Roughness of human enamel surface submitted to different prophylaxis methods

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Castanho, Gisela Muassab
Data de Publicação: 2008
Outros Autores: Arana-Chavez, Victor E., Fava, Marcelo [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.17796/jcpd.32.4.5p372ph43w216p41
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/225259
Resumo: The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate alterations in the surface roughness and micromorphology of human enamel submitted to three prophylaxis methods. Sixty-nine caries-free molars with exposed labial surfaces were divided into three groups. Group I was treated with a rotary instrument set at a low speed, rubber cup and a mixture of water and pumice; group II with a rotary instrument set at a low speed, rubber cup and prophylaxis paste Herjos-F (Vigodent S/A Indústria e Comércio, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil); and group III with sodium bicarbonate spray Profi II Ceramic (Dabi Atlante Indústrias Médico Odontológicas Ltda, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil). All procedures were performed by the same operator for 10 s, and samples were rinsed and stored in distilled water. Pre and post-treatment surface evaluation was completed using a surface profilometer (Perthometer S8P, Mark, Perthen, Germany) in 54 samples. In addition, the other samples were coated with gold and examined in a scanning electron microscope (SEM). The results of this study were statistically analyzed with the paired t-test (Student), the Kruskal-Wallis test and the Dunn (5%) test. The sodium bicarbonate spray led to significantly rougher surfaces than the pumice paste. The use of prophylaxis paste showed no statistically significant difference when compared with the other methods. Based on SEM analysis, the sodium bicarbonate spray presented an irregular surface with granular material and erosions. Based on this study, it can be concluded that there was an increased enamel surface roughness when teeth were treated with sodium bicarbonate spray when compared with teeth treated with pumice paste.
id UNSP_4d9f13fd288423258140f73ebba21ff0
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/225259
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Roughness of human enamel surface submitted to different prophylaxis methodsDental enamelDental prophylaxisEnamel roughnessJet abrasive systemScanning electron microscopeThe purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate alterations in the surface roughness and micromorphology of human enamel submitted to three prophylaxis methods. Sixty-nine caries-free molars with exposed labial surfaces were divided into three groups. Group I was treated with a rotary instrument set at a low speed, rubber cup and a mixture of water and pumice; group II with a rotary instrument set at a low speed, rubber cup and prophylaxis paste Herjos-F (Vigodent S/A Indústria e Comércio, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil); and group III with sodium bicarbonate spray Profi II Ceramic (Dabi Atlante Indústrias Médico Odontológicas Ltda, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil). All procedures were performed by the same operator for 10 s, and samples were rinsed and stored in distilled water. Pre and post-treatment surface evaluation was completed using a surface profilometer (Perthometer S8P, Mark, Perthen, Germany) in 54 samples. In addition, the other samples were coated with gold and examined in a scanning electron microscope (SEM). The results of this study were statistically analyzed with the paired t-test (Student), the Kruskal-Wallis test and the Dunn (5%) test. The sodium bicarbonate spray led to significantly rougher surfaces than the pumice paste. The use of prophylaxis paste showed no statistically significant difference when compared with the other methods. Based on SEM analysis, the sodium bicarbonate spray presented an irregular surface with granular material and erosions. Based on this study, it can be concluded that there was an increased enamel surface roughness when teeth were treated with sodium bicarbonate spray when compared with teeth treated with pumice paste.Department of Dentistry University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SPDepartment of Cell and Developmental Biology Institute of Biomedical Sciences University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SPDepartment of Preventive and Social Dentistry School of Dentistry of São José Dos Campos UNESP, São José dos Campos, SPLaboratory of Mineralized Tissue Biology Department of Cell and Developmental Biology University of São Paulo, 05508-900 São Paulo, SPDepartment of Preventive and Social Dentistry School of Dentistry of São José Dos Campos UNESP, São José dos