Desenvolvimento e produtividade de cultivares de arroz de terras altas em função do manejo do solo
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2011 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng por |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/11449/232007 |
Resumo: | The identification of upland rice cultivars for each kind of soil management system can increase upland rice yield. So, this study aimed to evaluate upland rice genotypes under two soil management systems: conventional tillage (CT) and no-tillage (NT). The experiment was carried out in Ipameri, Goiás State, Brazil, in 2008/2009. A randomized blocks design, in a 2x8 factorial scheme, with sixteen treatments and four replications was used. The first factor was the soil management system (CT and NT) and the second one rice genotypes (BRS Curinga, BRS Primavera, BRS Monarca, BRS Pepita, BRS Sertaneja, Carajás, Caiapó, and Bonança). Plants grew higher under CT than NT. For number of tillers per plant, there were differences among rice cultivars, according to the soil management system. For yield, CT provided higher rates (average of 4,349 kg ha-1) than NT (average of 3,521 kg ha-1), being the number of panicles m-2 and number of grains panicle-1 the yield components responsible for that difference. All cultivars presented statistic differences between the two soil management systems, except for the Caiapó cultivar. For both systems, Carajás reached the highest yield, differing from the BRS Sertaneja and BRS Primavera cultivars. |
id |
UNSP_50f4111d108a91d0c4a9ce8f54361973 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/232007 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Desenvolvimento e produtividade de cultivares de arroz de terras altas em função do manejo do soloUpland rice cultivars development and yield regarding soil managementMoldboard plowNo-tillage systemOryza sativaYieldThe identification of upland rice cultivars for each kind of soil management system can increase upland rice yield. So, this study aimed to evaluate upland rice genotypes under two soil management systems: conventional tillage (CT) and no-tillage (NT). The experiment was carried out in Ipameri, Goiás State, Brazil, in 2008/2009. A randomized blocks design, in a 2x8 factorial scheme, with sixteen treatments and four replications was used. The first factor was the soil management system (CT and NT) and the second one rice genotypes (BRS Curinga, BRS Primavera, BRS Monarca, BRS Pepita, BRS Sertaneja, Carajás, Caiapó, and Bonança). Plants grew higher under CT than NT. For number of tillers per plant, there were differences among rice cultivars, according to the soil management system. For yield, CT provided higher rates (average of 4,349 kg ha-1) than NT (average of 3,521 kg ha-1), being the number of panicles m-2 and number of grains panicle-1 the yield components responsible for that difference. All cultivars presented statistic differences between the two soil management systems, except for the Caiapó cultivar. For both systems, Carajás reached the highest yield, differing from the BRS Sertaneja and BRS Primavera cultivars.Embrapa Arroz e Feijão Departamento Técnico-Científico, Santo Antônio de Goiás, GOUniversidade de São Paulo Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz Departamento de Fitotecnia, Piracicaba, SPUniversidade Estadual Paulista Faculdade de Ciências Agronômicas Departamento de Agricultura, Botucatu, SPUniversidade Estadual Paulista Faculdade de Ciências Agronômicas Departamento de Agricultura, Botucatu, SPEmpresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (EMBRAPA)Universidade de São Paulo (USP)Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Nascente, Adriano StephanKluthcouski, JoãoRabelo, Raimundo Ricardode Oliveira, PriscilaCobucci, TarcísioCrusciol, Carlos Alexandre Costa [UNESP]2022-04-29T08:48:40Z2022-04-29T08:48:40Z2011-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article186-192Pesquisa Agropecuaria Tropical, v. 41, n. 2, p. 186-192, 2011.1517-63981983-4063http://hdl.handle.net/11449/2320072-s2.0-79959863239Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengporPesquisa Agropecuaria Tropicalinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-09-06T18:55:24Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/232007Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestrepositoriounesp@unesp.bropendoar:29462024-09-06T18:55:24Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Desenvolvimento e produtividade de cultivares de arroz de terras altas em função do manejo do solo Upland rice cultivars development and yield regarding soil management |
title |
Desenvolvimento e produtividade de cultivares de arroz de terras altas em função do manejo do solo |
spellingShingle |
Desenvolvimento e produtividade de cultivares de arroz de terras altas em função do manejo do solo Nascente, Adriano Stephan Moldboard plow No-tillage system Oryza sativa Yield |
title_short |
Desenvolvimento e produtividade de cultivares de arroz de terras altas em função do manejo do solo |
title_full |
Desenvolvimento e produtividade de cultivares de arroz de terras altas em função do manejo do solo |
title_fullStr |
Desenvolvimento e produtividade de cultivares de arroz de terras altas em função do manejo do solo |
title_full_unstemmed |
Desenvolvimento e produtividade de cultivares de arroz de terras altas em função do manejo do solo |
title_sort |
Desenvolvimento e produtividade de cultivares de arroz de terras altas em função do manejo do solo |
author |
Nascente, Adriano Stephan |
author_facet |
Nascente, Adriano Stephan Kluthcouski, João Rabelo, Raimundo Ricardo de Oliveira, Priscila Cobucci, Tarcísio Crusciol, Carlos Alexandre Costa [UNESP] |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Kluthcouski, João Rabelo, Raimundo Ricardo de Oliveira, Priscila Cobucci, Tarcísio Crusciol, Carlos Alexandre Costa [UNESP] |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (EMBRAPA) Universidade de São Paulo (USP) Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Nascente, Adriano Stephan Kluthcouski, João Rabelo, Raimundo Ricardo de Oliveira, Priscila Cobucci, Tarcísio Crusciol, Carlos Alexandre Costa [UNESP] |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Moldboard plow No-tillage system Oryza sativa Yield |
topic |
Moldboard plow No-tillage system Oryza sativa Yield |
description |
The identification of upland rice cultivars for each kind of soil management system can increase upland rice yield. So, this study aimed to evaluate upland rice genotypes under two soil management systems: conventional tillage (CT) and no-tillage (NT). The experiment was carried out in Ipameri, Goiás State, Brazil, in 2008/2009. A randomized blocks design, in a 2x8 factorial scheme, with sixteen treatments and four replications was used. The first factor was the soil management system (CT and NT) and the second one rice genotypes (BRS Curinga, BRS Primavera, BRS Monarca, BRS Pepita, BRS Sertaneja, Carajás, Caiapó, and Bonança). Plants grew higher under CT than NT. For number of tillers per plant, there were differences among rice cultivars, according to the soil management system. For yield, CT provided higher rates (average of 4,349 kg ha-1) than NT (average of 3,521 kg ha-1), being the number of panicles m-2 and number of grains panicle-1 the yield components responsible for that difference. All cultivars presented statistic differences between the two soil management systems, except for the Caiapó cultivar. For both systems, Carajás reached the highest yield, differing from the BRS Sertaneja and BRS Primavera cultivars. |
publishDate |
2011 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2011-04-01 2022-04-29T08:48:40Z 2022-04-29T08:48:40Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Agropecuaria Tropical, v. 41, n. 2, p. 186-192, 2011. 1517-6398 1983-4063 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/232007 2-s2.0-79959863239 |
identifier_str_mv |
Pesquisa Agropecuaria Tropical, v. 41, n. 2, p. 186-192, 2011. 1517-6398 1983-4063 2-s2.0-79959863239 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/232007 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng por |
language |
eng por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Agropecuaria Tropical |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
186-192 |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
repositoriounesp@unesp.br |
_version_ |
1813546592227033088 |