Creatine does not promote hypertrophy in skeletal muscle in supplemented compared with nonsupplemented rats subjected to a similar workload

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Aguiar, Andreo Fernando [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2011
Outros Autores: Alves de Souza, Rodrigo Wagner [UNESP], Aguiar, Danilo Henrique, Milanezi Aguiar, Rachel Colauto [UNESP], Vechetti, Ivan Jose [UNESP], Dal-Pai-Silva, Maeli [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nutres.2011.08.006
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/42603
Resumo: The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that creatine (Cr) supplementation may promote an additional hypertrophic effect on skeletal muscle independent of a higher workload on Cr-supplemented trained muscle compared with Cr-nonsupplemented trained muscle. Male Wistar rats (2-3 months old, 250-300 g) were divided randomly into 4 groups (n = 8 per group): nontrained without Cr supplementation (CO), nontrained with Cr supplementation (CR), trained without Cr supplementation (TR), and trained with Cr supplementation (TRCR). Creatine supplementation was given at 0.5 g/kg per day. Trained groups were submitted to a 5-week resistance training program (5 d/wk). The progressive workloads were similar between the Cr-supplemented (TRCR) and Cr-nonsupplemented (TR) trained groups; the only difference between groups was the Cr treatment. After the 5-week experiment, the soleus muscle was dissected to analyze the cross-sectional area (CSA) of the muscle fibers. Resistance training promoted a significant (P < .05) increase in the muscle fibers CSA in the TR group compared with the CO group. However, no additional hypertrophic effect was found when Cr supplementation was added to training (TRCR vs TR comparison, P > .05). In addition, Cr supplementation alone did not promote significant alterations in muscle fiber CSA (CR vs CO comparison, P > .05). We conclude that Cr supplementation does not promote any additional hypertrophic effect on skeletal muscle area when Cr-supplemented trained muscles are submitted to same training regimen than Cr-nonsupplemented trained muscles. Specifically, any benefits of Cr supplementation on hypertrophy gains during resistance training may not be attributed to a direct anabolic effect on the skeletal muscle. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
id UNSP_456f36ced068a13728bdba26255ccb59
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/42603
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Creatine does not promote hypertrophy in skeletal muscle in supplemented compared with nonsupplemented rats subjected to a similar workloadSoleus muscleWeight trainingCross-sectional areaNutritional interventionRodentThe purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that creatine (Cr) supplementation may promote an additional hypertrophic effect on skeletal muscle independent of a higher workload on Cr-supplemented trained muscle compared with Cr-nonsupplemented trained muscle. Male Wistar rats (2-3 months old, 250-300 g) were divided randomly into 4 groups (n = 8 per group): nontrained without Cr supplementation (CO), nontrained with Cr supplementation (CR), trained without Cr supplementation (TR), and trained with Cr supplementation (TRCR). Creatine supplementation was given at 0.5 g/kg per day. Trained groups were submitted to a 5-week resistance training program (5 d/wk). The progressive workloads were similar between the Cr-supplemented (TRCR) and Cr-nonsupplemented (TR) trained groups; the only difference between groups was the Cr treatment. After the 5-week experiment, the soleus muscle was dissected to analyze the cross-sectional area (CSA) of the muscle fibers. Resistance training promoted a significant (P < .05) increase in the muscle fibers CSA in the TR group compared with the CO group. However, no additional hypertrophic effect was found when Cr supplementation was added to training (TRCR vs TR comparison, P > .05). In addition, Cr supplementation alone did not promote significant alterations in muscle fiber CSA (CR vs CO comparison, P > .05). We conclude that Cr supplementation does not promote any additional hypertrophic effect on skeletal muscle area when Cr-supplemented trained muscles are submitted to same training regimen than Cr-nonsupplemented trained muscles. Specifically, any benefits of Cr supplementation on hypertrophy gains during resistance training may not be attributed to a direct anabolic effect on the skeletal muscle. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)UNESP Univ Estadual Paulista, Inst Biosci, Dept Morphol, BR-18618970 São Paulo, BrazilUniv Fed Mato Grosso, Dept Hlth Sci, BR-78550000 Sinop, Mato Grosso, BrazilUNESP Univ Estadual Paulista, Inst Biosci, Dept Morphol, BR-18618970 São Paulo, BrazilFAPESP: 04/08627-3Pergamon-Elsevier B.V. LtdUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Univ Fed Mato GrossoAguiar, Andreo Fernando [UNESP]Alves de Souza, Rodrigo Wagner [UNESP]Aguiar, Danilo HenriqueMilanezi Aguiar, Rachel Colauto [UNESP]Vechetti, Ivan Jose [UNESP]Dal-Pai-Silva, Maeli [UNESP]2014-05-20T15:34:37Z2014-05-20T15:34:37Z2011-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article652-657application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nutres.2011.08.006Nutrition Research. Oxford: Pergamon-Elsevier B.V. Ltd, v. 31, n. 8, p. 652-657, 2011.0271-5317http://hdl.handle.net/11449/4260310.1016/j.nutres.2011.08.006WOS:000295392900010WOS000295392900010.pdfWeb of Sciencereponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengNutrition Research2.7071,135info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-01-22T06:24:21Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/42603Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T23:40:42.730307Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Creatine does not promote hypertrophy in skeletal muscle in supplemented compared with nonsupplemented rats subjected to a similar workload
