Evaluation of Bone Heating, Drill Deformation, and Drill Roughness After Implant Osteotomy: Guided Surgery and Classic Drilling Procedure

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: dos Santos, Pâmela Letícia
Data de Publicação: 2014
Outros Autores: Queiroz, Thallita Pereira, Margonar, Rogério, de Souza Carvalho, Abrahão Cavalcante Gomes [UNESP], Betoni, Walter, Rezende, Regis Rocha Rodrigues, dos Santos, Paulo Henrique [UNESP], Garcia, Idelmo Rangel [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.11607/jomi.2919
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/206483
Resumo: Purpose: This study evaluated and compared bone heating, drill deformation, and drill roughness after several implant osteotomies in the guided surgery technique and the classic drilling procedure. Materials and Methods: The tibias of 20 rabbits were used. The animals were divided into a guided surgery group (GG) and a control group (CG); subgroups were then designated (G0, G1, G2, G3, and G4, corresponding to drills used 0, 10, 20, 30 and 40 times, respectively). Each animal received 10 sequential osteotomies (5 in each tibia) with each technique. Thermal changes were quantified, drill roughness was measured, and the drills were subjected to scanning electron microscopy. Results: Bone temperature generated by drilling was significantly higher in the GG than in the CG. Drill deformation in the GG and CG increased with drill use, and in the CG a significant difference between G0 and groups G3 and G4 was observed. In the GG, a significant difference between G0 and all other groups was found. For GG versus CG, a significant difference was found in the 40th osteotomy. Drill roughness in both groups was progressive in accordance with increased use, but there was no statistically significant difference between subgroups or between GG and CG overall. Conclusion: During preparation of implant osteotomies, the guided surgery technique generated a higher bone temperature and deformed drills more than the classic drilling procedure. The increase in tissue temperature was directly proportional to the number of times drills were used, but neither technique generated critical necrosisinducing temperatures. Drill deformation was directly proportional to the number of times the drills were used. The roughness of the drills was directly proportional to the number of reuses in both groups but tended to be higher in the GG group. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2014;29:51-58. doi: 10.11607/jomi.2919
id UNSP_4186d4079091e36c0d4e48d8120a9592
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/206483
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Evaluation of Bone Heating, Drill Deformation, and Drill Roughness After Implant Osteotomy: Guided Surgery and Classic Drilling Procedurebone overheatingdental implantsosteotomyPurpose: This study evaluated and compared bone heating, drill deformation, and drill roughness after several implant osteotomies in the guided surgery technique and the classic drilling procedure. Materials and Methods: The tibias of 20 rabbits were used. The animals were divided into a guided surgery group (GG) and a control group (CG); subgroups were then designated (G0, G1, G2, G3, and G4, corresponding to drills used 0, 10, 20, 30 and 40 times, respectively). Each animal received 10 sequential osteotomies (5 in each tibia) with each technique. Thermal changes were quantified, drill roughness was measured, and the drills were subjected to scanning electron microscopy. Results: Bone temperature generated by drilling was significantly higher in the GG than in the CG. Drill deformation in the GG and CG increased with drill use, and in the CG a significant difference between G0 and groups G3 and G4 was observed. In the GG, a significant difference between G0 and all other groups was found. For GG versus CG, a significant difference was found in the 40th osteotomy. Drill roughness in both groups was progressive in accordance with increased use, but there was no statistically significant difference between subgroups or between GG and CG overall. Conclusion: During preparation of implant osteotomies, the guided surgery technique generated a higher bone temperature and deformed drills more than the classic drilling procedure. The increase in tissue temperature was directly proportional to the number of times drills were used, but neither technique generated critical necrosisinducing temperatures. Drill deformation was directly proportional to the number of times the drills were used. The roughness of the drills was directly proportional to the number of reuses in both groups but tended to be higher in the GG group. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2014;29:51-58. doi: 10.11607/jomi.2919Assistant Professor Discipline of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Integrated Clinic Department of Oral Biology Postgraduate Studies Universidade do Sagrado Coração (USC)Assistant Professor Discipline of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Integrated Clinic University Center of Araraquara (UNIARA)Assistant Professor Discipline of Periodontology and Integrated Clinic University Center of Araraquara UNIARACoordinating Professor Postgraduate Course of Dental Implantology UNIARAPhD Student Department of Surgery and Integrated Clinic Discipline of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Dentistry School of Araçatuba São Paulo State University (UNESP)Assistant Professor Department of Oral Surgery University of Cuiabá (UNIC)Assistant Professor Specialization in Dental Implantology Dental School of CuiabáSpecialist in Implantology University Center Barretos (UniFEB)Associate Professor Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics Discipline of Dental Materials UNESPProfessor Department of Surgery Discipline of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Dentistry School of Araçatuba UNESPPhD Student Department of Surgery and Integrated Clinic Discipline of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Dentistry School of Araçatuba São Paulo State University (UNESP)Associate Professor Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics Discipline of Dental Materials UNESPProfessor Department of Surgery Discipline of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Dentistry School of Araçatuba UNESPUniversidade do Sagrado Coração (USC)University