Comparison of the quantification of caffeine in human plasma by gas chromatography and ELISA
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2001 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-879X2001000600019 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/2781 |
Resumo: | In the present study we evaluated the precision of the ELISA method to quantify caffeine in human plasma and compared the results with those obtained by gas chromatography. A total of 58 samples were analyzed by gas chromatography using a nitrogen-phosphorus detector and routine techniques. For the ELISA test, the samples were diluted to obtain a concentration corresponding to 50% of the absorbance of the standard curve. To determine whether the proximity between the I50 of the standard curve and that of the sample would bring about a more precise result, the samples were divided into three blocks according to the criterion of difference, in modulus, of the I50 of the standard curve and of the I50 of the sample. The samples were classified into three groups. The first was composed of 20 samples with I50 up to 1.5 ng/ml, the second consisted of 21 samples with I50 ranging from 1.51 to 3 ng/ml, and the third of 17 samples with I50 ranging from 3.01 to 13 ng/ml. The determination coefficient (R² = 0.999) showed that the data obtained by gas chromatography represented a reliable basis. The results obtained by ELISA were also reliable, with an estimated Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.82 between the two methods. This coefficient for the different groups (0.88, 0.79 and 0.49 for groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively) showed greater reliability for the test with dilutions closer to I50. |
id |
UNSP_52d17a303a4bb735286624eb0d4011f9 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/2781 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Comparison of the quantification of caffeine in human plasma by gas chromatography and ELISAgas chromatographyELISACaffeineplasmaquantificationIn the present study we evaluated the precision of the ELISA method to quantify caffeine in human plasma and compared the results with those obtained by gas chromatography. A total of 58 samples were analyzed by gas chromatography using a nitrogen-phosphorus detector and routine techniques. For the ELISA test, the samples were diluted to obtain a concentration corresponding to 50% of the absorbance of the standard curve. To determine whether the proximity between the I50 of the standard curve and that of the sample would bring about a more precise result, the samples were divided into three blocks according to the criterion of difference, in modulus, of the I50 of the standard curve and of the I50 of the sample. The samples were classified into three groups. The first was composed of 20 samples with I50 up to 1.5 ng/ml, the second consisted of 21 samples with I50 ranging from 1.51 to 3 ng/ml, and the third of 17 samples with I50 ranging from 3.01 to 13 ng/ml. The determination coefficient (R² = 0.999) showed that the data obtained by gas chromatography represented a reliable basis. The results obtained by ELISA were also reliable, with an estimated Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.82 between the two methods. This coefficient for the different groups (0.88, 0.79 and 0.49 for groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively) showed greater reliability for the test with dilutions closer to I50.Universidade Estadual Paulista Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias Departamento de Morfologia e Fisiologia AnimalUniversity of Kentucky Department of Veterinary ScienceUniversidade Estadual Paulista Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias Departamento de Morfologia e Fisiologia AnimalAssociação Brasileira de Divulgação Científica (ABRADIC)Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)University of Kentucky Department of Veterinary ScienceCarregaro, A.B. [UNESP]Woods, W.E.Tobin, T.Queiroz-Neto, A. [UNESP]2014-05-20T13:15:43Z2014-05-20T13:15:43Z2001-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article821-824application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-879X2001000600019Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research. Associação Brasileira de Divulgação Científica, v. 34, n. 6, p. 821-824, 2001.0100-879Xhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/278110.1590/S0100-879X2001000600019S0100-879X2001000600019S0100-879X2001000600019.pdfSciELOreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengBrazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research1.492info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-06-06T18:42:13Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/2781Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T21:11:22.717681Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Comparison of the quantification of caffeine in human plasma by gas chromatography and ELISA |
title |
Comparison of the quantification of caffeine in human plasma by gas chromatography and ELISA |
spellingShingle |
Comparison of the quantification of caffeine in human plasma by gas chromatography and ELISA Carregaro, A.B. [UNESP] gas chromatography ELISA Caffeine plasma quantification |
title_short |
Comparison of the quantification of caffeine in human plasma by gas chromatography and ELISA |
title_full |
Comparison of the quantification of caffeine in human plasma by gas chromatography and ELISA |
title_fullStr |
Comparison of the quantification of caffeine in human plasma by gas chromatography and ELISA |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison of the quantification of caffeine in human plasma by gas chromatography and ELISA |
title_sort |
Comparison of the quantification of caffeine in human plasma by gas chromatography and ELISA |
author |
Carregaro, A.B. [UNESP] |
author_facet |
Carregaro, A.B. [UNESP] Woods, W.E. Tobin, T. Queiroz-Neto, A. [UNESP] |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Woods, W.E. Tobin, T. Queiroz-Neto, A. [UNESP] |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) University of Kentucky Department of Veterinary Science |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Carregaro, A.B. [UNESP] Woods, W.E. Tobin, T. Queiroz-Neto, A. [UNESP] |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
gas chromatography ELISA Caffeine plasma quantification |
topic |
gas chromatography ELISA Caffeine plasma quantification |
description |
In the present study we evaluated the precision of the ELISA method to quantify caffeine in human plasma and compared the results with those obtained by gas chromatography. A total of 58 samples were analyzed by gas chromatography using a nitrogen-phosphorus detector and routine techniques. For the ELISA test, the samples were diluted to obtain a concentration corresponding to 50% of the absorbance of the standard curve. To determine whether the proximity between the I50 of the standard curve and that of the sample would bring about a more precise result, the samples were divided into three blocks according to the criterion of difference, in modulus, of the I50 of the standard curve and of the I50 of the sample. The samples were classified into three groups. The first was composed of 20 samples with I50 up to 1.5 ng/ml, the second consisted of 21 samples with I50 ranging from 1.51 to 3 ng/ml, and the third of 17 samples with I50 ranging from 3.01 to 13 ng/ml. The determination coefficient (R² = 0.999) showed that the data obtained by gas chromatography represented a reliable basis. The results obtained by ELISA were also reliable, with an estimated Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.82 between the two methods. This coefficient for the different groups (0.88, 0.79 and 0.49 for groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively) showed greater reliability for the test with dilutions closer to I50. |
publishDate |
2001 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2001-06-01 2014-05-20T13:15:43Z 2014-05-20T13:15:43Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-879X2001000600019 Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research. Associação Brasileira de Divulgação Científica, v. 34, n. 6, p. 821-824, 2001. 0100-879X http://hdl.handle.net/11449/2781 10.1590/S0100-879X2001000600019 S0100-879X2001000600019 S0100-879X2001000600019.pdf |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-879X2001000600019 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/2781 |
identifier_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research. Associação Brasileira de Divulgação Científica, v. 34, n. 6, p. 821-824, 2001. 0100-879X 10.1590/S0100-879X2001000600019 S0100-879X2001000600019 S0100-879X2001000600019.pdf |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research 1.492 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
821-824 application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Brasileira de Divulgação Científica (ABRADIC) |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Brasileira de Divulgação Científica (ABRADIC) |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
SciELO reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808129296245456896 |