Effect of conditioning methods on the microtensile bond strength of phosphate monomer-based cement on zirconia ceramic in dry and aged conditions

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Amaral, Regina [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2008
Outros Autores: Özcan, Mutlu, Valandro, Luiz Felipe [UNESP], Balducci, Ivan [UNESP], Bottino, Marco Antonio [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.30908
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/225089
Resumo: The objective of this study was to evaluate the durability of bond strength between a resin cement and aluminous ceramic submitted to various surface conditioning methods. Twenty-four blocks (5 x 5 x 4 mm3) of a glass-infiltrated zirconia-alumina ceramic (InCeram Zirconia Classic) were randomly divided into three surface treatment groups: ST1 - Air-abrasion with 110-μm Al2O3 particles + silanization; ST2 - Laboratory tribochemical silica coating method (110-μm Al2O3, 110-μm silica) (Rocatec) + silanization; ST3 - Chairside tribochemical silica coating method (30-μm SiOx) (CoJet) + silanization. Each treated ceramic block was placed in its silicone mold with the treated surface exposed. The resin cement (Panavia F) was prepared and injected into the mold over the treated surface. Specimens were sectioned to achieve nontrimmed bar specimens (14 sp/block) that were randomly divided into two conditions: (a) Dry - microtensile test after sectioning; (b) Thermocycling (TC) - (6,000x, 5-55°C) and water storage (150 days). Thus, six experimental groups were obtained (n = 50): Gr1-ST1 + dry; Gr2-ST1 + TC; Gr3-ST2 + dry; Gr4-ST2 + TC; Gr5-ST3 + dry; Gr6-ST3 + TC. After microtensile testing, the failure types were noted. ST2 (25.1 ± 11) and ST3 (24.1 ± 7.4) presented statistically higher bond strength (MPa) than that of ST1 (17.5 ± 8) regardless of aging conditions (p < 0.0001). While Gr2 revealed the lowest results (13.3 ± 6.4), the other groups (21.7 ± 7.4-25. 9 ± 9.1) showed statistically no significant differences (two-way ANOVA and Tukey's test, α = 0.05). The majority of the failures were mixed (82%) followed by adhesive failures (18%). Gr2 presented significantly higher incidence of ADHESIVE failures (54%) than those of other groups (p = 0.0001). Both laboratory and chairside silica coating plus silanization showed durable bond strength. After aging, air-abrasion with 110-μm Al2O3 + silanization showed the largest decrease indicating that aging is fundamental for bond strength testing for acid-resistant zirconia ceramics in order to estimate their long-term performance in the mouth. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
id UNSP_5180385e3d37e2aed36dcec7652c76fa
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/225089
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Effect of conditioning methods on the microtensile bond strength of phosphate monomer-based cement on zirconia ceramic in dry and aged conditionsBond strengthDurabilityMicrotensile testPanaviaResin cementSurface conditioningTribochemical silica coatingZirconiaThe objective of this study was to evaluate the durability of bond strength between a resin cement and aluminous ceramic submitted to various surface conditioning methods. Twenty-four blocks (5 x 5 x 4 mm3) of a glass-infiltrated zirconia-alumina ceramic (InCeram Zirconia Classic) were randomly divided into three surface treatment groups: ST1 - Air-abrasion with 110-μm Al2O3 particles + silanization; ST2 - Laboratory tribochemical silica coating method (110-μm Al2O3, 110-μm silica) (Rocatec) + silanization; ST3 - Chairside tribochemical silica coating method (30-μm SiOx) (CoJet) + silanization. Each treated ceramic block was placed in its silicone mold with the treated surface exposed. The resin cement (Panavia F) was prepared and injected into the mold over the treated surface. Specimens were sectioned to achieve nontrimmed bar specimens (14 sp/block) that were randomly divided into two conditions: (a) Dry - microtensile test after sectioning; (b) Thermocycling (TC) - (6,000x, 5-55°C) and water storage (150 days). Thus, six experimental groups were obtained (n = 50): Gr1-ST1 + dry; Gr2-ST1 + TC; Gr3-ST2 + dry; Gr4-ST2 + TC; Gr5-ST3 + dry; Gr6-ST3 + TC. After microtensile testing, the failure types were noted. ST2 (25.1 ± 11) and ST3 (24.1 ± 7.4) presented statistically higher bond strength (MPa) than that of ST1 (17.5 ± 8) regardless of aging conditions (p < 0.0001). While Gr2 revealed the lowest results (13.3 ± 6.4), the other groups (21.7 ± 7.4-25. 9 ± 9.1) showed statistically no significant differences (two-way ANOVA and Tukey's test, α = 0.05). The majority of the failures were mixed (82%) followed by adhesive failures (18%). Gr2 presented significantly higher incidence of ADHESIVE failures (54%) than those of other groups (p = 0.0001). Both laboratory and chairside silica coating plus silanization showed durable bond strength. After aging, air-abrasion with 110-μm Al2O3 + silanization showed the largest decrease indicating that aging is fundamental for bond strength testing for acid-resistant zirconia ceramics in order to estimate their long-term performance in the mouth. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics São José Dos Campos Dental School São Paulo State University (UNESP), São José dos CamposDepartment of Dentistry and Dental Hygiene University Medical Center Groningen University of Groningen, GroningenDepartment of Restorative Dentistry School of Dentistry Federal University of Santa Maria, Santa MariaDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics São José Dos Campos Dental School São Paulo State University (UNESP), São José dos CamposUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)University of GroningenFederal University of Santa MariaAmaral, Regina [UNESP]Özcan, MutluValandro, Luiz Felipe [UNESP]Balducci, Ivan [UNESP]Bottino, Marco Antonio [UNESP]2022-04-28T20:39:00Z2022-04-28T20:39:00Z2008-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article1-9http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.30908Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part B Applied Biomaterials, v. 85, n. 1, p. 1-9, 2008.1552-49731552-4981http://hdl.handle.net/11449/22508910.1002/jbm.b.309082-s2.0-41449099480Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengJournal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part B Applied Biomaterialsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-04-28T20:39:01Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/225089Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T14:53:22.738160Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Effect of conditioning methods on the microtensile bond strength of phosphate monomer-based cement on zirconia ceramic in dry and aged conditions
