Creatine does not promote hypertrophy in skeletal muscle in supplemented compared with nonsupplemented rats subjected to a similar workload
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2011 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nutres.2011.08.006 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/42603 |
Resumo: | The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that creatine (Cr) supplementation may promote an additional hypertrophic effect on skeletal muscle independent of a higher workload on Cr-supplemented trained muscle compared with Cr-nonsupplemented trained muscle. Male Wistar rats (2-3 months old, 250-300 g) were divided randomly into 4 groups (n = 8 per group): nontrained without Cr supplementation (CO), nontrained with Cr supplementation (CR), trained without Cr supplementation (TR), and trained with Cr supplementation (TRCR). Creatine supplementation was given at 0.5 g/kg per day. Trained groups were submitted to a 5-week resistance training program (5 d/wk). The progressive workloads were similar between the Cr-supplemented (TRCR) and Cr-nonsupplemented (TR) trained groups; the only difference between groups was the Cr treatment. After the 5-week experiment, the soleus muscle was dissected to analyze the cross-sectional area (CSA) of the muscle fibers. Resistance training promoted a significant (P < .05) increase in the muscle fibers CSA in the TR group compared with the CO group. However, no additional hypertrophic effect was found when Cr supplementation was added to training (TRCR vs TR comparison, P > .05). In addition, Cr supplementation alone did not promote significant alterations in muscle fiber CSA (CR vs CO comparison, P > .05). We conclude that Cr supplementation does not promote any additional hypertrophic effect on skeletal muscle area when Cr-supplemented trained muscles are submitted to same training regimen than Cr-nonsupplemented trained muscles. Specifically, any benefits of Cr supplementation on hypertrophy gains during resistance training may not be attributed to a direct anabolic effect on the skeletal muscle. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. |
id |
UNSP_456f36ced068a13728bdba26255ccb59 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/42603 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Creatine does not promote hypertrophy in skeletal muscle in supplemented compared with nonsupplemented rats subjected to a similar workloadSoleus muscleWeight trainingCross-sectional areaNutritional interventionRodentThe purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that creatine (Cr) supplementation may promote an additional hypertrophic effect on skeletal muscle independent of a higher workload on Cr-supplemented trained muscle compared with Cr-nonsupplemented trained muscle. Male Wistar rats (2-3 months old, 250-300 g) were divided randomly into 4 groups (n = 8 per group): nontrained without Cr supplementation (CO), nontrained with Cr supplementation (CR), trained without Cr supplementation (TR), and trained with Cr supplementation (TRCR). Creatine supplementation was given at 0.5 g/kg per day. Trained groups were submitted to a 5-week resistance training program (5 d/wk). The progressive workloads were similar between the Cr-supplemented (TRCR) and Cr-nonsupplemented (TR) trained groups; the only difference between groups was the Cr treatment. After the 5-week experiment, the soleus muscle was dissected to analyze the cross-sectional area (CSA) of the muscle fibers. Resistance training promoted a significant (P < .05) increase in the muscle fibers CSA in the TR group compared with the CO group. However, no additional hypertrophic effect was found when Cr supplementation was added to training (TRCR vs TR comparison, P > .05). In addition, Cr supplementation alone did not promote significant alterations in muscle fiber CSA (CR vs CO comparison, P > .05). We conclude that Cr supplementation does not promote any additional hypertrophic effect on skeletal muscle area when Cr-supplemented trained muscles are submitted to same training regimen than Cr-nonsupplemented trained muscles. Specifically, any benefits of Cr supplementation on hypertrophy gains during resistance training may not be attributed to a direct anabolic effect on the skeletal muscle. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)UNESP Univ Estadual Paulista, Inst Biosci, Dept Morphol, BR-18618970 São Paulo, BrazilUniv Fed Mato Grosso, Dept Hlth Sci, BR-78550000 Sinop, Mato Grosso, BrazilUNESP Univ Estadual Paulista, Inst Biosci, Dept Morphol, BR-18618970 São Paulo, BrazilFAPESP: 04/08627-3Pergamon-Elsevier B.V. LtdUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Univ Fed Mato GrossoAguiar, Andreo Fernando [UNESP]Alves de Souza, Rodrigo Wagner [UNESP]Aguiar, Danilo HenriqueMilanezi Aguiar, Rachel Colauto [UNESP]Vechetti, Ivan Jose [UNESP]Dal-Pai-Silva, Maeli [UNESP]2014-05-20T15:34:37Z2014-05-20T15:34:37Z2011-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article652-657application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nutres.2011.08.006Nutrition Research. Oxford: Pergamon-Elsevier B.V. Ltd, v. 31, n. 8, p. 652-657, 2011.0271-5317http://hdl.handle.net/11449/4260310.1016/j.nutres.2011.08.006WOS:000295392900010WOS000295392900010.pdfWeb of Sciencereponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengNutrition Research2.7071,135info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-01-22T06:24:21Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/42603Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T23:40:42.730307Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Creatine does not promote hypertrophy in skeletal muscle in supplemented compared with nonsupplemented rats subjected to a similar workload |