Center of Araraquara (UNIARA)UNIARAUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)University of Cuiabá (UNIC)Dental School of CuiabáUniversity Center Barretos (UniFEB)dos Santos, Pâmela LetíciaQueiroz, Thallita PereiraMargonar, Rogériode Souza Carvalho, Abrahão Cavalcante Gomes [UNESP]Betoni, WalterRezende, Regis Rocha Rodriguesdos Santos, Paulo Henrique [UNESP]Garcia, Idelmo Rangel [UNESP]2021-06-25T10:32:45Z2021-06-25T10:32:45Z2014-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article51-58http://dx.doi.org/10.11607/jomi.2919International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants, v. 29, n. 1, p. 51-58, 2014.1942-44340882-2786http://hdl.handle.net/11449/20648310.11607/jomi.29192-s2.0-84900012096Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengInternational Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implantsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-09-19T13:30:44Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/206483Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestrepositoriounesp@unesp.bropendoar:29462024-09-19T13:30:44Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Evaluation of Bone Heating, Drill Deformation, and Drill Roughness After Implant Osteotomy: Guided Surgery and Classic Drilling Procedure
title Evaluation of Bone Heating, Drill Deformation, and Drill Roughness After Implant Osteotomy: Guided Surgery and Classic Drilling Procedure
spellingShingle Evaluation of Bone Heating, Drill Deformation, and Drill Roughness After Implant Osteotomy: Guided Surgery and Classic Drilling Procedure
dos Santos, Pâmela Letícia
bone overheating
dental implants
osteotomy
title_short Evaluation of Bone Heating, Drill Deformation, and Drill Roughness After Implant Osteotomy: Guided Surgery and Classic Drilling Procedure
title_full Evaluation of Bone Heating, Drill Deformation, and Drill Roughness After Implant Osteotomy: Guided Surgery and Classic Drilling Procedure
title_fullStr Evaluation of Bone Heating, Drill Deformation, and Drill Roughness After Implant Osteotomy: Guided Surgery and Classic Drilling Procedure
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Bone Heating, Drill Deformation, and Drill Roughness After Implant Osteotomy: Guided Surgery and Classic Drilling Procedure
title_sort Evaluation of Bone Heating, Drill Deformation, and Drill Roughness After Implant Osteotomy: Guided Surgery and Classic Drilling Procedure
author dos Santos, Pâmela Letícia
author_facet dos Santos, Pâmela Letícia
Queiroz, Thallita Pereira
Margonar, Rogério
de Souza Carvalho, Abrahão Cavalcante Gomes [UNESP]
Betoni, Walter
Rezende, Regis Rocha Rodrigues
dos Santos, Paulo Henrique [UNESP]
Garcia, Idelmo Rangel [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Queiroz, Thallita Pereira
Margonar, Rogério
de Souza Carvalho, Abrahão Cavalcante Gomes [UNESP]
Betoni, Walter
Rezende, Regis Rocha Rodrigues
dos Santos, Paulo Henrique [UNESP]
Garcia, Idelmo Rangel [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade do Sagrado Coração (USC)
University Center of Araraquara (UNIARA)
UNIARA
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
University of Cuiabá (UNIC)
Dental School of Cuiabá
University Center Barretos (UniFEB)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv dos Santos, Pâmela Letícia
Queiroz, Thallita Pereira
Margonar, Rogério
de Souza Carvalho, Abrahão Cavalcante Gomes [UNESP]
Betoni, Walter
Rezende, Regis Rocha Rodrigues
dos Santos, Paulo Henrique [UNESP]
Garcia, Idelmo Rangel [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv bone overheating
dental implants
osteotomy
topic bone overheating
dental implants
osteotomy
description Purpose: This study evaluated and compared bone heating, drill deformation, and drill roughness after several implant osteotomies in the guided surgery technique and the classic drilling procedure. Materials and Methods: The tibias of 20 rabbits were used. The animals were divided into a guided surgery group (GG) and a control group (CG); subgroups were then designated (G0, G1, G2, G3, and G4, corresponding to drills used 0, 10, 20, 30 and 40 times, respectively). Each animal received 10 sequential osteotomies (5 in each tibia) with each technique. Thermal changes were quantified, drill roughness was measured, and the drills were subjected to scanning electron microscopy. Results: Bone temperature generated by drilling was significantly higher in the GG than in the CG. Drill deformation in the GG and CG increased with drill use, and in the CG a significant difference between G0 and groups G3 and G4 was observed. In the GG, a significant difference between G0 and all other groups was found. For GG versus CG, a significant difference was found in the 40th osteotomy. Drill roughness in both groups was progressive in accordance with increased use, but there was no statistically significant difference between subgroups or between GG and CG overall. Conclusion: During preparation of implant osteotomies, the guided surgery technique generated a higher bone temperature and deformed drills more than the classic drilling procedure. The increase in tissue temperature was directly proportional to the number of times drills were used, but neither technique generated critical necrosisinducing temperatures. Drill deformation was directly proportional to the number of times the drills were used. The roughness of the drills was directly proportional to the number of reuses in both groups but tended to be higher in the GG group. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2014;29:51-58. doi: 10.11607/jomi.2919
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-01-01
2021-06-25T10:32:45Z
2021-06-25T10:32:45Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.11607/jomi.2919
International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants, v. 29, n. 1, p. 51-58, 2014.
1942-4434
0882-2786
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/206483
10.11607/jomi.2919
2-s2.0-84900012096
url http://dx.doi.org/10.11607/jomi.2919
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/206483
identifier_str_mv International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants, v. 29, n. 1, p. 51-58, 2014.
1942-4434
0882-2786
10.11607/jomi.2919
2-s2.0-84900012096
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 51-58
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repositoriounesp@unesp.br
_version_ 1813546484341145600