Unfolding barriers for urban mobility plan in small and medium municipalities – A case study in Brazil

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Bezerra, Barbara Stolte [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: dos Santos, Ana Laura Lordelo [UNESP], Delmonico, Diego V.G. [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2019.12.006
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/201448
Resumo: This paper investigated barriers for the design and implementation of Urban Mobility Plans in small and medium-sized cities in the State of São Paulo, Brazil. To achieve this objective an exploratory survey was carried out with specialists involved in the urban planning processes of such cities. A total of 22 barriers were listed, and, using the Keiser criterion, these barriers were grouped into seven factors: (1) resources availability; (2) practical and technological; (3) city characteristics; (4) budget constrains; (5) social and cultural; (6) organizational; and (7) lack of infrastructure for sustainable vehicles; a grouping that, in general, was similar to those found in the literature. The first main barrier encountered in the municipalities analyzed were difficulties in finding mobility solutions that adequately meet all stakeholders’ needs, followed by budget constraints for implementing actions toward more sustainable transport modes. Even though the complexity of the actors involved is seen as one of the main barriers to urban planning, it is still necessary to effectively involve the population in the decision-making process, so that all needs are considered, and consensual solutions are reached. Through the Spearman correlation method, other barriers closely associated with the first main barrier were reconciling the mobility needs of the population with the already existing infrastructure and preference for motor vehicles. For the second main barrier, other closely correlated variables were insufficient data collection for the preparation of urban mobility plans and lack of qualified workforce within municipal agencies to both elaborate and implement the actions contained in the plans. These correlations suggest that a deficient budget hinders the development of sustainable urban mobility in several stages of the process, including the diagnosis phase (data collection).
id UNSP_434d8374c3bd4268c0189b12b8b7c609
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/201448
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Unfolding barriers for urban mobility plan in small and medium municipalities – A case study in BrazilBarriersSmall and medium citiesSustainable transportation modesUrban mobility planThis paper investigated barriers for the design and implementation of Urban Mobility Plans in small and medium-sized cities in the State of São Paulo, Brazil. To achieve this objective an exploratory survey was carried out with specialists involved in the urban planning processes of such cities. A total of 22 barriers were listed, and, using the Keiser criterion, these barriers were grouped into seven factors: (1) resources availability; (2) practical and technological; (3) city characteristics; (4) budget constrains; (5) social and cultural; (6) organizational; and (7) lack of infrastructure for sustainable vehicles; a grouping that, in general, was similar to those found in the literature. The first main barrier encountered in the municipalities analyzed were difficulties in finding mobility solutions that adequately meet all stakeholders’ needs, followed by budget constraints for implementing actions toward more sustainable transport modes. Even though the complexity of the actors involved is seen as one of the main barriers to urban planning, it is still necessary to effectively involve the population in the decision-making process, so that all needs are considered, and consensual solutions are reached. Through the Spearman correlation method, other barriers closely associated with the first main barrier were reconciling the mobility needs of the population with the already existing infrastructure and preference for motor vehicles. For the second main barrier, other closely correlated variables were insufficient data collection for the preparation of urban mobility plans and lack of qualified workforce within municipal agencies to both elaborate and implement the actions contained in the plans. These correlations suggest that a deficient budget hinders the development of sustainable urban mobility in several stages of the process, including the diagnosis phase (data collection).Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)São Paulo State University (UNESP) School of Engineering Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Av. Engenheiro Luís Edmundo Carrijo Coube, 14-01São Paulo State University (UNESP) School of Engineering Department of Production EngineeringSão Paulo State University (UNESP) School of Engineering Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Av. Engenheiro Luís Edmundo Carrijo Coube, 14-01São Paulo State University (UNESP) School of Engineering Department of Production EngineeringUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Bezerra, Barbara Stolte [UNESP]dos Santos, Ana Laura Lordelo [UNESP]Delmonico, Diego V.G. [UNESP]2020-12-12T02:32:44Z2020-12-12T02:32:44Z2020-02-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article808-822http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2019.12.006Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, v. 132, p. 808-822.0965-8564http://hdl.handle.net/11449/20144810.1016/j.tra.2019.12.0062-s2.0-85077513690Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengTransportation Research Part A: Policy and Practiceinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-10-22T19:32:34Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/201448Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462021-10-22T19:32:34Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Unfolding barriers for urban mobility plan in small and medium municipalities – A case study in Brazil
title Unfolding barriers for urban mobility plan in small and medium municipalities – A case study in Brazil
spellingShingle Unfolding barriers for urban mobility plan in small and medium municipalities – A case study in Brazil
Bezerra, Barbara Stolte [UNESP]
Barriers
Small and medium cities
Sustainable transportation modes
Urban mobility plan
title_short Unfolding barriers for urban mobility plan in small and medium municipalities – A case study in Brazil
title_full Unfolding barriers for urban mobility plan in small and medium municipalities – A case study in Brazil
title_fullStr Unfolding barriers for urban mobility plan in small and medium municipalities – A case study in Brazil
title_full_unstemmed Unfolding barriers for urban mobility plan in small and medium municipalities – A case study in Brazil
title_sort Unfolding barriers for urban mobility plan in small and medium municipalities – A case study in Brazil
author Bezerra, Barbara Stolte [UNESP]
author_facet Bezerra, Barbara Stolte [UNESP]
dos Santos, Ana Laura Lordelo [UNESP]
Delmonico, Diego V.G. [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 dos Santos, Ana Laura Lordelo [UNESP]
Delmonico, Diego V.G. [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Bezerra, Barbara Stolte [UNESP]
dos Santos, Ana Laura Lordelo [UNESP]
Delmonico, Diego V.G. [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Barriers
Small and medium cities
Sustainable transportation modes
Urban mobility plan
topic Barriers
Small and medium cities
Sustainable transportation modes
Urban mobility plan
description This paper investigated barriers for the design and implementation of Urban Mobility Plans in small and medium-sized cities in the State of São Paulo, Brazil. To achieve this objective an exploratory survey was carried out with specialists involved in the urban planning processes of such cities. A total of 22 barriers were listed, and, using the Keiser criterion, these barriers were grouped into seven factors: (1) resources availability; (2) practical and technological; (3) city characteristics; (4) budget constrains; (5) social and cultural; (6) organizational; and (7) lack of infrastructure for sustainable vehicles; a grouping that, in general, was similar to those found in the literature. The first main barrier encountered in the municipalities analyzed were difficulties in finding mobility solutions that adequately meet all stakeholders’ needs, followed by budget constraints for implementing actions toward more sustainable transport modes. Even though the complexity of the actors involved is seen as one of the main barriers to urban planning, it is still necessary to effectively involve the population in the decision-making process, so that all needs are considered, and consensual solutions are reached. Through the Spearman correlation method, other barriers closely associated with the first main barrier were reconciling the mobility needs of the population with the already existing infrastructure and preference for motor vehicles. For the second main barrier, other closely correlated variables were insufficient data collection for the preparation of urban mobility plans and lack of qualified workforce within municipal agencies to both elaborate and implement the actions contained in the plans. These correlations suggest that a deficient budget hinders the development of sustainable urban mobility in several stages of the process, including the diagnosis phase (data collection).
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-12-12T02:32:44Z
2020-12-12T02:32:44Z
2020-02-01
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2019.12.006
Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, v. 132, p. 808-822.
0965-8564
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/201448
10.1016/j.tra.2019.12.006
2-s2.0-85077513690
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2019.12.006
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/201448
identifier_str_mv Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, v. 132, p. 808-822.
0965-8564
10.1016/j.tra.2019.12.006
2-s2.0-85077513690
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 808-822
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1803045911892328448