Comparison of the quantification of caffeine in human plasma by gas chromatography and ELISA

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Carregaro, A.B. [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2001
Outros Autores: Woods, W.E., Tobin, T., Queiroz-Neto, A. [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-879X2001000600019
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/2781
Resumo: In the present study we evaluated the precision of the ELISA method to quantify caffeine in human plasma and compared the results with those obtained by gas chromatography. A total of 58 samples were analyzed by gas chromatography using a nitrogen-phosphorus detector and routine techniques. For the ELISA test, the samples were diluted to obtain a concentration corresponding to 50% of the absorbance of the standard curve. To determine whether the proximity between the I50 of the standard curve and that of the sample would bring about a more precise result, the samples were divided into three blocks according to the criterion of difference, in modulus, of the I50 of the standard curve and of the I50 of the sample. The samples were classified into three groups. The first was composed of 20 samples with I50 up to 1.5 ng/ml, the second consisted of 21 samples with I50 ranging from 1.51 to 3 ng/ml, and the third of 17 samples with I50 ranging from 3.01 to 13 ng/ml. The determination coefficient (R² = 0.999) showed that the data obtained by gas chromatography represented a reliable basis. The results obtained by ELISA were also reliable, with an estimated Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.82 between the two methods. This coefficient for the different groups (0.88, 0.79 and 0.49 for groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively) showed greater reliability for the test with dilutions closer to I50.
id UNSP_52d17a303a4bb735286624eb0d4011f9
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/2781
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Comparison of the quantification of caffeine in human plasma by gas chromatography and ELISAgas chromatographyELISACaffeineplasmaquantificationIn the present study we evaluated the precision of the ELISA method to quantify caffeine in human plasma and compared the results with those obtained by gas chromatography. A total of 58 samples were analyzed by gas chromatography using a nitrogen-phosphorus detector and routine techniques. For the ELISA test, the samples were diluted to obtain a concentration corresponding to 50% of the absorbance of the standard curve. To determine whether the proximity between the I50 of the standard curve and that of the sample would bring about a more precise result, the samples were divided into three blocks according to the criterion of difference, in modulus, of the I50 of the standard curve and of the I50 of the sample. The samples were classified into three groups. The first was composed of 20 samples with I50 up to 1.5 ng/ml, the second consisted of 21 samples with I50 ranging from 1.51 to 3 ng/ml, and the third of 17 samples with I50 ranging from 3.01 to 13 ng/ml. The determination coefficient (R² = 0.999) showed that the data obtained by gas chromatography represented a reliable basis. The results obtained by ELISA were also reliable, with an estimated Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.82 between the two methods. This coefficient for the different groups (0.88, 0.79 and 0.49 for groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively) showed greater reliability for the test with dilutions closer to I50.Universidade Estadual Paulista Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias Departamento de Morfologia e Fisiologia AnimalUniversity of Kentucky Department of Veterinary ScienceUniversidade Estadual Paulista Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias Departamento de Morfologia e Fisiologia AnimalAssociação Brasileira de Divulgação Científica (ABRADIC)Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)University of Kentucky Department of Veterinary ScienceCarregaro, A.B. [UNESP]Woods, W.E.Tobin, T.Queiroz-Neto, A. [UNESP]2014-05-20T13:15:43Z2014-05-20T13:15:43Z2001-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article821-824application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-879X2001000600019Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research. Associação Brasileira de Divulgação Científica, v. 34, n. 6, p. 821-824, 2001.0100-879Xhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/278110.1590/S0100-879X2001000600019S0100-879X2001000600019S0100-879X2001000600019.pdfSciELOreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengBrazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research1.492info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-06-06T18:42:13Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/2781Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T21:11:22.717681Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparison of the quantification of caffeine in human plasma by gas chromatography and ELISA
title Comparison of the quantification of caffeine in human plasma by gas chromatography and ELISA
spellingShingle Comparison of the quantification of caffeine in human plasma by gas chromatography and ELISA
Carregaro, A.B. [UNESP]
gas chromatography
ELISA
Caffeine
plasma
quantification
title_short Comparison of the quantification of caffeine in human plasma by gas chromatography and ELISA
title_full Comparison of the quantification of caffeine in human plasma by gas chromatography and ELISA
title_fullStr Comparison of the quantification of caffeine in human plasma by gas chromatography and ELISA
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the quantification of caffeine in human plasma by gas chromatography and ELISA
title_sort Comparison of the quantification of caffeine in human plasma by gas chromatography and ELISA
author Carregaro, A.B. [UNESP]
author_facet Carregaro, A.B. [UNESP]
Woods, W.E.
Tobin, T.
Queiroz-Neto, A. [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Woods, W.E.
Tobin, T.
Queiroz-Neto, A. [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
University of Kentucky Department of Veterinary Science
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Carregaro, A.B. [UNESP]
Woods, W.E.
Tobin, T.
Queiroz-Neto, A. [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv gas chromatography
ELISA
Caffeine
plasma
quantification
topic gas chromatography
ELISA
Caffeine
plasma
quantification
description In the present study we evaluated the precision of the ELISA method to quantify caffeine in human plasma and compared the results with those obtained by gas chromatography. A total of 58 samples were analyzed by gas chromatography using a nitrogen-phosphorus detector and routine techniques. For the ELISA test, the samples were diluted to obtain a concentration corresponding to 50% of the absorbance of the standard curve. To determine whether the proximity between the I50 of the standard curve and that of the sample would bring about a more precise result, the samples were divided into three blocks according to the criterion of difference, in modulus, of the I50 of the standard curve and of the I50 of the sample. The samples were classified into three groups. The first was composed of 20 samples with I50 up to 1.5 ng/ml, the second consisted of 21 samples with I50 ranging from 1.51 to 3 ng/ml, and the third of 17 samples with I50 ranging from 3.01 to 13 ng/ml. The determination coefficient (R² = 0.999) showed that the data obtained by gas chromatography represented a reliable basis. The results obtained by ELISA were also reliable, with an estimated Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.82 between the two methods. This coefficient for the different groups (0.88, 0.79 and 0.49 for groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively) showed greater reliability for the test with dilutions closer to I50.
publishDate 2001
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2001-06-01
2014-05-20T13:15:43Z
2014-05-20T13:15:43Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-879X2001000600019
Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research. Associação Brasileira de Divulgação Científica, v. 34, n. 6, p. 821-824, 2001.
0100-879X
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/2781
10.1590/S0100-879X2001000600019
S0100-879X2001000600019
S0100-879X2001000600019.pdf
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-879X2001000600019
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/2781
identifier_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research. Associação Brasileira de Divulgação Científica, v. 34, n. 6, p. 821-824, 2001.
0100-879X
10.1590/S0100-879X2001000600019
S0100-879X2001000600019
S0100-879X2001000600019.pdf
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research
1.492
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 821-824
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Divulgação Científica (ABRADIC)
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Divulgação Científica (ABRADIC)
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv SciELO
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808129296245456896