Paleontologia no Ensino Básico das escolas da Rede estadual do Rio de Janeiro: Uma avaliação Crítica

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Duarte, Sarah Gonçalves
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Arai, Mitsuru [UNESP], Passos, Nádia Zélia Gomes, Wanderley, Maria Dolores
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.11137/2016_2_124_132
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/220630
Resumo: A problem exists in the teaching of basic concepts about Paleontology to students of the elementary schools in the Rio de Janeiro state network, because National Curricular Parameters (PCN) do not emphasize or value the role of Paleontology within the Natural Sciences. The purpose of the present work is to investigate the basic paleontological knowledge of these students by distributing a questionnaire comprising the following six questions: (1) Do you understand the meaning of the term Paleontology?; (2) Have you ever seen a fossil and, if so, where (magazine, movie, museum, other)?; (3) What is a fossil and are there any fossils in Brazil?; (4) What is a geologist?; (5) What is a dinosaur? (6) Have humans ever lived with dinosaurs? At present, five schools have been analyzed and 399 students tested. 16.6% answered that they understood what Paleontology is, but between them, 77.2% had only a superficial idea, 22.8% wrong ideas, and 83.4% had no idea whatsoever. 81.4% had already seen and understood what a fossil is, but 116 between them defined it incorrectly, 45.7% did not know how to define a fossil, 18.7% defined it incompletely or inadequately, and 18.6% indicated that they had never seen a fossil object nor had any idea about what a fossil is. 64.6% were aware of the existence of fossils in Brazil, 20.5% were unaware, and 14.9% failed to answer question 3. 38.6% answered that they knew something about the geological profession, only 9.1% could explain satisfactorily the work of a geologist, 73.4% explained it incorrectly or incompletely, 17.5% marked “yes”, but did not explain the performance of a geologist, and 61.4% stated that they did not know. 0.6% students defined reasonably well what a dinosaur is, 55.6% defined it incorrectly, 19% failed to answer question 5, and 24.8% gave an incomplete definition. 31.1% believed that humans lived with dinosaurs, 65.4% answered “no”, and 3.5% provided no answer. This study highlights deficiencies in the teaching of paleontology in the state school network.
id UNSP_434c3a9c18691398089726832647006c
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/220630
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Paleontologia no Ensino Básico das escolas da Rede estadual do Rio de Janeiro: Uma avaliação CríticaPaleontology in elementary education of the state schools of the Rio de Janeiro: A critical evaluationEducationPaleontologySchoolA problem exists in the teaching of basic concepts about Paleontology to students of the elementary schools in the Rio de Janeiro state network, because National Curricular Parameters (PCN) do not emphasize or value the role of Paleontology within the Natural Sciences. The purpose of the present work is to investigate the basic paleontological knowledge of these students by distributing a questionnaire comprising the following six questions: (1) Do you understand the meaning of the term Paleontology?; (2) Have you ever seen a fossil and, if so, where (magazine, movie, museum, other)?; (3) What is a fossil and are there any fossils in Brazil?; (4) What is a geologist?; (5) What is a dinosaur? (6) Have humans ever lived with dinosaurs? At present, five schools have been analyzed and 399 students tested. 16.6% answered that they understood what Paleontology is, but between them, 77.2% had only a superficial idea, 22.8% wrong ideas, and 83.4% had no idea whatsoever. 81.4% had already seen and understood what a fossil is, but 116 between them defined it incorrectly, 45.7% did not know how to define a fossil, 18.7% defined it incompletely or inadequately, and 18.6% indicated that they had never seen a fossil object nor had any idea about what a fossil is. 64.6% were aware of the existence of fossils in Brazil, 20.5% were unaware, and 14.9% failed to answer question 3. 38.6% answered that they knew something about the geological profession, only 9.1% could explain satisfactorily the work of a geologist, 73.4% explained it incorrectly or incompletely, 17.5% marked “yes”, but did not explain the performance of a geologist, and 61.4% stated that they did not know. 0.6% students defined reasonably well what a dinosaur is, 55.6% defined it incorrectly, 19% failed to answer question 5, and 24.8% gave an incomplete definition. 31.1% believed that humans lived with dinosaurs, 65.4% answered “no”, and 3.5% provided no answer. This study highlights deficiencies in the teaching of paleontology in the state school network.Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro Centro de Ciências da Matemática e da Natureza Departamento de Geologia Laboratório de Nanofósseis Calcários, Cidade Universitária, Avenida Athos da Silveira Ramos, 274 Ilha do FundãoUniversidade Estadual Paulista ‘Júlio de Mesquita Filho’ Instituto de Geociências e Ciências Exatas UNESPetro, Avenida 24 A, 1515, Campus de Rio ClaroUniversidade Estadual Paulista ‘Júlio de Mesquita Filho’ Instituto de Geociências e Ciências Exatas UNESPetro, Avenida 24 A, 1515, Campus de Rio ClaroUniversidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ)Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Duarte, Sarah GonçalvesArai, Mitsuru [UNESP]Passos, Nádia Zélia GomesWanderley, Maria Dolores2022-04-28T19:03:37Z2022-04-28T19:03:37Z2016-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article124-132http://dx.doi.org/10.11137/2016_2_124_132Anuario do Instituto de Geociencias, v. 39, n. 2, p. 124-132, 2016.1982-39080101-9759http://hdl.handle.net/11449/22063010.11137/2016_2_124_1322-s2.0-84973138163Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPporAnuario do Instituto de Geocienciasinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-04-28T19:03:37Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/220630Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462022-04-28T19:03:37Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Paleontologia no Ensino Básico das escolas da Rede estadual do Rio de Janeiro: Uma avaliação Crítica
Paleontology in elementary education of the state schools of the Rio de Janeiro: A critical evaluation
title Paleontologia no Ensino Básico das escolas da Rede estadual do Rio de Janeiro: Uma avaliação Crítica
spellingShingle Paleontologia no Ensino Básico das escolas da Rede estadual do Rio de Janeiro: Uma avaliação Crítica
Duarte, Sarah Gonçalves
Education
Paleontology
School
title_short Paleontologia no Ensino Básico das escolas da Rede estadual do Rio de Janeiro: Uma avaliação Crítica
title_full Paleontologia no Ensino Básico das escolas da Rede estadual do Rio de Janeiro: Uma avaliação Crítica
title_fullStr Paleontologia no Ensino Básico das escolas da Rede estadual do Rio de Janeiro: Uma avaliação Crítica
title_full_unstemmed Paleontologia no Ensino Básico das escolas da Rede estadual do Rio de Janeiro: Uma avaliação Crítica
title_sort Paleontologia no Ensino Básico das escolas da Rede estadual do Rio de Janeiro: Uma avaliação Crítica
author Duarte, Sarah Gonçalves
author_facet Duarte, Sarah Gonçalves
Arai, Mitsuru [UNESP]
Passos, Nádia Zélia Gomes
Wanderley, Maria Dolores
author_role author
author2 Arai, Mitsuru [UNESP]
Passos, Nádia Zélia Gomes
Wanderley, Maria Dolores
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ)
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Duarte, Sarah Gonçalves
Arai, Mitsuru [UNESP]
Passos, Nádia Zélia Gomes
Wanderley, Maria Dolores
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Education
Paleontology
School
topic Education
Paleontology
School
description A problem exists in the teaching of basic concepts about Paleontology to students of the elementary schools in the Rio de Janeiro state network, because National Curricular Parameters (PCN) do not emphasize or value the role of Paleontology within the Natural Sciences. The purpose of the present work is to investigate the basic paleontological knowledge of these students by distributing a questionnaire comprising the following six questions: (1) Do you understand the meaning of the term Paleontology?; (2) Have you ever seen a fossil and, if so, where (magazine, movie, museum, other)?; (3) What is a fossil and are there any fossils in Brazil?; (4) What is a geologist?; (5) What is a dinosaur? (6) Have humans ever lived with dinosaurs? At present, five schools have been analyzed and 399 students tested. 16.6% answered that they understood what Paleontology is, but between them, 77.2% had only a superficial idea, 22.8% wrong ideas, and 83.4% had no idea whatsoever. 81.4% had already seen and understood what a fossil is, but 116 between them defined it incorrectly, 45.7% did not know how to define a fossil, 18.7% defined it incompletely or inadequately, and 18.6% indicated that they had never seen a fossil object nor had any idea about what a fossil is. 64.6% were aware of the existence of fossils in Brazil, 20.5% were unaware, and 14.9% failed to answer question 3. 38.6% answered that they knew something about the geological profession, only 9.1% could explain satisfactorily the work of a geologist, 73.4% explained it incorrectly or incompletely, 17.5% marked “yes”, but did not explain the performance of a geologist, and 61.4% stated that they did not know. 0.6% students defined reasonably well what a dinosaur is, 55.6% defined it incorrectly, 19% failed to answer question 5, and 24.8% gave an incomplete definition. 31.1% believed that humans lived with dinosaurs, 65.4% answered “no”, and 3.5% provided no answer. This study highlights deficiencies in the teaching of paleontology in the state school network.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-01-01
2022-04-28T19:03:37Z
2022-04-28T19:03:37Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.11137/2016_2_124_132
Anuario do Instituto de Geociencias, v. 39, n. 2, p. 124-132, 2016.
1982-3908
0101-9759
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/220630
10.11137/2016_2_124_132
2-s2.0-84973138163
url http://dx.doi.org/10.11137/2016_2_124_132
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/220630
identifier_str_mv Anuario do Instituto de Geociencias, v. 39, n. 2, p. 124-132, 2016.
1982-3908
0101-9759
10.11137/2016_2_124_132
2-s2.0-84973138163
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Anuario do Instituto de Geociencias
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 124-132
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1803046389017477120