title |
Creatine does not promote hypertrophy in skeletal muscle in supplemented compared with nonsupplemented rats subjected to a similar workload |
spellingShingle |
Creatine does not promote hypertrophy in skeletal muscle in supplemented compared with nonsupplemented rats subjected to a similar workload Aguiar, Andreo Fernando [UNESP] Soleus muscle Weight training Cross-sectional area Nutritional intervention Rodent |
title_short |
Creatine does not promote hypertrophy in skeletal muscle in supplemented compared with nonsupplemented rats subjected to a similar workload |
title_full |
Creatine does not promote hypertrophy in skeletal muscle in supplemented compared with nonsupplemented rats subjected to a similar workload |
title_fullStr |
Creatine does not promote hypertrophy in skeletal muscle in supplemented compared with nonsupplemented rats subjected to a similar workload |
title_full_unstemmed |
Creatine does not promote hypertrophy in skeletal muscle in supplemented compared with nonsupplemented rats subjected to a similar workload |
title_sort |
Creatine does not promote hypertrophy in skeletal muscle in supplemented compared with nonsupplemented rats subjected to a similar workload |
author |
Aguiar, Andreo Fernando [UNESP] |
author_facet |
Aguiar, Andreo Fernando [UNESP] Alves de Souza, Rodrigo Wagner [UNESP] Aguiar, Danilo Henrique Milanezi Aguiar, Rachel Colauto [UNESP] Vechetti, Ivan Jose [UNESP] Dal-Pai-Silva, Maeli [UNESP] |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Alves de Souza, Rodrigo Wagner [UNESP] Aguiar, Danilo Henrique Milanezi Aguiar, Rachel Colauto [UNESP] Vechetti, Ivan Jose [UNESP] Dal-Pai-Silva, Maeli [UNESP] |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) Univ Fed Mato Grosso |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Aguiar, Andreo Fernando [UNESP] Alves de Souza, Rodrigo Wagner [UNESP] Aguiar, Danilo Henrique Milanezi Aguiar, Rachel Colauto [UNESP] Vechetti, Ivan Jose [UNESP] Dal-Pai-Silva, Maeli [UNESP] |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Soleus muscle Weight training Cross-sectional area Nutritional intervention Rodent |
topic |
Soleus muscle Weight training Cross-sectional area Nutritional intervention Rodent |
description |
The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that creatine (Cr) supplementation may promote an additional hypertrophic effect on skeletal muscle independent of a higher workload on Cr-supplemented trained muscle compared with Cr-nonsupplemented trained muscle. Male Wistar rats (2-3 months old, 250-300 g) were divided randomly into 4 groups (n = 8 per group): nontrained without Cr supplementation (CO), nontrained with Cr supplementation (CR), trained without Cr supplementation (TR), and trained with Cr supplementation (TRCR). Creatine supplementation was given at 0.5 g/kg per day. Trained groups were submitted to a 5-week resistance training program (5 d/wk). The progressive workloads were similar between the Cr-supplemented (TRCR) and Cr-nonsupplemented (TR) trained groups; the only difference between groups was the Cr treatment. After the 5-week experiment, the soleus muscle was dissected to analyze the cross-sectional area (CSA) of the muscle fibers. Resistance training promoted a significant (P < .05) increase in the muscle fibers CSA in the TR group compared with the CO group. However, no additional hypertrophic effect was found when Cr supplementation was added to training (TRCR vs TR comparison, P > .05). In addition, Cr supplementation alone did not promote significant alterations in muscle fiber CSA (CR vs CO comparison, P > .05). We conclude that Cr supplementation does not promote any additional hypertrophic effect on skeletal muscle area when Cr-supplemented trained muscles are submitted to same training regimen than Cr-nonsupplemented trained muscles. Specifically, any benefits of Cr supplementation on hypertrophy gains during resistance training may not be attributed to a direct anabolic effect on the skeletal muscle. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. |
publishDate |
2011 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2011-08-01 2014-05-20T15:34:37Z 2014-05-20T15:34:37Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nutres.2011.08.006 Nutrition Research. Oxford: Pergamon-Elsevier B.V. Ltd, v. 31, n. 8, p. 652-657, 2011. 0271-5317 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/42603 10.1016/j.nutres.2011.08.006 WOS:000295392900010 WOS000295392900010.pdf |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nutres.2011.08.006 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/42603 |
identifier_str_mv |
Nutrition Research. Oxford: Pergamon-Elsevier B.V. Ltd, v. 31, n. 8, p. 652-657, 2011. 0271-5317 10.1016/j.nutres.2011.08.006 WOS:000295392900010 WOS000295392900010.pdf |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Nutrition Research 2.707 1,135 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
652-657 application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pergamon-Elsevier B.V. Ltd |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pergamon-Elsevier B.V. Ltd |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Web of Science reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808129542381895680 |