Evaluation of Bone Heating, Drill Deformation, and Drill Roughness After Implant Osteotomy: Guided Surgery and Classic Drilling Procedure
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2014 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.11607/jomi.2919 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/206483 |
Resumo: | Purpose: This study evaluated and compared bone heating, drill deformation, and drill roughness after several implant osteotomies in the guided surgery technique and the classic drilling procedure. Materials and Methods: The tibias of 20 rabbits were used. The animals were divided into a guided surgery group (GG) and a control group (CG); subgroups were then designated (G0, G1, G2, G3, and G4, corresponding to drills used 0, 10, 20, 30 and 40 times, respectively). Each animal received 10 sequential osteotomies (5 in each tibia) with each technique. Thermal changes were quantified, drill roughness was measured, and the drills were subjected to scanning electron microscopy. Results: Bone temperature generated by drilling was significantly higher in the GG than in the CG. Drill deformation in the GG and CG increased with drill use, and in the CG a significant difference between G0 and groups G3 and G4 was observed. In the GG, a significant difference between G0 and all other groups was found. For GG versus CG, a significant difference was found in the 40th osteotomy. Drill roughness in both groups was progressive in accordance with increased use, but there was no statistically significant difference between subgroups or between GG and CG overall. Conclusion: During preparation of implant osteotomies, the guided surgery technique generated a higher bone temperature and deformed drills more than the classic drilling procedure. The increase in tissue temperature was directly proportional to the number of times drills were used, but neither technique generated critical necrosisinducing temperatures. Drill deformation was directly proportional to the number of times the drills were used. The roughness of the drills was directly proportional to the number of reuses in both groups but tended to be higher in the GG group. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2014;29:51-58. doi: 10.11607/jomi.2919 |
id |
UNSP_4186d4079091e36c0d4e48d8120a9592 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/206483 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Evaluation of Bone Heating, Drill Deformation, and Drill Roughness After Implant Osteotomy: Guided Surgery and Classic Drilling Procedurebone overheatingdental implantsosteotomyPurpose: This study evaluated and compared bone heating, drill deformation, and drill roughness after several implant osteotomies in the guided surgery technique and the classic drilling procedure. Materials and Methods: The tibias of 20 rabbits were used. The animals were divided into a guided surgery group (GG) and a control group (CG); subgroups were then designated (G0, G1, G2, G3, and G4, corresponding to drills used 0, 10, 20, 30 and 40 times, respectively). Each animal received 10 sequential osteotomies (5 in each tibia) with each technique. Thermal changes were quantified, drill roughness was measured, and the drills were subjected to scanning electron microscopy. Results: Bone temperature generated by drilling was significantly higher in the GG than in the CG. Drill deformation in the GG and CG increased with drill use, and in the CG a significant difference between G0 and groups G3 and G4 was observed. In the GG, a significant difference between G0 and all other groups was found. For GG versus CG, a significant difference was found in the 40th osteotomy. Drill roughness in both groups was progressive in accordance with increased use, but there was no statistically significant difference between subgroups or between GG and CG overall. Conclusion: During preparation of implant osteotomies, the guided surgery technique generated a higher bone temperature and deformed drills more than the classic drilling procedure. The increase in tissue temperature was directly proportional to the number of times drills were used, but neither technique generated critical necrosisinducing temperatures. Drill deformation was directly proportional to the number of times the drills were used. The roughness of the drills was directly proportional to the number of reuses in both groups but tended to be higher in the GG group. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2014;29:51-58. doi: 10.11607/jomi.2919Assistant Professor Discipline of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Integrated Clinic Department of Oral Biology Postgraduate Studies Universidade do Sagrado Coração (USC)Assistant Professor Discipline of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Integrated Clinic University Center of Araraquara (UNIARA)Assistant Professor Discipline of Periodontology and Integrated Clinic University Center of Araraquara UNIARACoordinating Professor Postgraduate Course of Dental Implantology UNIARAPhD Student Department of Surgery and Integrated Clinic Discipline of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Dentistry School of Araçatuba São Paulo State University (UNESP)Assistant Professor Department of Oral Surgery University of Cuiabá (UNIC)Assistant Professor Specialization in Dental Implantology Dental School of CuiabáSpecialist in Implantology University Center Barretos (UniFEB)Associate Professor Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics Discipline of Dental Materials UNESPProfessor Department of Surgery Discipline of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Dentistry School of Araçatuba UNESPPhD Student Department of Surgery and Integrated Clinic Discipline of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Dentistry School of Araçatuba São Paulo State University (UNESP)Associate Professor Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics Discipline of Dental Materials UNESPProfessor Department of Surgery Discipline of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Dentistry School of Araçatuba UNESPUniversidade do Sagrado Coração (USC)University Center of Araraquara (UNIARA)UNIARAUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)University of Cuiabá (UNIC)Dental School of CuiabáUniversity Center Barretos (UniFEB)dos Santos, Pâmela