A comparison of bird communities in natural and revegetated grasslands in south Brazil
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/11449/196540 |
Resumo: | Natural grasslands are declining due to loss, fragmentation and degradation, resulting in the decline of grassland-associated bird species. The Pampas Biome in south Brazil is not exception to this worldwide trend, facing the expansion of croplands and afforestation with exotic tree plantations for cellulose production. To cope with the continuous degradation and loss of grasslands, restoration is an important conservation strategy, but basic information regarding the response of the fauna to restoration practices in southeastern South America grasslands is lacking. Here we compared the structure of bird communities in natural grasslands and revegetated grasslands after mining by planting native and exotic grasses. We sampled birds using 5-min point counts with unlimited radius in three replicates of each habitat (natural and revegetated grasslands; average size 22.2 +/- 2.3 ha). We also compared the vegetation density between the two habitat types. The structure of bird communities at natural and revegetated grasslands differed, with natural grasslands presenting higher species richness (42 vs. 35 species) and abundance (1459 vs. 839 records) than revegetated areas, and also a distinct species composition. Ten of the 11 grassland species that were associated to one of the two habitat types occurred more frequently in natural grasslands, which had higher vegetation density than revegetated areas. Even a decade after the beginning of the restoration process, revegetated areas did not resemble natural grasslands in bird species richness, abundance, and composition. These results differed from another study conducted in the Brazilian Pampas in which native plant species were used to actively restore a grassland. Therefore, until we have additional studies addressing the use of exotic grasses for the recovery of bird communities in South America grasslands, we encourage greater representation of native plant species in restoration projects. |
id |
UNSP_522125f82cdefc70f52f711c6471bfd1 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/196540 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
A comparison of bird communities in natural and revegetated grasslands in south Brazilexotic grasseshabitat restorationminingPampas BiomeNatural grasslands are declining due to loss, fragmentation and degradation, resulting in the decline of grassland-associated bird species. The Pampas Biome in south Brazil is not exception to this worldwide trend, facing the expansion of croplands and afforestation with exotic tree plantations for cellulose production. To cope with the continuous degradation and loss of grasslands, restoration is an important conservation strategy, but basic information regarding the response of the fauna to restoration practices in southeastern South America grasslands is lacking. Here we compared the structure of bird communities in natural grasslands and revegetated grasslands after mining by planting native and exotic grasses. We sampled birds using 5-min point counts with unlimited radius in three replicates of each habitat (natural and revegetated grasslands; average size 22.2 +/- 2.3 ha). We also compared the vegetation density between the two habitat types. The structure of bird communities at natural and revegetated grasslands differed, with natural grasslands presenting higher species richness (42 vs. 35 species) and abundance (1459 vs. 839 records) than revegetated areas, and also a distinct species composition. Ten of the 11 grassland species that were associated to one of the two habitat types occurred more frequently in natural grasslands, which had higher vegetation density than revegetated areas. Even a decade after the beginning of the restoration process, revegetated areas did not resemble natural grasslands in bird species richness, abundance, and composition. These results differed from another study conducted in the Brazilian Pampas in which native plant species were used to actively restore a grassland. Therefore, until we have additional studies addressing the use of exotic grasses for the recovery of bird communities in South America grasslands, we encourage greater representation of native plant species in restoration projects.Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation (EMBRAPA)Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)Univ Vale Rio dos Sinos UNISINOS, Programa Posgrad Diversidade & Manejo Vida Silves, Sao Leopoldo, RS, BrazilUniv Reg Cariri URCA, Dept Ciencias Biol, Lab Ecol Mamiferos, Crato, CE, BrazilUniv Estadual Paulista UNESP, Dept Zool, Rio Claro, SP, BrazilUniv Estadual Paulista UNESP, Dept Zool, Rio Claro, SP, BrazilCNPq: 304244/2016-3Soc Brasileira OrnitologiaUniv Vale Rio dos Sinos UNISINOSUniv Reg Cariri URCAUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Becker, Rafael GustavoPaise, GabrielaPizo, Marco Aurelio [UNESP]2020-12-10T19:48:13Z2020-12-10T19:48:13Z2019-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article199-206Revista Brasileira De Ornitologia. Vicosa: Soc Brasileira Ornitologia, v. 27, n. 3, p. 199-206, 2019.0103-5657http://hdl.handle.net/11449/196540WOS:000510161200010Web of Sciencereponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengRevista Brasileira De Ornitologiainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-10-23T07:59:27Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/196540Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T15:15:28.121901Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