Campos, SPUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Castanho, Gisela MuassabArana-Chavez, Victor E.Fava, Marcelo [UNESP]2022-04-28T20:43:56Z2022-04-28T20:43:56Z2008-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article299-303http://dx.doi.org/10.17796/jcpd.32.4.5p372ph43w216p41Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry, v. 32, n. 4, p. 299-303, 2008.1053-4628http://hdl.handle.net/11449/22525910.17796/jcpd.32.4.5p372ph43w216p412-s2.0-50849127123Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengJournal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistryinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-04-28T20:43:56Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/225259Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T19:49:27.679796Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Roughness of human enamel surface submitted to different prophylaxis methods
title Roughness of human enamel surface submitted to different prophylaxis methods
spellingShingle Roughness of human enamel surface submitted to different prophylaxis methods
Castanho, Gisela Muassab
Dental enamel
Dental prophylaxis
Enamel roughness
Jet abrasive system
Scanning electron microscope
title_short Roughness of human enamel surface submitted to different prophylaxis methods
title_full Roughness of human enamel surface submitted to different prophylaxis methods
title_fullStr Roughness of human enamel surface submitted to different prophylaxis methods
title_full_unstemmed Roughness of human enamel surface submitted to different prophylaxis methods
title_sort Roughness of human enamel surface submitted to different prophylaxis methods
author Castanho, Gisela Muassab
author_facet Castanho, Gisela Muassab
Arana-Chavez, Victor E.
Fava, Marcelo [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Arana-Chavez, Victor E.
Fava, Marcelo [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Castanho, Gisela Muassab
Arana-Chavez, Victor E.
Fava, Marcelo [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Dental enamel
Dental prophylaxis
Enamel roughness
Jet abrasive system
Scanning electron microscope
topic Dental enamel
Dental prophylaxis
Enamel roughness
Jet abrasive system
Scanning electron microscope
description The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate alterations in the surface roughness and micromorphology of human enamel submitted to three prophylaxis methods. Sixty-nine caries-free molars with exposed labial surfaces were divided into three groups. Group I was treated with a rotary instrument set at a low speed, rubber cup and a mixture of water and pumice; group II with a rotary instrument set at a low speed, rubber cup and prophylaxis paste Herjos-F (Vigodent S/A Indústria e Comércio, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil); and group III with sodium bicarbonate spray Profi II Ceramic (Dabi Atlante Indústrias Médico Odontológicas Ltda, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil). All procedures were performed by the same operator for 10 s, and samples were rinsed and stored in distilled water. Pre and post-treatment surface evaluation was completed using a surface profilometer (Perthometer S8P, Mark, Perthen, Germany) in 54 samples. In addition, the other samples were coated with gold and examined in a scanning electron microscope (SEM). The results of this study were statistically analyzed with the paired t-test (Student), the Kruskal-Wallis test and the Dunn (5%) test. The sodium bicarbonate spray led to significantly rougher surfaces than the pumice paste. The use of prophylaxis paste showed no statistically significant difference when compared with the other methods. Based on SEM analysis, the sodium bicarbonate spray presented an irregular surface with granular material and erosions. Based on this study, it can be concluded that there was an increased enamel surface roughness when teeth were treated with sodium bicarbonate spray when compared with teeth treated with pumice paste.
publishDate 2008
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2008-01-01
2022-04-28T20:43:56Z
2022-04-28T20:43:56Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.17796/jcpd.32.4.5p372ph43w216p41
Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry, v. 32, n. 4, p. 299-303, 2008.
1053-4628
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/225259
10.17796/jcpd.32.4.5p372ph43w216p41
2-s2.0-50849127123
url http://dx.doi.org/10.17796/jcpd.32.4.5p372ph43w216p41
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/225259
identifier_str_mv Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry, v. 32, n. 4, p. 299-303, 2008.
1053-4628
10.17796/jcpd.32.4.5p372ph43w216p41
2-s2.0-50849127123
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 299-303
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808129124407967744