Mudas de cana-de-açúcar influenciadas pelo manejo com herbicidas

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Silva, T. P.
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Azania, C. A.M., Xavier, M. A., Perecin, D. [UNESP], Vitorino, R.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0100-83582018360100019
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/170852
Resumo: This research aimed at studying herbicides selectivity on individuals from three sugarcane families after different chemical managements in primary selection fields (F1). On the field, a randomized block design with five replications in a split plot scheme was used. Twelve herbicide treatments were allocated in the plots and the three seedlings families were allocated in the sub-plots. The herbicides treatments were T1– tebuthiuron POST-i+ ametryn POST-t; T2– (diuron + hexazinone) POST-i+ ametryn POST-t; T3– sulfentrazone POST-i+ ametryn POST-t; T4– (diuron + hexazinone) POST-i+ metribuzin POST-t; T5– sulfentrazone POST-i+ metribuzin POST-t; T6– imazapyr IPP; T7– imazapyr IPP + ametryn POST-t; T8– imazapyr IPP + metribuzin POST-t; T9– imazapyr IPP + tebuthiuron POST-i; T10– imazapyr PPI + (diuron + hexazinone) POST-i; T11– imazapyr IPP + sulfentrazone POST-iand T12- weeded control. Families were F400 (♀IAC086155 x ♂?), F43 (♀IACBIO264 x ♂IAC911099) and F14 (♀IACSP991305 x ♂GlagaH). For each individual, the intoxication symptoms and the chlorophyll content on the leaves (40 and 120 DAApós-i), the percentage of live seedlings and selected seedlings (240 DAApós-i) were evauated. The chemical management with alternative treatments (T2 to T11) was selective to the three seedlings families because it caused slight intoxication symptoms and interference in the chlorophyll content, in addition to the high percentage of survival that allowed the plants selection for the later stage (F2). The management with herbicide applied in incorporated pre-planting (IPP) was highlighted as selective even when supplemented after the establishment phase of seedlings (POST-t).
id UNSP_51460a4d1ebf932a5861d75a4aac0441
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/170852
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Mudas de cana-de-açúcar influenciadas pelo manejo com herbicidasSugarcane seedlings influenced by the management with herbicidesBreedingPhytotoxicitySaccharum sppSelectivityThis research aimed at studying herbicides selectivity on individuals from three sugarcane families after different chemical managements in primary selection fields (F1). On the field, a randomized block design with five replications in a split plot scheme was used. Twelve herbicide treatments were allocated in the plots and the three seedlings families were allocated in the sub-plots. The herbicides treatments were T1– tebuthiuron POST-i+ ametryn POST-t; T2– (diuron + hexazinone) POST-i+ ametryn POST-t; T3– sulfentrazone POST-i+ ametryn POST-t; T4– (diuron + hexazinone) POST-i+ metribuzin POST-t; T5– sulfentrazone POST-i+ metribuzin POST-t; T6– imazapyr IPP; T7– imazapyr IPP + ametryn POST-t; T8– imazapyr IPP + metribuzin POST-t; T9– imazapyr IPP + tebuthiuron POST-i; T10– imazapyr PPI + (diuron + hexazinone) POST-i; T11– imazapyr IPP + sulfentrazone POST-iand T12- weeded control. Families were F400 (♀IAC086155 x ♂?), F43 (♀IACBIO264 x ♂IAC911099) and F14 (♀IACSP991305 x ♂GlagaH). For each individual, the intoxication symptoms and the chlorophyll content on the leaves (40 and 120 DAApós-i), the percentage of live seedlings and selected seedlings (240 DAApós-i) were evauated. The chemical management with alternative treatments (T2 to T11) was selective to the three seedlings families because it caused slight intoxication symptoms and interference in the chlorophyll content, in addition to the high percentage of survival that allowed the plants selection for the later stage (F2). The management with herbicide applied in incorporated pre-planting (IPP) was highlighted as selective even when supplemented after the establishment phase of seedlings (POST-t).Instituto Agronômico/Centro de Cana Ribeirão Preto-SP BrazilInstituto Agronômico/Centro de CanaUNESP/FCAVJUNESP/FCAVJInstituto Agronômico/Centro de CanaUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Silva, T. P.Azania, C. A.M.Xavier, M. A.Perecin, D. [UNESP]Vitorino, R.2018-12-11T16:52:41Z2018-12-11T16:52:41Z2018-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0100-83582018360100019Planta Daninha, v. 36.0100-8358http://hdl.handle.net/11449/17085210.1590/s0100-83582018360100019S0100-835820180001002022-s2.0-85044681674S0100-83582018000100202.pdfScopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengPlanta Daninha0,365info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-12-17T06:16:55Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/170852Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462023-12-17T06:16:55Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Mudas de cana-de-açúcar influenciadas pelo manejo com herbicidas
Sugarcane seedlings influenced by the management with herbicides
title Mudas de cana-de-açúcar influenciadas pelo manejo com herbicidas
spellingShingle Mudas de cana-de-açúcar influenciadas pelo manejo com herbicidas
Silva, T. P.