A comparison of bird communities in natural and revegetated grasslands in south Brazil |
title |
A comparison of bird communities in natural and revegetated grasslands in south Brazil |
spellingShingle |
A comparison of bird communities in natural and revegetated grasslands in south Brazil Becker, Rafael Gustavo exotic grasses habitat restoration mining Pampas Biome |
title_short |
A comparison of bird communities in natural and revegetated grasslands in south Brazil |
title_full |
A comparison of bird communities in natural and revegetated grasslands in south Brazil |
title_fullStr |
A comparison of bird communities in natural and revegetated grasslands in south Brazil |
title_full_unstemmed |
A comparison of bird communities in natural and revegetated grasslands in south Brazil |
title_sort |
A comparison of bird communities in natural and revegetated grasslands in south Brazil |
author |
Becker, Rafael Gustavo |
author_facet |
Becker, Rafael Gustavo Paise, Gabriela Pizo, Marco Aurelio [UNESP] |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Paise, Gabriela Pizo, Marco Aurelio [UNESP] |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Univ Vale Rio dos Sinos UNISINOS Univ Reg Cariri URCA Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Becker, Rafael Gustavo Paise, Gabriela Pizo, Marco Aurelio [UNESP] |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
exotic grasses habitat restoration mining Pampas Biome |
topic |
exotic grasses habitat restoration mining Pampas Biome |
description |
Natural grasslands are declining due to loss, fragmentation and degradation, resulting in the decline of grassland-associated bird species. The Pampas Biome in south Brazil is not exception to this worldwide trend, facing the expansion of croplands and afforestation with exotic tree plantations for cellulose production. To cope with the continuous degradation and loss of grasslands, restoration is an important conservation strategy, but basic information regarding the response of the fauna to restoration practices in southeastern South America grasslands is lacking. Here we compared the structure of bird communities in natural grasslands and revegetated grasslands after mining by planting native and exotic grasses. We sampled birds using 5-min point counts with unlimited radius in three replicates of each habitat (natural and revegetated grasslands; average size 22.2 +/- 2.3 ha). We also compared the vegetation density between the two habitat types. The structure of bird communities at natural and revegetated grasslands differed, with natural grasslands presenting higher species richness (42 vs. 35 species) and abundance (1459 vs. 839 records) than revegetated areas, and also a distinct species composition. Ten of the 11 grassland species that were associated to one of the two habitat types occurred more frequently in natural grasslands, which had higher vegetation density than revegetated areas. Even a decade after the beginning of the restoration process, revegetated areas did not resemble natural grasslands in bird species richness, abundance, and composition. These results differed from another study conducted in the Brazilian Pampas in which native plant species were used to actively restore a grassland. Therefore, until we have additional studies addressing the use of exotic grasses for the recovery of bird communities in South America grasslands, we encourage greater representation of native plant species in restoration projects. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-09-01 2020-12-10T19:48:13Z 2020-12-10T19:48:13Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira De Ornitologia. Vicosa: Soc Brasileira Ornitologia, v. 27, n. 3, p. 199-206, 2019. 0103-5657 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/196540 WOS:000510161200010 |
identifier_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira De Ornitologia. Vicosa: Soc Brasileira Ornitologia, v. 27, n. 3, p. 199-206, 2019. 0103-5657 WOS:000510161200010 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/196540 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira De Ornitologia |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
199-206 |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Soc Brasileira Ornitologia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Soc Brasileira Ornitologia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Web of Science reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808128489587474432 |