Cephalometric evaluation of the predictability of bimaxillary surgical-orthodontic treatment outcomes in long face pattern patients: a retrospective study
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2013 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S2176-94512013000500010 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/109907 |
Resumo: | OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare by means of McNamara as well as Legan and Burstone's cephalometric analyses, both manual and digitized (by Dentofacial Planner Plus and Dolphin Image software) prediction tracings to post-surgical results. METHODS: Pre and post-surgical teleradiographs (6 months) of 25 long face patients subjected to combined orthognathic surgery were selected. Manual and computerized prediction tracings of each patient were performed and cephalometrically compared to post-surgical outcomes. This protocol was repeated in order to evaluate the method error and statistical evaluation was conducted by means of analysis of variance and Tukey's test. RESULTS: A higher frequency of cephalometric variables, which were not statistically different from the actual post-surgical results for the manual method, was observed. It was followed by DFPlus and Dolphin software; in which similar cephalometric values for most variables were observed. CONCLUSION: It was concluded that the manual method seemed more reliable, although the predictability of the evaluated methods (computerized and manual) proved to be reasonably satisfactory and similar. |
id |
UNSP_50aaa6a1124ca3e419f18012f065dfdd |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/109907 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Cephalometric evaluation of the predictability of bimaxillary surgical-orthodontic treatment outcomes in long face pattern patients: a retrospective studyAvaliação cefalométrica da previsibilidade dos resultados do tratamento ortodôntico-cirúrgico bimaxilar em pacientes face longa: estudo retrospectivoOrtodontia corretivaPrevisõesCirurgia bucalFaceCorrective orthodonticsPredictive value of testsOral surgeryFaceOBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare by means of McNamara as well as Legan and Burstone's cephalometric analyses, both manual and digitized (by Dentofacial Planner Plus and Dolphin Image software) prediction tracings to post-surgical results. METHODS: Pre and post-surgical teleradiographs (6 months) of 25 long face patients subjected to combined orthognathic surgery were selected. Manual and computerized prediction tracings of each patient were performed and cephalometrically compared to post-surgical outcomes. This protocol was repeated in order to evaluate the method error and statistical evaluation was conducted by means of analysis of variance and Tukey's test. RESULTS: A higher frequency of cephalometric variables, which were not statistically different from the actual post-surgical results for the manual method, was observed. It was followed by DFPlus and Dolphin software; in which similar cephalometric values for most variables were observed. CONCLUSION: It was concluded that the manual method seemed more reliable, although the predictability of the evaluated methods (computerized and manual) proved to be reasonably satisfactory and similar.OBJETIVOS: a proposta desse trabalho foi comparar, por meio das análises cefalométricas de McNamara, Legan e Burstone, os traçados de previsão manuais e os digitalizados pelos programas Dentofacial Planner Plus e Dolphin Imaging, com os resultados pós-cirúrgicos. MÉTODOS: foram selecionadas as telerradiografias pré- e pós-cirúrgicas (seis meses) de 25 pacientes face longa submetidos a cirurgia ortognática combinada. Foram realizados os traçados de previsão manual e computadorizados de cada paciente, comparando-os, cefalometricamente, com os resultados pós-cirúrgicos. Esse protocolo foi repetido para avaliação do erro do método e realizou-se a avaliação estatística por meio da análise de variância e sobreteste de Tukey. RESULTADOS: observou-se uma maior frequência de variáveis cefalométricas que não diferiram estatisticamente do resultado pós-cirúrgico real para o método manual, seguido dos programas DFPLus e Dolphin; observando-se valores cefalométricos similares para a maioria das variáveis. CONCLUSÃO: concluiu-se que o método manual pareceu mais fidedigno, embora a previsibilidade dos métodos avaliados (computadorizados e manual) tenha se mostrado razoavelmente satisfatória e similar.UNESP FOAUNESP FOA Department of Pediatric DentistryUNESP FOAUNESP FOA Department of Pediatric DentistryDental Press InternationalUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Gimenez, Carla Maria Melleiro [UNESP]Bertoz, Francisco Antonio [UNESP]Gabrielli, Marisa Aparecida CabriniMagro Filho, Osvaldo [UNESP]Garcia, Idelmo [UNESP]Pereira Filho, Valfrido Antonio [UNESP]2014-10-01T13:08:40Z2014-10-01T13:08:40Z2013-10-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article53-58application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S2176-94512013000500010Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics. Dental Press International, v. 18, n. 5, p. 53-58, 2013.2176-9451http://hdl.handle.net/11449/10990710.1590/S2176-94512013000500010S2176-94512013000500010S2176-94512013000500010.pdf55354186707451258492596401380580SciELOreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengDental Press Journal of Orthodontics0,489info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-01-13T06:31:23Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/109907Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T22:49:31.877060Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Cephalometric evaluation of the predictability of bimaxillary surgical-orthodontic treatment outcomes in long face pattern patients: a retrospective study Avaliação cefalométrica da previsibilidade dos resultados do tratamento ortodôntico-cirúrgico bimaxilar em pacientes face longa: estudo retrospectivo |
