Efficacy and Safety of Bleaching Gels According to Application Protocol

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Borges, A. B. [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Abreu, F. S. de [UNESP], Mailart, M. C. [UNESP], Zanatta, R. F. [UNESP], Torres, C. R. G. [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.2341/19-253-L
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/218652
Resumo: Objectives: This study evaluated bleaching efficacy, enamel microhardness, and roughness of highly concentrated hydrogen peroxide (HP) gels (35%-40%) using different application protocols. Gel decomposition and pH alteration were also analyzed. Methods and Materials: Bovine enamel/dentin specimens were divided into groups according to the bleaching gel-Pola Office Plus (POP-SDI, 37.5% HP), Opalescence Boost (OPB-Ultradent, 40% HP), Whiteness HP (WHP-FGM, 35% HP)-and application protocol-single application (SA) and multiple application (MA) during the in-office session. Deionized water was used in control group (no bleaching). Thus, seven final groups were obtained (n=15/group). Color (CIE L*a*b*), surface microhardness (SMH), and roughness (Ra) were assessed before/after treatments. The pH of gels was measured, and HP concentration was determined with potassium permanganate titration method in different times. Data were submitted to analysis of variance and Tukey tests (5%). Results: All gels presented similar and clinically acceptable bleaching efficacy (Delta E>2.7) for both SA and MA, as well as no significant differences for SMH and Ra comparing the two protocols in the same gel. Peroxide decomposition significantly increased with time, but final gel concentrations were still high after 45 minutes (32.29% POP; 38.45% OPB; and 32.74% WHP). The pH decreased over time (initial - after 45 min) for WHP (6.83 +/- 0.07 - 5.81 +/- 0.06), but minimal alterations were observed for POP (8.09 +/- 0.09 - 7.88 +/- 0.07) and OPB (7.82 +/- 0.11 - 7.87 +/- 0.07). Conclusions: Peroxide decomposition was very low for all gels tested, and pH remained stable for POP and OPB gels. Bleaching protocol did not influence whitening efficacy and hazardous effects over enamel, thus potentially there was no clinical significance. Therefore, for the products tested, there is no evidence for recommending the gel change during the bleaching session.
id UNSP_4315ba39b86670d64b64d79e9f080d76
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/218652
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Efficacy and Safety of Bleaching Gels According to Application ProtocolObjectives: This study evaluated bleaching efficacy, enamel microhardness, and roughness of highly concentrated hydrogen peroxide (HP) gels (35%-40%) using different application protocols. Gel decomposition and pH alteration were also analyzed. Methods and Materials: Bovine enamel/dentin specimens were divided into groups according to the bleaching gel-Pola Office Plus (POP-SDI, 37.5% HP), Opalescence Boost (OPB-Ultradent, 40% HP), Whiteness HP (WHP-FGM, 35% HP)-and application protocol-single application (SA) and multiple application (MA) during the in-office session. Deionized water was used in control group (no bleaching). Thus, seven final groups were obtained (n=15/group). Color (CIE L*a*b*), surface microhardness (SMH), and roughness (Ra) were assessed before/after treatments. The pH of gels was measured, and HP concentration was determined with potassium permanganate titration method in different times. Data were submitted to analysis of variance and Tukey tests (5%). Results: All gels presented similar and clinically acceptable bleaching efficacy (Delta E>2.7) for both SA and MA, as well as no significant differences for SMH and Ra comparing the two protocols in the same gel. Peroxide decomposition significantly increased with time, but final gel concentrations were still high after 45 minutes (32.29% POP; 38.45% OPB; and 32.74% WHP). The pH decreased over time (initial - after 45 min) for WHP (6.83 +/- 0.07 - 5.81 +/- 0.06), but minimal alterations were observed for POP (8.09 +/- 0.09 - 7.88 +/- 0.07) and OPB (7.82 +/- 0.11 - 7.87 +/- 0.07). Conclusions: Peroxide decomposition was very low for all gels tested, and pH remained stable for POP and OPB gels. Bleaching protocol did not influence whitening efficacy and hazardous effects over enamel, thus potentially there was no clinical significance. Therefore, for the products tested, there is no evidence for recommending the gel change during the bleaching session.Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)Sao Paulo State Univ UNESP, Inst Sci & Technol, Dept Restorat, Sao Jose Dos Campos, SP, BrazilSao Paulo State Univ UNESP, Inst Sci & Technol, Dept Restorat Dent, Sao Jose Dos Campos, SP, BrazilUniv Taubate, Sch Dent, Dept Restorat Dent, Dept Dent,UNITAU, Taubate, SP, BrazilSao Paulo State Univ UNESP, Inst Sci & Technol, Dept Restorat Dent, Sao Paulo, SP, BrazilSao Paulo State Univ UNESP, Inst Sci & Technol, Dept Restorat, Sao Jose Dos Campos, SP, BrazilSao Paulo State Univ UNESP, Inst Sci & Technol, Dept Restorat Dent, Sao Jose Dos Campos, SP, BrazilSao Paulo State Univ UNESP, Inst Sci & Technol, Dept Restorat Dent, Sao Paulo, SP, BrazilCNPq: 310320/2017-8FAPESP: 2016/13044-4Operative Dentistry IncUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Univ TaubateBorges, A. B. [UNESP]Abreu, F. S. de [UNESP]Mailart, M. C. [UNESP]Zanatta, R. F. [UNESP]Torres, C. R. G. [UNESP]2022-04-28T17:22:09Z2022-04-28T17:22:09Z2021-03-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleE105-E116http://dx.doi.org/10.2341/19-253-LOperative Dentistry. Indianapolis: Operative Dentistry Inc, v. 46, n. 2, p. E105-E116, 2021.0361-7734http://hdl.handle.net/11449/21865210.2341/19-253-LWOS:000692033000018Web of Sciencereponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengOperative Dentistryinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-04-28T17:22:09Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/218652Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T22:14:44.445530Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Efficacy and Safety of Bleaching Gels According to Application Protocol
title Efficacy and Safety of Bleaching Gels According to Application Protocol
spellingShingle Efficacy and Safety of Bleaching Gels According to Application Protocol
Borges, A. B. [UNESP]
title_short Efficacy and Safety of Bleaching Gels According to Application Protocol
title_full Efficacy and Safety of Bleaching Gels According to Application Protocol
title_fullStr Efficacy and Safety of Bleaching Gels According to Application Protocol
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and Safety of Bleaching Gels According to Application Protocol
title_sort Efficacy and Safety of Bleaching Gels According to Application Protocol
author Borges, A. B. [UNESP]
author_facet Borges, A. B. [UNESP]
Abreu, F. S. de [UNESP]
Mailart, M. C. [UNESP]
Zanatta, R. F. [UNESP]
Torres, C. R. G. [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Abreu, F. S. de [UNESP]
Mailart, M. C. [UNESP]
Zanatta, R. F. [UNESP]
Torres, C. R. G. [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
Univ Taubate
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Borges, A. B. [UNESP]
Abreu, F. S. de [UNESP]
Mailart, M. C. [UNESP]
Zanatta, R. F. [UNESP]
Torres, C. R. G. [UNESP]
description Objectives: This study evaluated bleaching efficacy, enamel microhardness, and roughness of highly concentrated hydrogen peroxide (HP) gels (35%-40%) using different application protocols. Gel decomposition and pH alteration were also analyzed. Methods and Materials: Bovine enamel/dentin specimens were divided into groups according to the bleaching gel-Pola Office Plus (POP-SDI, 37.5% HP), Opalescence Boost (OPB-Ultradent, 40% HP), Whiteness HP (WHP-FGM, 35% HP)-and application protocol-single application (SA) and multiple application (MA) during the in-office session. Deionized water was used in control group (no bleaching). Thus, seven final groups were obtained (n=15/group). Color (CIE L*a*b*), surface microhardness (SMH), and roughness (Ra) were assessed before/after treatments. The pH of gels was measured, and HP concentration was determined with potassium permanganate titration method in different times. Data were submitted to analysis of variance and Tukey tests (5%). Results: All gels presented similar and clinically acceptable bleaching efficacy (Delta E>2.7) for both SA and MA, as well as no significant differences for SMH and Ra comparing the two protocols in the same gel. Peroxide decomposition significantly increased with time, but final gel concentrations were still high after 45 minutes (32.29% POP; 38.45% OPB; and 32.74% WHP). The pH decreased over time (initial - after 45 min) for WHP (6.83 +/- 0.07 - 5.81 +/- 0.06), but minimal alterations were observed for POP (8.09 +/- 0.09 - 7.88 +/- 0.07) and OPB (7.82 +/- 0.11 - 7.87 +/- 0.07). Conclusions: Peroxide decomposition was very low for all gels tested, and pH remained stable for POP and OPB gels. Bleaching protocol did not influence whitening efficacy and hazardous effects over enamel, thus potentially there was no clinical significance. Therefore, for the products tested, there is no evidence for recommending the gel change during the bleaching session.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-03-01
2022-04-28T17:22:09Z
2022-04-28T17:22:09Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.2341/19-253-L
Operative Dentistry. Indianapolis: Operative Dentistry Inc, v. 46, n. 2, p. E105-E116, 2021.
0361-7734
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/218652
10.2341/19-253-L
WOS:000692033000018
url http://dx.doi.org/10.2341/19-253-L
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/218652
identifier_str_mv Operative Dentistry. Indianapolis: Operative Dentistry Inc, v. 46, n. 2, p. E105-E116, 2021.
0361-7734
10.2341/19-253-L
WOS:000692033000018
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Operative Dentistry
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv E105-E116
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Operative Dentistry Inc
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Operative Dentistry Inc
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Web of Science
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808129408237568000