title Effect of conditioning methods on the microtensile bond strength of phosphate monomer-based cement on zirconia ceramic in dry and aged conditions
spellingShingle Effect of conditioning methods on the microtensile bond strength of phosphate monomer-based cement on zirconia ceramic in dry and aged conditions
Amaral, Regina [UNESP]
Bond strength
Durability
Microtensile test
Panavia
Resin cement
Surface conditioning
Tribochemical silica coating
Zirconia
title_short Effect of conditioning methods on the microtensile bond strength of phosphate monomer-based cement on zirconia ceramic in dry and aged conditions
title_full Effect of conditioning methods on the microtensile bond strength of phosphate monomer-based cement on zirconia ceramic in dry and aged conditions
title_fullStr Effect of conditioning methods on the microtensile bond strength of phosphate monomer-based cement on zirconia ceramic in dry and aged conditions
title_full_unstemmed Effect of conditioning methods on the microtensile bond strength of phosphate monomer-based cement on zirconia ceramic in dry and aged conditions
title_sort Effect of conditioning methods on the microtensile bond strength of phosphate monomer-based cement on zirconia ceramic in dry and aged conditions
author Amaral, Regina [UNESP]
author_facet Amaral, Regina [UNESP]
Özcan, Mutlu
Valandro, Luiz Felipe [UNESP]
Balducci, Ivan [UNESP]
Bottino, Marco Antonio [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Özcan, Mutlu
Valandro, Luiz Felipe [UNESP]
Balducci, Ivan [UNESP]
Bottino, Marco Antonio [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
University of Groningen
Federal University of Santa Maria
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Amaral, Regina [UNESP]
Özcan, Mutlu
Valandro, Luiz Felipe [UNESP]
Balducci, Ivan [UNESP]
Bottino, Marco Antonio [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Bond strength
Durability
Microtensile test
Panavia
Resin cement
Surface conditioning
Tribochemical silica coating
Zirconia
topic Bond strength
Durability
Microtensile test
Panavia
Resin cement
Surface conditioning
Tribochemical silica coating
Zirconia
description The objective of this study was to evaluate the durability of bond strength between a resin cement and aluminous ceramic submitted to various surface conditioning methods. Twenty-four blocks (5 x 5 x 4 mm3) of a glass-infiltrated zirconia-alumina ceramic (InCeram Zirconia Classic) were randomly divided into three surface treatment groups: ST1 - Air-abrasion with 110-μm Al2O3 particles + silanization; ST2 - Laboratory tribochemical silica coating method (110-μm Al2O3, 110-μm silica) (Rocatec) + silanization; ST3 - Chairside tribochemical silica coating method (30-μm SiOx) (CoJet) + silanization. Each treated ceramic block was placed in its silicone mold with the treated surface exposed. The resin cement (Panavia F) was prepared and injected into the mold over the treated surface. Specimens were sectioned to achieve nontrimmed bar specimens (14 sp/block) that were randomly divided into two conditions: (a) Dry - microtensile test after sectioning; (b) Thermocycling (TC) - (6,000x, 5-55°C) and water storage (150 days). Thus, six experimental groups were obtained (n = 50): Gr1-ST1 + dry; Gr2-ST1 + TC; Gr3-ST2 + dry; Gr4-ST2 + TC; Gr5-ST3 + dry; Gr6-ST3 + TC. After microtensile testing, the failure types were noted. ST2 (25.1 ± 11) and ST3 (24.1 ± 7.4) presented statistically higher bond strength (MPa) than that of ST1 (17.5 ± 8) regardless of aging conditions (p < 0.0001). While Gr2 revealed the lowest results (13.3 ± 6.4), the other groups (21.7 ± 7.4-25. 9 ± 9.1) showed statistically no significant differences (two-way ANOVA and Tukey's test, α = 0.05). The majority of the failures were mixed (82%) followed by adhesive failures (18%). Gr2 presented significantly higher incidence of ADHESIVE failures (54%) than those of other groups (p = 0.0001). Both laboratory and chairside silica coating plus silanization showed durable bond strength. After aging, air-abrasion with 110-μm Al2O3 + silanization showed the largest decrease indicating that aging is fundamental for bond strength testing for acid-resistant zirconia ceramics in order to estimate their long-term performance in the mouth. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
publishDate 2008
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2008-04-01
2022-04-28T20:39:00Z
2022-04-28T20:39:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.30908
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part B Applied Biomaterials, v. 85, n. 1, p. 1-9, 2008.
1552-4973
1552-4981
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/225089
10.1002/jbm.b.30908
2-s2.0-41449099480
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.30908
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/225089
identifier_str_mv Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part B Applied Biomaterials, v. 85, n. 1, p. 1-9, 2008.
1552-4973
1552-4981
10.1002/jbm.b.30908
2-s2.0-41449099480
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part B Applied Biomaterials
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 1-9
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808128431144042496