Decolonizing brazilian philosophy: ethical and political challenges for philosophies of the global south
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
DOI: | 10.1590/0101-3173.2022.v45esp.20.p415 |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0101-3173.2022.v45esp.20.p415 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/223512 |
Resumo: | The goal of this article is to problematize some of the main practices of Brazilian university philosophy, in order to denounce its colonizing assumptions and point out its limits to elaborate a philosophical thought capable of relating, effectively, with the problems that affect us in the Brazilian territory. We will analyze how the strategy of reading and explaining European and unitedstatian texts, predominantly considered the classic references to philosophy, operate the relations of knowledge and domination that exist between the global North under the peoples of the South that they colonized. We will use the constitutive experience of the degree in philosophy at the University of São Paulo as an example of the practices and assumptions of coloniality by which our academic philosophy is modeled. From the contributions of Lélia Gonzalez (1988), Ailton Krenak (2019), Silvia Rivera Cusicanqui (2010) and Leanne Betasamosake Simpson (KLEIN, 2012), we will question those practices and assumptions, demonstrating how these authors challenge us not only to change the usual theoretical framework naturalized in Brazilian philosophy, but, above all, to operate an ethical and political change in the relationships that we usually establish with philosophy. |
id |
UNSP_530e23dc8859be7c2ce11a36299c83a0 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/223512 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Decolonizing brazilian philosophy: ethical and political challenges for philosophies of the global southDescolonizar a filosofia brasileira: desafios éticos e políticos para as filosofias do sul globalBrazilian philosophyColonialityHistoriographyUniversity practicesThe goal of this article is to problematize some of the main practices of Brazilian university philosophy, in order to denounce its colonizing assumptions and point out its limits to elaborate a philosophical thought capable of relating, effectively, with the problems that affect us in the Brazilian territory. We will analyze how the strategy of reading and explaining European and unitedstatian texts, predominantly considered the classic references to philosophy, operate the relations of knowledge and domination that exist between the global North under the peoples of the South that they colonized. We will use the constitutive experience of the degree in philosophy at the University of São Paulo as an example of the practices and assumptions of coloniality by which our academic philosophy is modeled. From the contributions of Lélia Gonzalez (1988), Ailton Krenak (2019), Silvia Rivera Cusicanqui (2010) and Leanne Betasamosake Simpson (KLEIN, 2012), we will question those practices and assumptions, demonstrating how these authors challenge us not only to change the usual theoretical framework naturalized in Brazilian philosophy, but, above all, to operate an ethical and political change in the relationships that we usually establish with philosophy.Departamento de Didática e dos Programas de Pós-Graduação em Educação e Filosofia da Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), SPProfessora de Filosofia no Instituto Federal do Rio de Janeiro (IFRJ), RJDoutorando em Educação na Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), SPDepartamento de Didática e dos Programas de Pós-Graduação em Educação e Filosofia da Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), SPDoutorando em Educação na Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), SPUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Professora de Filosofia no Instituto Federal do Rio de Janeiro (IFRJ)Gelamo, Rodrigo Pelloso [UNESP]Garcia, Amanda VelosoRodrigues, Augusto [UNESP]2022-04-28T19:51:12Z2022-04-28T19:51:12Z2022-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article415-438http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0101-3173.2022.v45esp.20.p415Trans/Form/Acao, v. 45, n. spe, p. 415-438, 2022.0101-3173http://hdl.handle.net/11449/22351210.1590/0101-3173.2022.v45esp.20.p4152-s2.0-85125185345Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengTrans/Form/Acaoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-04-28T19:51:12Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/223512Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T14:00:10.909274Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Decolonizing brazilian philosophy: ethical and political challenges for philosophies of the global south Descolonizar a filosofia brasileira: desafios éticos e políticos para as filosofias do sul global |
title |
Decolonizing brazilian philosophy: ethical and political challenges for philosophies of the global south |
spellingShingle |
Decolonizing brazilian philosophy: ethical and political challenges for philosophies of the global south Decolonizing brazilian philosophy: ethical and political challenges for philosophies of the global south Gelamo, Rodrigo Pelloso [UNESP] Brazilian philosophy Coloniality Historiography University practices Gelamo, Rodrigo Pelloso [UNESP] Brazilian philosophy Coloniality Historiography University practices |
title_short |
Decolonizing brazilian philosophy: ethical and political challenges for philosophies of the global south |
title_full |
Decolonizing brazilian philosophy: ethical and political challenges for philosophies of the global south |
title_fullStr |
Decolonizing brazilian philosophy: ethical and political challenges for philosophies of the global south Decolonizing brazilian philosophy: ethical and political challenges for philosophies of the global south |
title_full_unstemmed |
Decolonizing brazilian philosophy: ethical and political challenges for philosophies of the global south Decolonizing brazilian philosophy: ethical and political challenges for philosophies of the global south |
title_sort |
Decolonizing brazilian philosophy: ethical and political challenges for philosophies of the global south |
author |
Gelamo, Rodrigo Pelloso [UNESP] |
author_facet |
Gelamo, Rodrigo Pelloso [UNESP] Gelamo, Rodrigo Pelloso [UNESP] Garcia, Amanda Veloso Rodrigues, Augusto [UNESP] Garcia, Amanda Veloso Rodrigues, Augusto [UNESP] |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Garcia, Amanda Veloso Rodrigues, Augusto [UNESP] |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) Professora de Filosofia no Instituto Federal do Rio de Janeiro (IFRJ) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Gelamo, Rodrigo Pelloso [UNESP] Garcia, Amanda Veloso Rodrigues, Augusto [UNESP] |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian philosophy Coloniality Historiography University practices |
topic |
Brazilian philosophy Coloniality Historiography University practices |
description |
The goal of this article is to problematize some of the main practices of Brazilian university philosophy, in order to denounce its colonizing assumptions and point out its limits to elaborate a philosophical thought capable of relating, effectively, with the problems that affect us in the Brazilian territory. We will analyze how the strategy of reading and explaining European and unitedstatian texts, predominantly considered the classic references to philosophy, operate the relations of knowledge and domination that exist between the global North under the peoples of the South that they colonized. We will use the constitutive experience of the degree in philosophy at the University of São Paulo as an example of the practices and assumptions of coloniality by which our academic philosophy is modeled. From the contributions of Lélia Gonzalez (1988), Ailton Krenak (2019), Silvia Rivera Cusicanqui (2010) and Leanne Betasamosake Simpson (KLEIN, 2012), we will question those practices and assumptions, demonstrating how these authors challenge us not only to change the usual theoretical framework naturalized in Brazilian philosophy, but, above all, to operate an ethical and political change in the relationships that we usually establish with philosophy. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-04-28T19:51:12Z 2022-04-28T19:51:12Z 2022-01-01 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0101-3173.2022.v45esp.20.p415 Trans/Form/Acao, v. 45, n. spe, p. 415-438, 2022. 0101-3173 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/223512 10.1590/0101-3173.2022.v45esp.20.p415 2-s2.0-85125185345 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0101-3173.2022.v45esp.20.p415 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/223512 |
identifier_str_mv |
Trans/Form/Acao, v. 45, n. spe, p. 415-438, 2022. 0101-3173 10.1590/0101-3173.2022.v45esp.20.p415 2-s2.0-85125185345 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Trans/Form/Acao |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
415-438 |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1822180752492593152 |
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/0101-3173.2022.v45esp.20.p415 |