How to decide between buying or renovating agricultural tractors?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Vidal, Diego Onofre [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: da Silva, Rouverson Pereira [UNESP], de Oliveira, Bruno Rocca [UNESP], Conceição, Elimar Veloso, Santos, David Ferreira Lopes [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/11449/249770
Resumo: Deciding whether to buy or rebuild a tractor and when to do so is an empirical problem for farmers and/or rural administrators, whose analytical methods explored in the literature do not provide a clear approach to the operational and economic effects in the short and long term, despite its importance to the competitiveness of the activity. If the cost of replacing the agricultural tractors used in spraying the citrus crop could be more helpful than the reform of these, this study aimed to build and validate an economic evaluation method to support the decision to buy new or replace existing wheel tractors. To achieve such goals, a database with quarterly operational and financial information on 47 tractors between 2009 and 2017 was constructed. The method combined the use of an empirical, with the use of model panel-data regression, combining cross-sectional data with time series, to establish the actual cost information to be used in the model, and finally, implement the discounted cash flow, in which all uncertainties were controlled using a Monte Carlo simulation. The results indicated that the best decision is to purchase new equipment only after the fourth year of use. It stands out in the study findings, the impact of tax benefits and the resale of tractors were relevant to the cash flow, as well as the increase in maintenance costs over time. The economic evaluation method applied in this study can help rural producers and administrators in the decision-making process for investments in fixed assets and innovative technologies, thereby enabling them to be more accurate in their investment decisions. Technological progress increases the obsolescence rate of agricultural machinery and equipment whose paradigm referring to replacement was restricted to costs and operating conditions. In this study, it was found that the aggregate impact of expenditures and tax benefits had significant relevance on cash flow, therefore, should guide the analysis to create economic value.
id UNSP_53edf2c3f57a5b413abc51455b255f01
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/249770
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling How to decide between buying or renovating agricultural tractors?Agricultural machineryInvestment decisionsValuationDeciding whether to buy or rebuild a tractor and when to do so is an empirical problem for farmers and/or rural administrators, whose analytical methods explored in the literature do not provide a clear approach to the operational and economic effects in the short and long term, despite its importance to the competitiveness of the activity. If the cost of replacing the agricultural tractors used in spraying the citrus crop could be more helpful than the reform of these, this study aimed to build and validate an economic evaluation method to support the decision to buy new or replace existing wheel tractors. To achieve such goals, a database with quarterly operational and financial information on 47 tractors between 2009 and 2017 was constructed. The method combined the use of an empirical, with the use of model panel-data regression, combining cross-sectional data with time series, to establish the actual cost information to be used in the model, and finally, implement the discounted cash flow, in which all uncertainties were controlled using a Monte Carlo simulation. The results indicated that the best decision is to purchase new equipment only after the fourth year of use. It stands out in the study findings, the impact of tax benefits and the resale of tractors were relevant to the cash flow, as well as the increase in maintenance costs over time. The economic evaluation method applied in this study can help rural producers and administrators in the decision-making process for investments in fixed assets and innovative technologies, thereby enabling them to be more accurate in their investment decisions. Technological progress increases the obsolescence rate of agricultural machinery and equipment whose paradigm referring to replacement was restricted to costs and operating conditions. In this study, it was found that the aggregate impact of expenditures and tax benefits had significant relevance on cash flow, therefore, should guide the analysis to create economic value.São Paulo State University (Unesp) Institution Sao Paulo State University (Unesp) Address Via de Acesso Prof, Paulo Donato Castellane s/n, São PauloUniversity of Sao Paulo Institution University of São Paulo (USP) FEA-RP, Address Av. Bandeirantes, 3900, Monte Alegre, São PauloSão Paulo State University (Unesp) Institution Sao Paulo State University (Unesp) Address Via de Acesso Prof, Paulo Donato Castellane s/n, São PauloUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Universidade de São Paulo (USP)Vidal, Diego Onofre [UNESP]da Silva, Rouverson Pereira [UNESP]de Oliveira, Bruno Rocca [UNESP]Conceição, Elimar VelosoSantos, David Ferreira Lopes [UNESP]2023-07-29T16:08:46Z2023-07-29T16:08:46Z2022-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article350-377Custos e Agronegocio, v. 18, n. 3, p. 350-377, 2022.1808-2882http://hdl.handle.net/11449/2497702-s2.0-85150233403Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengCustos e Agronegocioinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-06-06T15:18:42Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/249770Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T21:37:31.705188Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv How to decide between buying or renovating agricultural tractors?