title |
Cephalometric evaluation of the predictability of bimaxillary surgical-orthodontic treatment outcomes in long face pattern patients: a retrospective study |
spellingShingle |
Cephalometric evaluation of the predictability of bimaxillary surgical-orthodontic treatment outcomes in long face pattern patients: a retrospective study Gimenez, Carla Maria Melleiro [UNESP] Ortodontia corretiva Previsões Cirurgia bucal Face Corrective orthodontics Predictive value of tests Oral surgery Face |
title_short |
Cephalometric evaluation of the predictability of bimaxillary surgical-orthodontic treatment outcomes in long face pattern patients: a retrospective study |
title_full |
Cephalometric evaluation of the predictability of bimaxillary surgical-orthodontic treatment outcomes in long face pattern patients: a retrospective study |
title_fullStr |
Cephalometric evaluation of the predictability of bimaxillary surgical-orthodontic treatment outcomes in long face pattern patients: a retrospective study |
title_full_unstemmed |
Cephalometric evaluation of the predictability of bimaxillary surgical-orthodontic treatment outcomes in long face pattern patients: a retrospective study |
title_sort |
Cephalometric evaluation of the predictability of bimaxillary surgical-orthodontic treatment outcomes in long face pattern patients: a retrospective study |
author |
Gimenez, Carla Maria Melleiro [UNESP] |
author_facet |
Gimenez, Carla Maria Melleiro [UNESP] Bertoz, Francisco Antonio [UNESP] Gabrielli, Marisa Aparecida Cabrini Magro Filho, Osvaldo [UNESP] Garcia, Idelmo [UNESP] Pereira Filho, Valfrido Antonio [UNESP] |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Bertoz, Francisco Antonio [UNESP] Gabrielli, Marisa Aparecida Cabrini Magro Filho, Osvaldo [UNESP] Garcia, Idelmo [UNESP] Pereira Filho, Valfrido Antonio [UNESP] |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Gimenez, Carla Maria Melleiro [UNESP] Bertoz, Francisco Antonio [UNESP] Gabrielli, Marisa Aparecida Cabrini Magro Filho, Osvaldo [UNESP] Garcia, Idelmo [UNESP] Pereira Filho, Valfrido Antonio [UNESP] |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Ortodontia corretiva Previsões Cirurgia bucal Face Corrective orthodontics Predictive value of tests Oral surgery Face |
topic |
Ortodontia corretiva Previsões Cirurgia bucal Face Corrective orthodontics Predictive value of tests Oral surgery Face |
description |
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare by means of McNamara as well as Legan and Burstone's cephalometric analyses, both manual and digitized (by Dentofacial Planner Plus and Dolphin Image software) prediction tracings to post-surgical results. METHODS: Pre and post-surgical teleradiographs (6 months) of 25 long face patients subjected to combined orthognathic surgery were selected. Manual and computerized prediction tracings of each patient were performed and cephalometrically compared to post-surgical outcomes. This protocol was repeated in order to evaluate the method error and statistical evaluation was conducted by means of analysis of variance and Tukey's test. RESULTS: A higher frequency of cephalometric variables, which were not statistically different from the actual post-surgical results for the manual method, was observed. It was followed by DFPlus and Dolphin software; in which similar cephalometric values for most variables were observed. CONCLUSION: It was concluded that the manual method seemed more reliable, although the predictability of the evaluated methods (computerized and manual) proved to be reasonably satisfactory and similar. |
publishDate |
2013 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2013-10-01 2014-10-01T13:08:40Z 2014-10-01T13:08:40Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S2176-94512013000500010 Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics. Dental Press International, v. 18, n. 5, p. 53-58, 2013. 2176-9451 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/109907 10.1590/S2176-94512013000500010 S2176-94512013000500010 S2176-94512013000500010.pdf 5535418670745125 8492596401380580 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S2176-94512013000500010 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/109907 |
identifier_str_mv |
Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics. Dental Press International, v. 18, n. 5, p. 53-58, 2013. 2176-9451 10.1590/S2176-94512013000500010 S2176-94512013000500010 S2176-94512013000500010.pdf 5535418670745125 8492596401380580 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics 0,489 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
53-58 application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Dental Press International |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Dental Press International |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
SciELO reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808129466248986624 |