Fish Aversion and Attraction to Selected Agrichemicals

• Autor(a) principal: da Rosa, João Gabriel Santos
• Data de Publicação: 2016
• Outros Autores: de Abreu, Murilo Sander, Giacomini, Ana Cristina Varrone, Koakoski, Gessi, Kalichak, Fabiana, Oliveira, Thiago Acosta, de Alcântara Barcellos, Heloísa Helena, Barreto, Rodrigo Egydio [UNESP], Barcellos, Leonardo José Gil
• Tipo de documento: Artigo
• Idioma: eng
• Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
• Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00244-016-0300-x; http://hdl.handle.net/11449/168826

In agriculture intensive areas, fishponds and natural water bodies located in close proximity to these fields receive water with variable amounts of agrichemicals. Consequently, toxic compounds reach nontarget organisms. For instance, aquatic organisms can be exposed to tebuconazole-based fungicides (TBF), glyphosate-based herbicides (GBH), and atrazine-based herbicides (ABH) that are potentially dangerous, which motivates the following question: Are these agrichemicals attractant or aversive to fish? To answer this question, adult zebrafish were tested in a chamber that allows fish to escape from or seek a lane of contaminated water. This attraction and aversion paradigm was evaluated with zebrafish in the presence of an acute contamination with these compounds. We showed that only GBH was aversive to fish, whereas ABH and TBF caused neither attraction nor aversion for zebrafish. Thus, these chemicals do not impose an extra toxic risk by being an attractant for fish, although TBF and ABH can be more deleterious, because they induce no aversive response. Because the uptake and bioaccumulation of chemicals in fish seems to be time- and dose-dependent, a fish that remains longer in the presence of these substances tends to absorb higher concentrations than one that escapes from contaminated sites.