LetíciaQueiroz, Thallita PereiraMargonar, Rogériode Souza Carvalho, Abrahão Cavalcante Gomes [UNESP]Betoni, WalterRezende, Regis Rocha Rodriguesdos Santos, Paulo Henrique [UNESP]Garcia, Idelmo Rangel [UNESP]2021-06-25T10:32:45Z2021-06-25T10:32:45Z2014-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article51-58http://dx.doi.org/10.11607/jomi.2919International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants, v. 29, n. 1, p. 51-58, 2014.1942-44340882-2786http://hdl.handle.net/11449/20648310.11607/jomi.29192-s2.0-84900012096Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengInternational Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implantsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-09-19T13:30:44Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/206483Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestrepositoriounesp@unesp.bropendoar:29462024-09-19T13:30:44Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Evaluation of Bone Heating, Drill Deformation, and Drill Roughness After Implant Osteotomy: Guided Surgery and Classic Drilling Procedure |
title |
Evaluation of Bone Heating, Drill Deformation, and Drill Roughness After Implant Osteotomy: Guided Surgery and Classic Drilling Procedure |
spellingShingle |
Evaluation of Bone Heating, Drill Deformation, and Drill Roughness After Implant Osteotomy: Guided Surgery and Classic Drilling Procedure dos Santos, Pâmela Letícia bone overheating dental implants osteotomy |
title_short |
Evaluation of Bone Heating, Drill Deformation, and Drill Roughness After Implant Osteotomy: Guided Surgery and Classic Drilling Procedure |
title_full |
Evaluation of Bone Heating, Drill Deformation, and Drill Roughness After Implant Osteotomy: Guided Surgery and Classic Drilling Procedure |
title_fullStr |
Evaluation of Bone Heating, Drill Deformation, and Drill Roughness After Implant Osteotomy: Guided Surgery and Classic Drilling Procedure |
title_full_unstemmed |
Evaluation of Bone Heating, Drill Deformation, and Drill Roughness After Implant Osteotomy: Guided Surgery and Classic Drilling Procedure |
title_sort |
Evaluation of Bone Heating, Drill Deformation, and Drill Roughness After Implant Osteotomy: Guided Surgery and Classic Drilling Procedure |
author |
dos Santos, Pâmela Letícia |
author_facet |
dos Santos, Pâmela Letícia Queiroz, Thallita Pereira Margonar, Rogério de Souza Carvalho, Abrahão Cavalcante Gomes [UNESP] Betoni, Walter Rezende, Regis Rocha Rodrigues dos Santos, Paulo Henrique [UNESP] Garcia, Idelmo Rangel [UNESP] |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Queiroz, Thallita Pereira Margonar, Rogério de Souza Carvalho, Abrahão Cavalcante Gomes [UNESP] Betoni, Walter Rezende, Regis Rocha Rodrigues dos Santos, Paulo Henrique [UNESP] Garcia, Idelmo Rangel [UNESP] |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade do Sagrado Coração (USC) University Center of Araraquara (UNIARA) UNIARA Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) University of Cuiabá (UNIC) Dental School of Cuiabá University Center Barretos (UniFEB) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
dos Santos, Pâmela Letícia Queiroz, Thallita Pereira Margonar, Rogério de Souza Carvalho, Abrahão Cavalcante Gomes [UNESP] Betoni, Walter Rezende, Regis Rocha Rodrigues dos Santos, Paulo Henrique [UNESP] Garcia, Idelmo Rangel [UNESP] |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
bone overheating dental implants osteotomy |
topic |
bone overheating dental implants osteotomy |
description |
Purpose: This study evaluated and compared bone heating, drill deformation, and drill roughness after several implant osteotomies in the guided surgery technique and the classic drilling procedure. Materials and Methods: The tibias of 20 rabbits were used. The animals were divided into a guided surgery group (GG) and a control group (CG); subgroups were then designated (G0, G1, G2, G3, and G4, corresponding to drills used 0, 10, 20, 30 and 40 times, respectively). Each animal received 10 sequential osteotomies (5 in each tibia) with each technique. Thermal changes were quantified, drill roughness was measured, and the drills were subjected to scanning electron microscopy. Results: Bone temperature generated by drilling was significantly higher in the GG than in the CG. Drill deformation in the GG and CG increased with drill use, and in the CG a significant difference between G0 and groups G3 and G4 was observed. In the GG, a significant difference between G0 and all other groups was found. For GG versus CG, a significant difference was found in the 40th osteotomy. Drill roughness in both groups was progressive in accordance with increased use, but there was no statistically significant difference between subgroups or between GG and CG overall. Conclusion: During preparation of implant osteotomies, the guided surgery technique generated a higher bone temperature and deformed drills more than the classic drilling procedure. The increase in tissue temperature was directly proportional to the number of times drills were used, but neither technique generated critical necrosisinducing temperatures. Drill deformation was directly proportional to the number of times the drills were used. The roughness of the drills was directly proportional to the number of reuses in both groups but tended to be higher in the GG group. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2014;29:51-58. doi: 10.11607/jomi.2919 |
publishDate |
2014 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2014-01-01 2021-06-25T10:32:45Z 2021-06-25T10:32:45Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.11607/jomi.2919 International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants, v. 29, n. 1, p. 51-58, 2014. 1942-4434 0882-2786 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/206483 10.11607/jomi.2919 2-s2.0-84900012096 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.11607/jomi.2919 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/206483 |
identifier_str_mv |
International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants, v. 29, n. 1, p. 51-58, 2014. 1942-4434 0882-2786 10.11607/jomi.2919 2-s2.0-84900012096 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
51-58 |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
repositoriounesp@unesp.br |
_version_ |
1813546484341145600 |