Are native bees in Brazil at risk from the exposure to the neonicotinoid imidacloprid?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Conceição de Assis, Josimere
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Tadei, Rafaela [UNESP], Menezes-Oliveira, Vanessa B., Silva-Zacarin, Elaine C.M.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2022.113127
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/223703
Resumo: All across the world, different countries use Ecological risk assessments (ERA) of pesticides to pollinators as a regulatory tool to understand the safety of pesticide use in agriculture. However, pesticide application is still recognized as one of the main stress factors causing a decline in the global population of bees. In all ERA procedures, the effects of pesticides on the honey bee species Apis mellifera are used as a reference for the effects on all different bee species. To evaluate if tropical native bees are protected by the current risk assessment procedures and to propose improvements to the methods, we assessed the ecological risk of the neonicotinoid imidacloprid posed to native and exotic bee species. The risk was assessed through a low (TIER I) and an intermediate (TIER II) level of analysis. For TIER I the USEPA BeeREX model was used and for TIER II the Species Sensitivity Distribution (SSD) approach was adopted. For the imidacloprid exposure conditions, four different crops were taken into consideration; bean, passion fruit, sunflower and tomato. The imidacloprid risk on native species was assessed both by extrapolating the effects obtained to Apis species, and by using ecotoxicological data from tests performed with native species. In TIER I, the risks calculated through empirical data showed that more than 50% of the non-Apis species presented risk levels of 28–180% higher than those obtained with the extrapolation factor used in the Brazilian pesticide regulation. In TIER II, the SSDs showed that most of the native bees are more sensitive to imidacloprid than the Africanized A. mellifera. This is the first study in which an ERA of a pesticide was conducted on tropical bee species. Here we also present some gaps and perspectives for future studies aiming to improve the risk assessment of pesticides in terrestrial environments.
id UNSP_5033e0e7022d18e72775f10a514c6d3d
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/223703
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Are native bees in Brazil at risk from the exposure to the neonicotinoid imidacloprid?Brazilian beesNative speciesNeonicotinoidPollinatorsRisk quotientSSD curveAll across the world, different countries use Ecological risk assessments (ERA) of pesticides to pollinators as a regulatory tool to understand the safety of pesticide use in agriculture. However, pesticide application is still recognized as one of the main stress factors causing a decline in the global population of bees. In all ERA procedures, the effects of pesticides on the honey bee species Apis mellifera are used as a reference for the effects on all different bee species. To evaluate if tropical native bees are protected by the current risk assessment procedures and to propose improvements to the methods, we assessed the ecological risk of the neonicotinoid imidacloprid posed to native and exotic bee species. The risk was assessed through a low (TIER I) and an intermediate (TIER II) level of analysis. For TIER I the USEPA BeeREX model was used and for TIER II the Species Sensitivity Distribution (SSD) approach was adopted. For the imidacloprid exposure conditions, four different crops were taken into consideration; bean, passion fruit, sunflower and tomato. The imidacloprid risk on native species was assessed both by extrapolating the effects obtained to Apis species, and by using ecotoxicological data from tests performed with native species. In TIER I, the risks calculated through empirical data showed that more than 50% of the non-Apis species presented risk levels of 28–180% higher than those obtained with the extrapolation factor used in the Brazilian pesticide regulation. In TIER II, the SSDs showed that most of the native bees are more sensitive to imidacloprid than the Africanized A. mellifera. This is the first study in which an ERA of a pesticide was conducted on tropical bee species. Here we also present some gaps and perspectives for future studies aiming to improve the risk assessment of pesticides in terrestrial environments.ASCRS Research FoundationCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)Federal University of São Carlos UFSCar Postgraduate Program in Biotechnology and Environmental Monitoring, São Paulo StateSão Paulo State University UNESP Postgraduate Program in Biological Sciences, São Paulo StateFederal University of Tocantins UFT Environmental Engineering Course, Quadra 109 Norte Av. NS-15, ALCNO-14, Plano Diretor Norte, Palmas/TO, Tocantins StateFederal University of São Carlos UFSCar Department of Biology Laboratory of Ecotoxicology and Environmental Integrity (LEIA), São Paulo StateSão Paulo State University UNESP Postgraduate Program in Biological Sciences, São Paulo StateCAPES: 001ASCRS Research Foundation: 097–3ASCRS Research Foundation: 2017/21FAPESP: 2017/21097–3ASCRS Research Foundation: 2019/27FAPESP: 2019/27863–5CAPES: 400CAPES: 400540/2018–5CAPES: 540/2018–5ASCRS Research Foundation: 863–5Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCar)Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Environmental Engineering CourseConceição de Assis, JosimereTadei, Rafaela [UNESP]Menezes-Oliveira, Vanessa B.Silva-Zacarin, Elaine C.M.2022-04-28T19:52:38Z2022-04-28T19:52:38Z2022-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2022.113127Environmental Research, v. 212.1096-09530013-9351http://hdl.handle.net/11449/22370310.1016/j.envres.2022.1131272-s2.0-85126866576Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengEnvironmental Researchinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-04-28T19:52:38Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/223703Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462022-04-28T19:52:38Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Are native bees in Brazil at risk from the exposure to the neonicotinoid imidacloprid?