title Creatine does not promote hypertrophy in skeletal muscle in supplemented compared with nonsupplemented rats subjected to a similar workload
spellingShingle Creatine does not promote hypertrophy in skeletal muscle in supplemented compared with nonsupplemented rats subjected to a similar workload
Aguiar, Andreo Fernando [UNESP]
Soleus muscle
Weight training
Cross-sectional area
Nutritional intervention
Rodent
title_short Creatine does not promote hypertrophy in skeletal muscle in supplemented compared with nonsupplemented rats subjected to a similar workload
title_full Creatine does not promote hypertrophy in skeletal muscle in supplemented compared with nonsupplemented rats subjected to a similar workload
title_fullStr Creatine does not promote hypertrophy in skeletal muscle in supplemented compared with nonsupplemented rats subjected to a similar workload
title_full_unstemmed Creatine does not promote hypertrophy in skeletal muscle in supplemented compared with nonsupplemented rats subjected to a similar workload
title_sort Creatine does not promote hypertrophy in skeletal muscle in supplemented compared with nonsupplemented rats subjected to a similar workload
author Aguiar, Andreo Fernando [UNESP]
author_facet Aguiar, Andreo Fernando [UNESP]
Alves de Souza, Rodrigo Wagner [UNESP]
Aguiar, Danilo Henrique
Milanezi Aguiar, Rachel Colauto [UNESP]
Vechetti, Ivan Jose [UNESP]
Dal-Pai-Silva, Maeli [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Alves de Souza, Rodrigo Wagner [UNESP]
Aguiar, Danilo Henrique
Milanezi Aguiar, Rachel Colauto [UNESP]
Vechetti, Ivan Jose [UNESP]
Dal-Pai-Silva, Maeli [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
Univ Fed Mato Grosso
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Aguiar, Andreo Fernando [UNESP]
Alves de Souza, Rodrigo Wagner [UNESP]
Aguiar, Danilo Henrique
Milanezi Aguiar, Rachel Colauto [UNESP]
Vechetti, Ivan Jose [UNESP]
Dal-Pai-Silva, Maeli [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Soleus muscle
Weight training
Cross-sectional area
Nutritional intervention
Rodent
topic Soleus muscle
Weight training
Cross-sectional area
Nutritional intervention
Rodent
description The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that creatine (Cr) supplementation may promote an additional hypertrophic effect on skeletal muscle independent of a higher workload on Cr-supplemented trained muscle compared with Cr-nonsupplemented trained muscle. Male Wistar rats (2-3 months old, 250-300 g) were divided randomly into 4 groups (n = 8 per group): nontrained without Cr supplementation (CO), nontrained with Cr supplementation (CR), trained without Cr supplementation (TR), and trained with Cr supplementation (TRCR). Creatine supplementation was given at 0.5 g/kg per day. Trained groups were submitted to a 5-week resistance training program (5 d/wk). The progressive workloads were similar between the Cr-supplemented (TRCR) and Cr-nonsupplemented (TR) trained groups; the only difference between groups was the Cr treatment. After the 5-week experiment, the soleus muscle was dissected to analyze the cross-sectional area (CSA) of the muscle fibers. Resistance training promoted a significant (P < .05) increase in the muscle fibers CSA in the TR group compared with the CO group. However, no additional hypertrophic effect was found when Cr supplementation was added to training (TRCR vs TR comparison, P > .05). In addition, Cr supplementation alone did not promote significant alterations in muscle fiber CSA (CR vs CO comparison, P > .05). We conclude that Cr supplementation does not promote any additional hypertrophic effect on skeletal muscle area when Cr-supplemented trained muscles are submitted to same training regimen than Cr-nonsupplemented trained muscles. Specifically, any benefits of Cr supplementation on hypertrophy gains during resistance training may not be attributed to a direct anabolic effect on the skeletal muscle. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
publishDate 2011
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2011-08-01
2014-05-20T15:34:37Z
2014-05-20T15:34:37Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nutres.2011.08.006
Nutrition Research. Oxford: Pergamon-Elsevier B.V. Ltd, v. 31, n. 8, p. 652-657, 2011.
0271-5317
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/42603
10.1016/j.nutres.2011.08.006
WOS:000295392900010
WOS000295392900010.pdf
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nutres.2011.08.006
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/42603
identifier_str_mv Nutrition Research. Oxford: Pergamon-Elsevier B.V. Ltd, v. 31, n. 8, p. 652-657, 2011.
0271-5317
10.1016/j.nutres.2011.08.006
WOS:000295392900010
WOS000295392900010.pdf
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Nutrition Research
2.707
1,135
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 652-657
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pergamon-Elsevier B.V. Ltd
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pergamon-Elsevier B.V. Ltd
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Web of Science
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808129542381895680