Life cycle comparative assessment of pet bottle waste management options: A case study for the city of Bauru, Brazil

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Martin, Eduardo J.P. [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Oliveira, Deborah S.B.L., Oliveira, Luiza S.B.L., Bezerra, Barbara S. [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2020.08.041
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/205329
Resumo: This study analyzed the environmental impacts of nine scenarios for Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) bottle waste disposal, in the city of Bauru, Brazil. Nine scenarios were considered in this study: (1) current (base) scenario (96.4% of PET waste is sent to landfill, 3.6% is sent to sorting cooperatives); (2) 50% to sorting cooperatives, 50% to landfill; (3) 50% to sorting cooperatives, 50% to incineration; (4) 50% to landfill, 50% to incineration; (5) 100% to sorting cooperatives (keeping the current collection distribution); (6) 100% to landfill; (7) 100% to incineration; (8) and (9) 100% sent to sorting cooperatives, with changes in the collection scheme. Life cycle assessment was implemented to compute the impacts for each scenario and compare their environmental performances. The results have shown that recycling is a better option than incineration across all impact categories analyzed. Landfilling had lower net impacts than incineration in all categories, except for ozone depletion and freshwater eutrophication. All recycling scenarios proposed outperformed the current scenario in all impact categories. Even though recycling presents itself as an environmentally-promising alternative, much work still needs to be done for its successful implementation, such as promoting source-separation at home and improving the management strategies of recycling cooperatives, including additional funding and training to support an increased sorting capacity.
id UNSP_476712ce0541309a5a175577d0f3f042
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/205329
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Life cycle comparative assessment of pet bottle waste management options: A case study for the city of Bauru, BrazilIncinerationLandfillingLife cycle assessmentPolyethylene Terephthalate (PET) wasteRecyclingThis study analyzed the environmental impacts of nine scenarios for Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) bottle waste disposal, in the city of Bauru, Brazil. Nine scenarios were considered in this study: (1) current (base) scenario (96.4% of PET waste is sent to landfill, 3.6% is sent to sorting cooperatives); (2) 50% to sorting cooperatives, 50% to landfill; (3) 50% to sorting cooperatives, 50% to incineration; (4) 50% to landfill, 50% to incineration; (5) 100% to sorting cooperatives (keeping the current collection distribution); (6) 100% to landfill; (7) 100% to incineration; (8) and (9) 100% sent to sorting cooperatives, with changes in the collection scheme. Life cycle assessment was implemented to compute the impacts for each scenario and compare their environmental performances. The results have shown that recycling is a better option than incineration across all impact categories analyzed. Landfilling had lower net impacts than incineration in all categories, except for ozone depletion and freshwater eutrophication. All recycling scenarios proposed outperformed the current scenario in all impact categories. Even though recycling presents itself as an environmentally-promising alternative, much work still needs to be done for its successful implementation, such as promoting source-separation at home and improving the management strategies of recycling cooperatives, including additional funding and training to support an increased sorting capacity.Sao Paulo State University – UNESP Department of Production EngineeringUSF University of South FloridaSao Paulo State University – UNESP Department of Civl and Environmental EngineeringSao Paulo State University – UNESP Department of Production EngineeringSao Paulo State University – UNESP Department of Civl and Environmental EngineeringUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)University of South FloridaMartin, Eduardo J.P. [UNESP]Oliveira, Deborah S.B.L.Oliveira, Luiza S.B.L.Bezerra, Barbara S. [UNESP]2021-06-25T10:13:31Z2021-06-25T10:13:31Z2021-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article226-234http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2020.08.041Waste Management, v. 119, p. 226-234.1879-24560956-053Xhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/20532910.1016/j.wasman.2020.08.0412-s2.0-85092720227Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengWaste Managementinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-10-23T12:31:48Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/205329Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T19:35:12.981734Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Life cycle comparative assessment of pet bottle waste management options: A case study for the city of Bauru, Brazil
title Life cycle comparative assessment of pet bottle waste management options: A case study for the city of Bauru, Brazil
spellingShingle Life cycle comparative assessment of pet bottle waste management options: A case study for the city of Bauru, Brazil
Martin, Eduardo J.P. [UNESP]
Incineration
Landfilling
Life cycle assessment
Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) waste
Recycling
title_short Life cycle comparative assessment of pet bottle waste management options: A case study for the city of Bauru, Brazil
title_full Life cycle comparative assessment of pet bottle waste management options: A case study for the city of Bauru, Brazil
title_fullStr Life cycle comparative assessment of pet bottle waste management options: A case study for the city of Bauru, Brazil
title_full_unstemmed Life cycle comparative assessment of pet bottle waste management options: A case study for the city of Bauru, Brazil
title_sort Life cycle comparative assessment of pet bottle waste management options: A case study for the city of Bauru, Brazil
author Martin, Eduardo J.P. [UNESP]
author_facet Martin, Eduardo J.P. [UNESP]
Oliveira, Deborah S.B.L.
Oliveira, Luiza S.B.L.
Bezerra, Barbara S. [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Oliveira, Deborah S.B.L.
Oliveira, Luiza S.B.L.
Bezerra, Barbara S. [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
University of South Florida
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Martin, Eduardo J.P. [UNESP]
Oliveira, Deborah S.B.L.
Oliveira, Luiza S.B.L.
Bezerra, Barbara S. [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Incineration
Landfilling
Life cycle assessment
Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) waste
Recycling
topic Incineration
Landfilling
Life cycle assessment
Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) waste
Recycling
description This study analyzed the environmental impacts of nine scenarios for Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) bottle waste disposal, in the city of Bauru, Brazil. Nine scenarios were considered in this study: (1) current (base) scenario (96.4% of PET waste is sent to landfill, 3.6% is sent to sorting cooperatives); (2) 50% to sorting cooperatives, 50% to landfill; (3) 50% to sorting cooperatives, 50% to incineration; (4) 50% to landfill, 50% to incineration; (5) 100% to sorting cooperatives (keeping the current collection distribution); (6) 100% to landfill; (7) 100% to incineration; (8) and (9) 100% sent to sorting cooperatives, with changes in the collection scheme. Life cycle assessment was implemented to compute the impacts for each scenario and compare their environmental performances. The results have shown that recycling is a better option than incineration across all impact categories analyzed. Landfilling had lower net impacts than incineration in all categories, except for ozone depletion and freshwater eutrophication. All recycling scenarios proposed outperformed the current scenario in all impact categories. Even though recycling presents itself as an environmentally-promising alternative, much work still needs to be done for its successful implementation, such as promoting source-separation at home and improving the management strategies of recycling cooperatives, including additional funding and training to support an increased sorting capacity.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-06-25T10:13:31Z
2021-06-25T10:13:31Z
2021-01-01
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2020.08.041
Waste Management, v. 119, p. 226-234.
1879-2456
0956-053X
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/205329
10.1016/j.wasman.2020.08.041
2-s2.0-85092720227
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2020.08.041
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/205329
identifier_str_mv Waste Management, v. 119, p. 226-234.
1879-2456
0956-053X
10.1016/j.wasman.2020.08.041
2-s2.0-85092720227
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Waste Management
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 226-234
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808129090740289536