COST OF AERIAL AND GROUND SPRAYINGS AND TECHNOLOGICAL REPLACEMENT POINT: A CASE STUDY IN THE REGION OF MINEIROS, GO, BRAZIL
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1809-4430-Eng.Agric.v41n3p359-367/2021 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/211233 |
Resumo: | One of the main costs in agriculture is related to mechanized operations, which, in turn, are associated with the capital invested in machinery and equipment, the scale of production, and the operating efficiency. Thus, the choice of technology to carry out these operations must take these factors into account to minimize the production cost. In this context, this study aimed to evaluate the most economical investment option for the set of sprayings on a farm located in the municipality of Mineiros, Goiás, Brazil, by comparing two technologies (ground and aerial spraying) and identifying the scale of production that makes each of the technologies more feasible. This study covers the period of one year with the soybean crop in the summer season, followed by the cultivation of corn in the off-season. Economic feasibility indicators were calculated, and the total average costs of both technologies were compared. The results allowed concluding that the investment in aerial spraying with the aircraft acquisition is assertive, as it reduced losses due to crushing. Contracting the service via third parties is feasible and can be used not only in cases of emergency, as it allows for increased profitability. |
id |
UNSP_4dc39dc0a573375d43c331115133f0ae |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/211233 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
COST OF AERIAL AND GROUND SPRAYINGS AND TECHNOLOGICAL REPLACEMENT POINT: A CASE STUDY IN THE REGION OF MINEIROS, GO, BRAZILEfficiencypesticide sprayingplant crushingapplication costsproductivityOne of the main costs in agriculture is related to mechanized operations, which, in turn, are associated with the capital invested in machinery and equipment, the scale of production, and the operating efficiency. Thus, the choice of technology to carry out these operations must take these factors into account to minimize the production cost. In this context, this study aimed to evaluate the most economical investment option for the set of sprayings on a farm located in the municipality of Mineiros, Goiás, Brazil, by comparing two technologies (ground and aerial spraying) and identifying the scale of production that makes each of the technologies more feasible. This study covers the period of one year with the soybean crop in the summer season, followed by the cultivation of corn in the off-season. Economic feasibility indicators were calculated, and the total average costs of both technologies were compared. The results allowed concluding that the investment in aerial spraying with the aircraft acquisition is assertive, as it reduced losses due to crushing. Contracting the service via third parties is feasible and can be used not only in cases of emergency, as it allows for increased profitability.Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho, Faculdade de Ciências AgronômicasUniversidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho, Faculdade de Ciências AgronômicasAssociação Brasileira de Engenharia AgrícolaUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Moraes, Tiago R. [UNESP]Cornago, Vicente M. [UNESP]Araújo, Vitor C. R. De [UNESP]Esperancini, Maura S. T. [UNESP]Antuniassi, Ulisses R. [UNESP]2021-07-14T10:21:20Z2021-07-14T10:21:20Z2021-06-25info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article359-367application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1809-4430-Eng.Agric.v41n3p359-367/2021Engenharia Agrícola. Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola, v. 41, n. 3, p. 359-367, 2021.0100-69161809-4430http://hdl.handle.net/11449/21123310.1590/1809-4430-Eng.Agric.v41n3p359-367/2021S0100-69162021000300359S0100-69162021000300359.pdfSciELOreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengEngenharia Agrícolainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-11-05T06:11:09Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/211233Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T16:59:08.464498Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
