Comparison of different designs of implant-retained overdentures and fixed full-arch implant-supported prosthesis on stress distribution in edentulous mandible - A computed tomography-based three-dimensional finite element analysis

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Barão, V. A R [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2013
Outros Autores: Delben, J. A. [UNESP], Lima, J., Cabral, T., Assunção, Wirley Goncalves [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.02.008
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/75173
Resumo: A finite element analysis was used to compare the effect of different designs of implant-retained overdentures and fixed full-arch implant-supported prosthesis on stress distribution in edentulous mandible. Four models of an human mandible were constructed. In the OR (O'ring) group, the mandible was restored with an overdenture retained by four unsplinted implants with O'ring attachment; in the BC (bar-clip) -C and BC groups, the mandibles were restored with overdentures retained by four splinted implants with bar-clip anchor associated or not with two distally placed cantilevers, respectively; in the FD (fixed denture) group, the mandible was restored with a fixed full-arch four-implant-supported prosthesis. Models were supported by the masticatory muscles and temporomandibular joints. A 100-N oblique load was applied on the left first molar. Von Mises (σvM), maximum (σmax) and minimum (σmin) principal stresses (in MPa) analyses were obtained. BC-C group exhibited the highest stress values (σvM=398.8, σmax=580.5 and σmin=-455.2) while FD group showed the lowest one (σvM=128.9, σmax=185.9 and σmin=-172.1). Within overdenture groups, the use of unsplinted implants reduced the stress level in the implant/prosthetic components (59.4% for σvM, 66.2% for σmax and 57.7% for σmin versus BC-C group) and supporting tissues (maximum stress reduction of 72% and 79.5% for σmax, and 15.7% and 85.7% for σmin on the cortical and trabecular bones, respectively). Cortical bone exhibited greater stress concentration than the trabecular bone for all groups. The use of fixed implant dentures and removable dentures retained by unsplinted implants to rehabilitate edentulous mandible reduced the stresses in the periimplant bone tissue, mucosa and implant/prosthetic components. © 2013 Elsevier Ltd.
id UNSP_55a1449e1d66b6d5fa3c8854e077d13f
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/75173
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Comparison of different designs of implant-retained overdentures and fixed full-arch implant-supported prosthesis on stress distribution in edentulous mandible - A computed tomography-based three-dimensional finite element analysisBiomechanicsDental ImplantsFinite element analysisFixed full-arch prosthesisOverdentureImplant-supported prosthesisMasticatory musclesPeri-implant bonesPrincipal stressTemporomandibular jointThree dimensional finite element analysisTrabecular bonesArchesBoneComputerized tomographyDental prosthesesFinite difference methodFinite element methodRestorationStress concentrationTissueProstheticsbone stresscompressive stresscomputer assisted tomographycontrolled studycortical bonedental abutmentdental retaineredentulousnessequipment designfinite element analysishumanmandible prosthesismandible reconstructionmechanical stressoverlay denturepriority journalprocess designremovable partial denturestress distibutionthree dimensional imagingtrabecular boneA finite element analysis was used to compare the effect of different designs of implant-retained overdentures and fixed full-arch implant-supported prosthesis on stress distribution in edentulous mandible. Four models of an human mandible were constructed. In the OR (O'ring) group, the mandible was restored with an overdenture retained by four unsplinted implants with O'ring attachment; in the BC (bar-clip) -C and BC groups, the mandibles were restored with overdentures retained by four splinted implants with bar-clip anchor associated or not with two distally placed cantilevers, respectively; in the FD (fixed denture) group, the mandible was restored with a fixed full-arch four-implant-supported prosthesis. Models were supported by the masticatory muscles and temporomandibular joints. A 100-N oblique load was applied on the left first molar. Von Mises (σvM), maximum (σmax) and minimum (σmin) principal stresses (in MPa) analyses were obtained. BC-C group exhibited the highest stress values (σvM=398.8, σmax=580.5 and σmin=-455.2) while FD group showed the lowest one (σvM=128.9, σmax=185.9 and σmin=-172.1). Within overdenture groups, the use of unsplinted implants reduced the stress level in the implant/prosthetic components (59.4% for σvM, 66.2% for σmax and 57.7% for σmin versus BC-C group) and supporting tissues (maximum stress reduction of 72% and 79.5% for σmax, and 15.7% and 85.7% for σmin on the cortical and trabecular bones, respectively). Cortical bone exhibited greater stress concentration than the trabecular bone for all groups. The use of fixed implant dentures and removable dentures retained by unsplinted implants to rehabilitate edentulous mandible reduced the stresses in the periimplant bone tissue, mucosa and implant/prosthetic components. © 2013 Elsevier Ltd.Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics Araçatuba Dental School Univ Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Sao PauloSmarttech Company, Sao PauloDepartment of Prosthodontics and Periodontology Piracicaba Dental School State Univ of Campinas (UNICAMP), Sao PauloDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics Araçatuba Dental School Univ Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Sao PauloUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Smarttech CompanyUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)Barão, V. A R [UNESP]Delben, J. A. [UNESP]Lima, J.Cabral, T.Assunção, Wirley Goncalves [UNESP]2014-05-27T11:29:00Z2014-05-27T11:29:00Z2013-04-26info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article1312-1320application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.02.008Journal of Biomechanics, v. 46, n. 7, p. 1312-1320, 2013.0021-92901873-2380http://hdl.handle.net/11449/7517310.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.02.008WOS:0003185838000142-s2.0-848763010002-s2.0-84876301000.pdf4438747643373395Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengJournal of Biomechanics2.4311,147info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-12-31T06:23:20Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/75173Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462023-12-31T06:23:20Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparison of different designs of implant-retained overdentures and fixed full-arch implant-supported prosthesis on stress distribution in edentulous mandible - A computed tomography-based three-dimensional finite element analysis
title Comparison of different designs of implant-retained overdentures and fixed full-arch implant-supported prosthesis on stress distribution in edentulous mandible - A computed tomography-based three-dimensional finite element analysis
spellingShingle Comparison of different designs of implant-retained overdentures and fixed full-arch implant-supported prosthesis on stress distribution in edentulous mandible - A computed tomography-based three-dimensional finite element analysis
Barão, V. A R [UNESP]
Biomechanics
Dental Implants
Finite element analysis
Fixed full-arch prosthesis
Overdenture
Implant-supported prosthesis
Masticatory muscles
Peri-implant bones
Principal stress
Temporomandibular joint
Three dimensional finite element analysis
Trabecular bones
Arches
Bone
Computerized tomography
Dental prostheses
Finite difference method
Finite element method
Restoration
Stress concentration
Tissue
Prosthetics
bone stress
compressive stress
computer assisted tomography
controlled study
cortical bone
dental abutment
dental retainer
edentulousness
equipment design
finite element analysis
human
mandible prosthesis
mandible reconstruction
mechanical stress
overlay denture
priority journal
process design
removable partial denture
stress distibution
three dimensional imaging
trabecular bone
title_short Comparison of different designs of implant-retained overdentures and fixed full-arch implant-supported prosthesis on stress distribution in edentulous mandible - A computed tomography-based three-dimensional finite element analysis
title_full Comparison of different designs of implant-retained overdentures and fixed full-arch implant-supported prosthesis on stress distribution in edentulous mandible - A computed tomography-based three-dimensional finite element analysis
title_fullStr Comparison of different designs of implant-retained overdentures and fixed full-arch implant-supported prosthesis on stress distribution in edentulous mandible - A computed tomography-based three-dimensional finite element analysis
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of different designs of implant-retained overdentures and fixed full-arch implant-supported prosthesis on stress distribution in edentulous mandible - A computed tomography-based three-dimensional finite element analysis
title_sort Comparison of different designs of implant-retained overdentures and fixed full-arch implant-supported prosthesis on stress distribution in edentulous mandible - A computed tomography-based three-dimensional finite element analysis
author Barão, V. A R [UNESP]
author_facet Barão, V. A R [UNESP]
Delben, J. A. [UNESP]
Lima, J.
Cabral, T.
Assunção, Wirley Goncalves [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Delben, J. A. [UNESP]
Lima, J.
Cabral, T.
