Sarcopenia diagnosis in patients receiving hemodialysis: Agreement among different consensuses

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Rosa, Clara Suemi Costa [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Ribeiro, Heitor Siqueira, Vogt, Barbara Perez, Sakkas, Giorgos K., Monteiro, Henrique Luiz [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ncp.10813
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/233957
Resumo: Background: There are many consensuses to diagnose sarcopenia, and their agreement in patients receiving hemodialysis (HD) is not clear. We described the sarcopenia prevalence in patients receiving HD using different consensuses and analyzed their level of agreement. Methods: Sixty-seven patients (43 men, 55 ± 14.6 years) were evaluated for appendicular skeletal muscle mass using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry and muscle strength using handgrip strength. Patients were classified according to different sarcopenia consensuses (European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People [EWGSOP], Revised EWGSOP [EWGSOP2], Foundation for the National Institutes of Health Project [FNIH], and Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia 2019 [AWGS2]). Kappa analysis identified the level of agreement. Results: The prevalence of sarcopenia ranged from 1.5% to 11.9% depending on the sarcopenia consensus. The agreement between the different consensuses ranged from poor to almost perfect. FNIH and EWGSOP showed the lowest agreement (κ = 0.20; 95% CI, −0.14 to 0.54; P < 0.05), whereas EWGSOP2 and AWGS2 had the largest κ = 0.90 (95% CI, 0.71 to 1.00; P < 0.001). When stratified by age (≥60 years), the sarcopenia prevalence was higher in the older group (27% vs 2%; P = 0.004). In addition, male participants seemed to be more prone to sarcopenia compared with female counterparts, but this difference was not statistically confirmed (16% vs 4%; P = 0.242). Conclusion: The sarcopenia consensuses showed from poor to almost perfect agreement, which varied the sarcopenia prevalence rates in patients receiving HD. EWGSOP2 and AWGS2 showed the largest agreement.
id UNSP_4cee6f03ddd3d67eb9a620e2d49bc64c
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/233957
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Sarcopenia diagnosis in patients receiving hemodialysis: Agreement among different consensusesBackground: There are many consensuses to diagnose sarcopenia, and their agreement in patients receiving hemodialysis (HD) is not clear. We described the sarcopenia prevalence in patients receiving HD using different consensuses and analyzed their level of agreement. Methods: Sixty-seven patients (43 men, 55 ± 14.6 years) were evaluated for appendicular skeletal muscle mass using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry and muscle strength using handgrip strength. Patients were classified according to different sarcopenia consensuses (European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People [EWGSOP], Revised EWGSOP [EWGSOP2], Foundation for the National Institutes of Health Project [FNIH], and Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia 2019 [AWGS2]). Kappa analysis identified the level of agreement. Results: The prevalence of sarcopenia ranged from 1.5% to 11.9% depending on the sarcopenia consensus. The agreement between the different consensuses ranged from poor to almost perfect. FNIH and EWGSOP showed the lowest agreement (κ = 0.20; 95% CI, −0.14 to 0.54; P < 0.05), whereas EWGSOP2 and AWGS2 had the largest κ = 0.90 (95% CI, 0.71 to 1.00; P < 0.001). When stratified by age (≥60 years), the sarcopenia prevalence was higher in the older group (27% vs 2%; P = 0.004). In addition, male participants seemed to be more prone to sarcopenia compared with female counterparts, but this difference was not statistically confirmed (16% vs 4%; P = 0.242). Conclusion: The sarcopenia consensuses showed from poor to almost perfect agreement, which varied the sarcopenia prevalence rates in patients receiving HD. EWGSOP2 and AWGS2 showed the largest agreement.Department of Physical Education São Paulo State UniversityFaculty of Physical Education University of BrasíliaResearch Center in Sports Sciences Health Sciences and Human Development University of MaiaGraduate Program in Health Sciences School of Medicine Federal University of UberlandiaSchool of Physical Education Sport Science and Dietetics University of ThessalySchool of Sport and Health Sciences Cardiff Metropolitan UniversityDepartment of Physical Education São Paulo State UniversityUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)University of BrasíliaUniversity of MaiaUniversidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)University