COST OF AERIAL AND GROUND SPRAYINGS AND TECHNOLOGICAL REPLACEMENT POINT: A CASE STUDY IN THE REGION OF MINEIROS, GO, BRAZIL |
title |
COST OF AERIAL AND GROUND SPRAYINGS AND TECHNOLOGICAL REPLACEMENT POINT: A CASE STUDY IN THE REGION OF MINEIROS, GO, BRAZIL |
spellingShingle |
COST OF AERIAL AND GROUND SPRAYINGS AND TECHNOLOGICAL REPLACEMENT POINT: A CASE STUDY IN THE REGION OF MINEIROS, GO, BRAZIL Moraes, Tiago R. [UNESP] Efficiency pesticide spraying plant crushing application costs productivity |
title_short |
COST OF AERIAL AND GROUND SPRAYINGS AND TECHNOLOGICAL REPLACEMENT POINT: A CASE STUDY IN THE REGION OF MINEIROS, GO, BRAZIL |
title_full |
COST OF AERIAL AND GROUND SPRAYINGS AND TECHNOLOGICAL REPLACEMENT POINT: A CASE STUDY IN THE REGION OF MINEIROS, GO, BRAZIL |
title_fullStr |
COST OF AERIAL AND GROUND SPRAYINGS AND TECHNOLOGICAL REPLACEMENT POINT: A CASE STUDY IN THE REGION OF MINEIROS, GO, BRAZIL |
title_full_unstemmed |
COST OF AERIAL AND GROUND SPRAYINGS AND TECHNOLOGICAL REPLACEMENT POINT: A CASE STUDY IN THE REGION OF MINEIROS, GO, BRAZIL |
title_sort |
COST OF AERIAL AND GROUND SPRAYINGS AND TECHNOLOGICAL REPLACEMENT POINT: A CASE STUDY IN THE REGION OF MINEIROS, GO, BRAZIL |
author |
Moraes, Tiago R. [UNESP] |
author_facet |
Moraes, Tiago R. [UNESP] Cornago, Vicente M. [UNESP] Araújo, Vitor C. R. De [UNESP] Esperancini, Maura S. T. [UNESP] Antuniassi, Ulisses R. [UNESP] |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Cornago, Vicente M. [UNESP] Araújo, Vitor C. R. De [UNESP] Esperancini, Maura S. T. [UNESP] Antuniassi, Ulisses R. [UNESP] |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Moraes, Tiago R. [UNESP] Cornago, Vicente M. [UNESP] Araújo, Vitor C. R. De [UNESP] Esperancini, Maura S. T. [UNESP] Antuniassi, Ulisses R. [UNESP] |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Efficiency pesticide spraying plant crushing application costs productivity |
topic |
Efficiency pesticide spraying plant crushing application costs productivity |
description |
One of the main costs in agriculture is related to mechanized operations, which, in turn, are associated with the capital invested in machinery and equipment, the scale of production, and the operating efficiency. Thus, the choice of technology to carry out these operations must take these factors into account to minimize the production cost. In this context, this study aimed to evaluate the most economical investment option for the set of sprayings on a farm located in the municipality of Mineiros, Goiás, Brazil, by comparing two technologies (ground and aerial spraying) and identifying the scale of production that makes each of the technologies more feasible. This study covers the period of one year with the soybean crop in the summer season, followed by the cultivation of corn in the off-season. Economic feasibility indicators were calculated, and the total average costs of both technologies were compared. The results allowed concluding that the investment in aerial spraying with the aircraft acquisition is assertive, as it reduced losses due to crushing. Contracting the service via third parties is feasible and can be used not only in cases of emergency, as it allows for increased profitability. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-07-14T10:21:20Z 2021-07-14T10:21:20Z 2021-06-25 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1809-4430-Eng.Agric.v41n3p359-367/2021 Engenharia Agrícola. Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola, v. 41, n. 3, p. 359-367, 2021. 0100-6916 1809-4430 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/211233 10.1590/1809-4430-Eng.Agric.v41n3p359-367/2021 S0100-69162021000300359 S0100-69162021000300359.pdf |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1809-4430-Eng.Agric.v41n3p359-367/2021 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/211233 |
identifier_str_mv |
Engenharia Agrícola. Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola, v. 41, n. 3, p. 359-367, 2021. 0100-6916 1809-4430 10.1590/1809-4430-Eng.Agric.v41n3p359-367/2021 S0100-69162021000300359 S0100-69162021000300359.pdf |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Engenharia Agrícola |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
359-367 application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
SciELO reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808128730547093504 |