A Comparative Analysis of FBD, PQ and CPT Current Decompositions Part I: Three-Phase Three-Wire Systems

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Paredes, Helmo K. M.
Data de Publicação: 2009
Outros Autores: Marafao, Fernando P. [UNESP], Silva, Luiz C. P. da, Toma, L., Otomega, B.
Tipo de documento: Artigo de conferência
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/11449/197394
Resumo: This paper investigates the main similarities and discrepancies among three important current decompositions proposed for the consideration of unbalanced and/or non linear three-phase three-wire power circuits. The considered approaches were the so called FBD Theory, the pq-Theory and the Conservative Power Theory (CPT), recently presented by Tenti et al.. Such decompositions and related definitions may influence the power measurement techniques, revenue metering, instrumentation technology and also power conditioning strategies. The three methods have been summarized, discussed and compared by means of computational simulation. Although the three methods are based on different concepts, the results obtained under ideal conditions are very similar. The main differences appear in the presence of unbalanced and non linear load conditions. Under linear unbalanced conditions, both FBD and pq-Theory suggest that the some current components contain a third-order harmonic. Besides, neither pq-Theory nor FBI) method are able to provide accurate information for reactive current under unbalanced and distorted conditions, what can be done by means of the CPT-Theory. The paper tries to explain the causes of these differences in terms of the decomposition's foundations and the resulting waveforms and spectra.
id UNSP_4b957419a2d29a5c79c9083cebefaef0
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/197394
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling A Comparative Analysis of FBD, PQ and CPT Current Decompositions Part I: Three-Phase Three-Wire SystemsFBD theorypq-TheoryHomo-variablesharmonicscurrent decompositionpower theoryThis paper investigates the main similarities and discrepancies among three important current decompositions proposed for the consideration of unbalanced and/or non linear three-phase three-wire power circuits. The considered approaches were the so called FBD Theory, the pq-Theory and the Conservative Power Theory (CPT), recently presented by Tenti et al.. Such decompositions and related definitions may influence the power measurement techniques, revenue metering, instrumentation technology and also power conditioning strategies. The three methods have been summarized, discussed and compared by means of computational simulation. Although the three methods are based on different concepts, the results obtained under ideal conditions are very similar. The main differences appear in the presence of unbalanced and non linear load conditions. Under linear unbalanced conditions, both FBD and pq-Theory suggest that the some current components contain a third-order harmonic. Besides, neither pq-Theory nor FBI) method are able to provide accurate information for reactive current under unbalanced and distorted conditions, what can be done by means of the CPT-Theory. The paper tries to explain the causes of these differences in terms of the decomposition's foundations and the resulting waveforms and spectra.Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)Fundação para o Desenvolvimento da UNESP (FUNDUNESP)Univ Estadual Campinas, Campinas, SP, BrazilSao Paulo State Univ, Grp Automat & Integrating Syst, Sao Paulo, BrazilSao Paulo State Univ, Grp Automat & Integrating Syst, Sao Paulo, BrazilIeeeUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Paredes, Helmo K. M.Marafao, Fernando P. [UNESP]Silva, Luiz C. P. daToma, L.Otomega, B.2020-12-10T22:02:02Z2020-12-10T22:02:02Z2009-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject909-+2009 Ieee Bucharest Powertech, Vols 1-5. New York: Ieee, p. 909-+, 2009.http://hdl.handle.net/11449/197394WOS:000276834600139Web of Sciencereponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPeng2009 Ieee Bucharest Powertech, Vols 1-5info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-10-23T12:19:09Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/197394Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T22:17:28.138706Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv A Comparative Analysis of FBD, PQ and CPT Current Decompositions Part I: Three-Phase Three-Wire Systems
title A Comparative Analysis of FBD, PQ and CPT Current Decompositions Part I: Three-Phase Three-Wire Systems
spellingShingle A Comparative Analysis of FBD, PQ and CPT Current Decompositions Part I: Three-Phase Three-Wire Systems
Paredes, Helmo K. M.
FBD theory
pq-Theory
Homo-variables
harmonics
current decomposition
power theory
title_short A Comparative Analysis of FBD, PQ and CPT Current Decompositions Part I: Three-Phase Three-Wire Systems
title_full A Comparative Analysis of FBD, PQ and CPT Current Decompositions Part I: Three-Phase Three-Wire Systems
title_fullStr A Comparative Analysis of FBD, PQ and CPT Current Decompositions Part I: Three-Phase Three-Wire Systems
title_full_unstemmed A Comparative Analysis of FBD, PQ and CPT Current Decompositions Part I: Three-Phase Three-Wire Systems
title_sort A Comparative Analysis of FBD, PQ and CPT Current Decompositions Part I: Three-Phase Three-Wire Systems
author Paredes, Helmo K. M.
author_facet Paredes, Helmo K. M.
Marafao, Fernando P. [UNESP]
Silva, Luiz C. P. da
Toma, L.
Otomega, B.
author_role author
author2 Marafao, Fernando P. [UNESP]
Silva, Luiz C. P. da
Toma, L.
Otomega, B.
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Paredes, Helmo K. M.
Marafao, Fernando P. [UNESP]
Silva, Luiz C. P. da
Toma, L.
Otomega, B.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv FBD theory
pq-Theory
Homo-variables
harmonics
current decomposition
power theory
topic FBD theory
pq-Theory
Homo-variables
harmonics
current decomposition
power theory
description This paper investigates the main similarities and discrepancies among three important current decompositions proposed for the consideration of unbalanced and/or non linear three-phase three-wire power circuits. The considered approaches were the so called FBD Theory, the pq-Theory and the Conservative Power Theory (CPT), recently presented by Tenti et al.. Such decompositions and related definitions may influence the power measurement techniques, revenue metering, instrumentation technology and also power conditioning strategies. The three methods have been summarized, discussed and compared by means of computational simulation. Although the three methods are based on different concepts, the results obtained under ideal conditions are very similar. The main differences appear in the presence of unbalanced and non linear load conditions. Under linear unbalanced conditions, both FBD and pq-Theory suggest that the some current components contain a third-order harmonic. Besides, neither pq-Theory nor FBI) method are able to provide accurate information for reactive current under unbalanced and distorted conditions, what can be done by means of the CPT-Theory. The paper tries to explain the causes of these differences in terms of the decomposition's foundations and the resulting waveforms and spectra.
publishDate 2009
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2009-01-01
2020-12-10T22:02:02Z
2020-12-10T22:02:02Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject
format conferenceObject
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv 2009 Ieee Bucharest Powertech, Vols 1-5. New York: Ieee, p. 909-+, 2009.
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/197394
WOS:000276834600139
identifier_str_mv 2009 Ieee Bucharest Powertech, Vols 1-5. New York: Ieee, p. 909-+, 2009.
WOS:000276834600139
url http://hdl.handle.net/11449/197394
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 2009 Ieee Bucharest Powertech, Vols 1-5
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 909-+
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Ieee
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Ieee
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Web of Science
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808129413823332352