of ThessalyCardiff Metropolitan UniversityRosa, Clara Suemi Costa [UNESP]Ribeiro, Heitor SiqueiraVogt, Barbara PerezSakkas, Giorgos K.Monteiro, Henrique Luiz [UNESP]2022-05-01T11:54:10Z2022-05-01T11:54:10Z2021-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ncp.10813Nutrition in Clinical Practice.1941-24520884-5336http://hdl.handle.net/11449/23395710.1002/ncp.108132-s2.0-85122140990Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengNutrition in Clinical Practiceinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-04-24T18:52:54Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/233957Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T14:36:23.660265Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Sarcopenia diagnosis in patients receiving hemodialysis: Agreement among different consensuses
title Sarcopenia diagnosis in patients receiving hemodialysis: Agreement among different consensuses
spellingShingle Sarcopenia diagnosis in patients receiving hemodialysis: Agreement among different consensuses
Rosa, Clara Suemi Costa [UNESP]
title_short Sarcopenia diagnosis in patients receiving hemodialysis: Agreement among different consensuses
title_full Sarcopenia diagnosis in patients receiving hemodialysis: Agreement among different consensuses
title_fullStr Sarcopenia diagnosis in patients receiving hemodialysis: Agreement among different consensuses
title_full_unstemmed Sarcopenia diagnosis in patients receiving hemodialysis: Agreement among different consensuses
title_sort Sarcopenia diagnosis in patients receiving hemodialysis: Agreement among different consensuses
author Rosa, Clara Suemi Costa [UNESP]
author_facet Rosa, Clara Suemi Costa [UNESP]
Ribeiro, Heitor Siqueira
Vogt, Barbara Perez
Sakkas, Giorgos K.
Monteiro, Henrique Luiz [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Ribeiro, Heitor Siqueira
Vogt, Barbara Perez
Sakkas, Giorgos K.
Monteiro, Henrique Luiz [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
University of Brasília
University of Maia
Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)
University of Thessaly
Cardiff Metropolitan University
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Rosa, Clara Suemi Costa [UNESP]
Ribeiro, Heitor Siqueira
Vogt, Barbara Perez
Sakkas, Giorgos K.
Monteiro, Henrique Luiz [UNESP]
description Background: There are many consensuses to diagnose sarcopenia, and their agreement in patients receiving hemodialysis (HD) is not clear. We described the sarcopenia prevalence in patients receiving HD using different consensuses and analyzed their level of agreement. Methods: Sixty-seven patients (43 men, 55 ± 14.6 years) were evaluated for appendicular skeletal muscle mass using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry and muscle strength using handgrip strength. Patients were classified according to different sarcopenia consensuses (European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People [EWGSOP], Revised EWGSOP [EWGSOP2], Foundation for the National Institutes of Health Project [FNIH], and Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia 2019 [AWGS2]). Kappa analysis identified the level of agreement. Results: The prevalence of sarcopenia ranged from 1.5% to 11.9% depending on the sarcopenia consensus. The agreement between the different consensuses ranged from poor to almost perfect. FNIH and EWGSOP showed the lowest agreement (κ = 0.20; 95% CI, −0.14 to 0.54; P < 0.05), whereas EWGSOP2 and AWGS2 had the largest κ = 0.90 (95% CI, 0.71 to 1.00; P < 0.001). When stratified by age (≥60 years), the sarcopenia prevalence was higher in the older group (27% vs 2%; P = 0.004). In addition, male participants seemed to be more prone to sarcopenia compared with female counterparts, but this difference was not statistically confirmed (16% vs 4%; P = 0.242). Conclusion: The sarcopenia consensuses showed from poor to almost perfect agreement, which varied the sarcopenia prevalence rates in patients receiving HD. EWGSOP2 and AWGS2 showed the largest agreement.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-01-01
2022-05-01T11:54:10Z
2022-05-01T11:54:10Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ncp.10813
Nutrition in Clinical Practice.
1941-2452
0884-5336
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/233957
10.1002/ncp.10813
2-s2.0-85122140990
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ncp.10813
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/233957
identifier_str_mv Nutrition in Clinical Practice.
1941-2452
0884-5336
10.1002/ncp.10813
2-s2.0-85122140990
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Nutrition in Clinical Practice
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808128386747334656