A comparison of bird communities in natural and revegetated grasslands in south Brazil

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Becker, Rafael Gustavo
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Paise, Gabriela, Pizo, Marco Aurelio [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/11449/196540
Resumo: Natural grasslands are declining due to loss, fragmentation and degradation, resulting in the decline of grassland-associated bird species. The Pampas Biome in south Brazil is not exception to this worldwide trend, facing the expansion of croplands and afforestation with exotic tree plantations for cellulose production. To cope with the continuous degradation and loss of grasslands, restoration is an important conservation strategy, but basic information regarding the response of the fauna to restoration practices in southeastern South America grasslands is lacking. Here we compared the structure of bird communities in natural grasslands and revegetated grasslands after mining by planting native and exotic grasses. We sampled birds using 5-min point counts with unlimited radius in three replicates of each habitat (natural and revegetated grasslands; average size 22.2 +/- 2.3 ha). We also compared the vegetation density between the two habitat types. The structure of bird communities at natural and revegetated grasslands differed, with natural grasslands presenting higher species richness (42 vs. 35 species) and abundance (1459 vs. 839 records) than revegetated areas, and also a distinct species composition. Ten of the 11 grassland species that were associated to one of the two habitat types occurred more frequently in natural grasslands, which had higher vegetation density than revegetated areas. Even a decade after the beginning of the restoration process, revegetated areas did not resemble natural grasslands in bird species richness, abundance, and composition. These results differed from another study conducted in the Brazilian Pampas in which native plant species were used to actively restore a grassland. Therefore, until we have additional studies addressing the use of exotic grasses for the recovery of bird communities in South America grasslands, we encourage greater representation of native plant species in restoration projects.
id UNSP_522125f82cdefc70f52f711c6471bfd1
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/196540
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling A comparison of bird communities in natural and revegetated grasslands in south Brazilexotic grasseshabitat restorationminingPampas BiomeNatural grasslands are declining due to loss, fragmentation and degradation, resulting in the decline of grassland-associated bird species. The Pampas Biome in south Brazil is not exception to this worldwide trend, facing the expansion of croplands and afforestation with exotic tree plantations for cellulose production. To cope with the continuous degradation and loss of grasslands, restoration is an important conservation strategy, but basic information regarding the response of the fauna to restoration practices in southeastern South America grasslands is lacking. Here we compared the structure of bird communities in natural grasslands and revegetated grasslands after mining by planting native and exotic grasses. We sampled birds using 5-min point counts with unlimited radius in three replicates of each habitat (natural and revegetated grasslands; average size 22.2 +/- 2.3 ha). We also compared the vegetation density between the two habitat types. The structure of bird communities at natural and revegetated grasslands differed, with natural grasslands presenting higher species richness (42 vs. 35 species) and abundance (1459 vs. 839 records) than revegetated areas, and also a distinct species composition. Ten of the 11 grassland species that were associated to one of the two habitat types occurred more frequently in natural grasslands, which had higher vegetation density than revegetated areas. Even a decade after the beginning of the restoration process, revegetated areas did not resemble natural grasslands in bird species richness, abundance, and composition. These results differed from another study conducted in the Brazilian Pampas in which native plant species were used to actively restore a grassland. Therefore, until we have additional studies addressing the use of exotic grasses for the recovery of bird communities in South America grasslands, we encourage greater representation of native plant species in restoration projects.Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation (EMBRAPA)Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)Univ Vale Rio dos Sinos UNISINOS, Programa Posgrad Diversidade & Manejo Vida Silves, Sao Leopoldo, RS, BrazilUniv Reg Cariri URCA, Dept Ciencias Biol, Lab Ecol Mamiferos, Crato, CE, BrazilUniv Estadual Paulista UNESP, Dept Zool, Rio Claro, SP, BrazilUniv Estadual Paulista UNESP, Dept Zool, Rio Claro, SP, BrazilCNPq: 304244/2016-3Soc Brasileira OrnitologiaUniv Vale Rio dos Sinos UNISINOSUniv Reg Cariri URCAUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Becker, Rafael GustavoPaise, GabrielaPizo, Marco Aurelio [UNESP]2020-12-10T19:48:13Z2020-12-10T19:48:13Z2019-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article199-206Revista Brasileira De Ornitologia. Vicosa: Soc Brasileira Ornitologia, v. 27, n. 3, p. 199-206, 2019.0103-5657http://hdl.handle.net/11449/196540WOS:000510161200010Web of Sciencereponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengRevista Brasileira De Ornitologiainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-10-23T07:59:27Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/196540Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T15:15:28.121901Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv A comparison of bird communities in natural and revegetated grasslands in south Brazil
title A comparison of bird communities in natural and revegetated grasslands in south Brazil
spellingShingle A comparison of bird communities in natural and revegetated grasslands in south Brazil
Becker, Rafael Gustavo
exotic grasses
habitat restoration
mining
Pampas Biome
title_short A comparison of bird communities in natural and revegetated grasslands in south Brazil
title_full A comparison of bird communities in natural and revegetated grasslands in south Brazil
title_fullStr A comparison of bird communities in natural and revegetated grasslands in south Brazil
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of bird communities in natural and revegetated grasslands in south Brazil
title_sort A comparison of bird communities in natural and revegetated grasslands in south Brazil
author Becker, Rafael Gustavo
author_facet Becker, Rafael Gustavo
Paise, Gabriela
Pizo, Marco Aurelio [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Paise, Gabriela
Pizo, Marco Aurelio [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Univ Vale Rio dos Sinos UNISINOS
Univ Reg Cariri URCA
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Becker, Rafael Gustavo
Paise, Gabriela
Pizo, Marco Aurelio [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv exotic grasses
habitat restoration
mining
Pampas Biome
topic exotic grasses
habitat restoration
mining
Pampas Biome
description Natural grasslands are declining due to loss, fragmentation and degradation, resulting in the decline of grassland-associated bird species. The Pampas Biome in south Brazil is not exception to this worldwide trend, facing the expansion of croplands and afforestation with exotic tree plantations for cellulose production. To cope with the continuous degradation and loss of grasslands, restoration is an important conservation strategy, but basic information regarding the response of the fauna to restoration practices in southeastern South America grasslands is lacking. Here we compared the structure of bird communities in natural grasslands and revegetated grasslands after mining by planting native and exotic grasses. We sampled birds using 5-min point counts with unlimited radius in three replicates of each habitat (natural and revegetated grasslands; average size 22.2 +/- 2.3 ha). We also compared the vegetation density between the two habitat types. The structure of bird communities at natural and revegetated grasslands differed, with natural grasslands presenting higher species richness (42 vs. 35 species) and abundance (1459 vs. 839 records) than revegetated areas, and also a distinct species composition. Ten of the 11 grassland species that were associated to one of the two habitat types occurred more frequently in natural grasslands, which had higher vegetation density than revegetated areas. Even a decade after the beginning of the restoration process, revegetated areas did not resemble natural grasslands in bird species richness, abundance, and composition. These results differed from another study conducted in the Brazilian Pampas in which native plant species were used to actively restore a grassland. Therefore, until we have additional studies addressing the use of exotic grasses for the recovery of bird communities in South America grasslands, we encourage greater representation of native plant species in restoration projects.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-09-01
2020-12-10T19:48:13Z
2020-12-10T19:48:13Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira De Ornitologia. Vicosa: Soc Brasileira Ornitologia, v. 27, n. 3, p. 199-206, 2019.
0103-5657
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/196540
WOS:000510161200010
identifier_str_mv Revista Brasileira De Ornitologia. Vicosa: Soc Brasileira Ornitologia, v. 27, n. 3, p. 199-206, 2019.
0103-5657
WOS:000510161200010
url http://hdl.handle.net/11449/196540
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira De Ornitologia
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 199-206
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Soc Brasileira Ornitologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Soc Brasileira Ornitologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Web of Science
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808128489587474432