Assessment of integrated MSW management using multicriteria analysis in São Paulo City
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13762-021-03681-9 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/222669 |
Resumo: | The environmental concern with the treatment and final disposal of municipal solid waste (MSW) generated in cities has increased worldwide. In São Paulo, the largest Latin America’s city, the landfills use is preponderant and initiatives that incorporate treatment technologies that recover recyclable materials, compost, and generate energy are incipient. In this context, the main objective of this paper is to assess the treatment technologies for integrated MSW management and propose the optimal scenario that increases materials recovery and reduce the current landfill disposal, with the objective of postponing its lifetime. To achieve the result proposed, five scenarios were modeled and compared with the current scenario, which is (1) 2% of selective collection and 98% to the landfill. The other scenarios were: (2) Scenario 1 added by 4 mechanical biological treatment units (MBT); (3) Fivefold increasing of the selective collection, added by 2 Thermal Treatment Units (WtE); (4) 2% of selective collection, 2 MBTs and 2 WtEs; and (5) same of Scenario 2, but without compost sale. Considering environmental, financial, social, and technical factors of each scenario, the TOPSIS method was used, which orders the preference for similarity of the ideal solution. As a result, the Scenario 2 was the optimal solution, diverting 70% of MSW from landfill. |
id |
UNSP_4e7b073b1645c0b51ddd5ac8adaed922 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/222669 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Assessment of integrated MSW management using multicriteria analysis in São Paulo CityAnalytical Hierarchy Process (AHP)Material Recovery Facility (MRF)Mechanical Biological Treatment (MBT)Multicriteria Decision Making (MCDM)Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS)Waste to Energy (WtE)The environmental concern with the treatment and final disposal of municipal solid waste (MSW) generated in cities has increased worldwide. In São Paulo, the largest Latin America’s city, the landfills use is preponderant and initiatives that incorporate treatment technologies that recover recyclable materials, compost, and generate energy are incipient. In this context, the main objective of this paper is to assess the treatment technologies for integrated MSW management and propose the optimal scenario that increases materials recovery and reduce the current landfill disposal, with the objective of postponing its lifetime. To achieve the result proposed, five scenarios were modeled and compared with the current scenario, which is (1) 2% of selective collection and 98% to the landfill. The other scenarios were: (2) Scenario 1 added by 4 mechanical biological treatment units (MBT); (3) Fivefold increasing of the selective collection, added by 2 Thermal Treatment Units (WtE); (4) 2% of selective collection, 2 MBTs and 2 WtEs; and (5) same of Scenario 2, but without compost sale. Considering environmental, financial, social, and technical factors of each scenario, the TOPSIS method was used, which orders the preference for similarity of the ideal solution. As a result, the Scenario 2 was the optimal solution, diverting 70% of MSW from landfill.São Paulo State University (UNESP) School of EngineeringCenter of Engineering Modelling and Social Applied Sciences Federal University of ABCSão Paulo State University (UNESP) School of EngineeringUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Federal University of ABCRodrigues, E. [UNESP]Mondelli, G.2022-04-28T19:46:02Z2022-04-28T19:46:02Z2021-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13762-021-03681-9International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology.1735-26301735-1472http://hdl.handle.net/11449/22266910.1007/s13762-021-03681-92-s2.0-85117266537Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengInternational Journal of Environmental Science and Technologyinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-04-28T19:46:02Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/222669Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T15:13:18.444645Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Assessment of integrated MSW management using multicriteria analysis in São Paulo City |
title |
Assessment of integrated MSW management using multicriteria analysis in São Paulo City |
spellingShingle |
Assessment of integrated MSW management using multicriteria analysis in São Paulo City Rodrigues, E. [UNESP] Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) Material Recovery Facility (MRF) Mechanical Biological Treatment (MBT) Multicriteria Decision Making (MCDM) Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) Waste to Energy (WtE) |
title_short |
Assessment of integrated MSW management using multicriteria analysis in São Paulo City |
title_full |
Assessment of integrated MSW management using multicriteria analysis in São Paulo City |
title_fullStr |
Assessment of integrated MSW management using multicriteria analysis in São Paulo City |
title_full_unstemmed |
Assessment of integrated MSW management using multicriteria analysis in São Paulo City |
title_sort |
Assessment of integrated MSW management using multicriteria analysis in São Paulo City |
author |
Rodrigues, E. [UNESP] |
author_facet |
Rodrigues, E. [UNESP] Mondelli, G. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Mondelli, G. |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) Federal University of ABC |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Rodrigues, E. [UNESP] Mondelli, G. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) Material Recovery Facility (MRF) Mechanical Biological Treatment (MBT) Multicriteria Decision Making (MCDM) Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) Waste to Energy (WtE) |
topic |
Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) Material Recovery Facility (MRF) Mechanical Biological Treatment (MBT) Multicriteria Decision Making (MCDM) Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) Waste to Energy (WtE) |
description |
The environmental concern with the treatment and final disposal of municipal solid waste (MSW) generated in cities has increased worldwide. In São Paulo, the largest Latin America’s city, the landfills use is preponderant and initiatives that incorporate treatment technologies that recover recyclable materials, compost, and generate energy are incipient. In this context, the main objective of this paper is to assess the treatment technologies for integrated MSW management and propose the optimal scenario that increases materials recovery and reduce the current landfill disposal, with the objective of postponing its lifetime. To achieve the result proposed, five scenarios were modeled and compared with the current scenario, which is (1) 2% of selective collection and 98% to the landfill. The other scenarios were: (2) Scenario 1 added by 4 mechanical biological treatment units (MBT); (3) Fivefold increasing of the selective collection, added by 2 Thermal Treatment Units (WtE); (4) 2% of selective collection, 2 MBTs and 2 WtEs; and (5) same of Scenario 2, but without compost sale. Considering environmental, financial, social, and technical factors of each scenario, the TOPSIS method was used, which orders the preference for similarity of the ideal solution. As a result, the Scenario 2 was the optimal solution, diverting 70% of MSW from landfill. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-01-01 2022-04-28T19:46:02Z 2022-04-28T19:46:02Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13762-021-03681-9 International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology. 1735-2630 1735-1472 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/222669 10.1007/s13762-021-03681-9 2-s2.0-85117266537 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13762-021-03681-9 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/222669 |
identifier_str_mv |
International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology. 1735-2630 1735-1472 10.1007/s13762-021-03681-9 2-s2.0-85117266537 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808128483273998336 |