title Are native bees in Brazil at risk from the exposure to the neonicotinoid imidacloprid?
spellingShingle Are native bees in Brazil at risk from the exposure to the neonicotinoid imidacloprid?
Conceição de Assis, Josimere
Brazilian bees
Native species
Neonicotinoid
Pollinators
Risk quotient
SSD curve
title_short Are native bees in Brazil at risk from the exposure to the neonicotinoid imidacloprid?
title_full Are native bees in Brazil at risk from the exposure to the neonicotinoid imidacloprid?
title_fullStr Are native bees in Brazil at risk from the exposure to the neonicotinoid imidacloprid?
title_full_unstemmed Are native bees in Brazil at risk from the exposure to the neonicotinoid imidacloprid?
title_sort Are native bees in Brazil at risk from the exposure to the neonicotinoid imidacloprid?
author Conceição de Assis, Josimere
author_facet Conceição de Assis, Josimere
Tadei, Rafaela [UNESP]
Menezes-Oliveira, Vanessa B.
Silva-Zacarin, Elaine C.M.
author_role author
author2 Tadei, Rafaela [UNESP]
Menezes-Oliveira, Vanessa B.
Silva-Zacarin, Elaine C.M.
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCar)
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
Environmental Engineering Course
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Conceição de Assis, Josimere
Tadei, Rafaela [UNESP]
Menezes-Oliveira, Vanessa B.
Silva-Zacarin, Elaine C.M.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Brazilian bees
Native species
Neonicotinoid
Pollinators
Risk quotient
SSD curve
topic Brazilian bees
Native species
Neonicotinoid
Pollinators
Risk quotient
SSD curve
description All across the world, different countries use Ecological risk assessments (ERA) of pesticides to pollinators as a regulatory tool to understand the safety of pesticide use in agriculture. However, pesticide application is still recognized as one of the main stress factors causing a decline in the global population of bees. In all ERA procedures, the effects of pesticides on the honey bee species Apis mellifera are used as a reference for the effects on all different bee species. To evaluate if tropical native bees are protected by the current risk assessment procedures and to propose improvements to the methods, we assessed the ecological risk of the neonicotinoid imidacloprid posed to native and exotic bee species. The risk was assessed through a low (TIER I) and an intermediate (TIER II) level of analysis. For TIER I the USEPA BeeREX model was used and for TIER II the Species Sensitivity Distribution (SSD) approach was adopted. For the imidacloprid exposure conditions, four different crops were taken into consideration; bean, passion fruit, sunflower and tomato. The imidacloprid risk on native species was assessed both by extrapolating the effects obtained to Apis species, and by using ecotoxicological data from tests performed with native species. In TIER I, the risks calculated through empirical data showed that more than 50% of the non-Apis species presented risk levels of 28–180% higher than those obtained with the extrapolation factor used in the Brazilian pesticide regulation. In TIER II, the SSDs showed that most of the native bees are more sensitive to imidacloprid than the Africanized A. mellifera. This is the first study in which an ERA of a pesticide was conducted on tropical bee species. Here we also present some gaps and perspectives for future studies aiming to improve the risk assessment of pesticides in terrestrial environments.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-04-28T19:52:38Z
2022-04-28T19:52:38Z
2022-09-01
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2022.113127
Environmental Research, v. 212.
1096-0953
0013-9351
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/223703
10.1016/j.envres.2022.113127
2-s2.0-85126866576
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2022.113127
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/223703
identifier_str_mv Environmental Research, v. 212.
1096-0953
0013-9351
10.1016/j.envres.2022.113127
2-s2.0-85126866576
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Environmental Research
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799965442354184192