Breeding
Phytotoxicity
Saccharum spp
Selectivity
title_short Mudas de cana-de-açúcar influenciadas pelo manejo com herbicidas
title_full Mudas de cana-de-açúcar influenciadas pelo manejo com herbicidas
title_fullStr Mudas de cana-de-açúcar influenciadas pelo manejo com herbicidas
title_full_unstemmed Mudas de cana-de-açúcar influenciadas pelo manejo com herbicidas
title_sort Mudas de cana-de-açúcar influenciadas pelo manejo com herbicidas
author Silva, T. P.
author_facet Silva, T. P.
Azania, C. A.M.
Xavier, M. A.
Perecin, D. [UNESP]
Vitorino, R.
author_role author
author2 Azania, C. A.M.
Xavier, M. A.
Perecin, D. [UNESP]
Vitorino, R.
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Agronômico/Centro de Cana
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Silva, T. P.
Azania, C. A.M.
Xavier, M. A.
Perecin, D. [UNESP]
Vitorino, R.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Breeding
Phytotoxicity
Saccharum spp
Selectivity
topic Breeding
Phytotoxicity
Saccharum spp
Selectivity
description This research aimed at studying herbicides selectivity on individuals from three sugarcane families after different chemical managements in primary selection fields (F1). On the field, a randomized block design with five replications in a split plot scheme was used. Twelve herbicide treatments were allocated in the plots and the three seedlings families were allocated in the sub-plots. The herbicides treatments were T1– tebuthiuron POST-i+ ametryn POST-t; T2– (diuron + hexazinone) POST-i+ ametryn POST-t; T3– sulfentrazone POST-i+ ametryn POST-t; T4– (diuron + hexazinone) POST-i+ metribuzin POST-t; T5– sulfentrazone POST-i+ metribuzin POST-t; T6– imazapyr IPP; T7– imazapyr IPP + ametryn POST-t; T8– imazapyr IPP + metribuzin POST-t; T9– imazapyr IPP + tebuthiuron POST-i; T10– imazapyr PPI + (diuron + hexazinone) POST-i; T11– imazapyr IPP + sulfentrazone POST-iand T12- weeded control. Families were F400 (♀IAC086155 x ♂?), F43 (♀IACBIO264 x ♂IAC911099) and F14 (♀IACSP991305 x ♂GlagaH). For each individual, the intoxication symptoms and the chlorophyll content on the leaves (40 and 120 DAApós-i), the percentage of live seedlings and selected seedlings (240 DAApós-i) were evauated. The chemical management with alternative treatments (T2 to T11) was selective to the three seedlings families because it caused slight intoxication symptoms and interference in the chlorophyll content, in addition to the high percentage of survival that allowed the plants selection for the later stage (F2). The management with herbicide applied in incorporated pre-planting (IPP) was highlighted as selective even when supplemented after the establishment phase of seedlings (POST-t).
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-12-11T16:52:41Z
2018-12-11T16:52:41Z
2018-01-01
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0100-83582018360100019
Planta Daninha, v. 36.
0100-8358
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/170852
10.1590/s0100-83582018360100019
S0100-83582018000100202
2-s2.0-85044681674
S0100-83582018000100202.pdf
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0100-83582018360100019
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/170852
identifier_str_mv Planta Daninha, v. 36.
0100-8358
10.1590/s0100-83582018360100019
S0100-83582018000100202
2-s2.0-85044681674
S0100-83582018000100202.pdf
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Planta Daninha
0,365
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799965312795279360