facial silicone. Both materials were bonded through mechanical retentions and/or application of primers (DC 1205 primer and Sofreliner primer S) and adhesive (Silastic Medical Adhesive Type A) or not (control group). Samples were divided into 12 groups according to the method used to attach the silicone to the acrylic resin. All samples were subjected to a T-peel test in a universal testing machine. Failures were classified as adhesive, cohesive or mixed. The data were evaluated by the analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the Tukey's HSD test (α=.05). Results: The highest bond strength values (5.95 N/mm; 3.07 N/mm; 4.75 N/mm) were recorded for the samples that received a Sofreliner primer application. These values were significantly higher when the samples had no scratches and did not receive the application of Silastic Medical Adhesive Type A. Conclusions: The most common type of failure was adhesive. The use of Sofreliner primer increased the bond strength between the auto-polymerized acrylic resin and the Silastic MDX 4-4210 facial silicone.Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics Araçatuba Dental School Univ Estadual Paulista-UNESP, Rua José Bonifácio, n.1193, Vila Mendonça-16.015-050-Araçatuba-SPDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics Araçatuba Dental School Univ Estadual Paulista-UNESP, Rua José Bonifácio, n.1193, Vila Mendonça-16.015-050-Araçatuba-SPUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Haddad, Marcela Filié [UNESP]Goiato, Marcelo Coelho [UNESP]dos Santos, Daniela Micheline [UNESP]Crepaldi, Nádia de Marchi [UNESP]Pesqueira, Aldiéris Alves [UNESP]Bannwart, Lisiane Cristina [UNESP]2022-04-29T06:48:18Z2022-04-29T06:48:18Z2012-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article649-654http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572012000600010Journal of Applied Oral Science, v. 20, n. 6, p. 649-654, 2012.1678-77651678-7757http://hdl.handle.net/11449/22710910.1590/S1678-775720120006000102-s2.0-84872776982Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengJournal of Applied Oral Scienceinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-09-19T14:50:49Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/227109Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestrepositoriounesp@unesp.bropendoar:29462024-09-19T14:50:49Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Bond strength between acrylic resin and maxillofacial silicone
title Bond strength between acrylic resin and maxillofacial silicone
spellingShingle Bond strength between acrylic resin and maxillofacial silicone
Haddad, Marcela Filié [UNESP]
Acrylic resins
Dental implantation
Polymethyl methacrylate
Silicone elastomers
title_short Bond strength between acrylic resin and maxillofacial silicone
title_full Bond strength between acrylic resin and maxillofacial silicone
title_fullStr Bond strength between acrylic resin and maxillofacial silicone
title_full_unstemmed Bond strength between acrylic resin and maxillofacial silicone
title_sort Bond strength between acrylic resin and maxillofacial silicone
author Haddad, Marcela Filié [UNESP]
author_facet Haddad, Marcela Filié [UNESP]
Goiato, Marcelo Coelho [UNESP]
dos Santos, Daniela Micheline [UNESP]
Crepaldi, Nádia de Marchi [UNESP]
Pesqueira, Aldiéris Alves [UNESP]
Bannwart, Lisiane Cristina [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Goiato, Marcelo Coelho [UNESP]
dos Santos, Daniela Micheline [UNESP]
Crepaldi, Nádia de Marchi [UNESP]
Pesqueira, Aldiéris Alves [UNESP]
Bannwart, Lisiane Cristina [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Haddad, Marcela Filié [UNESP]
Goiato, Marcelo Coelho [UNESP]
dos Santos, Daniela Micheline [UNESP]
Crepaldi, Nádia de Marchi [UNESP]
Pesqueira, Aldiéris Alves [UNESP]
Bannwart, Lisiane Cristina [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Acrylic resins
Dental implantation
Polymethyl methacrylate
Silicone elastomers
topic Acrylic resins
Dental implantation
Polymethyl methacrylate
Silicone elastomers
description The development of implant dentistry improved the possibilities of rehabilitation with maxillofacial prosthesis. However, clinically it is difficult to bond the silicone to the attachment system. Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of an adhesive system on the bond strength between acrylic resin and facial silicone. Material and Methods: A total of 120 samples were fabricated with auto-polymerized acrylic resin and MDX 4-4210 facial silicone. Both materials were bonded through mechanical retentions and/or application of primers (DC 1205 primer and Sofreliner primer S) and adhesive (Silastic Medical Adhesive Type A) or not (control group). Samples were divided into 12 groups according to the method used to attach the silicone to the acrylic resin. All samples were subjected to a T-peel test in a universal testing machine. Failures were classified as adhesive, cohesive or mixed. The data were evaluated by the analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the Tukey's HSD test (α=.05). Results: The highest bond strength values (5.95 N/mm; 3.07 N/mm; 4.75 N/mm) were recorded for the samples that received a Sofreliner primer application. These values were significantly higher when the samples had no scratches and did not receive the application of Silastic Medical Adhesive Type A. Conclusions: The most common type of failure was adhesive. The use of Sofreliner primer increased the bond strength between the auto-polymerized acrylic resin and the Silastic MDX 4-4210 facial silicone.
publishDate 2012
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2012-01-01
2022-04-29T06:48:18Z
2022-04-29T06:48:18Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572012000600010
Journal of Applied Oral Science, v. 20, n. 6, p. 649-654, 2012.
1678-7765
1678-7757
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/227109
10.1590/S1678-77572012000600010
2-s2.0-84872776982
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572012000600010
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/227109
identifier_str_mv Journal of Applied Oral Science, v. 20, n. 6, p. 649-654, 2012.
1678-7765
1678-7757
10.1590/S1678-77572012000600010
2-s2.0-84872776982
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Journal of Applied Oral Science
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 649-654
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repositoriounesp@unesp.br
_version_ 1813546411213455360