Assunção, Wirley Goncalves [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
Smarttech Company
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Barão, V. A R [UNESP]
Delben, J. A. [UNESP]
Lima, J.
Cabral, T.
Assunção, Wirley Goncalves [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Biomechanics
Dental Implants
Finite element analysis
Fixed full-arch prosthesis
Overdenture
Implant-supported prosthesis
Masticatory muscles
Peri-implant bones
Principal stress
Temporomandibular joint
Three dimensional finite element analysis
Trabecular bones
Arches
Bone
Computerized tomography
Dental prostheses
Finite difference method
Finite element method
Restoration
Stress concentration
Tissue
Prosthetics
bone stress
compressive stress
computer assisted tomography
controlled study
cortical bone
dental abutment
dental retainer
edentulousness
equipment design
finite element analysis
human
mandible prosthesis
mandible reconstruction
mechanical stress
overlay denture
priority journal
process design
removable partial denture
stress distibution
three dimensional imaging
trabecular bone
topic Biomechanics
Dental Implants
Finite element analysis
Fixed full-arch prosthesis
Overdenture
Implant-supported prosthesis
Masticatory muscles
Peri-implant bones
Principal stress
Temporomandibular joint
Three dimensional finite element analysis
Trabecular bones
Arches
Bone
Computerized tomography
Dental prostheses
Finite difference method
Finite element method
Restoration
Stress concentration
Tissue
Prosthetics
bone stress
compressive stress
computer assisted tomography
controlled study
cortical bone
dental abutment
dental retainer
edentulousness
equipment design
finite element analysis
human
mandible prosthesis
mandible reconstruction
mechanical stress
overlay denture
priority journal
process design
removable partial denture
stress distibution
three dimensional imaging
trabecular bone
description A finite element analysis was used to compare the effect of different designs of implant-retained overdentures and fixed full-arch implant-supported prosthesis on stress distribution in edentulous mandible. Four models of an human mandible were constructed. In the OR (O'ring) group, the mandible was restored with an overdenture retained by four unsplinted implants with O'ring attachment; in the BC (bar-clip) -C and BC groups, the mandibles were restored with overdentures retained by four splinted implants with bar-clip anchor associated or not with two distally placed cantilevers, respectively; in the FD (fixed denture) group, the mandible was restored with a fixed full-arch four-implant-supported prosthesis. Models were supported by the masticatory muscles and temporomandibular joints. A 100-N oblique load was applied on the left first molar. Von Mises (σvM), maximum (σmax) and minimum (σmin) principal stresses (in MPa) analyses were obtained. BC-C group exhibited the highest stress values (σvM=398.8, σmax=580.5 and σmin=-455.2) while FD group showed the lowest one (σvM=128.9, σmax=185.9 and σmin=-172.1). Within overdenture groups, the use of unsplinted implants reduced the stress level in the implant/prosthetic components (59.4% for σvM, 66.2% for σmax and 57.7% for σmin versus BC-C group) and supporting tissues (maximum stress reduction of 72% and 79.5% for σmax, and 15.7% and 85.7% for σmin on the cortical and trabecular bones, respectively). Cortical bone exhibited greater stress concentration than the trabecular bone for all groups. The use of fixed implant dentures and removable dentures retained by unsplinted implants to rehabilitate edentulous mandible reduced the stresses in the periimplant bone tissue, mucosa and implant/prosthetic components. © 2013 Elsevier Ltd.
publishDate 2013
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2013-04-26
2014-05-27T11:29:00Z
2014-05-27T11:29:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.02.008
Journal of Biomechanics, v. 46, n. 7, p. 1312-1320, 2013.
0021-9290
1873-2380
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/75173
10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.02.008
WOS:000318583800014
2-s2.0-84876301000
2-s2.0-84876301000.pdf
4438747643373395
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.02.008
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/75173
identifier_str_mv Journal of Biomechanics, v. 46, n. 7, p. 1312-1320, 2013.
0021-9290
1873-2380
10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.02.008
WOS:000318583800014
2-s2.0-84876301000
2-s2.0-84876301000.pdf
4438747643373395
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Journal of Biomechanics
2.431
1,147
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 1312-1320
application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1803047206033293312