title How to decide between buying or renovating agricultural tractors?
spellingShingle How to decide between buying or renovating agricultural tractors?
Vidal, Diego Onofre [UNESP]
Agricultural machinery
Investment decisions
Valuation
title_short How to decide between buying or renovating agricultural tractors?
title_full How to decide between buying or renovating agricultural tractors?
title_fullStr How to decide between buying or renovating agricultural tractors?
title_full_unstemmed How to decide between buying or renovating agricultural tractors?
title_sort How to decide between buying or renovating agricultural tractors?
author Vidal, Diego Onofre [UNESP]
author_facet Vidal, Diego Onofre [UNESP]
da Silva, Rouverson Pereira [UNESP]
de Oliveira, Bruno Rocca [UNESP]
Conceição, Elimar Veloso
Santos, David Ferreira Lopes [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 da Silva, Rouverson Pereira [UNESP]
de Oliveira, Bruno Rocca [UNESP]
Conceição, Elimar Veloso
Santos, David Ferreira Lopes [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Vidal, Diego Onofre [UNESP]
da Silva, Rouverson Pereira [UNESP]
de Oliveira, Bruno Rocca [UNESP]
Conceição, Elimar Veloso
Santos, David Ferreira Lopes [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Agricultural machinery
Investment decisions
Valuation
topic Agricultural machinery
Investment decisions
Valuation
description Deciding whether to buy or rebuild a tractor and when to do so is an empirical problem for farmers and/or rural administrators, whose analytical methods explored in the literature do not provide a clear approach to the operational and economic effects in the short and long term, despite its importance to the competitiveness of the activity. If the cost of replacing the agricultural tractors used in spraying the citrus crop could be more helpful than the reform of these, this study aimed to build and validate an economic evaluation method to support the decision to buy new or replace existing wheel tractors. To achieve such goals, a database with quarterly operational and financial information on 47 tractors between 2009 and 2017 was constructed. The method combined the use of an empirical, with the use of model panel-data regression, combining cross-sectional data with time series, to establish the actual cost information to be used in the model, and finally, implement the discounted cash flow, in which all uncertainties were controlled using a Monte Carlo simulation. The results indicated that the best decision is to purchase new equipment only after the fourth year of use. It stands out in the study findings, the impact of tax benefits and the resale of tractors were relevant to the cash flow, as well as the increase in maintenance costs over time. The economic evaluation method applied in this study can help rural producers and administrators in the decision-making process for investments in fixed assets and innovative technologies, thereby enabling them to be more accurate in their investment decisions. Technological progress increases the obsolescence rate of agricultural machinery and equipment whose paradigm referring to replacement was restricted to costs and operating conditions. In this study, it was found that the aggregate impact of expenditures and tax benefits had significant relevance on cash flow, therefore, should guide the analysis to create economic value.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-01-01
2023-07-29T16:08:46Z
2023-07-29T16:08:46Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv Custos e Agronegocio, v. 18, n. 3, p. 350-377, 2022.
1808-2882
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/249770
2-s2.0-85150233403
identifier_str_mv Custos e Agronegocio, v. 18, n. 3, p. 350-377, 2022.
1808-2882
2-s2.0-85150233403
url http://hdl.handle.net/11449/249770
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Custos e Agronegocio
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 350-377
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808129342457249792